The Syria Analysis Thread

10 posts

Amadis
RUS Spetznaz @ Palmyra appear to be operating mainly as JTACs, calling in air strikes.

So far they seem to be using Zaslon at the embassy, KSO for more specialised ops (counter-sniping apparently) and GRU Spetsnaz for a combination of recon (including as JTACs) and for special missions (hunt/kill). However they've held back from conducting frontal assaults or mass deployments.

Using a small number of elite troops as a force multiplier alongside the locals gives Russia strategic flexibility, keeps the casualties low and provides complex skills. Rather than try to reconquer the entire country (like the US in Afghan), they're using a focused deployment to achieve their limited objectives.

And as we see at Palmyra, they're succeeding.
Welund

What was the conclusion here? Is Latakia now free of its Sunni demographic problem?

Niccolo and Donkey

SAA now storming the city:

[​IMG]

Niccolo and Donkey
Latakia Province is 95% clean.
Niccolo and Donkey
[​IMG]
Niccolo and Donkey
[​IMG]
Amadis

Serb mercenaries among Russian PMC which fought at Palmyra?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/09/where-are-the-syrians-in-assads-syrian-arab-army/

Niccolo and Donkey
Fitz
- latest hit, a notorious regime torturer-murderer known for stabbing victims in lungs and letting them drown in their own blood.

Fitz

this is a good question that assadists don't seem to have an answer to. The regime doesn't have anywhere near the numbers necessary to reoccupy the country. What is their plan if they were to defeat all their enemies and retake syria? Would they retain this horde of foreign mercenaries and shia-jihadis as an occupying force? They'd need to remain otherwise the only other way to prevent another rebellion would be slaughtering or severely decimating the sunni population.