On Women

Laocoon Sunday 21 May 2017

Except they aren't women.

( I know... I'm being a shitlord. Do I have a reeducation camp appointment yet? )

Thoughts Sunday 21 May 2017

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Countries that don't have nuclear weapons
Should be nuked by those that do.

Women are from Venus
Men are from Mars
Anyone who doesn't have a penis
Should be run over by cars.

Welund Sunday 21 May 2017

If we take in feminist logic, which you do, you're a gay, yes, yes they are.

Laocoon Sunday 21 May 2017

Your writing is nearly indecipherable.

m-to-w trans are not women.
pointing out idiocy in feminist logic is not gay.
arguing that m-to-w trans are actual women is delusional.

I think you and I may be arguing the roughly the same thing from different directions.

Welund Sunday 21 May 2017

There is no internal inconsistency. According to feminists, trans-women and testosterone-injected and genetically modified she-things are women, and therefore women are as strong as men. You can't disprove the unfalsifiable. You're wrong, they're right.

I think "arguing" with anti-rationalists is stupid, and that they aren't arguing at all. They're just right.

I appreciate any in-person head explosions you may cause, but just reading it online I think of these Twitter guys who "argue" against "intolerant leftists." I don't even really think leftists/feminists are our (worst and most relevant) enemy, but if they were, logic isn't the answer, and it's sort of silly for (I don't know what you are but) fascists to "argue" all day.

Valley_Quail said: ↑

Thought I've had before re women, "game", "seduction" etc.; Many of the mind-games discussed on "game" blogs is in a sense a very poor substitute for the actions described in old tales of men capturing women they found attractive.

Part of me believes that the actual capturing of a woman in the ancient times was a "fitness test" in and of itself, in the sense that if a man had the ability and athleticism necessary to attack an enemy group, steal one of their women, and make it back alive, than the man that had accomplished this was most likely worthy of reproducing, and on a biological level the woman he had captured would recognize this.

Since we no longer acquire mates in that fashion for the most part, and we lack many of the tests those in the past had to face to prove their worth, we end up with these strange pseudo-tests, "game", "seduction", and a bunch of other weird substitutes.

"Game" is a waste of time (mostly) but the thing it is attempting to overcome is an exaggerated fear of a woman's judgement -- which is the whole point of approaching one, caused by sheer inexperience, and which not worth fearing -- but really physically the kind of contest you describe, on a much lesser scale. A claimed or unclaimed woman potentially has men protecting her. All of these "pseudo-tests" used to be achieved with courtship rituals in civilized society, which of course have been decimated in most American circles, but I don't think they were bad replacements at all.

Welund Monday 22 May 2017

Here's a good example:
13 minutes ago - Niccolo and Donkey :

stigletz Monday 22 May 2017

RedHand said: ↑

I remember watching a Republican political debate where they were all cheering the idea of women in the military because strong American women could fight for freedom against the "barbarians". The only one who disagreed was Ron Paul because he is a pacifist and also an old guy. A people with RACE would abhor women in combat, or even on juries or court benches. But the 'Ibsen Woman' (as Spengler called her) is fit for the battlefield, apparently. After all she is self-owning, she is 'independent', she might even "find herself" on the battlefield or in the workplace.

The woman with the child at her breast is the cosmic symbol of life. What does that make the self-owning 'Ibsen Woman' or the romantic comedienne? I leave you to decide.

Valley_Quail Broseph Niccolo and Donkey

Ibsen Woman. Is this the female version of the small-souled bug man? Well either way, that's how we'll use it. Ibsen Woman.

RedHand Monday 22 May 2017

I'm not sure it's equivalent. The true equivalent of the "bug man" is probably the salaried career woman. Children replaced by professional concerns, apparent "toughness", guile, qualification acquired at the big centres of intellectual life. Sheryl Sandberg is probably a good example.

RedHand Monday 22 May 2017

I think it's an extremely healthy instinct in a society that rewards it. The problem is why do this when when you live in Amy Schumer Hellworld? I know it's not OK to act like a kaffer towards women but why observe 'chivalrous' practices when the same obligations don't exist for women. I'm not being wiseass or aggressive here, it just seems like it would be an emotional disaster if young men tried to 'revive chivalry'. I actually knew guys like this who acted chivalrous and emotionally invested in 'Sex and the City' women and they get let down big time.

Valley_Quail Monday 22 May 2017

That's why I specified it only makes sense to act in that manner regarding women that are deserving of that sort of treatment.

Treating a whore like a lady is stupid.

10 posts