← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Rudel

Thread 9795

Thread ID: 9795 | Posts: 13 | Started: 2003-09-15

Wayback Archive

Rudel [OP]

2003-09-15 06:00 | User Profile

Living In Hitler’s Germany A letter from Hans Schmidt of GANPAC Published in the Hoskins Report, Dec. 1993 Richard Kelly Hoskins, publisher

Dear Dick: You asked for someone who had lived in Hitler’s Germany to tell what it was like. Permit me, someone who lived under the Swastika flag from 1935, when the Saar was reunited with Germany, to 1945, to give a short answer.

To be a boy or girl at that time was wonderful. In the Hitler Youth the differences between Christian denominations or the different German states didn’t count. We all truly felt that we were members of one body of people – one nation. Youth hostels were opened all over the Reich, enabling us to hike from one beautiful town to another seeing our fatherland. Every effort was made to strengthen our minds and bodies. Contrary to what is said today, we were encouraged to become free in spirit, and not to succumb to peer (or authority) pressure. In peacetime, NO military training was allowed by the Hitler Youth leadership; scouting yes. Incidentally, to “snitch on our parents” was frowned upon.

At the very time when America’s allies, the Soviets, destroyed most of the Christian churches in Russia and Ukraine, about 2500 new churches were built in Germany. NOT ONE Christian church was closed. It was the law that school and church had priority over service in the Hitler Youth. As late as the fall of 1944, the Waffen SS barracks in Breslau supplied two buses to take youth to either the nearest Catholic or Protestant church every Sunday. To be a registered member of a Christian church did not prevent advancement in the National Socialist Party.

Germany was National Socialist, but free enterprise flourished during the entire Hitler years. No company was nationalized. No small businessman was stopped from opening up his own store. I myself worked during the war for a company that can only be called part of international capitalism. If you owned shares, nobody confiscated them, like the allies did in 1945.

The accomplishments of the ‘Nazis’ were incredible. Starting without money and with six million unemployed (a third of the workforce), they constructed the entire German Autobahn road network in a short span of 6 years – almost without corruption – while seeing to it that the new road system did not unnecessarily destroy either the German landscape, or wildlife habitats and forests. Two years after the NS were elected to power, conditions were so improved that workers had to be hired in nearby friendly countries to help alleviate the worker’s shortage in Germany. Germany was booming while Britain, France and the US were in the depths of depression.

To help the workers get cheap transportation, the VW was designed and a factory was being built for their manufacture when the war started. Also, for the common people, villages of small single family homes were erected. The monthly payments were set so low that almost anyone could afford his own house. In Hitler’s Germany there were no homeless; no beggars. Crime was almost non existent because habitual criminals were in concentration camps. All this was reported in the newspapers and was known by everybody.

The German press during the Third Reich had fewer taboos than the American press today. The only taboo I can think of evolved around Hitler, and, during the war, there was a law that prohibited “defeatism”. This was because of the negative role the German press played in the German defeat of 1918.

It bears remembering that the ‘European Economic Community” was first coined by the Third Reich government. I remember many articles, both pro and con about this subject. One should also not forget that during the war at least seven million foreign nationals (nearly 10% of the population) worked in Germany, either as voluntary workers (Dutch, Danes, French, Poles, Ukrainians come to mind), or as forced laborers or as prisoners. I know of no instance where foreigners were attacked or molested (much less killed) because they were foreigners. Speaking of the press, I have an article from 1943 in my possession that spells out how necessary friendship is between the German and Russian peoples.

Between 1933 and 1945 there was a tremendous emphasis on culture: theatres flourished; the German movie industry produced about 100 feature films per year (of which not one was anti-American. Only 50 of them can be considered pure propaganda movies). Some the best classical recordings still extant were made in Hitler’s Germany. Actors from all over Europe, but mainly from France, Sweden and Italy were stars in German movies.

Germany always loved sports, and there was no lack of opportunities to partake in any sport one liked. The 1936 Berlin Olympics was merely a showcase of what transpired all over the Reich. In a book on these Olympics issued by the Hitler Youth that is still in my possession, Jesse Owens is shown several times and mentioned favorably. During the Schmeling boxing fights, we kids all knew of Joe Louis, the brown bomber. Nowhere did I ever read derogatory remarks about other races. Certainly the accomplishments of Germany and the Germans were given prominence, similar to ‘the ad nauseum’ statements of today that the U.S. is the land of the free, etc. In my ten years in the Hitler Youth (actually 8, since I obviously couldn’t attend while a soldier), the Jews were never mentioned. Other sports that gripped our attention were flying (there was Hitler Youth flying training with their own sail planes), car races (British and Italian drivers dominated) and riding.

Frequently I am asked about gun control during the Hitler era. Claims are made that Hitler could take power because he disarmed the German people. That is nonsense. In Germany gun ownership was never as prevalent as it is in America. I would say that for hundreds of years one needed a gun license in order to keep a weapon. On the other hand, my father owned an old pistol clandestinely (about which we children knew), and there were gun clubs all over the Reich. Furthermore, Germany was always a country with many excellent gunsmiths. It is doubtful that they could stay in business if the laws were too stringent. I would surmise that while Germany was Germany (before it was ‘liberated’ by the allies) gun ownership probably was far more widespread than is acknowledged today. Laws on the books were mainly to give the police a handle to arrest criminals with guns, not the ordinary citizen. Incidentally, just as Hitler had forbidden so-called ‘punishment exercises’ in the army (the brutal methods still employed in the American army), so had he forbidden the use of clubs by the police. He considered it demeaning to the German people.

Finally this: I don’t believe I’ll ever see again a people as happy and content as were the great majority of Germans under Hitler, especially in peacetime. Certainly some minorities suffered: former parliamentary politicians – because they couldn’t play their political games; the Jews – because they lost their power over Germany; the gypsies – because during the war they were required to work; and crooked union bosses – because they lost their parasitical positions. To this day I believe that the happiness of the majority of a people is more important than the well-being of a few spoiled minorities. In school there should be emphasis on promoting the best and the intelligent, as was done in Germany during the Hitler years – a fact that contributed after the war to the rapid German reconstruction. That Hitler was loved by his people, there can be no question. Even a few week’s before the war’s end and his death, he was able to drive to the front and mingle among the combat soldiers with only minimum security. None of the soldiers had to unload their weapons before meeting with the Fuhrer (as was required when President Bush met with American soldiers during the Gulf War).

Germany under Hitler was quite different from what the media would have you believe.

friedrich braun

2003-09-17 06:12 | User Profile

Germany under Hitler was quite different from what the [Jew] media would have you believe.

There's little doubt about that.

friedrich braun

2003-10-02 00:10 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]I personally don't consider myself a traitor for having a relationship with someone of a different race.QUOTE]

You might not consider yourself as such, but you are.

Here's an oldie that neatly encapsulates my thoughts on this matter:

TODAY'S LETTER: A Reader Challenges Steve Sailer On Miscegenation From: [Name Withheld]

It's All Relative: Putting Race in Its Proper Perspective, By Steve Sailer

Steve Sailer's definition of race—an extended and inbred family group—is, of course, accurate biologically and thus is the only definition of race that bears any relation to reality.

However, his favored solution to the "race problem" is pure evil: racial intermarriage so extensive that distinct races cease to exist.

This is genocide. Miscegenation destroys irreversibly and utterly that which took Nature tens of thousands of years to create and which our ancestors fought and died to preserve.

VDARE.COM promotes itself as an information source intended to help preserve Western Civilization. Yet without Western people, there is no West.

None of the above has anything to do with the usual Leftist shrieks about "hate" or "supremacy." If such a thing as "rights" exist anymore, then surely all distinct peoples have a right to preservation of their distinctiveness.

As usual, the Left has succeeded in convincing people to believe both sides of an impossible contradiction. They rant constantly about the imperative of diversity while simultaneously urging intermarriage as the solution to all ills.

Of course, once this process runs to completion, there will be no diversity—except, one suspects, for that of the ruling class itself.

VDARE.COM comment: Steve Sailer says he’s thinking about this and will write another article when he’s decided what to say.

August 19, 2002

il ragno

2003-10-02 01:05 | User Profile

Bitchin', dude! You are SO 21st century! Like you are down with EVERY approved victim-group, you stand tall against Hate with the setting sun highlighting your diamond stud earring, you're thoughtful enough to throw in a black-power salute for your Comanche and Navajo homies locked down on Whitey's reservation.... AND you have a hot girlfriend! You're like a one-man Lifetime Network made-for-tv movie, complete with a town-hall panel discussion on racial sensitivity afterwards! I'm just gonna save time and refer to you as "Jimmy Smits" from now on.

But I notice you forgot to give a shout-out to your Asian-American peeps, though. You're slipping, Jimmy...you MISSED one!

friedrich braun

2003-10-02 01:56 | User Profile

Tell us "proud race traitor": why are you proud of being a race traitor?

Let's have the self-loathing and masochistic rant.

(It's always fun to hear such people -- if you hate yourself and your race so much that you're willing to destroy it through miscegenation -- it must be a heavy burden, no?)

Genocide describes the dissolution of an ethnic group via any method, including miscegenation, genocide, oppression, ethnic cleansing, etc.

It's seems like an apt description of your stance.

friedrich braun

2003-10-02 04:11 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]Well, like I said before I do not consider myself to be a race traitor as I find the entire notion to be archaic. I've dated plenty of white girls. I'm just currently engaged to a person who happens to be of a different race. I'm proud to be marrying such a great person. I used the term "race traitor" rather sarcastically as that is what I am refered to by White Nationalists.

I don't hate myself or my skin pigmintation. It is what I was born with, that is all. If I was really a self-loathing individual I probably would have led a very different life. Probably would have looked at someway to lash out at the world. Like joining some fringe organization and buying into their BS to make myself feel belonged.

May I ask where do you get your definition of genocide?[/QUOTE]

The greatest threat facing Whites and western civilization, created by Whites, is MISCEGENATION. There's no greater evil facing Whites today; unfortunately, for the past sixty years this fact has been purposely ignored and obfuscated by Jews and their eager shabbos goyim and useful idiots. So, I don't really blame you, you're just parroting, out of ignorance, the official party line fed to us 24/7 by the media, Hollywood and academe.

Instead of coming here to spout stale, peecee disinformation take a look at some real research on the topic of race; for e.g., read Prof. J. Philippe Rushton's brilliant masterpiece "Race, Evolution and Behaviour", 3rd edition.

One of the most fascinating sections in Race, Evolution, and Behaviour addresses the issue of genotypes (do you even know what a genotype, or a phenotype, is?) and culture creation. If genotypes create various, specific cultures, it seems likely that there is a relationship between a people’s genetic makeup and their respective social arrangements. Cultures didn't just fall from the sky, like Manna for the wandering Jewish tribe. For e.g., the differences in genotype between Northern Europeans and the Australian aborigines would account for the divergent socio-political arrangements that these racial groups have constructed for themselves throughout the ages.

Chimpanzees and humans share 99 % percent of their genes; yet, no one in their right mind will argue that they’re (almost) identical.

Charles Murray writes that when it comes to race, lies, propaganda, and dishonesty are to be expected. Again, to paraphrase Murray: on the topic of race science is corrupt.

What I found even more fascinating is Rushton's data on the racial differences in brain size. Murray believes that this is of extreme importance in explaining Africans incredibly low IQs (in effect, the average African IQ corresponds to European retardation -- Rushton thinks that this fact alone clarifies why Africa is such a backward, violent, anarchic, choatic, disease-ridden hell-hole and cesspool. See the link bellow for his latest statement on Race and IQ). It's rather difficult to run a tight ship when your populace is composed of drooling bone-in-the-nose subhuman beasts.

Here's data on brain seize

See [url]http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol2no1/jpr-taxonomic.html[/url]

"I published several other studies during the 1990s, also in Intelligence, confirming the racial differences in brain size. In one study, I (1991) analyzed data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and found the mean cranial capacity for East Asians was 1,460 cm3, and for Europeans it was 1,446 cm3. From a stratified random sample of 6,325 U.S. Army personnel, I (1992) calculated average cranial capacities for Asians, Whites, and Blacks, respectively, of 1,416 cm3, 1,380 cm3, and 1,359 cm3. (I also found that officers averaged 1,393 cm3 while enlisted personnel averaged 1,375 cm3.) From a compilation made by the International Labour Office in Geneva of tens of thousands of people from around the world, I (1994) found that samples from the Pacific Rim, Europe, and Africa averaged cranial capacities, respectively, of 1,308 cm3, 1,297 cm3, and 1,241 cm3. Travis Osborne and I (1995) published a paper showing that brain size was about 50% heritable for both Blacks and Whites using data from the Georgia Twin Study based on 236 pairs of Black and White adolescent twins. And once again we found Whites averaged greater cranial capacity than Blacks.

Since one cubic inch of brain matter contains millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of nerve connections, brain size helps to explain why the races differ in IQ. On standardized IQ tests, hundreds of studies show the three-way pattern. Orientals average slightly ahead of Whites on such tests and Whites average substantially ahead of Blacks. Most IQ tests have an average score of 100, with a “normal” range from 85 to 115. Around the world, Whites average an IQ of about 100, Orientals an IQ of about 104, and Blacks in Britain, the Caribbean, and the U.S. average lower IQs -- about 85. The lowest average IQs are found for sub-Saharan Africans – around 70 (see Chart 4). Like the other data sets in this essay, these are reviewed in my book Race, Evolution, and Behavior. An even more recent book on the topic is by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, IQ and the Wealth of Nations."

I look forward to your comments on the article.

friedrich braun

2003-10-02 04:42 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]Going to read the article but could you post for me where you get you definition of genocide?[/QUOTE]

I'm not surprised that a self-identified "race traitor" and someone in an interracial relationship cannot see how racial mixing = genocide. Perhaps the UN definition of genocide should be looked up, which includes the idea that conditions that prevent the survival of any group can be considered genocide. Thus, multiracialism - leading to displacement and mixing - IS genocide. And, btw, it doesn't matter if the aliens are "high IQ" or not. see this: [url]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn/showEssay.asp?essayID=1507[/url]

Rudel

2003-10-02 04:44 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Rob_in_Canada]:ohmy: that should be "cool". Boy, I hope I'm not a lame as* now.[/QUOTE]

Mr. Rob,

If you really are a naive 'race traitor' and not a Jewish ADL agent-provocateur (which would not surprise me - they are known to have salaried personnel whose job it is to subvert this kind of forums), here are some comments:

• Genocide:

The term was invented by a Jew - Rafael Lemkin for political purposes. It is one of the foundations of their Holohoax claims. Jews subvert the language and come up with handy neologisms that serve their political interests - the Jew Trotsky coined the term 'racism', for example. The UN definition of genocide (Resolution 260 -III- A, 9.december 1948) defines genocide as '...acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group...' The term covers (among other things such as 'killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group etc.) the action of [B]'...deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part...' [/B] - and this is exactly what has been happening to our beautiful and gifted race in the past 40-50 years, by cultural brainwashing, massive immigration, miscegenation (you know something about it) etc.

• Interracial couples:

Our ancestors have checked out, thought it over and selected their significant others based on certain characteristics for millenia. Look yourself in the mirror and thousands of generations are looking back. Our race isn't perfect, but it has undeniable virtues - why wasn't the Sixtine Cahppel built in Nigeria or the Quantum Mechanics devised in China? Now you want to undo all this because MTV (that does the thinking for you) says it's cool and fashionable? Remember, every time you desire a person from another race you are de-facto spitting on the picture of your mother and father (and the same is true for your girlfriend). I know people who have children from interracial marriages that have gone sour and resent both their ex-spouse as well as their children bitterly, but there is no going back. Picture yourself in a similar situation in the future and get your act together before it's too late.

il ragno

2003-10-02 06:09 | User Profile

Looks like "Rob from ADL" deleted all his posts.

Snif....Jimmy, we hardly knew ye....

friedrich braun

2003-10-02 06:16 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]Looks like "Rob from ADL" deleted all his posts.

Snif....Jimmy, we hardly knew ye....[/QUOTE]

Odd.

I didn't know that you could delete your posts now.

Hilaire Belloc

2003-10-02 07:28 | User Profile

[QUOTE=friedrich braun]Odd.

I didn't know that you could delete your posts now.[/QUOTE]

Click under "edit" and you have a choice if you want to delete your post or not.

Paragon

2003-10-06 22:49 | User Profile

Hopefully he deletes himself.

friedrich braun

2003-10-06 23:33 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Paragon]Hopefully he deletes himself.[/QUOTE]

Don't count on it, jewboy! :blow:

"Still hunting Jews after all those years..." :gunsmilie

(Location: Warsaw Ghetto.)

Paging Madrussian! Paging Madrussian! -- OD's suspected-troll spotter.