← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · yummybear

Thread 8440

Thread ID: 8440 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2003-07-25

Wayback Archive


yummybear [OP]

2003-07-25 07:28 | User Profile

[url=http://www.rense.com/general39/unlim.htm]http://www.rense.com/general39/unlim.htm[/url]


Rense.com

Ready For Unlimited Immigration? The End Of America?

From Daniel Johns minuteman53@mindspring.com 7-24-3

In days, Congress will decide on unlimited immigration. What does "unlimited" mean? One million? Ten million? Why not 400 million? The word "unlimited" means unlimited. How will you keep track of unlimited numbers? Who will pay for the unlimited welfare and medical? Will you be out-voted by unlimited numbers of immigrants? Remember the phrase "open borders?" or NAFTA "open borders", project of the United Nations? or "unlimited immigration" project of the UN? or "population resettlement" program of the UN? or UN's "free-trade" plan to abolish national borders? or UN's plan to abolish nationhood? Congress is pushing for the UN's goal of unlimited immigration. The Facts: In the next few days, Congress is expected to approve official trade agreements with Chile and Singapore. These Free Trade Agreements would allow an unlimited number of "temporary" immigrants to enter the US. "Legal" precedents would be established. Then, unlimited Chinese, Pakistanis, Mongolians, Burmese or Bangladesh? Why not 130 million from India, Morocco, Iran, North Korea, Zambia, Liberia or Turkey? Unlimited numbers!
These official Free Trade Agreements are the stepping stones to a European-style regional government for the Western Hemisphere, to be completed by 2005. There would be no national borders in North America, Central or South America. It would spell the end of American sovereignty. What we are talking about here is a conspiracy to bring about the end of American nationhood, on the way to world government; our Constitution and Bill of Rights become irrelevant. We are in the last stages of seeing a world effectively controlled by unelected and unaccountable agents of the United Nations. American power brokers are giving their critical support to the plan because they expect to be in charge of their new world order. Now do you understand The John Birch Society's long-time efforts to Get US out of the United Nations? http://www.getusout.org/www.getusout.org. For More Information: Read "Trading Away Jobs and Liberty," by William F.Jasper, The New American, June 30, 2003.
[url=http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2003/06302003/vo19no13_trading.htm]http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2003/063...o13_trading.htm[/url] www.thenewamerican.com. and http://www.getusout.org/www.getusout.org Free Trade Agreements are the excuse for unlimited immigration. Free Trade Agreements will result in the end of nationhood. FTAs and unlimited immigration will destroy America.
Requested action: Because of the August 1 deadline, please take prompt pro-action with continuing efforts to urge your US Rep. and your two US senators to: Vote NO! on Chile and Singapore Trade Agreements and Get US out of the United Nations Faxes and phones are excellent, plus emails. It's all over at 5PM CST on Friday, August 1, 2003.
Please forward this email to your list and your US Rep. & your two US senators. Add your name at the bottom if you want. Contact your US Representative & both senators at: 1-800-648-3516
anytime, night or day. Email addresses for the U.S. House of Representatives: http://www.house.gov/http://www.house.gov Email addresses for the U.S. Senate: http://www.senate.gov/http://www.senate.gov

Disclaimer


Okiereddust

2003-07-25 23:14 | User Profile

A couple of interesting articles on the bills.

[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42616-2003Jul24.html]Washington Post[/url]

[url=http://www.statesman.com/business/content/auto/epaper/editions/today/business]Statesman[/url]

The bills passed today, 270-155. GOP 197-27, Dems 75-127. Voting records are at [url=http://clerkweb.house.gov/cgi-bin/vote.exe?year=2003&rollnumber=432]Congressional Rollcall[/url]

It should be noted that although the bills passed, protests about the immigration provisions resulted in significant changes in this and other bills substantially reducing their bad effects.