← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · golfball
Thread ID: 9929 | Posts: 19 | Started: 2003-09-20
2003-09-20 14:55 | User Profile
[SIZE=6][CENTER]Right? Or Wrong?[/CENTER][/SIZE] [CENTER][IMG]http://www.arkpower-light.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/negro-whitemarriage.jpg[/IMG][/CENTER]
[SIZE=6][CENTER]GOD and Abraham Lincoln on Negro - White Marriages[/CENTER][/SIZE]
Movies, magazines, television and other media glorify the negro in America and endorse negro - white marriages. People objecting to such integration are called bigots, white racists, or white supremacists. As long ago as 1969, CHRISTIAN LIFE magazine ran articles approving negro - white marriages. BIOLA radio magazine has for years told itââ¬â¢s readers there is no scripture against interracial marriage. Billy Graham often repeats his stand: ââ¬ÅThe Bible does not prohibit people of different races marrying.ââ¬Â Other ministers and publications parrot Billy Graham. With such statements from ââ¬Åreligiousââ¬Â sources supplementing Secular promotion of race crossing, White parents often find their children believe God gives approval of Whites marrying other races.
[SIZE=6][CENTER]What Did Abraham Lincoln Say?[/CENTER][/SIZE]
ââ¬ÅWhat I would most desire would be separation of the white and black racesââ¬Â (Spoken at Springfield, Illinois July 17, 1858; Abraham Lincoln Complete Works, edited by Nicolay and Hay, published by the Century Company 1894 Volume 1, p. 273)
ââ¬ÅI will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes - nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people: and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.ââ¬Â
(Spoken in sixth joint debate with Senator Douglas at Quincy, Illinois October 13, 1858) Ibid., pp. 369, 370, 457, and 458.
ââ¬ÅWhy........should the people of your race be colonized, and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong, I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word we suffer from each side. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated."
"It is better for both, therefore, to be separated."
(Spoken to a committee of colored men at the White House, July 14, 1862) The New York Daily Tribune, August 15, 1862 - p. 1 New York Semi-Weekly Times August 15, 1862 - p. 5
[SIZE=4][CENTER]ON THE JEFFERSON MEMORIAL: THE TRUTH, BUT NOT THE WHOLE TRUTH[/CENTER][/SIZE]
On the Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C., Thomas Jefferson is quoted about the negro. [B]"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free.ââ¬Â [/B] The rest of his original statement is NOT there, [B]ââ¬ÅNor is it less certain, that these two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.ââ¬Â[/B] That is the WHOLE truth!
[SIZE=6][CENTER]What Does The Bible Say?[/CENTER][/SIZE]
The first reference to offspring is in the creation record of Genesis 1 in the term, [B]after his kind[/B] . It refers to animals multiplying and seems proof that God made living things to reproduce their [B]OWN KIND[/B]. We know Robins beget Robins, Coho salmon produce Coho salmon, Red Clover seeds grow into Red Clover, White humans have White children, Chinese beget Chinese, etc. [B]THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN[/B] when a negro and white mate. Their offspring is ââ¬Åmulattoââ¬Â or ââ¬Åhalf-breedââ¬Â, not [B]after his kind[/B] as written by the Creator - God.
[SIZE=6][CENTER]BIBLE ORIGIN OF THE RACES[/CENTER][/SIZE]
Adam and Eve were created about 6,000 years ago, according to Bible chronology. Their descendants increased in the ââ¬Åfertile crescentââ¬Â of Mesopotamia, often called ââ¬Åthe cradle of civilizationââ¬Â. The White race obviously descended from them. All other races are much older, with archeological evidence and histories of tens of thousands of years in other parts of the earth before the White man appeared in Mesopotamia. They are the humans of Genesis 1:26-28 who were commanded to overspread the earth whereas Adamââ¬â¢s offspring began in a geographically limited area. The intelligence and morals of these other peoples are substantially below those of Adam and Eve. Marriages between the Adamites (sons of God) and the pre-Adamites (daughters of men) (Gen. 6:1-2) brought on the Noahic flood to destroy the mongrel offspring in that area. God saved Noah, who was perfect in his generation [B][White - Adamic][/B] to continue the White-Adamic line. (Gen. 9:1) Intermarriage again corrupted the race of Adam and God destroyed their [B]tower of Babel [/B] because [B]the people is one[/B] (Gen. 11:6) Their attempt to amalgamate into [B]one[/B] race (like the integrationists of today) has produced half-breeds who worshipped idols and committed amoral abominations just as the heathen did.
[SIZE=6][CENTER]THE ORIGIN OF ISRAEL[/CENTER][/SIZE]
Much later God chose Abraham as he had once chosen Noah to carry on a pure racial line and produce His Chosen Race. Abraham knew Godââ¬â¢s command for racial purity and saw that his son Isaac married into the line of Shem and Heber. (Gen. 24) Isaac fathered twin sons, Esau and Jacob. Esau, the firstborn, married Canaanite wives (Gen. 26) and his descendants were Edomite-Canaanites. (Gen. 36) God caused Esau to sell the Abrahamic birthright to Jacob; and after Jacob took Leah and Rachel of his own race as wives and had 12 racially pure sons, God then changed Jacobââ¬â¢s name to Israel, which means ââ¬Åruling with Godââ¬Â. Jacob - Israel and his sons moved to Egypt under Joseph. Later Moses delivered two million of their offspring to God at Mt. Sinai where God took these White Israelites of the Adamic-Shemite line as His ââ¬ÅChosen Peopleââ¬Â (Exodus 19) To retain their racial purity, God gave Israel [B]VERY STRICT COMMANDMENTS AGAINST RACIAL MIXING. (Duet 7, etc.) [/B] But they intermarried in Canaan, [B]going after the heathen that were round about them[/B].(2 Kings 17:8-15, etc.) Because they would not segregate themselves and began to follow the heathensââ¬â¢ gods, God removed Israel out of Canaan into the Assyrian captivity before 700 B.C. (2 Kings 17 & 18) These [B]dispersed[/B] ( Ezekiel 36:19) were under punishment, but they were also under Godââ¬â¢s Abrahamic covenant to be multiplied and blessed, so from Assyria they overspread Europe in the centuries before Christ and are the ancestors of the White race there. We are the descendants of those dispersed Israelites and therefore we are Israelites. Our fathers were punished for mixing with the heathen and we too suffer when our race commits such sins, for God said if the Israelites marry non-Israelites [B]so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you[/B]. (Deut 7:4) If you are still skeptical that God harshly forbids Israel to marry with the heathen, read Numbers 25 where Israel [B]began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab.[/B] God brought a plague upon Israel until Phineas, grandson of Aaron, executed an Israelite in the act of intercourse with a Midianitish [Canaanite] woman, and [B]the plague was stayed from the children of Israel.[/B] Read Ezra 9, where Ezra heard the [B]holy seed[/B] [Israel] [B]have mingled themselves with the people of those lands[/B]. He fell on his face and said, [B]O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee my God: for our iniquities are increased over our head, and our trespass is grown up to the heavens[/B]. Ezra knew interracial marriage was the gravest and most terrible sin Israel could commit! In Proverbs we are told Godââ¬â¢s Word will keep a man from the [B]strange woman[/B]. The term means ââ¬Ånon-Israeliteââ¬Â. One white girl who married a negro was quoted in CHRISTIAN LIFE as saying her parents opposed her marriage but gave her "no rational arguments". If they (or she) had known their true Adamic-Israelitish origin, there would have been no question but that such interracial marriage is wicked and a sin against God. CHRISTIAN LIFE magazine approved her marriage and asked, ââ¬ÅCan a Christian interracial marriage be successful by scriptural standards?ââ¬Â The magazine answered, ââ¬ÅYes.ââ¬Â (They did not mention her descendants would be coloreds!) Most white parents do not know that (Judeo-)ââ¬ÅChristianââ¬Â magazines and ministers are telling their children that God ââ¬Åapprovesââ¬Â of Whites marrying non-Whites. When a white girl is asked for a date by a negro, she can tell her parents, ââ¬ÅWhy, Billy Graham says its alright with Jesus.ââ¬Â What can they answer? If they knew they could answer that the New Testament calls Esau a [B]fornicator[/B] in Hebrews 12:16 and that since Esau actually MARRIED his wives (see Genesis 26:34 and 28:8-9) it was not promiscuity that gave him the title of [B]fornicator[/B] , BUT MARRYING OUTSIDE HIS OWN ADAMIC RACE! A White Israelite descendant of Jacob marrying a negro or other non-Israelite would be a [B]fornicator[/B] by the same scriptural definition. [B]Fornication[/B] will keep a person from Godââ¬â¢s Kingdom. (1 Cor. 6:9) But secret anti-Christââ¬â¢s will continue to promote nonwhite-white marriages as they attempt to destroy true Israel; and Jesus warned that such interracial fornication would be widespread at the end of this age. In Matthew 24 He said this age would end [B]as the days of Noah....marrying and giving in marriage[/B]. He meant interracial marriage for we have seen that is what brought on the Noahic flood. As before Noah and Babel and as in ancient Israel, Adamites mixing with pre-Adamites always brings in heathen religions, witchcraft, sex perversion, poverty, drugs, and every abomination known to man or God. Any city or nation where the dark, mixed-bloods live is proof of this. And so the age will close, but God will reveal the truth to Israel; and our race sees the horror of heathen filth and the oppression of our people by non-whites, they will pray, [B]Spare thy people, O Lord, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen shall rule over them[/B].....(Joel 2:17) God will answer and deliver us. The Prophets wrote of a day when Israel would be separated from ALL heathen races. In the time of great trouble in which this age will close, and the Kingdom Age will begin. [B]They shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land [/B] (Isa. 13:14 and Jer. 50:16) In the Old Testament, the heathen were called [B]briers[/B] and [B]thorns[/B], and Ezekiel wrote of a time to come when [B]There shall be no more a pricking brier unto the house of Israel, nor any grieving thorn of all that are around about them[/B] (Ezekiel 28:24) May the God of Israel shut the mouths of our enemies and the false prophets whose lies deceive our race and corrupt our children. May God forgive us for our sins and open the eyes of our people to His Truth, in Jesus Christ.
From a very smart White man of God
2003-09-20 23:28 | User Profile
golfball,
Jefferson was Most Right! [QUOTE][SIZE=4]On the Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C., Thomas Jefferson is quoted about the negro. [B]"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free.ââ¬Â[/B] The rest of his original statement is NOT there, [B]ââ¬ÅNor is it less certain, that these two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.ââ¬Â[/B] That is the WHOLE truth![/SIZE][/QUOTE]
2003-09-21 01:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Faust]golfball,
Jefferson was Most Right![/QUOTE]
Our Founding Fathers knew what would happen if integration and equality were to become acceptable. The had the foresight to keep the negro in the inferior position. We have seen what has happened to our nation when this standard was subverted. Now, we see all kinds of abominations everyday around us and we know that our Heavenly Father has turned away from our country due to the filth and social decay due to Jewish influence and disobediant, riotous non-whites. It is time for Christians to step away from the Apostate churches they attend and pray to a Holy God of Segregation again. I know how Ezra felt as I look around and see the filthy race mixing going on today.
2003-09-21 02:11 | User Profile
This idea of attacking race mixing by appealing to the Jewish mythology of Genesis--well, it's just plain foolish.
Nor is old-style segregation going to come back anytime soon. But perhaps long-term, we can move to some co-op type property arrangements based on race, which might ultimately allow real racial segregation. Here whites would come together to form corporations or co-ops to buy large sections of land, which would then be rented out or sold with easements that allowed the white-owned corporation to exclude based on politically or morally harmful behavior, along with racial grounds.
Such white corportations or co-ops would allow for a wonderful cultural environment, not merely solve the problem white women marrying non-whites.
If interracial marriage is one's sole concern, then the real issue is stopping white women from having sexual relations with non-whites. Here a wide variety of strategies are possible, from straightforward social disaproval, to highly nasty insults and 'trash-talking,' to Daddy's controls of pursue-string, to.... less orthodox 'techniques.' What is mostly laking these days are not mean, but the will of Germanic and Celtic peoples to keep the race pure and proud.
2003-09-21 04:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=iwannabeanarchy]
But perhaps long-term, we can move to some co-op type property arrangements based on race, which might ultimately allow real racial segregation. Here whites would come together to form corporations or co-ops to buy large sections of land, which would then be rented out or sold with easements that allowed the white-owned corporation to exclude based on politically or morally harmful behavior, along with racial grounds.[/QUOTE]
A great idea, but at present there are two huge obstacles in the path of a white co-op:
1.A U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 1948 prohibited any court from enforcing a restrictive racial covenant. (But aren't affirmative action and set-aside programs "racial covenants"?)
2.Even if the 1948 ruling didn't exist, the various state and federal Fair Housing Laws would prohibit a whites-only community.
As you wrote, your idea is "long-term". In order to achieve the possibility of white communities, we first have to restore freedom of association, and that will be one grand social/political struggle.
Speaking of social struggle, you had it exactly right when you wrote
[QUOTE]the real issue is stopping white women from having sexual relations with non-whites. Here a wide variety of strategies are possible, from straightforward social disaproval, to highly nasty insults and 'trash-talking,' to Daddy's controls of pursue-string, to.... less orthodox 'techniques.' What is mostly laking these days are not mean, but the will of Germanic and Celtic peoples to keep the race pure and proud.[/QUOTE]
2003-09-22 00:54 | User Profile
As more and more Christians pray to our Heavenly Father, the Holy God of Segregation, we start to see results of our prayers. Look at this article posted in today's ( 9/21/2003 ) paper: [url]http://epaper.ardemgaz.com/Daily/Skins/Arkansas/?AW=1064191206201[/url] Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 9/21/03 page 87 / 168
[COLOR=Red][SIZE=5]Do we want Diversity?[/SIZE][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Blue][SIZE=4]We all pay lip service to the melting pot, but we really prefer the congealing pot. [/SIZE][/COLOR] BY DAVID BROOKS THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY
[COLOR=Red]Maybe itââ¬â¢s time to admit the obvious. We donââ¬â¢t really care about diversity all that much in America, even though we talk about it a great deal. Maybe somewhere in this country there is a truly diverse neighborhood in which a black Pentecostal minister lives next to a white anti-globalization activist, who lives next to an Asian short-order cook, who lives next to a professional golfer, who lives next to a postmodern-literature professor and a cardiovascular surgeon. But I have never been to or heard of that neighborhood. Instead, what I have seen all around the country is people making strenuous efforts to group themselves with people who are basically like themselves.
Human beings are capable of drawing amazingly subtle social distinctions and then shaping their lives around them. In the Washington, D.C., area Democratic lawyers tend to live in suburban Maryland and Republican lawyers tend to live in suburban Virginia. If you asked a Democratic lawyer to move from her $750,000 house in Bethesda, Md., to a $750,000 house in Great Falls, Va., sheââ¬â¢d look at you as if you had just asked her to buy a pickup truck with a gun rack and to shove chewing tobacco in her kidââ¬â¢s mouth. In Manhattan the owner of a $3 million SoHo loft would feel out of place moving into a $3 million Fifth Avenue apartment. A West Hollywood interior decorator would feel dislocated if you asked him to move to Orange County. In Georgia a barista from Athens would probably not fit in serving coffee in Americus.
It is a common complaint that every place is starting to look the same. But in the information age, the late writer James Chapin once told me, every place becomes more like itself. People are less often tied down to factories and mills, and they can search for places to live on the basis of cultural affinity. Once they find a town in which people share their values, they flock there, and reinforce whatever was distinctive about the town in the first place. Once Boulder, Colo., became known as congenial to politically progressive mountain bikers, half the politically progressive mountain bikers in the country (it seems) moved there; they made the place so culturally pure that it has become practically a parody of itself.
But people love it. Make no mistakeââ¬âwe are increasing our happiness by segmenting off so rigorously. We are finding places where we are comfortable and where we feel we can flourish. But the choices we make toward that end lead to the very opposite of diversity. The United States might be a diverse nation when considered as a whole, but block by block and institution by institution it is a relatively homogeneous nation.
When we use the word "diversity" today we usually mean racial integration. But even here our good intentions seem to have run into the brick wall of human nature. Over the past generation reformers have tried heroically, and in many cases successfully, to end housing discrimination. But recent patterns arenââ¬â¢t encouraging: according to an analysis of the 2000 census data, the 1990s saw only a slight increase in the racial integration of neighborhoods in the United States. The number of middle-class and upper-middle-class black families is rising, but for whatever reasonsââ¬âracism, psychological comfortââ¬âthese families tend to congregate in predominantly black neighborhoods.
In fact, evidence suggests that some neighborhoods become more segregated over time. New suburbs in Arizona and Nevada, for example, start out reasonably well integrated. These neighborhoods donââ¬â¢t yet have reputations, so people choose their houses for other, mostly economic reasons. But as neighborhoods age, they develop personalities (thatââ¬â¢s where the Asians live, and thatââ¬â¢s where the Hispanics live), and segmentation occurs. It could be that in a few years the new suburbs in the Southwest will be nearly as segregated as the established ones in the Northeast and the Midwest.
Even though race and ethnicity run deep in American society, we should in theory be able to find areas that are at least culturally diverse. But here, too, people show few signs of being truly interested in building diverse communities. If you run a retail company and youââ¬â¢re thinking of opening new stores, you can choose among dozens of consulting firms that are quite effective at locating your potential customers. They can do this because people with similar tastes and preferences tend to congregate by ZIP code.
The most famous of these precision marketing firms is Claritas, which breaks down the U.S. population into sixty-two psycho-demographic clusters, based on such factors as how much money people make, what they like to read and watch, and what products they have bought in the past. For example, the "suburban sprawl" cluster is composed of young families making about $41,000 a year and living in fast-growing places such as Burnsville, Minn., and Bensalem, Pa. These people are almost twice as likely as other Americans to have threeway calling. They are two and a half times as likely to buy Light nââ¬â¢ Lively Kid Yogurt. Members of the "towns & gowns" cluster are recent college graduates in places such as Berkeley, Calif., and Gainesville, Fla. They are big consumers of DoveBars and Saturday Night Live. They tend to drive small foreign cars and to read Rolling Stone and Scientific American.
Looking through the market research, one can sometimes be amazed by how efficiently people clusterââ¬âand by how predictable we all are. If you wanted to sell imported wine, obviously you would have to find places where rich people live. But did you know that the 16 counties with the greatest proportion of imported-wine drinkers are all in the same three metropolitan areas (New York, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)? If you tried to open a motor-home dealership in Montgomery County, Pa., youââ¬â¢d probably go broke, because people in this ring of the Philadelphia suburbs think RVs are kind of uncool. But if you traveled just a short way north, to Monroe County, Pa., you would find yourself in the fifth motor-home-friendliest county in America.
Geography is not the only way we find ourselves divided from people unlike us. Some of us watch Fox News, while others listen to NPR. Some like David Letterman, and othersââ¬âtypically in less urban neighborhoodsââ¬âlike Jay Leno. Some go to charismatic churches; some go to mainstream churches. Americans tend more and more often to marry people with education levels similar to their own, and to befriend people with backgrounds similar to their own.
My favorite illustration of this latter pattern comes from the first, noncontroversial chapter of The Bell Curve. Think of your 12 closest friends, Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray write. If you had chosen them randomly from the American population, the odds that half of your 12 closest friends would be college graduates would be six in a thousand. The odds that half of the 12 would have advanced degrees would be less than one in a million. Have any of your twelve closest friends graduated from Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Princeton, Caltech, MIT, Duke, Dartmouth, Cornell, Columbia, Chicago or Brown? If you chose your friends randomly from the American population, the odds against your having four or more friends from those schools would be more than a billion to one.
Many of us live in absurdly unlikely groupings, because we have organized our lives that way.
Itââ¬â¢s striking that the institutions that talk the most about diversity often practice it the least. For example, no group of people sings the diversity anthem more frequently and fervently than administrators at just such elite universities. But elite universities are amazingly undiverse in their values, politics and mores. Professors in particular are drawn from a rather narrow segment of the population. If faculties reflected the general population, 32 percent of professors would be registered Democrats and 31 percent would be registered Republicans. Forty percent would be evangelical Christians. But a recent study of several universities by the conservative Center for the Study of Popular Culture and the American Enterprise Institute found that roughly 90 percent of those professors in the arts and sciences who had registered with a political party had registered Democratic. Fifty-seven professors at Brown were found on the voter-registration rolls. Of those, fiftyfour were Democrats. Of the forty-two professors in the English, history, sociology and political-science departments, all were Democrats. The results at Harvard, Penn State, Maryland and the University of California at Santa Barbara were similar to the results at Brown.
What we are looking at here is human nature. People want to be around others who are roughly like themselves. Thatââ¬â¢s called community. It probably would be psychologically difficult for most Brown professors to share an office with someone who was pro-life, a member of the National Rifle Association or an evangelical Christian. Itââ¬â¢s likely that hiring committees would subtlyââ¬âeven unconsciouslyââ¬âscreen out any such people they encountered. Republicans and evangelical Christians have sensed that they are not welcome at places like Brown, so they donââ¬â¢t even consider working there. In fact, any registered Republican who contemplates a career in academia these days is both a hero and a fool. So, in a semi-self-selective pattern, brainy people with generally liberal social mores flow to academia, and brainy people with generally conservative mores flow elsewhere.
The dream of diversity is like the dream of equality. Both are based on ideals we celebrate even as we undermine them daily. (How many times have you seen someone renounce a high-paying job or pull his child from an elite college on the grounds that these things are bad for equality?) On the one hand, the situation is appalling. It is appalling that Americans know so little about one another. It is appalling that many of us are so narrow-minded that we canââ¬â¢t tolerate a few people with ideas significantly different from our own. Itââ¬â¢s appalling that evangelical Christians are practically absent from entire professions, such as academia, the media and filmmaking. Itââ¬â¢s appalling that people should be content to cut themselves off from everyone unlike themselves.
The segmentation of society means that often we donââ¬â¢t even have arguments across the political divide. Within their little validating communities, liberals and conservatives circulate half-truths about the supposed awfulness of the other side. These distortions are believed because it feels good to believe them.
On the other hand, there are limits to how diverse any community can or should be. Iââ¬â¢ve come to think that it is not useful to try to hammer diversity into every neighborhood and institution in the United States. Sure, Augusta National should probably admit women, and university sociology departments should probably hire a conservative or two. It would be nice if all neighborhoods had a good mixture of ethnicities. But human nature being what it is, most places and institutions are going to remain culturally homogeneous.
Itââ¬â¢s probably better to think about diverse lives, not diverse institutions. Human beings, if they are to live well, will have to move through a series of institutions and environments, which may be individually homogeneous but, taken together, will offer diverse experiences. It might also be a good idea to make national service a rite of passage for young people in this country: it would take them out of their narrow neighborhood segment and thrust them in with people unlike themselves. Finally, itââ¬â¢s probably important for adults to get out of their own familiar circles. If you live in a coastal, socially liberal neighborhood, maybe you should take out a subscription to The Door, the evangelical humor magazine; or maybe you should visit Branson, Mo. Maybe you should stop in at a megachurch. Sure, it would be superficial familiarity, but it beats the iron curtains that now separate the nationââ¬â¢s various cultural zones.
Look around at your daily life. Are you really in touch with the broad diversity of American life? Do you care?[/COLOR]
Notice how the jewsmedia calls Jewish institutions, "Elite"? Jews are lamenting over the fact that integration is preceived as un-natural and is not acceptable to even negroes.
2003-09-22 01:45 | User Profile
Yes, we need to get around the un-freedom of association problem. Besides changing the law, we might appeal to freedom of religion (I like the idea of church of European practises that one would join, if desired, in addition to joinging a Christian church). Alternately, we might use some not-explicitly racial criteria concerning culture, to weed out most non-whites.
PS Thanks for your words of agreement concerning the need to control white trash females that want to take up with non-white males.
[QUOTE=Fernando Wood]A great idea, but at present there are two huge obstacles in the path of a white co-op:
1.A U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 1948 prohibited any court from enforcing a restrictive racial covenant. (But aren't affirmative action and set-aside programs "racial covenants"?)
2.Even if the 1948 ruling didn't exist, the various state and federal Fair Housing Laws would prohibit a whites-only community.
As you wrote, your idea is "long-term". In order to achieve the possibility of white communities, we first have to restore freedom of association, and that will be one ....[/QUOTE]
2003-09-22 02:28 | User Profile
I have never, in all my long and strange life, ever seen a Caucasian female with a non-white male who was not:
Disgustingly fat. Ugly (as in: What-was-the-name-of-the-horse-who-kicked-you-in-the-face ugly) Both fat AND ugly. A golddigger (in the case of non-white atheletes) Stupid as a rock (apologies to all rocks reading this for the insult) A drug user. A whore. Morally bankrupt and ethically dead. Had massive psychological problems (if not outright blatant mental disease) Had no self worth. Was defensive to the point of hysteria.
All in all, any female who debased herself with a non-white can be counted on to be written off in the future. I never been attracted to any white female who debased herself with a non-white and can see no reason why any self-respecting Caucasian male can see any reason to be in the first place.
I ran into one the other day. Was forced to treat her pleasantly because of my position. Skanky, lots of tatoos, had the habit of saying 'um' a lot, had the manners of a goat... nasty.
Ausonius
2003-09-22 18:04 | User Profile
I firmly believe that those who turn away from a Holy God of Segregation will see their children mix and marry outside of their own race. When a White child is born, they must be raised in a racial conscious home in order to perpetuate the racial bloodline. Those that let the T.V. raise their kids are courting disaster.
Racial Awareness starts at home. Teaching your children to stay with their own kind is approved of by God and accepted by White society. I don't give a hoot about what [COLOR=Red]race traitors, Jews and integrated families [/COLOR] think about me trying to instill racial values in my children, as that upsets [COLOR=Red]their[/COLOR] efforts to destroy my White children and our future.
2003-09-22 18:44 | User Profile
Golfball, I saw that you mentioned up above somewhere that true believers in Christ should abandon apostate churches that fail to teach the true and full Gospels of the Bible and the Bible alone. I agree with you on that. The end of the church age is coinciding with the complete falling apart of society and the world at large.
Anyone interested in true end times prophecy backed up by Scripture and not some phony dispensationalist theory, I recommend this book "The End Of The Church Age?" found free online: [url]http://www.familyradio.com/graphical/literature/frame/book_case.html[/url]
2003-09-25 22:54 | User Profile
How does Graham explain God telling Abraham to go among his own people to find a wife for his sons? The bibkle is full of cases of how Christians must stay away from those who are different, or become infected. Graham think that was just for that one time. The bible says over and over how a little "leaven" changes the entire character of the loaf. I suppose when you concentrate on getting rich as a preacher, a few things are beyond understanding.
2003-09-26 00:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=All Old Right]How does Graham explain God telling Abraham to go among his own people to find a wife for his sons? ....... .......[/QUOTE] Billy Graham does what ALL Judeo-Christian preachers do. They say that God has changed and offers salvation to everybody, when the Holy Bible CLEARLY indicates that is not the case.
Billy Graham is a liar and a deceiver that uses the name of Jesus Christ to spread "Judeo-Christianity" and the apostacy it comes from. The New Testament book of 2 Peter, Chapter 2 speaks of men like Billy Graham.
2003-09-27 04:15 | User Profile
**golfball,
You are most Right!**
:) :gunsmilie :tank: :gunsmilie :)
2003-09-27 16:23 | User Profile
This is a fair assessment of Judeo-Christianity and it's representatives: [B]2 Peter 2[/B]
2003-10-02 01:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]How ironic. I've never met a White Nationalist who wasn't some fat ugly hick who was probably attracted to family members.
Written by a proud race traitor.[/QUOTE]
How many "White Nationalists" have you met "proud race traitor"?
2003-10-02 02:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]How ironic. I've never met a White Nationalist who wasn't some fat ugly hick who was probably attracted to family members.
Written by a proud race traitor.[/QUOTE]
Well, enjoy yourself and the mongrel children you help create. I am sure that they will love you and respect you later in life.
2003-10-02 02:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]The proper term is bi-racial.[/QUOTE] Actually, the proper term is "bastard".
Deuteronomy 23:2 - KJV 1611
2003-10-02 03:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada].......
On second though I think you had another definition in mind. "Bastard" as in something that is of irregular, inferior, or dubious origin. ........[/QUOTE]
Right, a mongrel. [color=red][ Bastard ][/color] [color=blue][ heathen ][/color]
2003-10-02 13:43 | User Profile
Hopefully, Angry internet trolls can have a place to post, much like a "Rants" section. That would be beneficial and an excellent place to debate with the ones that promote the destruction of our race, and our way of life.
Build the firewall pretty thick, the flames may overwhelm. :taz: