The Syria Analysis Thread

10 posts

Longface
Niccolo and Donkey
Stubby mlad Longface Angocachi SweetLeftFoot SteamshipTime

Fighting in Christian village




A bit on Maaloula:

St. Thecla

[​IMG]

Statue of St. Thecla

[​IMG]



Rebels in Maaloula

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/embed/G3mJMdBPMHA

Niccolo and Donkey

This New York Times article is getting lots of play...............

Brutality of Syrian Rebels Posing Dilemma in West


Bob Dylan Roof

What will the NYT editors do when Obama effectively cedes substantial portions of the country to Islamic militants who are focused on preventing women from getting an education? Imagine that op-ed section.

President Camacho
LOLOL Kerry the "gay mortician" as Thomas described him is a certified clown! The only honorable exit for him now is to volunteer being drawn and quartered live on C-SPAN.
Longface
Israel Backs Limited Strike Against Syria


More at link.
Vuk
Niccolo and Donkey
rust

For some context, Harry Reid introduced a use-of-force resolution on Friday, which if passed would authorize Obama to proceed with a strike regardless of the congressional vote or the wishes of the people. ( source )

See also:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/embed/nz20lu2AM2k

Obama Might Defy Congressional ‘No’ Vote, Attack Syria Anyhow

Setting the stage for what may literally be the biggest constitutional crisis in American history, the White House is continuing to insist that President Obama has the “right” to attack Syria whenever he wants, regardless of the circumstances.

That position was a controversial one when the talk centered around starting a war with Congress in recess. Now, having sought Congressional authorization and facing a defeat in the House, the White House is refusing to rule out attacking Syria over the explicit objections of Congress. Obama continues to demand Congress authorize the war, saying it would set the stage for military intervention in Syria and beyond.

In practice Congress has been abrogating its foreign policy clout to the executive branch for generations now, and has recently been willing to look the other way on aggressive wars started by presidents. But being asked, rejecting the war, then seeing it happen anyhow would be many steps farther than any president has ever attempted to go, and would oblige Congress to respond forcefully.

Aide Tony Blinken seemed to downplay that prospect, saying there was “no intention” to do so, but with officials continually insisting they don’t expect to lose the House vote, that’s nowhere close to ruling it out.

Likewise, US Ambassador to the United National Samantha Power continued to talk of war as an inevitability, declaring today that the US has no alternative but to attack Syria at this point, seemingly in spite of broad public opposition and an impending Congressional rebuke.

Bob Dylan Roof
All revenue appropriations for the US military must originate in the House of Representatives. No Senate resolution can alter this fact. Based on the historical practices and the text of the COTUS, it is relatively certain that a President may unilaterally pursue military actions to protect the United States from exceptional threats, which in practice means that the President can use the military as he sees fit, subject only to revenue restrictions.