← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · BjarniTyrdal
Thread ID: 9538 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2003-09-05
2003-09-05 02:36 | User Profile
It's not known to me if this article should go here. If not please give me direction for future use.
LIBERTARIANISM IN ONE LESSON -- by Tsun
Dear Alex Linder,
You just coined a very insightful term:
"The communal context that allows individualism to thrive." [url=http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/.../letters307.htm]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/.../letters307.htm[/url]
"...the Libertarian Individualist who believes he spawned, suckled, and schooled himself and never credits the community context that created him. Because he really, truly believes he is self-created, the libertarian laughs and smears at anybody who tries to preserve the communal context that allows individualism to thrive. He remains the eternally impotent party of one, smirking stupidly while things crumble that could have been saved if he'd pitched in."
Last week I emailed an old friend, a woman Libertarian who has a very good head on her shoulders, as well as a great sense of humor. She didn't like my letter. I may have been a bit brusque as I attempted to explain certain problems that are facing us as a Nation/People/Race. She also chided me for not supporting my statements. I suppose I could have footnoted everything I wrote, after all, I have the URLs and I have the files on my hard drive. In fact, I have about 4 CDs packed full of essays, texts, photos and many entire large websites (I download everything against the day that such material is removed from the web under color of law). I don't think she would have read the supporting files I could have given her. Who has time to do that these days. Believe me, I've played the "cites please" game in the past: people rarely even read the first document you give them. Total waste of time!
I've tried to answer her twice over the past week, spending nearly two hours on each occasion. I discarded both letters: how the hell can I convince her in one letter, when it took me several years to de-jewdaze myself? I will send her a Blind Cc of this email I'm sending to you. I hope you'll post it in the "Letters" pages of Vanguard News Network.
[url=http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/letters.htm]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/letters.htm[/url]
Maybe if she'd spend some time reading through VNN's "Letters" department, she'd get some food for thought.
I bet you will publish this letter because guess what? [He didn't. I guess he didn't like it :-(
While pondering what to write to my friend, the TRUTH about Libertarianism was suddenly revealed to me. I would like to share it with the world. Here goes:
Libertarianism is a Faith-based, Universalistic Religion, concocted and spread by jews, for the "benefit" of those gentiles too sophisticated to believe in the Big Jew in the Sky and his Black Fairy Book. What a conundrum! The poor folks don't believe in the jew's "God," but they believe in the jews. (!)
And they tend to hate you as a "Nazi" if you try to warn them about it!
Consider... Compare the new Faith, Libertarianism, with the old, Christianity. Libertarians, as an act of Faith, believe that weez all one race, and weez all de chillun ob de Big Market, and ebbryting gwine be oki-doki, jest as soon as we can Reason with the world's countless nigs and nogs, and convince them to behave like Principled Libertarians (or at least like Republicans:-)
Of course, we can't even convince all the White Europeans and Americans to behave like Principled Libertarians, but it should be at least as easy to convert the wogs and negroes to the Libertarian Creed as it will be convince Somalis and Ethiopians to stop snipping their daughters clits; South African Xhosas to refrain from butchering one-year-old boys for the sake of using their testicles in muti-magic ceremonies; Cambodians and Thais to stop selling their daughters into prostitution; and "Israeli" jews to knock off using Palestinian toddlers for target practice. That's the theory, anyhow.
Well, it's not going to happen, as anybody with a lick of sense understands. However, as the naughty savages might evolve in two or three (hundred) thousand years, Libertarians must stand fast in their beliefs and keep the Faith. If they do, then some day in the far distant future, de Invisible Hand gwine lead de whole wide worl into de Promise Land ob Hebbin on Earth.
It may seem snotty of me to say it that way, but by gum, it's more perfect than most analogies. In fact, if you mention the dark deeds of the jews to a Libertarian, many respond with, "You know, Ayn Rand was a Jew!"
Some years ago (was it 1983?) I shared a joke with the same friend. I told her that Libertarianism (I used to be one) was a form of Socialism because:
1.) Libertarians claim that people should own their own lives.
2.) They also claim that the human life is the basis of all value, and that Individuals create goods and services.
3.) In other words, the individual life is the means of production and people should own the means of production (their individual lives).
So... Libertarianism=Socialism
She didn't care for my joke, but truer words were never spoken. You see, it doesn't matter much what you call something; the label is not the thing. What does matter is WHO is creating or using the thing.
Libertarians are fond of claiming that the American Revolution was a libertarian revolution, and it was. But it was also a National Socialist revolution: remember the words of the Founder who reminded us that the people in the various colonies all came from European countries and areas that were closely related, and that this was good for our Nation.
It can also be claimed that the American Revolution was a"Militia Revolution," or even a "Welfare Revolution," can't it? ("Promote the General Welfare" etc., though that didn't appear until the Constitution, a few years later.)
Well, there's welfare and there's welfare. Who's doing the "promoting" is the most important thing about promoting the general welfare.
America's Founders, many of whom really were of libertarian mind, understood that the "general welfare" is best served when a limited government serves a nation of people who share a basic culture. Our culture includes the Common Law, Magna Charta, Habeas Corpus, Trial by Jury, and all the rest. These ideas mostly came from Germany, by way of Great Britain.
Shaka Zulu, the African King's interpretation of "promoting the general welfare" was quite different, wouldn't you say? So was Genghis Khan's. And Mohammad's. And Mao Tse Tung's. Yet each of those "Law Givers" was revered by great numbers of people in his own culture, and rightly so. Those people, by the way, would probably find the modern Libertarian ideal of a nation consisting of forcibly "atomized" individualists to be cruel and heartlessly inhuman beyond belief.
When savage stone age "negro" slaves took over the finest, most productive colony in the entire world, they produced... Haiti. Yet Haiti was based upon the American idea.
When jews took over Russia, they produced... a charnel house of ritual murder and a savage extinction of the human spirit, unequaled by anything in human memory. Yet a copy of the Soviet Constitution sits atop my PC tower, right next to my copy of the Constitution for the United States. The two do resemble each other in many ways. Yet how different the end results!
Now that jews have taken over America, our "nation" resembles the Soviet Union far more than it reminds one of our old Federal Republic.
Maybe I should ask my old friend why her heroes: Ayn Rand, Murray Rothbard, and Ludwig vonMisses, all jews, each of whom wrote many lengthy tomes dedicated to the spirit of "Free" Markets and "Liberty," and all of whom knocked Soviet communism, never bothered to tell their fans about the jews who founded and operated "Russian" communism? Maybe it wouldn't have been "Good for the Jews" to bring that up?
Perhaps I should ask my friend why she supports the Liberal Social Democrat (e.g. jewish communist) theory that Race does not exist, and racism is evil, when she literally hates ALL the other doctrines of that group. That one she supports is the most poisonous of all! Will she ever come to understand that individualism and libertarianism may work in among White Europeans and Americans, but adding the very different third world peoples and cultures to the mix is a sure recipe for racial extinction? I guess I'll find out.
In closing, I will include several documents that are guaranteed to give the average newcomer an excellent insight into why so many White Americans and Europeans -- including many ex-Libertarians -- are coming over to White Nationalism, National Socialism, and Racial Nationalism.
These are the 12 best documents I've found on the subject matter to date. I'll only supply a quotation from the first paper.
" A White Nationalist Primer:" [someone should write this book]
01.) The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements Stanley Hornbeck's review of Kevin MacDonald's book
"In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements - largely established and led by Jews - have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning." [url=http://www.heretical.org/miscella/culturec.html]http://www.heretical.org/miscella/culturec.html[/url]
02.) Introduction to Sir Arthur Keith (The Father of Nationalism) by Yggdrasil [url=http://www.ddc.net/ygg/etext/ak-intro.htm]http://www.ddc.net/ygg/etext/ak-intro.htm[/url]
03.) Who Rules America: The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media - By National Vanguard [url=http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america/]http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america/[/url]
04.) The Color of Crime (based upon federal crime statistics) From American Rennaissance Online version or PDF document here: [url=http://www.davidduke.com/colorcrime/]http://www.davidduke.com/colorcrime/[/url]
05.) Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881 - 1965: A Historical Review by Kevin MacDonald : Department of Psychology California State University [url=http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol-1.htm]http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol-1.htm[/url]
06.) The Myth of Diversity by Jared Taylor [url=http://www.amren.com/divers.htm]http://www.amren.com/divers.htm[/url]
07.) The Morality of Survival by Michael W. Masters [url=http://www.amren.com/masters.htm]http://www.amren.com/masters.htm[/url]
08.) If We Do Nothing by Jared Taylor [url=http://www.amren.com/966issue/966issue.html]http://www.amren.com/966issue/966issue.html[/url]
09.) Franz Boas -- Liberal Icon, Scientific Fraud by Sam Francis [url=http://www.vdare.com/francis/boas.htm]http://www.vdare.com/francis/boas.htm[/url]
10.) Significance of the Non-Existent Chambers by Yggdrasil [url=http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol-1.htm]http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol-1.htm[/url]
11.) No Way Out But Through the Jews A Review of Paul Gottfried's The Conservative Movement by Alex Linder [url=http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index5.htm]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index5.htm[/url]
12.) Links for the Uncommited by Cozenage [url=http://www.samaelwings.com/~cozenage/kiosk/links.html]http://www.samaelwings.com/~cozenage/kiosk/links.html[/url]
2003-09-05 03:12 | User Profile
Linder must have seen this article, which is an old favorite of mine, and plagiarized the title. Oh well - imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. :lol:
[dohtml]
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS .HTML FILE! Code generated from onelesson.w --> <!-- use only HTML style comments! -->
<!-- magic incantation to specify HTML 3.2 --> <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
Last updated 01/04/03.
No, this isn't David Bergland's evangelistic text. This is an outsider's view of the precepts of libertarianism. I hope you can laugh at how close this is to real libertarianism!
Introduction
One of the most attractive features of libertarianism is that it is basically a very simple ideology. Maybe even simpler than Marxism, since you don't have to learn foreign words like "proletariat".
This brief outline will give you most of the tools you need to hit the ground running as a freshly indoctrinated libertarian ideologue. Go forth and proselytize!
Copyright 2002 by Mike Huben ( mhuben@world.std.com ).
This document may be freely distributed for non-commercial purposes if it is reproduced in its textual entirety, with this notice intact.
[/dohtml]
2003-09-05 10:08 | User Profile
I'll do you boys one better
[SIZE=4][color=purple]Libertarianism in One Logical Statement [/color][/SIZE]
God = money.
From that one statement we can deduce the entire body of libertarian ethics, aethetics, economics and philosophy.
2003-09-06 03:53 | User Profile
OK, :D
I think you summed it up nicely. That certainly covers the Randian types well. Anyone who has spent anytime listening to neo-con radio talkshow host "libertarian" Neal Boortz and his L.P.org nonsense of atomized individualism knows what I mean.
I like that better than what I say about people like that. "I got mine, so hooray for me and to hell with you!"
2003-09-06 05:34 | User Profile
Uncle Franco say: only large groups that think alike have power. "Individuals" have no power in the long term, thus are doomed to 3rd-class status of Jewess Rand world of marjiuana, free sex and no military-since-no-government....oy...
Libs are GOOD FOR JEWS. Bad for Whites. :mellow:
2004-05-05 18:42 | User Profile
Libertarianism is a doctrine about the proper use of coercion. It tells us nothing about whether groups can or cannot act together.
Libertarianism is probably good for Jews (particularly as much of what Jews do with the state is not good for Jews in the long run). But libertarianism is certainly good for whites, as is frees us from having to tailor our lives to the demands of the parasite-political class, which inevitably relies upon non-whites votes, leftist ideology, and Jewish power-structures.
2004-05-05 20:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Oklahomaman]I'll do you boys one better
[size=4][color=purple]Libertarianism in One Logical Statement [/color][/size]
God = money.
From that one statement we can deduce the entire body of libertarian ethics, aethetics, economics and philosophy.[/QUOTE] Hilarious and true simultaneously.