← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · triskelion
Thread ID: 8385 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2003-07-23
2003-07-23 20:39 | User Profile
When looking over forums such as these I note that determining what exactly is the foundation of our belief in racialism for the purpose of determining what exactly we wish to accomplish and why is almost never addressed explicitly. A forum,such as this one, is worth while to the extent that significant interaction and the useful exchange of ideas that result in positive action on behalf of national renewal takes place. As a result, I have decided to simply stating my perception of the matter in the hopes that a decent exchange can begin on this most crucial of matters.
Before one can consider the supposed merits of an ideal the definitions of the terms used must be succinctly stated. The first of which is race being a very large scale aggregate comprised of those that share a highly similar genetic legacy. The particular highly genetically similar population that we as Eurocentrics are foremost concerned with is our own Occidental race which consists of the indigenous populations of Europa no matter what nation they reside in . While one can debate the cutoff point at which the product of miscegenation ceases to be Occidental we should be able to agree that those individuals whose accessory are over whelmingly European should be accepted as racial kinsmen should they view themselves as such. A past that produced a collective sense of purpose in the form of folkways and aesthetics that provided for internal cohesion over a great number of generations is what I maintain defines Tradition. The political expression of racial interests and the Traditionalism of a homogeneous and fully sovereign folk should be what defines a nation rather then merely the perpetuation of coalition disparate interests seeking dominance over society as is currently the case. Such an expression can be either from the state or privately organized by societal interests but what makes such arrangements nationalistic is the extent to which they can be made to maintain and advance Traditionalism rather then simply impose a sectarian will upon the nation, state, or government at large. The means by which the collective affairs of the nation is carried out via a set of institutions that out live their creators is what I refer to as the state. A government is merely a temporary collection of individuals responsible for directing the institutions that comprise the state.
If racialism is to have a center, a reason for being, it is the notion that the various sub-species of humanity (i.e. the races) have intrinsic differences which manifest themselves in the sort of societies they produce and that such diversity should be preserved because the output of homogenous societies are objectively meritorious and unique. Inherent within this view is a recognition that demographics drives history and that a people which lack a collective sense of purpose and identity will be subsumed/destroyed by those that do via economic, military or cultural conquest which are forerunners, if not reversed, to demographic annihilation. Certainly, as Eurocentric racialists we do not believe that all cultures, and the races that create them, are equally productive forces of creation as we campion the objectivity and empiricism which are products of the Occidental mind.
The means by which one can determine the objective meritoriousness of a race or is at it's most basic a matter of the of the viability of a people. Self perpetuation entails more then simply keeping birth rates above death rates. It also means creating a society with a high degree of multi-generational domestic stability which in turn requires an infrastructure for the maintenance of independence from competing societies, a high degree of public health/sanitation, a reasonable level of physical safety for the populace as well as a means for the production and distribution of the goods and services needed to provide the aforementioned from domestic industriousness and ingenuity.
Given the previously mentioned criteria for racial viability and the undeniable fact that some races have simply never been able to create such a society it is self evident that the capacity for fostering civilization varies greatly among the races. When one looks about the world it is easy to see that widely disparate populations living within the confines of the same nation state have a long history of debilitating civil conflict which has it's natural byproducts racially based repression, genocide and civil war. All of these things make heterogenous political entities vulnerable to more cohesive societies in the never ending quest for diminishing natural resources and habitat.
Less tangible but equally important are the artifacts generated by the Traditionalism of a nation which are commonly referred to as "high" and "common" culture which is expressed as art, music and literature. These things are born not of focus groups and the need to sell that which is useless, conspicuous, banal and pathological as are the products of "pop culture" but rather of shared experiences and aesthetics that can only come from the interactions of a genetically similar community recognizing a common history producing a sense of mutual uniqueness and value. The utility of Traditionalism and the culture that spring s forth from it rests not with it's sophistication or genius but rather with the ability that such material has in fostering within those that consume it a sense of communion with one's Organic community, with those that created a society that produced such treasures as well as those who have and will inherit such a legacy and the genetic uniqueness which made it possible. A folkish society is one that places paramount importance upon the promotion of it's own Traditionalism and the race which it issued from as the ultimate arbitrator of morality and the public policy prescriptions that flow from it. In short, racialism is the practical expression of folkish values.
The folkish world view is pan Occidental and for racial Europeans worldwide. As such it accepts Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean, Baltic, Slavic, Iberian and other segments of our race as equally worthy aspects yet distinct aspects of European existence. We do not wish for a "generic Europa" homogenized like Velveeta but the preservation and furtherance of all Organic expressions of European diversity. For Occidentals outside of Europa the folkish vision entails excepts such homogenization and realizes that folkish expression should be influenced by local conditions as well as the legacy of our mutual motherland. Relations between Occidental states outside of Europa must be characterized by an understanding of our common interests in the preservation of the local racial foundations free from hegemonic ambitions of other European based states as well as freedom from third world conquest and Jewish control of socializing institutions. Pan Occidentalism does not entail a desire for race to serve as basis for a supra-state or confederation. Instead, the individual expressions of the intertwining of genetics and history that form the basis of nationhood are integral to our world view and as a result, those wish to embrace the folkish vision must reject intra-Occidental imperialism/hegemony or narrowly defined intra-racial narcism or primate chauvinism. Within the contexts of our racial kinfolk outside The simple yet stark and depressing reality is that Occidentals are roughly 8% of the world's population, comprise less then 2% of births and lack any note worthy exclusive habitats in a hostile world with diminishing resources. At this late date a failure to recognize that any all segments of our race share a similar oblivion without the liberation of the nations of Europa is a fantasy that is suicidal to entertain.
Within the contemporary era the notion most favoured by propasphere for Occidental consumption is the promotion of an "anti-culture". Values for our people within the current order are dependant upon transitory fadism in the service of crass materialism and self aggrandizement with the individual as sovereign and atomistic lusting after the vapid and trivial. Within such a country familial stability is the exception rather then the rule and socio-pathologies like rampant alcoholism, narcotic abuse, sexual deviancy and it's many byproducts create a societal environment in which individual restraint comes most commonly from force of law and satiating the gut and groin in accordance with the whims of those that mold public opinion.
Unfortunately for the current order and those that benefit from it the "anti-culture" contains within it the seeds of it's own demise. The nihilistic mania that has replaced the numerous expressions of the civilizing compulsion of Occidental humanity failed to suppress our productiveness and capacity for innovation to such an extent that alien populations have stopped seeking the bounties their own nations have failed to provide. This is because the simple reality that the kind of people determine what sort of country (or nation-state)one lives in is easily seen by noting that Mestizo, Asian, Turkish, Congoid etc. dominated areas within Occidental nations resemble the native environs of the inhabitants rather then the country as a whole. The dramatic disparities between abilities of our alien populations to create the material prosperity enjoyed by our middle and upper classes combined with their radically different folkways, demographic ascendance and the advanced decadence of our own people is the ultimate threat to the current order. The vast well of envy and hatred for Occidental man within the current climate of culture Bolshevism has turned the states of our nations into mere dispensers of confiscated largesse to the alien forces of decay. This subsidization of third world dysgenics will increase along with the alien share of the electorate rendering the current order economically unviable and politically untenable.
Coming back to the original questions of what do want, why do we want it and what does racialism have to offer I believe the answer is the instillation of a folkish society. The reason being that the folkish world view is the only paradigm that is based upon Occidental Traditionalism which is vital for long term societal stability and our survival as a distinct segment of humanity. Other systems of societal ordering be they from what are typically referred to as left or right are based upon the either the negation or destruction of our biologic uniqueness and have as a consequence either third world savagery or some variant of Bolshevism and the strangulation of that which created the material and cultural products we all value by a miasma of nihilistic crapulence and alien malevolence.
Before ending this discourse into our foundationalisms some brief mention must be made with respect to what the folkish vision is not. It is not hatred of that which is alien but a recognition of that which makes us unique and a recognition that the legitimacy of the state and of government comes from its ability to safeguard Occidental Traditionalism and the nation organic that gave rise to it. A folkish world view is not collectivist or totalitarian. Rather, it is a recognition that individuals have identities and responsibilities whose meaning and value are derived from obligations to past, present and future generations as well as to the Nation Organic that provides the Traditionalism from which we derive meaning and the capacity for salubrious living. Nostalgia for pastoral eras and regimes gone by and the Ludite impulse is not an accurate description of the folkish vision. It instead is an expression of the means to maintain Traditionalism to the greatest extent possible and that entails an understanding of how innovation impacts upon society as Heidegger did combined with the vision of Walther Darre tempered by industrial prudence. One should not view the folkish disposition as utopian. All of the vices of the current order will continue to exist and the human frailty and institutional short comings will remain. What the folkish gestalt offers is sound societal fundamentals which minimize the most grievous pathologies afflicting Occidental nations within the modern era.
Why Racialism Part 2: What's wrong with the libertine mind set that thinks porn and every variety of sexual deviancy such as pedophia which the Birdman supports can be answered by what the acceptance of such values means to society. In large measure, the basis of a healthy society is the nuclear family because the family is responsible for passing along a sense of identity and values across generations providing society providing cohesion and an understanding of obligations the individual has beyond himself. Traditional Occidental morals also provide an environment in which the perpetuation of our sub-species is encouraged by producing descendants within an environment in which they have the best chance of receiving the material and emotional support children need to become functioning members of a society and the understanding that something greater then the immediate demands of gut and groin should dominate their attentions. Without a firm, stable nuclear family a stable productive society simply can't exist.
Sexual deviancy places simple carnal desire above one's responsibility to that primal building block of society known as the family in a subservient position lust. Rather then strengthening societal cohesion the libertine mind set views individuals simply in terms of vessels of gratification for the transitory lusts of others. The acceptance of such an outlook has as an inevitable consequence the de-emphasis of common purpose and obligation which naturally allows for cohesive alien populations a chance to impose themselves upon a random collection of disassociated individuals which I think explains in large measure why libertine behavior is actively promoted by jews.
Naturally, sexual deviancy promotes the spread of disease and illegitimate birth which further help undermine the preservation of our nations. One clearly sees the opposite of Occidental Traditionalism in such matters with the famous Hugh Heffner quote "women are like Kleenex I use them throw them away." Or the rallying call of the depraved "If it feels good do it" or it's more modern version "If it feels good do it, if feels painful do it more". Naturally, no one save libertarian dogmatics and others totally alienated from the concept of social responsibility think that porn is anything but a socio-pathology as one can find numerous porno industry figures come right out and admit that what they do is promote a vile sickness for love of money, sadism and self hatreds. At one time I had plenty of quotes from porno heavy weights to that effect but it will take a while to dig it up. Of course, doing so is not necessary given that plenty of porno is marketed as being sick and dehumanizing. In the end, sex can become an agent of societal disintegration when people are reduced to mere commodities for momentary entertainment rather then as a reward for fidelity and sacrifice for something greater then one's self which is the essence of family life. In a larger sense, the problem with sex goes back to the problem of the social nillism that is libertarianism. Nearly all Libertarians, are fully in support of erasing national boarders and has nothing but contempt for any form of racialism including the neutered quasi racialism pushed by AmRen. They do so because they view humans as strictly economic actors and deem history, culture and race as irrational and meaningless. Of course much the libertarian establishment in the states is very pro-Zionism, ex. Reason Magazine, the Cato Foundations, FEE and CLS, which demonstrates that internal constancy is simply lacking from the bulk of the libertarian movement.
As I have made my rejection of the mystical psychobabble presented as irrefutable natural law known as" free market economics" clear often in the past I will deal with the matter only in passing now so as to save time. Libertarianism has not been compatible with Eurocentrism within living memory nor can it be in a multi-generational sense ever since the advent of industrialization. This should come as no surprise as libertarianism holds humans as mere "rational maximizers of utility" and as such it is fully logical that such an outlook objects to nation, race and tradition as irrational and contrary to a Rational Objectionist notion of liberty and morality.
In part this is because the unrestrained flow of capital and labor has globalism as a natural consequence which is in turn is fully incompatible with the small town nostalgia and sense of community so dear to racialists and paleo-cons. Another consequence of transnational capitalism is the domination of multi-national enterprises over alien cultures and states which destroy the true racial diversity dear to genuine racialists while encouraging imperialist wars of aggression which in turn force Occidental states to become larger, more repressive and globalist in outlook.
Long before so called "negative externalities" of capitalism brought about the current levels of globalism the libertarian impulse was wreaking havoc upon Occidental traditionalism. The ascendancy of capital over traditional societal arrangements helped to foster class conflict and the gradual destruction of a sense of national identity allowing the rise of racial aliens and class warfare in our nations. Without this societal chaos the "long march through the institutions" which produced cultural bolshevism could never have happened. As the forces of capital became consolidated within an ever shrinking collection of oligopolies the motive force of culture went from primarily an organic basis to mere fadism/universalism manufactured by often alien plutocrats which in turn provided a means for those that control transnational capital to determine the perceptions of the electorate. Thereby allowing the absolute dominance of anti Occidental forces over our societies. In short, a philosophy which is centered upon atomistic individualism and crass materialism is one that is wholly at odds with racial solidarity and identification once Occidental man's natural capacity for invention makes long distance travel and communication widely available.