← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · travis
Thread ID: 9981 | Posts: 4 | Started: 2003-09-22
2003-09-22 23:57 | User Profile
Some of my left- wing friends/aquaintances (who don't know my racial views)are charmed to hear me denounce Bush and the war after having lost arguments with me in the past. They listen intently as I suggest that Skull and Bones Bush is a lying bastard, that the war is total fraud, that there is lots of behind the scenes activity that the media doesn't tell us about. They answer by ranting about the "right wing media" and I don't correct them other than to suggest that ideologies are for us sheep to argue about while the power players take advantage of both sides. Then I talk about secret societies.
Liberals are even less adept at logic than conservatives so there is little benifit to a full blown discussion. Things take time. This war has given us many opportunities to plant seeds of thought, don't pass them up! At this point we can suggest conspiracy in general, talk about the military-industrial establishment, how the media has selected a tiny segment of the Iraqi population that wanted "liberation" and portrayed them as a majority. Liberals don't have a very keen sense of the obvious but most of them oppose the war and can grasp that major corruption is going on. We must help them understand how the media is involved, we can explain who owns it next year.
Another angle is international corporations and international trade, It benifits us to emphasize the corruption in this sector, (which we wont tell them is controlled by Jews), and point out strategic ways that public officials and media assist these corporations at America's expense. When the time comes to enlighten them we will have already laid the foundation.
What political commentary individuals hear from other individuals, which is very little, has a greater impact than political commentary on the boob tube. What really has an impact on liberals is when a conservative friend denounces the above issues. Seek them out.
2003-12-20 00:09 | User Profile
Whether people in America indentify themselves as "conservatives" or "liberals", the fact is that they all refuse to address the very pertinent issue of the Jewish role in politics and culture. They have naively swallowed the whole song-and-dance about the Jews being a poor, persecuted, downtrodden people.
Of course, these same people are the ones who only know what the mainstream media tells them to know and what to think. And we all know who pulls the strings behind the scenes in America's media corporations:
[url]http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/[/url]
2003-12-20 02:48 | User Profile
It is not easy to address the Jewish question in polite company. Many jokes are made, but I am never sure how many people are on the same page.
I would suggest focusing on the role of Jews in Hollywood. Everyone can read the Jewish names on the producer's credits of movies/TV, and most everyone can see that even under capitalism, not ever feature of a film/show is going to be determined by what sells. Thus most will be prepared to accept that Jews in Hollywood influence film production so that it reflects a Jewish slant on life.
These topics can be readily explored. Talking about the role of Jews in academia brings the objection that Jews are just smart, end of story, and talking about Jews in politics gets the same reaction, or a 'shouldn't we just focus on ideas and individuals' response.
Even talking about the particular features of Jewish influence in Hollywood is difficult. You can point out that interracial sex is features way out of proportion to reality, and point out the endless coupling of blonde female images with black male images, but you would be a brave soul to so in most circles. Moreover, you will inevitably get the 'it's just the market' response, or flat-out accusations of racism, together with much scorn and stupidity, right off the bat. If you want to next move to suggest that the interracial content has a Jewish origin--good luck.
So I say, generally, keep base the accounts for common conception as closely on facts and 'common sense' as is possible while still actually saying anything of interest at all.
[QUOTE=Braveheart]Whether people in America indentify themselves as "conservatives" or "liberals", the fact is that they all refuse to address the very pertinent issue of the Jewish role in politics and culture. They have naively swallowed the whole song-and-dance about the Jews being a poor, persecuted, downtrodden people.
Of course, these same people are the ones who only know what the mainstream media tells them to know and what to think. And we all know who pulls the strings behind the scenes in America's media corporations:
[url]http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/[/url][/QUOTE]
2004-01-12 04:43 | User Profile
"What political commentary individuals hear from other individuals, which is very little, has a greater impact than political commentary on the boob tube. What really has an impact on liberals is when a conservative friend denounces the above issues. Seek them out."
I've been having some success in using the sort of tactics you detailed among anti-war leftists here in the Bay Area. Its especially fertile ground these days, in that they are all trying to outdo each other with regard to who is the biggest anti-Zionist of them all. A few of these people seem to have already begun to have made the transition from anti-Zionist to anti-Semite (and that's the White ones; many of the others are definitely leaning in the anti-Semitic direction). The Rachel Corrie murder was especially helpful in this area. As much as I feel like a shit for saying this, I almost hope the Israelis kill a few more telegenic White, female activists. Few things can help our cause more.