← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · hqz
Thread ID: 9213 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2003-08-22
2003-08-22 17:47 | User Profile
Articles and editorials collected by David Irving, who has been banned from entering Australia due to Jewish pressure:
[url=http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/03/08/DTel220803.html]http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/03/08/DTel220803.html[/url]
AUSTRALIANS were shocked yesterday by the three-year prison sentence on Pauline Hanson, the former leader of the anti-immigration One Nation party.
Radio phone-in programmes were inundated by callers, with the majority saying they thought the sentence was too harsh. Some politicians agreed.
There were fears, too, that the former fish and chip shop owner might be attacked by Aboriginal prisoners, resentful of her past statements about white Australians being subjected to "reverse racism".
Hanson, 49, and her One Nation co-founder, David Ettridge, 58, were each jailed for three years on Wednesday after a Brisbane district court jury found them guilty of illegally registering their party in Queensland.
Hanson, condemned by her critics as a racist, was also convicted of dishonestly obtaining almost ã200,000 in campaign expenses.
[The major parties in Oz are financed by wealthy overseas Jews.]
2003-08-27 06:25 | User Profile
[url=http://www.vdare.com/misc/stove_hanson_prisoner.htm]Pauline Hanson - Political Prisoner (VDARE)[/url]
This is shocking and outrageous.
2003-08-27 15:44 | User Profile
And now the backlash (let's all hope.)
[url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/australia/story/0,12070,1028785,00.html]http://www.guardian.co.uk/australia/story/...1028785,00.html[/url]
**What they said about ... Pauline Hanson
Toby Manhire Monday August 25, 2003 The Guardian
The comment pages of the Australian press were dominated over the weekend by the imprisonment of Pauline Hanson, the controversial founder of the anti-immigration One Nation party. Last week, she and David Ettridge, the party's deputy director, were handed three-year jail sentences for electoral fraud.
"Hanson was brilliant in pitching her message to people looking for simple answers to complex problems, but never much good at the detail," ran an editorial in the Australian. "She believed the major political parties were making things more complicated than they needed to be. But one of the complicated things that Hanson and Ettridge decided did not matter was the law on electoral funding. To register for electoral funding in Queensland, a political party needs a member of state parliament or 500 party members ... One Nation ... submitted a list of 500 members of a supporters' group instead. This meant she had no right to the $500,000 [ã205,000] in public funds ... and this is the reason she is in prison."
For many, however, the sentence was excessive. It was ignorance rather than malice that had landed Hanson in prison, argued Piers Akerman in the Sydney Sunday Telegraph, and "three years is too long a sentence for stupidity." The Melbourne Herald Sun noted that "far greater crimes have resulted in leniency ... Hanson was dishonest, her politics ill-conceived and dangerous, but in this case the punishment does not fit the crime." The Queensland Sunday Mail's Terry Sweetman was happy to "dance on her political grave", but he felt "a suspended sentence or a symbolic couple of months in the slammer probably would have been enough."
It was not yet time to dust off the grave-dancing shoes, warned the Melbourne Age. Hanson was still a political force to be reckoned with. Her xenophobic philosophy had infected the ruling Labor party; indeed, "by coopting some of her less savoury ideas by stealth, the prime minister helped to neutralise One Nation as a political force." And the Hanson factor refused to go away. "Her influence continues ... She still walks among us."
The Age's concerns appeared to be borne out by a poll in the Sunday Mail, which showed that 21% of Queensland voters favour One Nation, "a return to the levels of support during Hanson's heyday". It was plainly a "political backlash", with 74% of those who said they would vote for One Nation revealing they had been "influenced by the week's events".**
2004-02-16 09:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=hqz] [The major parties in Oz are financed by wealthy overseas Jews.][/QUOTE]
How is it you know this?
2004-05-02 21:31 | User Profile
..overseas? Frank Lowry and the rest are Australian residents, I think.
2004-05-03 07:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE][The major parties in Oz are financed by wealthy overseas Jews.]
How is it you know this?[/QUOTE]
These days, only a fool would assume otherwise. If David Irving isn't allowed in - but dookies and Muslims are welcomed - the odds on Jewish control of the country's institutions and democratic processes are 2-5.
But here, if you insist:
[QUOTE]
[url]http://www.fpp.co.uk/Australia/Jews/AJN200203.html[/url] [B]Jewish donors back main political parties[/B]
Bernard Freedman
JEWISH donors were among the biggest corporate and individual contributors to party political funds in 2001 and 2002, the Australian Electoral Commission revealed in its political donations return released last week.
Westfield shopping mall developer Frank Lowy topped the list of Jewish donations with $624,200 - $311,900 to the Australian Labor Party (ALP) and $312,300 to the Liberals.
The bulk came from Lowy's private company Croissy Pty Ltd, supplemented by smaller donations under $10,000 from Westfield Capital Corporation.
Harry Triguboff's Meriton Apartments gave $250,000 to the Liberals' fundraising front The Free Enterprise Foundation. Another $27,917 went to the Liberals in NSW. The ALP's NSW branch received $107,400 in two $50,000 donations and a number of other smaller donations.
Packaging magnate Richard Pratt, through Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd, was also a major contributor to The Free Enterprise Foundation with a $200,000 gift. Another $6000 went directly to the Liberals and $2500 to the National Party in NSW. The ALP's Victorian branch received $100,000 and the ALP in NSW $25,000.
Both the Liberal Party and the ALP benefited from the Gandel Group and another Gandel company, Northgan. The ALP received $95,000, the Liberals $86,300.
Isador Magid gave $50,000 to the Victorian branch of the ALP.
Donations to the ALP headquarters and state branches from all over Australia totalled $60,268,768. The Liberal Party, nationally and in the states, received $58,250,015; the National Party, $9,180,641. Pauline Hanson's One Nation, despite its virtual demise, received $1,482,929.[/QUOTE]
2004-05-03 10:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=hqz]Hanson, 49, and her One Nation co-founder, David Ettridge, 58, were each jailed for three years on Wednesday after a Brisbane district court jury found them guilty of illegally registering their party in Queensland.
Hanson, condemned by her critics as a racist, was also convicted of dishonestly obtaining almost ã200,000 in campaign expenses.[/QUOTE]
What a disgrace!!! Pauline Hanson was NOT a national socialist or any kind of radical revolutionary (not that such a designation would justify her imprisonment for what appears to be some sort of vague, irrelevant and selectively prosecuted technicality). She was basically equivalent to U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, or maybe Ron Paul (albeit with a strong, immigration restrictionist position; I don't know what Paul has said about immigration). She was pro-White (that's why she's in prison, after all - that, plus the fact she was unusually effective), but I'm nearly certain she never made a bona fide hateful or bigoted statement against anyone. All she did was suggest, strongly at times, that mass immigration from China, Indonesia and Southeast Asia, to the extent Whites would become a minority in Australia within a few decades, was a bad idea. I suspect about 80% of White Australians agree with her. And for that, they trumped up some B.S. charges, laws that leftists and Jews probably break all the time, and sentenced her to three years. I guess Australia is now a Stalinist dictatorship. What a shame. Oh well, we're not much better....
2004-05-03 22:19 | User Profile
Her case was quashed under appeal, and she was released a few months back, and vowed not to return to Politics. The Liberal and Labour leaders (Right and Leftish) have since espoused every good idea she had, and taken it as their own...but, what else can you expect from a bunch of Lawyers..?