← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Avalanche
Thread ID: 8933 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2003-08-10
2003-08-10 15:12 | User Profile
Alex Linder on Mel Gibson: quoted by Fbraun: Concerned about historical truth, we're!
I've begun to notice -- the 'defenses' of Mel are mostly about his "historical accuracy" and the attacks are often cloaked in "it's not historically accurate." (Latin instead of Greek etc.) When the hell did historical accuracy become the foundational requirement for making a film?!? (And who set that requirement?! And who is an dis not bound by it!?)
Mel can make any d@mned film he wants, showing any d@mned version of his belief structure he wants. WHY are we all pretending he needs the shield of historical accuracy?
Because we have bought into the jews' requirement that "well, MAYBE we can be allowed to say a few things IF we can prove a couple hundred times over that it's true and historical and unchallengable!"
We're already fighting a losing battle if we allow the jews to set the battlefield and the rules of engagement! Let's start standing up and saying Mel can make his film say ANYthing he wants it to-- the d@mned jew-filmakers do so, no matter WHO if offends! WHY are we allowing them to heap requirements and restrictions and insults on a film that THEY don't like?!