← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · toddbrendanfahey
Thread ID: 8537 | Posts: 47 | Started: 2003-07-28
2003-07-28 20:56 | User Profile
Polichinello (extremist) 07/28/03 03:31 PM
Re: We Have No Right to Happiness [ To: toddbrendanfahey | Post 782535, reply to 782505 ] (Score: 2)
I quit participating in that forum months ago. I look in every now and again, though, and see if I'm still mentioned, which I am, with no small amount of bile I'm happy to see.
2003-07-28 20:59 | User Profile
*Originally posted by toddbrendanfahey@Jul 28 2003, 14:56 * ** with no small amount of bile I'm happy to see. **
Yes, the release of bile in the public forums is a great problem, one that I am constantly complaining about. Of course, I myself am not completely innocent, I often use the derrogatory remark "neo-Nazi" instead of the technical term "National Socialist" as a way of insulting. I will no longer do this.
Regards,
Ares
2003-07-28 22:06 | User Profile
** I look in every now and again, though, and see if I'm still mentioned, which I am, with no small amount of bile I'm happy to see.**
What a jewish sentiment.
2003-07-28 22:42 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Leland Gaunt@Jul 28 2003, 15:41 * ** I don't consider "nationalsocialist" as insult. I am proud of it. **
Yes, Texas Dissident does have a policy of allowing Nationalist Socialists to post on the forums. Of course, if this was my forum, I would follow the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
Regards,
Ares
2003-07-28 23:38 | User Profile
toddbrendanfahey(Posted: Jul 28 2003, 21:56)> ** [color=red]Polichinello[/color] (extremist) 07/28/03 03:31 PM
Re: We Have No Right to Happiness [ To: toddbrendanfahey | Post 782535, reply to 782505 ] (Score: 2)
I quit participating in that forum months ago. I look in every now and again, though, and see if I'm still mentioned, which I am, with no small amount of bile I'm happy to see. **
[color=yellow]Yellow Polichinello[/color] was the single most dishonest person I have come across on the internet. I cannot imagine him changing. I wish he were here and had enough b*lls to confront his lies. He pretends to believe the most outrageous statements so that he may affirm his manhood.
Yet the single worst thing about this creature was his need to corrupt others. His being so dishonorable that he makes all others seem reputable irritated the most. May this snotty twerp have justice delivered to him some day.
2003-07-29 02:51 | User Profile
Originally posted by madrussian@Jul 28 2003, 22:06 * > ** I look in every now and again, though, and see if I'm still mentioned, which I am, with no small amount of bile I'm happy to see.*
What a jewish sentiment.**
What your response be if I told you Polichinello said "what a Russian sentiment"?
("What a Jewish sentiment"? :lol:)
2003-07-29 03:03 | User Profile
I don't know what the brouhaha underlying this is, so I can't comment.
However since I was, to paraphrase, called "jew-hypnotized" for using an allusion involving the "Matrix," I can only imagine.
Imagine that Frostfire, Veronicitzim, Cachelot et assorted Tribal lurkers- moi, blinded by the tribe.
For those who don't truly value free speech in all its diverse manifestations, the Iron echt NS evangelizers can be a bit hard to take.
2003-07-29 08:56 | User Profile
You react as if burning agitprop is a bad thing. If Americans had followed suit with The Authoritarian Personality and The Feminine Mystique, among others, things might be somewhat different today. We could even put them to a constructive use for a change and use them as fuel for electric generators. The possibilities are endless. B)
2003-07-29 13:05 | User Profile
That honorable soldier today would be throwing televitz's. :th:
2003-07-29 15:06 | User Profile
*Originally posted by godlesscapitalist@Jul 29 2003, 06:27 * ** One way the Nazis cleansed the country of "un-German" thoughts was through censorship. A "brown shirt" (member of the SA) throws some more fuel--"un-German" books-- into a roaring fire on the Opernplatz in Berlin. May 10, 1933. Photo credit: USHMM Photo Archives **
Physically burning books is a trivial sidenote to the fact that books deemed undesirable were banned, which is as true today as it was when the photo was taken. Germany still bans books, it's just done without the photo-opportunities.
What's more, the ban on undesirable books and prosecution of speech cimes is getting worse. The EU is used as a vector to spread the most repressive laws to all EU states.
PS: Welcome to OD Godless. GNXP is very interesting and informative site.
2003-07-29 16:08 | User Profile
In 1935 the Germans passed the [u]Nuremberg Laws [/u]which said Jews could no longer vote or work in Public Service.
One part of it never discussed was [color=red]" Jews cannot employ white females under 45 ".[/color]
Jews would bang their housekeepers and secreteries -- If they didn't comply they were fired ( German jobs were scarce because of the horrible economy)
Not to sound anti semetic but Chancellor Hitler did the 'Right thing'
[img]http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/r/professor2222/jewschool.jpg[/img]
2003-07-30 05:57 | User Profile
**What, you think white slaveowners didn't rape their slaves? **
The historical record says it was rare. Less rare for Jewish slaveowners.
**Or that banging the secretary isn't a rather universal occurrence? **
It is definitely not a universal occurrence.
2003-07-30 06:43 | User Profile
Originally posted by Okiereddust@Jul 28 2003, 19:51 * *What your response be if I told you Polichinello said "what a Russian sentiment"?
("What a Jewish sentiment"? :lol:)**
Bei zhidov, spasai Rossiu -- Beat the zhids, save Russia :gun: :sm:
2003-07-30 06:59 | User Profile
Originally posted by madrussian+Jul 30 2003, 00:43 -->
QUOTE (madrussian @ Jul 30 2003, 00:43 ) <!--QuoteBegin-Okiereddust@Jul 28 2003, 19:51 * *What your response be if I told you Polichinello said "what a Russian sentiment"? ("What a Jewish sentiment"?ÃÂ :lol:)**
Bei zhidov, spasai Rossiu -- Beat the zhids, save Russia :gun: :sm:**
General Wrangel, ah presumes! :afro:
mwdallas
2003-07-30 07:05 | User Profile
The genetic record does not:
Stop insulting my intelligence. The cited article provides zero support for your claim.
First, a very small influx of white genes into the black population can affect the black gene pool significantly if blacks prefer to mate with blacks who have some European ancestry. And blacks do indeed discriminate in favor of lighter-skinned blacks.
Second, any widespread practice of rape of slaves would have resulted in a far higher percentage of white ancestry among the black population.
Third, admixture does not imply rape.
il ragno
2003-07-30 20:11 | User Profile
**What, you think white slaveowners didn't rape their slaves? Or that banging the secretary isn't a rather universal occurrence? **
If you ever did a headcount of black hats 'n' earlocks on 42nd Street back when it was Peepshow & Pross Central, you'd know Jews make a specialty of combining the Massa and Boss approaches both. Two great tastes that taste great together, so to speak. For a Jew it's unbeatable: a hot piece of strange to service him, followed by the chance to patronize and impress a gullible talking chimp as if he were King Solomon himself in an expansive post-coital mood. If there's one shared experience that makes all black hookers kin, it's the sight of a man in a yarmulke undoing his trousers. Without Orthodox & stealth Jews, most black hookers would have to dangle an OUT OF BUSINESS pest-strip from their pudendas.
As for the standard agitprop we're buried under daily - Jefferson and Sally, randy slaveowners, etc....well, some of that doubtless happened, but hell - it improved the breed! If it wasn't for bed-wenchin' 150 years ago, we'd be looking at 30 million LaWanda Pages today, instead of one Beyonce Knowles for every 8 or 10 Aunt Esthers.
il ragno
2003-07-30 20:18 | User Profile
**So if "black" women are ugly (as racists like to claim), why do they give Hymieee such a hard-on? **
Their beauty relates directly to the amount of white in 'em, dear. Surely even non-racists have commented on this or that black actress' "white features".
As for why Shmuel & Pincas go for them, I would suspect it ties directly in to their exploitability. No money, no property and little education mean no power, and that's a turn-on for certain people. Like slumlords & sweat-shop employers.
il ragno
2003-07-30 22:59 | User Profile
**You'll notice that many 'black' women in music videos and the like have very 'African' features - ample lips, big butts, etc. Should be obvious to you that many find this appealing, or it wouldn't sell.
I think your view of black women is pretty outmoded. Despite all the prejudice & stereotyping levied against them (which is very real), most 'black' Americans are now in the middle class or above. **
What's your last name, Raina - Doody or Guano?
il ragno
2003-07-30 23:33 | User Profile
**You're all emotion.. no logic.. oddly, exactly how women are stereotyped to be. **
Yeah, well, it's my heavy day...and these bulky pads are a pain....
What 'logic' is involved with a discussion of why certain people are attracted to certain other people, and why? There is no logic in attraction except whatever you can cobble together after the fact. De gustibus non est disputandum, after all.
And frankly, I'd rather read ad hominems than any more of your "race is a construct", "'white' is a myth", "all great societies have always been diverse melting pots" sophistries. Y'ever notice the people who parrot that last one - you know, "Britain had Jutes and Picts and they ended up giving us the Magna Carta, so who knows what benefit to mankind Somalis and Bantus in the Corn Belt will bring?" - are the very same people who turn purple with rage when you rebut with "every great society has been built upon slavery"?
Campion Moore Boru
2003-07-31 20:16 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 13:23 * **
Far from turning purple with rage, I'll say there's some truth to that (tho' it's hardly a rebuttal!). Slavery has been very common throughout history - often involving groups of 'whites' enslaving other groups of 'whites'. This doesn't mean that slavery is the most desirable or even most efficient way to build a society. **
Frankly, a retarded comment.
"Often" involving? I would suggest a cursory historical review of any tribe in Africa. Though of course, whether "civilization" resulted from these practices on that continent I leave to your logic and non-emotional reply.
Try also, any history of the near east, pre-Columbine America, or South Asia. Seems you restrict "History" exclusively to the "White" man's previous escapades. Tres racist of you.
Alka
2003-07-31 20:41 | User Profile
I would like to lend my observation that Polichinello has not quit OD at all. If anyone is curious, you only need to take a look at Polichinello's posts and compare them to that of Ares. Polichinello/Ares signs his posts in exactly the same manner, and the flavour is exactly the same.
This individual has multiple accounts across the Internet from which he spews his obvious agenda.
It is unfortunate that there seems to be no means of ensuring that only one IP address is allowed to register at this forum.
Edana
2003-07-31 21:49 | User Profile
I highly doubt that Ares is Polich. Polich spends his time at LF and his style doesn't strike me as the same at all.
madrussian
2003-07-31 21:56 | User Profile
I don't see much similarity either. Polichinello is a smirking zhid. Ares is an (failing) artificial intelligence program :lol:
Eendracht Maakt Mag
2003-07-31 22:01 | User Profile
Excuse me, but doesn't this amount to a confession of being Polichinello on Ares's behalf?
Originally posted by Ares+Jul 28 2003, 14:59 -->
QUOTE* (Ares @ Jul 28 2003, 14:59 ) <!--QuoteBegin-toddbrendanfahey@Jul 28 2003, 14:56 * ** with no small amount of bile I'm happy to see. ** Yes, the release of bile in the public forums is a great problem, one that [color=red]I am constantly complaining about[/color]. **
Franco
2003-08-01 01:54 | User Profile
duhhh, gee -- I did not know that NATIONALISM [thinking and acting racially to benefit your race ONLY, and nobody else] could include ALL humans.
D-oh!! :blink: Guess I have been drinkin' waaay too much vodka.... [hiccup]... [hiccup]....[hiccup]....
Franco
2003-08-01 02:02 | User Profile
duhhhh....fer sure?... :shock: Then how come dem darkies be sooo dark??
Franco
2003-08-01 02:14 | User Profile
Nahh, I just don't like BoolieCoons... :)
Franco
2003-08-01 02:32 | User Profile
I have no problems with Greeks unless they are super-dark. Ditto Italians.
Jews are a whole 'nother ballgame. Inbred, hybrid [Ashkenazim] people who are UNLIKE ANY OTHER HUMANS... :dung:
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 03:06 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 20:36 * ** So if a Jew were raised as an 'Aryan' by an 'Aryan' family from birth, you'd still regard him/her as a dangerous enemy? **
Depends. If the Jude in question had completly abandoned any parochial loyalties to his tribe, was isolated from other Juden (and hence, did not have an opportunity to cultivate his genetic propensity for radical in-group altruism) and did not participate in his culture, then no...I would not consider him to be an enemy. I am sure that there are numerous Juden who fit this profile...but they are the exception, not the rule.
As an aside, Raina...despite what Franco may have said, Race does not = skin tone. You are intelligent enough to understand this...but the reality of race seems to make you uncomfortable.
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 03:15 | User Profile
Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 18:39 * ** > *So then why are you stumping for multiracialism? Couldn't it also be said that this, like slavery, is not "the most desirable or even efficient way" to build a society?
Wintermute**
I don't advocate multiracialism. The scientific data show that there's only one human race remaining: homo sapiens sapiens. Unless, that is, Michael Crichton can somehow resurrect homo sapiens neanderthalis & other extinct races of humankind.
I'm human racialist & nationalist. As such, I support the political & cultural unification of the human race. Once this is peaceably accomplished, every beneficial process will be far more efficient. Universal education, readily available birth control & abortion services (particularly in the developing world, where these are needed most), & a common human identity will solve the most pressing problems. E.g.: Tropical Africa will stop being a pesthole soon after its reproductive rates are lowered near W. European levels. This will allow an effective campaign of (environmentally friendly) industrialization, the introduction of advanced education, medicine & sanitation, & easier development of a humanist ethos. The oppressive tropical diseases could also be brought under control - albeit with some effort - once the population stopped skyrocketing. **
So you favor:
-The destruction of ancient cultures. -The elimination of organic ethnic bonds. -The relegation of people to passive instruments of the powerful. -The establishment of a leviathan, global police state apparatus.
This sounds absolutely wonderful...I can't think of anywhere I'd rather live than in a cultureless nightmare world that resembles a cross between Huxley's and Orwell's worst-case scenarios.
Edana
2003-08-01 03:32 | User Profile
Well said, Walter. She seeks One World Government/Global Socialism. And she accuses us "Neo-Nazis" of wanting "World Domination". Sheesh... talk about chutzpah.
il ragno
2003-08-01 03:36 | User Profile
Well, she doesn't back down from a fight, which is actually a good thing. Too many 'amens' make an echo chamber; it sharpens the senses knowing you're gonna have to bring your A game to the ballpark if you expect to win. I liked Polchinello for that reason and I like Raina as well.
Of course, she's as nutty as pistachio ice cream, but utopian insanity hasn't exactly hindered one's political cachet in the West these past 50 or so years.
il ragno
2003-08-01 03:37 | User Profile
I have no problems with Greeks unless they are super-dark. Ditto Italians.
Does that extend to Southerners who work long hours outdoors in the hot sun, too?
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 03:37 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Edana@Jul 31 2003, 21:32 * ** Well said, Walter. She seeks One World Government/Global Socialism. And she accuses us "Neo-Nazis" of wanting "World Domination". Sheesh... talk about chutzpah. **
Agreed.
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 03:44 | User Profile
Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 21:36 * ** > *So you favor:
-The destruction of ancient cultures. **
No, but rather their transformation & sublimation into a united human metaculture.
Anyway, get real! What ancient cultures are you talking about? How much do you have in common with an ancient German tribesman? Bloody little, I'd wager.
**-The elimination of organic ethnic bonds. **
To the contrary, the many hands of humanity will join into an organically united ethnocultural group.
-The relegation of people to passive instruments of the powerful.
Huh? That's the status quo! I advocate moving away from that. With everyone well educated & equitable distribution of wealth, it will be more difficult than ever to turn people into mere instruments of power.
The establishment of a leviathan, global police state apparatus.
Where the hell do you get that? There is already such an apparatus; it's called the United States. I advocate abolishing this setup in favor of a free global federation.
**This sounds absolutely wonderful...I can't think of anywhere I'd rather live than in a cultureless nightmare world that resembles a cross between Huxley's and Orwell's worst-case scenarios. **
In what way does it resemble such scenarios? Orwell was a progressive socialist & antinazi who would have agreed with much of what I propose. Ditto Huxley. **
The concept of a "human metaculture" is laughable and preposterous. Culture is not created by bureaucratic edict...this is why "New Soviet Man" has gone the way of the Velociraptor.
I have a great deal in common with a Germanic Tribesman. These folks were my ancient ancestors. The values, traditions, ethics, etc. that my family has adhered to for generations were cultivated by these Teutons who tilled the soil of ancient Europe.
The "status quo" is intolerable...and it is the result of the destruction of self-government and the centralization of political authority. The establishment of a global regime would smash the remaining vestiges of accountability in government.
George Orwell was a (albeit misguided) socialist who despised tyranny. He was not a mealy mouthed, effeminate Trotskyite who loved the Juden, praised miscegenation, and hated his own culture.
Edana
2003-08-01 03:47 | User Profile
So, who are the unelected bureaucrats in charge of this global utopian scheme, Raina? How do they carry it out? How do they enforce their will on everyone? How do you plan to make this "cultural and political unification" of every nation and tribe on earth? Kill off or crush everyone who doesn't want to go along? Sounds a little Stalin-esque. Break a few eggs, make a global omelet.
Franco
2003-08-01 03:50 | User Profile
Kindly note that Jews are a race/ethnic group. 'Who raised them?' is moot. Converts to Judaism do not count... and they are very rare.
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 03:53 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Franco@Jul 31 2003, 21:50 * ** Kindly note that Jews are a race/ethnic group. 'Who raised them?' is moot. Converts to Judaism do not count... and they are very rare. **
True. However, Yockey praised Stalin after the hanging of several Juden (under the auspices of the "Doctor's Plot") because he felt that Stalin was attempting to establish a variant of National Socialism in the USSR. Yockey continued by stating that during Stalin's later years in power, he effectively destroyed the power base of the Juden because Stalin's regime did not permit "a Jew to behave as a Jew"...food for thought. I don't accept the premise completely, but it is a valid premise. If Jewish culture distortion was not tolerated, and their tribal ethos undermined, Jews would no longer be a threat.
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 04:00 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 21:57 * ** The Spider's right that debate & discussion are great things. It's good to see that some people here recognize that.
But how is human nationalism utopian? It's actually rather practical in its proposals & goals. Globalization is reality. Modernization & enlightenment made it possible. Advances in communications, transportation, & other technologies have made it inevitable. *Attempting to reverse globalization is utopian! * The question then becomes what to do about globalization, rather than how to reverse it. Human nationalists propose that we harness these new technologies to reverse the population explosion & develop a common human identity. This is certainly more pragmatic & less utopian than, say, the program of the National Alliance. The results would be extremely practical & relevant to the average person.
How annoyed by Mexicans will you be once their reproductive rate drops to Euro levels? Imagine if that same rate held true in Asia and Africa. With modern technology, we can make this happen. We can nip overpopulation in the bud and greatly enhance the quality of life for everyone.
White nationalism tends to be mystical & often religion-based. Human nationalism of the kind I espouse is scientific & pragmatic. Clearly, WN is more often utopian in its orientation. **
You're mistaken. The global centralization of political authority will enslave the masses of the world. You cannot grant men this sort of power and expect them to act as anything other than Tyrant-Kings.
RE: "The Global Village"
The reason why Somali Bantus and other Third World riff-raff behave like savages is not because they don't have access to abortion on demand, can't watch cable TV, and don't enjoy purchasing power parity with Americans...rather, the reason why the unwashed masses are impoverished is because they act like savages.
Edana
2003-08-01 04:06 | User Profile
Who's going to enforce and carry out this depopulation campaign? The Mao Division of the Global Police Force?
Who's going to fund all of this? I suppose we'll need to create a World Tax for the World Schools and the World Depopulation Campaign (why not save some money and just shoot them all?) and the World Technology and Transportation System. Then we'll need the World Re-education Camps for all the people who don't want to be politically and culturally unified. We might need a World War to reign some unwilling nations and populations in. We can use our World Military.
Edana
2003-08-01 04:08 | User Profile
You cannot grant men this sort of power and expect them to act as anything other than Tyrant-Kings.
You neo-nazi Hitlerite!
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 04:11 | User Profile
Originally posted by Edana@Jul 31 2003, 22:08 * ** > You cannot grant men this sort of power and expect them to act as anything other than Tyrant-Kings.*
You neo-nazi Hitlerite! **
Guilty as charged. When I misbehave in the global schoolhouse, the Hillarys and Rainas of the world will be forced to send me to the detention Gulag until I either perish or am sufficiently broken so that I will no longer disrupt the global classroom.
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 04:14 | User Profile
Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 22:11 * ** It's amazing to get a lecture about tyranny from a National Socialist! Someone whose very philosophy exalts tyranny (fuehrerprinzip) criticising me for imagined* tyrannical impulses. There's something deliciously ironic about that.... **
When did I say that I'm a National Socialist? I believe in the Old Republic and the Constitution that it had. I AM partial to Yockey's account of history...although some regard it as nothing more than a bastardization of Spengler's ideas.
I'd be lying if I said that I didn't get shivers when I imagine leigons of Waffen troopers from the great nations of Europe laying waste to scores of Reds...but that just makes me a romantic...not a National Socialist.
Edana
2003-08-01 04:22 | User Profile
Raina, I think you've won the trophy in tyrannical impulses here. You want to impose your will on billions of people and the entire globe, whereas people here just want a small section to call our own. You just cloak your tyrannical impulses with the guise of altruism. They all must submit to your will for their own good. You're no better than Americans who go to war to spread "Freedom, Democracy, and Capitalism" for their own good, but you think you're morally superior just because when your ideologues are in charge, they will magically be uncorruptable even with the globe in their grip. Sorry, lady. Your Global bureaucrats and politicians will be lining their pockets and feasting off the corruption just like they do today and do in America. They will also be beholden to Global Financers whom you probably despise. Be careful what you wish for.
Walter E Kurtz
2003-08-01 04:32 | User Profile
Originally posted by Raina@Jul 31 2003, 22:25 * ** > *1.ÃÂ The concept of a "human metaculture" is laughable and preposterous. **
If so then the concept of a "White culture" is equally preposterous.
A human metaculture is already in development. The similarities between each human culture far outweigh the differences. Even Jung (ironically favored by some Nazis) postulated a collective unconscious - a common archetypical metaculture of great depth & magnitude.
Culture is not created by bureaucratic edict...this is why "New Soviet Man" has gone the way of the Velociraptor.
I don't propose to create any culture by bureaucratic edict. Quite unlike the National Alliance or WCOTC...
2.ÃÂ I have a great deal in common with a Germanic Tribesman.ÃÂ These folks were my ancient ancestors.ÃÂ The values, traditions, ethics, etc. that my family has adhered to for generations were cultivated by these Teutons who tilled the soil of ancient Europe.
Then why do you rant against savages? The ancient German berserkers & the Viking barbarians prided themselves in their savagery.
3.ÃÂ The "status quo" is intolerable...and it is the result of the destruction of self-government and the centralization of political authority.ÃÂ The establishment of a global regime would smash the remaining vestiges of accountability in government.
You assume that a global government would need to be highly centralized. That's like assuming the United States - a country with huge landmass - need have a tyrannical government. This is a silly assumption, to say the least.
4.ÃÂ George Orwell was a (albeit misguided) socialist who despised tyranny.ÃÂ He was not a mealy mouthed, effeminate Trotskyite who loved the Juden, praised miscegenation, and hated his own culture.
& neither am I. I'm straightforward & direct, the opposite of mealy mouthed. I'm female, not effeminate. I'm no Trotskyite - not even close. I'm highly critical of Jewish culture & religion. I don't praise what is not currently possible. I love human culture & seek to preserve it for eternity. **
- The difference between White culture and "human metaculture" is as follows:
"White" culture in America is a series of traditions, values, and normative behaviors that refelct the traditions, values, and normative behaviors of the Anglo-Germanic founders of America. "Human metaculture" is essentially a politically created, externally imposed social arrangment that benefits global capitalists.
The WCOTC and the NA are both sideshow acts. I don't need to address this issue. Neither "organization" is relevant socially or politically.
Germans and Vikings were far from "savages". Why don't you research the legendary shipbuilding ability of the Norse. "Savages" are people who do things like cannibalizing each other for shits and giggles...sort of like the Negros of the Congo that you wish to incorporate into your "human metaculture".
How can the world be controlled by a governmental entity that is not centralized? By definition, a global government is the opposite of sovreign national governments.
Edana
2003-08-01 04:43 | User Profile
Attempting to reverse globalization is utopian!
Anyone else reminded of Marxist ideologues who claim(ed) that Communism is inevitable and then used a dialectic "scientific" process which proved that Communism is inevitable?
Sure, globalism of a sorts (plutocratic) is very powerful. Does that mean it's a good thing? Who would really want to be under the power of corrupt One World bureaucrats and Global Financing Organizations with forced World Education and World Taxation? That sounds like crap, so let's just dress it up with a bunch of altruistic stuff like "Our Global Human Political Unification will get rid of poverty, make everything environmental friendly, bring all the third-world nations to first-world living standards, then we'll feel all unified and hug/fornicate with each other." Talk about putting rose-colored glasses on and sympathizing with the tyrants. No thanks to global plutocrats and their little do-gooder dupes.
friedrich braun
2003-08-07 07:11 | User Profile
Originally posted by Leveller+Jul 29 2003, 09:06 -->
QUOTE* (Leveller @ Jul 29 2003, 09:06 ) <!--QuoteBegin-godlesscapitalist@Jul 29 2003, 06:27 * ** One way the Nazis cleansed the country of "un-German" thoughts was through censorship. A "brown shirt" (member of the SA) throws some more fuel--"un-German" books-- into a roaring fire on the Opernplatz in Berlin. May 10, 1933. Photo credit: USHMM Photo Archives ** **
Coming from the South Asian known as "godlesscapitalist" that's really rich! He runs his blog "gene expression" with all the haughty imperiousness of a typical oriental despot! He anathematizes and excommunicates anyone who strongly disagree with him; the list of the individuals whom he has banned is long and distinguished (he also enjoys editing other people's posts that he deems not to be quite to his delicate taste). Whatââ¬â¢s the difference between banning a contributor, or deleting his posts, and placing an anti-German, or decadent, author on the Index? Whatââ¬â¢s the difference between deleting posts and burning books? The bottom line is that unpopular ideas donââ¬â¢t get aired, i.e., itââ¬â¢s a distinction without a difference.
Adolf Hitler didnââ¬â¢t have anything to do with the book burning of May 10, 1933. [url=http://www.cyberussr.com/hcunn/volkisch.html]http://www.cyberussr.com/hcunn/volkisch.html[/url]
David Irving writes:
ââ¬ÅAn acrid stench filled the Berlin air as Hitler was dining with Auwi the next evening. He heard that an enormous bonfire of books was blazing beneath newsreel floodlights in the Opera square, and made a wry comment about Goebbelsââ¬â¢ revolutionary activism.2 In fact Goebbels was not the instigator.3 The partyââ¬â¢s student organisation had first approached his ministry a month earlier for financial support for this symbolic burning of decadent and anti-German literature. Although they had listed him as principal speaker in a draft programme as early as April 10 for several weeks he had kept his distance: he had after all studied under famous Jewish teachers like Waldberg and Gundolf. It was not until a week before the event that his adjutant finally conveyed to the students his agreement to deliver the main speech.4 Between the Opera and the university they had erected a criss-cross log pyre, some twelve feet square and five feet high, on a thick bed of sand. Some streets away, five thousand students assembled in their full regalia and solemnly marched to the square carrying flaming torches, with an S.A. marching band at their head. Forty thousand Berliners packed the square. As the students hove into sight, followed by motorized tumbrils charged with the condemned books and pamphlets, the Berlinersââ¬â¢ cheering turned into mass hysteria. ââ¬ËI thought theyââ¬â¢d all gone stark raving mad,ââ¬â¢ wrote Bella Fromm privately, ââ¬Ëparticularly the womenfolk.ââ¬â¢5 The students marched around the bonfire tossing books onto it. Indictments were read over the loudspeakers. As each hated author was named, the cheers rang louderââ¬â and not just in Berlin: in every German university city the bonfires blazed that night, on the Königsplatz in Munich, the Römerberg in Frankfurt, and the Castle Square in Breslau. At midnight the Little Doctor himself drove up and mounted the swastika-decked rostrum. Golo Mann, a student witness of the scene, noticed that Goebbels seemed distinctly ill at ease.6 His brief radio commentary was heard all over Germany. ââ¬ËThe Age of Jewish Intellectualism is over,ââ¬â¢ he remarked, in a tone that was more reasoned than inflammatory.7 ââ¬ËThis symbolic fire is blazing now outside many a German university, to show the world that here the intellectual basis of the November Republic is sinking into the ground.ââ¬â¢ ââ¬ËIf the old men cannot understand what is going on,ââ¬â¢ he intoned, ââ¬Ëthen let them grasp that we young men have gone and done it!ââ¬â¢ The ugly bonfires seized the worldââ¬â¢s headlines. The New York Times devoted a whole page to the bonfires, and published the Nazisââ¬â¢ list of 160 proscribed authors in full.8 Not all the confiscated books were burned. A paper mill paid one mark (27â) per hundred kilos (220 pounds) for the rest. The regurgitated paper reappeared over ensuing months bearing the stamp of a very different propaganda. Speaking in the Sport Palace the next day Goebbels warned the Jews against continuing their international boycott against Germany. ââ¬ËWe have spared the Jews,ââ¬â¢ he said, ââ¬Ëbut if they think ââ¬Â¦ that they can again stroll down the Kurfürstendamm as if nothing at all has happened, let them heed my words as a last warning.ââ¬â¢ The Jews were guests in Germany, he said, and must behave accordingly.9" See [url=http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Goebbels/Goebbels.pdf]http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Goebbels/Goebbels.pdf[/url]
Adolf Hitler was a lover of books and a voracious reader (see [url=http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2003/05/ryback.htm)]http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2003/05/ryback.htm)[/url]
Overall, the intellectual freedom during the Nazi period wasnââ¬â¢t heavily restrained (nothing in comparison with Bolshevik Russia, for example).