On a second reading of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by E Michael Jones

10 posts

Thesokorus

Jones is incredibly critical of the Catholic Church's post Vatican II (Nostra Aetate) ecumenical project. He sees it as an almost complete victory of the Jews. But he is a loyalist and sees the future as bright because of theology more than anything.

The finale of the book is a discussion of the constant and decades long Jewish attack on the Obergammerau Passion Play. The germans have almost entirely capitulated and made it jew friendly. The jews as usual got them with money. They bought the director and the town...

However, St Mel made his movie from the original version of the play!
Thesokorus
IMG_20170602_014956_kindlephoto-2619541.jpg
Thesokorus
I don't have the book with me, but Ralph Reed was even more philo-semitic. He was Abramoff's protege even in college and made a career of purging any jew wise republicans.
Thesokorus
Jones goes further, he agrees with the Talmudism take and goes on to argue that The Modern World is definitionally Jewish.

But my question was more why are they like this? It is clear they've rejected Logos and do so on a daily basis. And this explains their behavior. But why did they reject Logos?
Thesokorus
Jones discusses the story about John XXIII where he reluctantly allowed a Jew to convert and then told him he had to still be a good jew and go to Synagogue so he could go to heaven...
Thesokorus
Thesokorus

Remember, they actually think like this. The actions of others confuse them because we do not assume the Chosen are superior.

IMG_20170601_230920_kindlephoto-1733146.jpg

Thesokorus
The thing is, anyone who looks even half-way seriously at the JQ realizes they deserve an epic ass-kicking. And I think most Catholic schools are 40% jewish in the US anyway...
Valley_Quail
Yes there were a few Misch kids in my grade, at least one of which who had a parent that hadn't even converted.
Roody

I'm sure it's been mentioned on here before, but the Christian Zionism (oxymoron?) among American Evangelical Protestants can be traced to the Scofield Bible.

Scofield compiled a hugely popular Bible, one of the first to include commentary and notes explaining certain passages, words, etc. It was capitalizing on the nineteenth century's historical analysis of the Bible, and takes basically a Talmudic approach to Scripture. The commentary promote an essentially Zionist/millenarian view of the Jews and the Apocalypse. I'll confirm later, but I remembered running across the fact the the project was financed primarily by a Jew.

The Scofield Bible became the handbook for the evangelical preacher of the 20th century. I suspect it benefited from a general turn towards manicheanism in the same place and time, as shown, for example, by the temperance movement.