Why You Should Marry a Russian Mail Order Bride

10 posts

Dr. Breck

My dear corny, if your first born is a daughter that is simple scientific proof that you are, in fact, ghey.
I am the eldest son of an eldest son of an eldest son.
Alpha males sire sons
Weak beta fags sire daughters
Its that simple

Niccolo and Donkey
This is precisely the waste of electrons that Breck is both spiritually and in reality. He is a useless waste of space.
Dr. Breck
I'm sorry Nic. But your brother's kids may be able to carry on the family name.
Always be positive
Stars Down To Earth
Does your wife's son have your last name? He may not have your skin hue, but the name is always something...
Bronze Age Pervert

I've got nothing to add to that one of Perkunos' posts. American men don't talk about this ...but Russian and eastern bloc women are generally very difficult. They are not "submissive" women by any definition and once married will start all kinds of fights and you can generally expect a difficult domestic life even while living in Europe or Russia. In the USA with feminism and the courts on their side (which they were even in communist Russia btw, just not as much), things would be even harder...

Of course they're better than American women, but almost any are. America will corrupt almost any woman who lives here long enough though.

I would only ever get married to a very rich woman. I don't see the point of marriage otherwise...

Marcus

Based on what I've read, they expect Western men to be complete pushovers (justifiably so, except in the case of Mel Gibson) and are looking for citizenship. Like you say, there's no comparison between them and Western women for the most part: the few I've met take care of themselves, classy and sophisticated demeanor, nice dresses, etc. like they arrived from the early 60s in a time warp

perkunos
I've never been married to one, but it is possible to tame them. They make excellent pets; one even brought me pipe and slippers when I would come home from work. On the other hand, it is just as Limonov said:

Why do you think Russian men drink so much?
Police_Gazette

If Russian women are not prime marriage material - and I'm not asserting that they're perfect in any way, 70 years of Communism will do irreparable damage to any people, just that the success rate for "mail order" marriages is far higher than what almost everyone thinks - then most American women certainly aren't either; Mormon women marry heavily, if not exclusively, within their religious community, I question whether anyone would consider moving to Utah, converting, etc, tithing, to enjoy the benefits of a traditional bride. From what I've read via Dalrock, women in conservative churches in the South are just as bad as women elsewhere in the kwa, although they do marry earlier; but if Russian women aren't worth marrying, as some seem to imply, then who is worth marrying?

I do have an alternative for those who are opting out of marriage altogether, but you'll have to wait ~2 weeks for it; my next thread will be "Why You Should Move to Germany and Fuck Escorts Bareback." The thread will be unironic, I think it's superior to the serial monogamy/fornication that most men practice. If you're going to sin, why not enjoy the best pleasures?

Bronze Age Pervert
No one is worth marrying. Marrying is inherently a bad deal for men. This is why bachelorhood was illegal in early Rome, as Devlin points out. Marriage is a social and political institution, that men had to be coaxed in by law and by being given tremendous legal privileges (ownership of the wife and family, including often power of life and death). But even with those privileges it's hardly worthwhile. This is why I say I would only consider marriage to a very rich woman.

If it's a question for children, I advocate doing girls bareback and having as many children as possible, but out of wedlock, and letting the state or other men take care of their material upbringing. You can also do this in other countries under a pseudonym.
perkunos

One of my most talented friends is a mathematician who sired a son out of wedlock. Even within kwa legal boundaries it is a vastly better deal for men to sire bastards. By contrast, another talented pal who has done it the way you're supposed to has given away half his wealth to first wife, then half his subsequent wealth to second. He has more kids, but holy shit it cost more, both psychologically and financially.

Cucks such as Charles Murray (sorry Charles) are fond of pointing out that married people do better than single people in all kinds of measurable life outcomes. I believe this is true. But this sort of analysis deliberately leaves out the outcomes of divorces, which are very bad, particularly for the man. Taking the probabilities together, you'd have to be a real optimist, or have some kind of real edge in the game of life (aka be Mel Gibson) to get married in the US.

I agree with BAP; marriage is a raw deal for men, almost no matter how you slice it. For people who want a family life, the only way is to shack up with a woman who has very traditional values. Not surface traditional values: it has to be real, or fuhgeddaboudit. Result is a nation of fucked up people who don't come from traditional families, and a narrow aristocracy of people who do.