← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · yummybear
Thread ID: 9880 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2003-09-19
2003-09-19 00:17 | User Profile
[url]http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=6006[/url]
Occam's Razor, Corporate Conspiracy And The Jews A Dinner With The Lawyers For The Worker's World Party
9/18/2003 2:52:36 PM
Bill White
Commentary -- I had dinner last night with Mara Venderheysen(sp?)-Hilliard and her law firm partner Karl [last name I can't remember] -- the chief attorneys for the Worker's World Party in Washington DC. Worker's World, for those unfamiliar, is the Stalinist group that broke with the Socialist Worker's Party in 1956 because the Socialist Worker's Party condemned the Soviet invasion of Hungary and Worker's World supported it. Today, Worker's World runs the International Action Center and International ANSWER, two noisy groups that claim to run most of the anti-globalization and anti-war demonstrations in the country, though that claim is somewhat doubtful. Ms Hilliard spoke on the topic of the PATRIOT Act and domestic repression in the United States. In doing so she pretended that that the PATRIOT Act has been targeted primarily against "progressives", aka communists, that it represents an "ultra-right" "racist" and "nationalist" view, and that, as her partner chimed in, "opposition to the government and revolutionary activism is liberal because the government always champions conservative interests." They said this with a straight face and really believed it -- as far as communists can really hold to any beliefs.
What I realized through their talk is that there are really two ways to understand the world and the political situation in the United States. One can understand it as Jew versus non-Jew, or one can understand it within the Jewish-media-produced paradigm of corporate interests, left v. right, corporate v. liberal, etc, etc.
The first world view is very simple -- one looks at where the Jews are, and knows that that side of any issue is up to no good. When one sees Jews on both sides of an issue, one knows that the issue itself is no good. In response one stops listening to and consuming anything produced by any Jew -- from Noam Chomsky to Richard Perle -- and utterly rejects that the very complex world Jews believe in, with corporations and oil companies and all the rest, really exists and is the driving force behind world politics.
The second world view is very compled. You see, there are leftists opposed to the PATRIOT Act, but there are "right-wingers" opposed to it to, and both sides are being targeted by it, so one has to simultaneously believe that the PATRIOT Act is "ultra-right" while believing that it is anti-right-wing as well. I asked Ms Hilliard about this -- specifically about the ADL and the PATRIOT Act's targeting of white nationalists -- and she gave no adequate answer except to say that the ADL is certainly a bad group of people who are opposed to "progressives". The fact that the "ultra-right", which is allegedly "racist" and "nationalist", is engaged in a program of imperialist internationalism while simultaneously working violently to suppress "racism" and "anti-Semitism" cannot be explained by the world view, without a number of complex logical leaps.
Similarly, one has to believe that there is a fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives, while explaining that both liberals and conservatives come together in the government on most important issues to further state repression. The communist theory to explain this involved bourgeois co-option of progressive movements and the belief that bourgeois liberalism is really conservatism in disguise, etc etc, -- a very complex explanation.
In short, to hold to the second view, which I once did, one has to make all kinds of logical leaps and jumps and create an extremely complex system in order to remain internally consistent and still explain reality. What I have come to realize is that the first world view -- the belief that Jews are the root of most of the evil in the modern world -- explains what is going on just as well as the second world view and gives a better predictive value, while leading to a much simpler analysis.
Jew like to say that Anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools, because they think that a world view that simple cannot be correct; unlike sensible people, Jews have always preferred very complex systems that, as they become more complex, have less and less bearing on reality -- everything from their Talmud to their Bolshevism to their Zionism reflects this.
However, Occam's razor suggests that if two ways of viewing the world allow one to predict future events with equal accuracy, that the simpler world view is correct.
Believing that Jews are wicked, that they love war, that they love turning a profit but only when that profit is gained at another's expense, that they essentially hate humanity, and that even when well motivated are incapable of conceiving of ideas that are not fundamentally destructive, gets me through life pretty well. I can almost always see what is coming politically, and the behavior of political leaders never shocks me. I usually have a good sense of what is going on.
In contrast, believing in the Jew concept of left-wing v. right-wing, liberal v. conservative, Republican v. Democrat, etc always dissappoints and confuses its supporters. The behavior of a Republican cannot be predicted based upon their party affiliation, but the behavior of a Jew can be predicted based upon their Judaism. Christopher Hitchen's love of war cannot be predicted based upon his ostensible liberalism, but it can be predicted based upon his Judaism. David Horowitz's hatred of most blacks may be explainable, in the communist world view, by his conservatism, but his denunciation of racism while simultaneously adhering to racist views can only be explained by his Judaism. Richard Perle's insane failure to adequately put together the Iraq war attack plan cannot be explained by his "conservatism" or by his position in the Pentagon -- nor can his position in the Pentagon be explained by his qualification for the job; his behavior can only be explained his Judaism. Throughout the world and the history of mankind, the behavior of people can be better explained by looking at whether or not they were a Jew or under the influence of Judaism better than it can be by any other factor.
So to believe in the Worker's World Party's doctrines of "progressive"- ness, one has to simultaneously believe that the government is racist, but that it also brutally persecutes racists -- or one has to ignore the fact of that persecution. To believe in that doctrine is to believe that the government is ultra-right and conservative, and yet is legalizing gay marriages, liberalizing immigration laws for Mexicans and most non-Arab non- whites, backing gun restrictions (though speaking as if it wasn't), and so on and so forth. One has to believe one thing that, when put most simply, stands in defiance of the actual facts.
I enjoyed the talk because these folk were right on most things, but I know, from having known these folk so well, that what they say and what they mean are two very different things. The Communists would pass a law more vicious than the PATRIOT Act in a heartbeat, and the fact that the "conservative" movement is dominated by a group of Communist Jews -- from Horowitz and Abrams to Perle and Wolfowitz to Krauthammer and Podhoretz and everywhere in bettern -- is the real danger behind the PATRIOT Act. Several people at the dinner last night compared 9-11 to the Reichstag fire, but, ignoring the fact that Hitler, in reality, had nothing to do with the Reichstag fire, I would be more than happy to have a government institute a Reichstag fire if it meant taking all of the Jew-influenced politicians in Washington and all of the Jew-owned and influenced newspapers in this country and shutting them all down. "Dictatorship" is not such a bad thing when it occurs under a proper socially and ethno-nationally inclined leader; it is a terrible thing when it occurs under a group of communist Jews who want nothing but to hate and to destroy humanity.
2003-09-19 00:32 | User Profile
In math terms, you have to find the smallest orthoginal set of vectors, or the basis, that uniquely describes the state. If your basis isnt' orthogonal, and/or there are redundant basis vectors, then you end up in confusion.
In the absense of zhid interests, left/right could be a valid description. With the introduction of the zhid parasite in the picture, there is whole one new dimension to it.