← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · yummybear

Thread 8952

Thread ID: 8952 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2003-08-11

Wayback Archive

yummybear [OP]

2003-08-11 06:40 | User Profile

In Defense of Racism

by Edgar J. Steele

August 10, 2003

I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races. I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. -- Abraham Lincoln, September 18, 1858

This series examines racism, which I see simply as preferring the company of those of one's own ethnic background over others. Most imply an element of false superiority when invoking the term, thus it has fallen from favor among even the politically incorrect. That is why many who unabashedly speak of racial differences as the basis for favoring one's own prefer the term "racialist."

Most of us prefer the company of members of our own family to that of others. Showing racial preference is the logical extension of showing family, or community preference. Be true to your school. Stand by your man. That sort of thing. Why must it be any different as the circle widens?

The politically correct see no difference between "racist" and "racialist," because they pretend there are no differences among the races except skin color and economic class. In fact, the politically correct dismiss anybody who dares even to speak of obvious racial differences, with nothing more, as being racist. Thus, the entire topic is off limits to discussion or investigation, with the consequence that serious scientific researchers either adjust their findings to the establishment viewpoint or become marginalized (defunded). The most glaring example is in the area of IQ measurement.

The sole exception to the racist "no-go zone" is invocation of the term "racist" to vilify another, either socially or judicially. Such baseless vilification has been done repeatedly down through history, as in Salem with the witch hunts or in the Middle Ages, via the Inquisition. The parallels are aptly made, since those guilty today of racism, via hate crimes or holocaust denial, for example, are routinely sent to prison throughout the Western world. A number of executions, in fact, have resulted due to the enhancement of criminal penalties engendered by laws governing racism. Thus, racism is seen for what it truly is: pure thought crime - thinking and expressing thoughts inconsistent with the establishment's point of view, though such thoughts were perfectly legal until very recently.

The politically correct believe that their approach is working, due to an apparent decrease in overt racism. They are wrong, as the politically incorrect are well aware. Racism merely has gone underground in polite society, and is building pressure, much as a steam boiler without a release valve - the release valve that has been plugged by societal pressure and hate crime laws. Witness the ever-growing resentment of affirmative action in both the left and the right in America. This pressure is aggravated by the sense of entitlement and victimhood engendered in so-called minority groups. A disaster of mythical proportions looms over the American landscape, awaiting only an ignition spark.

Simultaneously, there is a growing recognition in America that white separatists might not be the racists that the media would have us believe. Separatism is merely the act of being or living apart from others possessing specified characteristics. Want to live in a low-crime area? Near good schools? Then you are a separatist, because those are characteristics that do not exist in multiethnic neighborhoods. Separatism might be racism, but if it is, then most whites are racist. Removing separatist tendencies and forcing full integration upon society is a very recent phenomenon in America, but not to the rest of the world, whose experience would be instructive, if only we were inclined to pay attention.

Race mixing has led to many national disasters down through history, the most noteworthy of which involve the fall of empires, a topic we will take up in the segment following the next. Lesser national disasters look a lot like today’s South Africa and Zimbabwe (nee Rhodesia ).

Both countries were founded by European expatriates and both were sparsely populated by indigenous populations at their founding. Both grew to substantial size and wealth, exporting agricultural products and natural resources, the most recognizable of which are gold and diamonds.

Blacks were imported from other parts of the continent to provide labor and prospered, as well, albeit at a pace far behind that of the resident white population. With a good deal of help from liberal elements in both America and Europe , blacks seized political power and thus began the downfall of two formerly great countries.

Today, white farmers are all but extinct in Zimbabwe and headed that way in South Africa . With the backing of anti-white governments, blacks have invaded farms and slaughtered farmers and their families. Crime has become rampant in both countries, with violent black-on-white crime, especially rape and murder, the most pervasive and most ignored. This is nothing short of genocide, with whites who do not flee the countries living in bunkers which are proving not to be the safe havens intended.

Moreover, both countries have become net consumer states, versus net providers a short time ago. The farms have been broken up and rendered nonproductive, with both livestock and seed corn consumed by the black squatters, with no concern for the future. The native population is...well, going native.

I have heard the African tragedies dismissed by liberals who sniff, “Well, this is the first time the African blacks have experienced real freedom, so a few missteps are to be expected.” These people ignore reality.

For example, Liberia was founded shortly after Australia, with a constitution modeled on America's. Today, Australia ranks in the first tier of nations. Last week, Liberia once again collapsed into widespread anarchy. Or Ethiopia. Independent since 1855, save only four years when it was occupied by Italy (1936-1940), Ethiopia was host to the single greatest man-made famine ever known, in 1985.

What is taking place in Africa today was as predictable as night following day. One need only observe the behavior of blacks in the rest of Africa to foresee precisely how things have gone in South Africa and Zimbabwe .

After all is said and done, the best way to tell where you are going is to turn around and look at where you are coming from. Based on that analysis, things are going to get much worse in southern Africa , more akin to what is taking place elsewhere on the continent, where superstition is rampant and cannibalism still exists.

Those who have read previous segments in this series understand why. They know that we all inherit our appearance, our intellect and a good deal of our behavior from our ancestors, with there being substantial racial differences in all three areas. Those readers know that character is a collection of behavioral response patterns, most of which are directly inherited (breeding shows, as they say). Those readers also know that there is an inverse relationship between IQ and the degree to which our DNA governs our behavior, with the result that those of lesser intellects are bound to repeat the behavior of their forebears to a degree far greater than those of higher intellect.

The average African black’s IQ is about 70, thereby placing a significant portion of the African population into the range of what we deem to be mental retardation. It is scarcely surprising that they, like the lower animals, are almost entirely governed by their inherited behavioral response patterns, passed to them from their ancestors via DNA.

Even the blacks now ruling South Africa and Zimbabwe agree that they preside over burgeoning national disasters, while simultaneously seeking aid of all forms from Europe and America . Whereas once they exported food in abundance, now their populations are again starving. All this on the continent that arguably is the richest in natural resources on the planet. The reason is obvious to those willing to see.

What is less clear is that America , too, stands on the edge of its own racial national disaster, and for the same reasons. The American disaster will take a different form, if for no other reason than the fact that blacks comprise only about 13% of the total American population. Then, too, the average black IQ is considerably higher than that of their African cousins, though still 15 points less than the white average of 100...still a gulf.

A goodly portion of the behavioral response patterns encoded in DNA by Africa ’s jungle habitat still remains in America ’s blacks. We see it manifested in black street and gang criminal behavior on a daily basis.

As America slides into what now seems inevitable - a second economic Depression - the black underclass will take to the streets en masse because government will prove incapable of providing, as in the past.

America has operated under the illusion that white/black differences are socioeconomic only, thus interracial problems should respond to socioeconomic stratagems. That was a grave error, akin to the relatively recent medical practice of treating a variety of diseases with leaches and bloodletting. Out goes the bad air, in comes the good air. Sure. And patient America is doomed as surely as so many who died in times past from similarly arrogant medical blundering. Problem is, we are a part of this patient.

We erroneously believed that affirmative action, quotas, set asides, preferences and welfare would provide a temporary bandaid, a hand up for blacks to attain socioeconomic parity with whites. Then, such programs could be discarded and we could all live in multi-hued bliss. This literally was the rationale taught in law school in the seventies (and today, probably) for favoring one racial class over another.

I recall hearing my Constitutional Law professor muse that the new century would be one of true equality, allowing us to dispense with preferential treatment after a single generation. A recent US Supreme Court decision saw Justice O’Connor make the same argument, extending the time line by another 25 years, however, yet another generation.

Because of the inherent racial differences between whites and blacks, whites always will have to be handicapped in order to provide equal outcomes for the races. Get used to affirmative action, because it is here to stay. The good news is that “here to stay” won’t be long, because America simply won’t last that long. At least, not America as currently comprised.

Remember, with this series I am constructing a thesis that racism might be a good thing, at least some of the time. For that to be true requires good reasons. A rationale that withstands the charge of “Hate” for its own sake. I propose that rationale to be twofold: personal preference, on the one hand, and safety, on the other.

All will agree that we have the right to associate with our own family members, to the exclusion of others. So, too, is it our constitutional right to associate freely within our society. As a corollary, we should have a right not to associate with others, as well. Just as outsiders have no right to enter my family’s home and associate with us in that setting, so should we have a right to live apart from others, solely because that is our desire. The US Supreme court disagrees. So much for personal preference and individual rights.

However, the US Supreme Court agrees that a certain class of people should be segregated from the rest of us for our physical protection and to facilitate rehabilitation of members of that class: the class of criminals. Therefore, separation of classes of people for certain purposes is okay if physical safety of the population is threatened. I submit that a simple extension of this court-approved logic demands that blacks be separated from whites.

American blacks comprise about 1/7th the total population. American blacks commit seven times the total violent crime that American whites commit. Do the math: blacks are fifty times as likely to commit violent crimes as are whites. Interracial crime, overwhelmingly black on white, has claimed more American lives in the past generation than the Korean war and nearly as many as did Viet Nam. There is a very real race war already raging in the streets of America.

As developed at length in this series, the black proclivity for violence, like all other behavioral response patterns, largely is mandated genetically. No amount of education, affirmative action, racial preference or welfare is going to change this disparity between white and black Americans. Only thousands, if not millions, of years of evolution will change things. Since the danger cannot be neutralized or eradicated, physical separation is required for the safety of white America .

Here is where many step up and say, "But, they're not all like that. You can't condemn them all because of the acts of some, even if the miscreants do make up a sizable portion of the entire population." Or, better yet, "I judge people one by one, not in groups." There is truth to these viewpoints, but they ignore the reality of genetics and DNA-encoded behavioral response patterns.

It may well be that Alan Keyes (a recent black candidate for president who clearly was the best of an otherwise vapid field of whites) will never steal my hubcaps. However, even he will pass along his jungle-evolved DNA to children and grandchildren, some of whom will rape and kill my children and grandchildren in numbers consistent with their cousins across America. Yes, there must be full racial separation, else we are right back where we started in only a generation or two.

But, separation hardly will be a tragedy. After all, the races in America already show distinct preferences for their own kind in all situations: school, work and domestic. And, all but the white race are permitted to separate themselves in America. Whites can't do it because that would be racist, donchaknow. Fact is, other races want to invade our space only when it gives them some advantage which they cannot otherwise obtain for themselves.

The same rationale can be employed with regard to the hordes of Mexican illegals now occupying southwest America , given their demonstrated predilection for criminal behavior. And some Pacific Islanders such as Tongans and Samoans. Possibly Filipinos and Puerto Ricans, as well.

However, and this is where the rationale loses its ability to be called true racism, other races need not be segregated for reasons of physical safety. There is no demonstrated disproportionate proclivity for violence on the part of Asians, for example. Or Russians. Or Eskimos. Or any of a number of other racial groups.

In reality, the beef that real racists and racialists have is over the issue of safety. Without the black and Mexican elements of American society, most racists would be living blissfully unaware lives, just like other Americans do at present.

There is another racial group in America that is less obvious because of the lack of physical markers, but which presents an even greater menace to the safety and well being of white Americans on many levels, not just that of physical safety. Indeed, this group has made it possible, through black civil rights and unchecked illegal immigration, for both blacks and Mexicans to threaten the physical well being of white America, thus are to be held accountable for that harm, as well. We take up examination of that racial group and the rationale for its exclusion, as well, in the next segment.

-ed

"I didn't say it would be easy. I just said it would be the truth." - Morpheus

Copyright ©2003, Edgar J. Steele

Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate

among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet

sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications.

Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

On-Line link to this article in HTML format: [url=http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/racism5.htm]http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/racism5.htm[/url]

Nagelfar

2003-08-11 10:35 | User Profile

one could not make their way from one side of a room to the other if it weren't for personal prejudice & the ability to discriminate one thing from another. it is an objective way of working with decisions on tangible pieces of reality. we also have this choice with race. we can use social engineering and change our characteristics, completely remove certain characteristics, make ourselves into what we please, as a matter of import to ourselves, especially when it effects intrinsically what we will be. or ignore this ability, which would be as foolish as ignoring any other manifest object laid before your senses; that is the definitive meaning of 'ignorance'. we would ignore this out of fear that we ourselves can be judged, grasping at base survival instincts over human intellect & ability to mold our sphere of influence into the future and beyond our individual lives. racism/racialism is stigmatized because it isn't directly relatable to conventional welfare (and even is opposed to it); only to the welfare of advancement. it is also dangerous to 'democracy' as the opinions of differing peoples and the survival of their individual type as their own priority, has to be taken into account by a state system which considers itself the collective will of that to which it pertains rather than a vehicle to increase the amount of human civilization. to-day's society sees advancement as so subjective, that as long as anything "advances", be it the best possible thing to advance, or something degenerate that advances, that we seem to be 'getting somewhere' and civilization seems safe. this infact is not "advancement" at all, but just progression. advancement is when the circumstances allow situation to grow better, progression is simply seeing something move forward. diseases can progress, one can also progress their way off the edge of a cliff. only what is better can 'advance'. until society sees what advances us as opposed to blind progression of any indiscriminate thing, can we then hope to see the ignorant nature of universalism in regard to diversity of form over diversity in action finally cease