← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · hqz
Thread ID: 9351 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2003-08-28
2003-08-28 03:22 | User Profile
Sex Talk In 1977 interview, actor spoke of orgies, drugs, and homosexuality [url=http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/arnoldoui1.html]http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/arnoldoui1.html[/url]
Full text of interview: [url=http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/arnoldinter1.html]http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/arnoldinter1.html[/url]
This sounds like rape -- did Arnold ask for and receive permission before piling on? --
"Bodybuilders party a lot, and once, in Gold's--the gym in Venice, California, where all the top guys train--there was a black girl who came out naked. Everybody jumped on her and took her upstairs, where we all got together." Asked by Manso if he was talking about a "gang bang," Schwarzenegger answered, "Yes, but not everybody, just the guys who can fck in front of other guys. Not everybody can do that. Some think that they don't have a big-enough cck, so they can't get a hard-on.
Also:
On the practice of abstaining from sex prior to a competition, Schwarzenegger rejected that approach: "I get laid on purpose. I can't sleep before a competition and I'm up all night, anyway, so instead of staring at the ceiling I figure I might as well find somebody and f*ck." In fact, at the 1972 Mr. Olympia contest, "we had girls backstage giving head, then all of us went out and I won. It didn't bother me at all; in fact, I went out there feeling like King Kong," added Schwarzenegger.
When Manso asked whether he used "dope," Schwarzenegger replied, "Yes, grass and hash--no hard drugs. But the point is that I do what I feel like doing. I'm not on a health kick."
--
Linking to or quoting the article has been banned by Commissar Robinson (Rabinowitz?):
[url=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/971628/posts]http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/971628/posts[/url]
To: journey7873; All
To all:
Do not post the text of this "article" or even a link to it. It is inappropriate material for FR and will be deleted.
Thanks,
Jim
2 posted on 08/27/2003 4:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
And the same people who led the campaign to impeach Clinton for getting a blow job in private respond in unison -- No problem, everybody did it. Except for a few dissidents, who probably will be gone shortly --
What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People >change. They grow up, get married, have children.
"It is all about sex! Nothing to see here, move on."
Would love to see the responses here if the man giving that interview was one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.
45 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18 PM PDT by ambrose
2003-08-28 04:34 | User Profile
Basically, the real issue is morality. What you do defines what sort of person you are the extent to which your capable of leadership. Degenerates can't control themselves because everything is simply a matter of meeting some passing fancy without regard to the consiquences which reduces the libertine to sub-human status.
While it is possible that Schwarzenegger has changed drastically from the era in which in engaged in those sorts of activities I see no reason to simply accept that proposition with blind faith. If Schwarzenegger changed his ways so to speak then I expect him to be honest about what he did, and demostrate by example why that behvior was wrong. Someone that can't do that doesn't deserve to lead anyone in any fashion.
The Feeb Republic simply supresses anything contrary to the neo-con possition because they are simply a front for the RNC and nothing more. I assume that millions of republicans will vote for him and not notice that in no way is he conservative but in fact his positions on anything worth mentioning are no different then Ted Kennedy.
2003-08-28 10:26 | User Profile
Hollywood is banking on Ahrnold to be their next
[img]http://www.geocities.com/theactionkingsa/KindergartenCop.gif[/img]
An Aryanesque actor who can read one-liners and jump through hoops. Divershity? no problemo. California, apparently, requires the 'skills' of a professional imitator.
[img]http://www.geocities.com/theactionkingsa/JUNIOR.gif[/img]
Critical Comment:
"This politically correct farce boasts enthusiastic performances from its three stars, and precious few laughs after the initial joke is presented." -- Leonard Maltin
Can't say the man doesn't have experience...
2003-09-14 06:59 | User Profile
*Originally posted by wintermute@Aug 28 2003, 05:01 * ** He's still trailing Bustamente, and a win for the La Raza candidate would only be an advantage for our side. **
Bingo.
We need a nice, sharp trajectory down into the third world sewer.
Worse is better, and so Bustamante can only be good for us.
Walter
2003-09-14 10:54 | User Profile
Planning on worse being better tends to backfire. I'd rather go with the vast psychological effects of having as governor the son of Nazi who is 'not oppossed to militarizing the border.'
2003-09-14 12:47 | User Profile
*Originally posted by iwannabeanarchy@Sep 14 2003, 10:54 * ** Planning on worse being better tends to backfire. I'd rather go with the vast psychological effects of having as governor the son of Nazi who is 'not oppossed to militarizing the border.' **
He'd never do it.
Ah-nold is a product of the establishment.
He's married to a Kennedy, for Pete's sake. He made his fortune working for Jewish media bosses. He's bought and paid for.
Clearly he's a false flag operation meant to divert growing white anger away from this same establishment long enough to complete white dispossession.
They'd prefer one of their own, but they know they'll get Cruz or some other anti-white bigot in office soon enough. What they need now is a transitional figure - one who can complete the transition from the California of the Beach Boys to Mexifornia.
And that's who Ah-nold is.
Cruz is a much better deal for us at this point.
2003-09-14 14:46 | User Profile
It's pretty hard for me to guage which one of you is correct. If Bustamante gets elected it really depends on how keen a sense of the obvious our people have and how good of a job the Jews do of circumventing it with propaganda, as usual. Judging by the comments (concerning Mexican hegemony) on other (non-racial) forums, a keen sense of the obvious might prevail. Has Ahnold ever shown that he values principles very far above social position?
2003-09-14 15:23 | User Profile
*Originally posted by travis@Sep 14 2003, 14:46 * ** Has Ahnold ever shown that he values principles very far above social position? **
I take that as a purely rhetorical question.
Of course not. Ah-nold is a bright, ambitious and ruthless climber.
I need to watch Pumping Iron again, which I saw years ago. If I recall correctly, he scoffed at the suggestion that he should break off his gruelling training schedule for the Mr. Universe contest [SIZE=3][u]to attend his father's funeral[/u][/SIZE].
He set off to be a star, to marry above his station. And he succeeded. He's a real American success story, which means unfortunately in this day in age that he sold his soul for fame and fortune.
I repeat: HE'S MARRIED TO A KENNEDY.
'nuff said.