← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · iwannabeanarchy
Thread ID: 9947 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2003-09-21
2003-09-21 15:55 | User Profile
What is the role of law breaking in white nationalism? It is clear that the left condones law breaking when it comes to immigration. Can we afford to sit back and always follow the law in such a situation?
No, respect for the law must have its limits. Everyone who exceeds the speed limits, jaywalks, smokes pot, give a minor alcohol/cigarettes, etc.--all such people already implicitly recognize the laws limits.
I would argue that you have no general duty whatsoever to follow laws defining victimless crimes, but should only be bound by such laws for prudential reasons. Resisting codification of victimless crimes is an important part of general white resistance to leftist and Jewish uses of the state to curtail white freedom and flourishing.
But what of crimes with victims? For example, what if you know that your neighbor has stolen your car, but the police will not charge him, for lack of evidence? Do you have the right to take matters into your own hands, and break you neighbor's face? Of course you do. Now I would say society also has the right to punish this kind of vigiliante justice if you get caught, but that's a separate point.
What about the case of your wife sleeping with another man?