Tech Nazi Halo

Wyldawen Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

???

Niccolo and Donkey Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

Being diagnosed as whatever you were diagnosed as.

Wyldawen Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

Autism + schizoaffective. At that point, they're very pushy with the pills no matter what. It's $ for someone.

Niccolo and Donkey Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

I don't even know what schizoaffective means.

Wyldawen Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

It means I'm autistic and had a religious epiphany towards gnostic Christianity. I believe in the spirit realm and began praying a lot and seemingly talking to myself out loud (how I was sorting stuff out in my head), at which very secular minded doc insisted that it's "hearing voices" and "delusions." It does feel like oppression, tbh. This is why I'm currently pissed at militant atheism and pill pushers.

Alex Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

I hear the voices of my ancestors. After 9/11 I threw the television on the street. It was just a small black & white piece of junk. Felt like Elvis. Mother Bates didn't approve and called psych.

Alex Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

They won't give me pills. They insist on injecting me for the last 5 years. I'm gonna tell off this Jew soon. Make him cry. Tell him Hitler was right about everything. Show him the Kubrick quote.

Alex Wednesday 10 Feb 2016

Pharmakeia is singularly credited in Revelation 18. Drugging our prophets. I'm recording 9/11 prophets on my blog. Hogan and Savage don't get certified anymore since NPD with delusions of grandeur would mean the entire millenial generation would be diagnosed.

Welund Tuesday 3 May 2016

I read Elliot Rodger's writings. He never , I repeat never approached a female. He did not speak to them unless they were mutual acquaintances of his parents . If you want to bang girls, you approach the ones that look interested or not, then lie about wanting a relationship if that comes up. How's that desirable unless you're truly nihilistic, and you help create the "25 dick" 30 year old women. (Often an understatement.) And if you turn it into a science, you become the manipulative slut you're looking at. But expecting a traditional woman is even more disheartening. There are traditional women (not in metropolis) but not enough for everyone.

Going to CA schools then going home or driving to Starbucks confused why everyone knows someone but you don't isn't socialization obviously.

-

The idea a guy is "gay" for any particular reason other than buggery is a sort of female sexual harassment that promotes homosexuality. It is there to inflate female attractiveness when there is none, and couldn't be, for the aforementioned type.

Possibly a romcom/American pop culture thing. He had expectations* based on nothing, namely that every guy gets a girl or vice versa, and of course they're attractive and have every other positive quality you could imagine, and you don't have to leave your room because that's just the plot of your movie. "Feminism" however means no male socialization, no male societies, on top of other modern maladies like free, universal chronic-masturbating to pornography. So in that sense feminism is a culprit, though it is a tool of other groups.

*Also huge entitlement issues based on his being in his mind an upper class Englishman. There were strong identity issues here.

-

As for the pharmakons, I barely touched the psychological world and I was prescribed and suggested medication ... three times? And for 3 different diagnoses. The last time I went I lied to the therapist, told her I was taking it, just to milk her for advice. My main problem seems to be nothing to do physically. Working out helps; but I'm so autistic I've taken words like "no pain no gain" literally and caused stress to my bones.

stigletz Tuesday 17 May 2016

SixtusVIth

This is a fantastic article on why healthy societies repress open homosexuality, with a focus on how it affects male greetings.

Which brings us to one more reason, alongside disease, sterility and effeminacy, that traditional social norms the world over are necessarily and correctly opposed to open homosexuality: the more homosexuals there are in a society, and the more open they are about their homosexuality, the less warm male heterosexuals can be towards each other, and the weaker the social bonds between male heterosexuals will be, and the weaker the social fabric of the society itself will be, as society is necessarily founded upon the Mannerbund between a society’s male heterosexuals who honor, uphold and propagate the society’s values.

Open homosexuals represent a signalling hazard for male heterosexuals. A male heterosexual who needs to signal appreciation, affection or love of a male heterosexual friend also needs to be sure that his signal will not be interpreted as a sexual advance – either by the intended recipient of the signal or by others. Homosexuals may be interested in signalling homosexuality, but male heterosexuals certainly are not.

The more open homosexuals there are in a society, the less certain a male heterosexual can be that a gesture of masculine camaraderie won’t be interpreted as a sexual advance.

[...]

A signal may be interpreted as something as simple as words – in which case, what’s the big deal? Just find new words to express yourself – but the most effective social signals are never mere words , and a tightly-knit and highly-functioning society needs signals that are stronger than words. Words can be used by anybody. People lie with words. Words are a very weak signal, though they are often used anyway because they are still better than no signals at all.

Much stronger than words are actions and sacrifices. Demonstrating appreciation and affection is a much more powerful signal than simply stating it. Unfortunately, the scope of socially acceptable actions is limited unless there is a greater coordinated effort to change them or impose them from the top down, and if open homosexuals begin colonizing the existing socially acceptable actions, people will adjust their signals accordingly so as not to accidentally send the wrong impression. Often the adjustment means fewer signals at all.

Efforts to colonize new signalling spaces to make up for the ones colonized by open homosexuals are difficult because signals need widespread acceptance and understanding to function. That is not to say that they are totally unsuccessful – see the ubiquity of the phrase “no homo” in the West.

Western women are often the first to call out "gay" behavior between two male companions, as evidenced in their above remarks when overseas, but also how they react in the States. You'll frequently hear American girls call two men "gay" who share a close bond; this is also why you always hear girls saying, "he's so touchy " about a man behind his back, as they are not accustomed to touchiness the way Europeans or Latin Americans are, and associate all physical contact with sexual desire.

I find that Western Europeans in general are much more touchy-feely with their male counterparts than Americans are, for whom a harmless arm around the shoulder is an egregious breach of sexual boundaries. They think to themselves silently, "Huh. That's strange."

10 posts