← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Robbie
Thread ID: 8034 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2003-07-10
2003-07-10 16:47 | User Profile
THE HOFFMAN WIRE
Judeo-Christian Political Correctness and New Age Capitalism in the American Oz "A Utopia for Usurers" by Michael A. Hoffman II
Copyright 2003 hoffman-info.com
Neo-cons have a new crusade against "political correctness." According to the Newhouse News Service , the commissars of correctness in this case are not feminists or U.C. Berkeley professors, but Muslims:
"Leading Muslim organizations say it's time for Americans to stop using the phrase 'Judeo-Christian' when describing the values and character that define the United States. Better choices, they say, are ... 'Abrahamic,' referring to Abraham, the patriarch held in common by the monotheistic big three religions.
"The new language should be used 'in all venues where we normally talk about Judeo-Christian values, starting with the media, academia, statements by politicians and comments made in churches, synagogues and other places,' said Agha Saeed, founder and chairman of the American Muslim Alliance, a political group headquartered in Fremont, California...Others take offense, arguing that to alter the phrase 'Judeo-Christian' is political correctness and revisionist history at its worst.
"A lot of the ideas that underpin civil liberties come from Judeo-Christian theology,' said the Rev. Ted Haggard of Colorado Springs, Colo., president of the National Association of Evangelicals. 'What the Islamic community needs to make are positive contributions to culture and society so we can include them.'
"Michael Cromartie, vice president of the Washington-based Ethics and Public Policy Center, said a 'Judeo-Christian understanding of things like freedom of conscience and liberty' are embodied in the Constitution. 'No offense intended,' he said, 'but Muslims weren't a part of that, even though they're part of the discussion now.' The conflict illustrates the power of words, especially those touching on religion, national history and identity." (End quote).
Calling America "Islamic" is no more of a betrayal than calling it by the oxymoron "Judeo-Christian" (a monstrous hybrid of Pharisaic Judaism and the creed of Jesus Christ). What interests this writer is the genesis of this term, which is now ubiquitous ("...part of the vernacular, uttered recently by public officials ranging from Republican Attorney General John Ashcroft to Sen. Ted Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat..").
"Judeo-Christian" was seldom used to describe our nation's core values until the advent of the pro-Soviet change-agents who came to power in Washington D.C. during the Second World War:
"From its founding to the late 1940s, the United States was commonly described as Christian, a trend epitomized by an 1892 Supreme Court ruling in which Justice David Brewer wrote, 'This is a Christian nation.' According to a 1984 scholarly article by religion writer Mark Silk, 'Judeo-Christian' wasn't used to refer to a common American outlook of values and beliefs until World War II, when the supposedly Christian Nazis and their death camps made future references to 'our Christian civilization' sound ominously exclusive."
In other words, the phrase "Judeo-Christian," in addition to being an abominable falsehood, is an Orwellian artifice that arose with the ascent of the pro-Communist regime of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the "inclusive" political correctness it imposed in that era.
Islam is surely a mistaken religious system, but it honors Christ and Mary. Judaism is a religion whose holiest book puts Christ in a toilet filled with boiling hot excrement (Babylonian Talmud, tractate Gittin 57a), and His Mother Mary in a whorehouse, where she "played the harlot for carpenters" (Sanhedrin 106A). There is no comparison between Islam and Judaism. Muslims, though in error, are often fundamentally of good will. They are woefully ignorant and misled in certain key respects, but they are not predominately enemies of God.
The use of the term "Abrahamic," to describe America's religious tradition, as proposed by Muslims, would, paradoxically, be a more accurate appellation since Christians, not the rabbis, are the rightful heirs of Biblical Israel and comprise the true children of Abraham and Moses (John 8:39-41; 5:45-47).
Until the 20th century, many Christian-Americans understood that they comprised the New Israel. They would have been stupefied by the claims made today for the old Jerusalem in the Middle East, "the killer of the prophets." Until the suppressed history of America is more completely understood, the current debate over Islamic attempts to re-direct America's identity will remain a plaything of the neo-cons, who circumscribe the issue and limit it solely to contrived outrage about "those who would tamper with our history and traditions."
But the use of "Judeo-Christian" as a description of the root identity of our civilization is itself a recent contrivance, a form of modernist tampering and a neologism imposed by those who despise the classical civilization of the West, with its historic suspicion toward all things rabbinic.
Capitalism: A New Age Heresy
The buccaneer system of usury that rules the West in our time, through the World Bank and the Federal Reserve, is a New Age heresy. It is not Free Enterprise, it is New Age capitalism, with its roots in the political economy of Jeremy Bentham and David Ricardo, the targets of Charles Dickens' jeremiad in some of the most honored classics of western literature, including "Oliver Twist," "A Christmas Carol" and "Bleak House."
There is no Biblical sanction for New Age capitalism. The Bible forbids usury among Israelites, as does Islam among Muslims. The Bible recognizes that the charging of interest is a form of warfare, and reserves it for use only against an enemy. But the Talmud, with its endless lawyerly loopholes, nullifies the Biblical injunction and permits the taking of interest, based on a rabbinic "prozbul issued for the good of the world." The Protestant "reformer" John Calvin introduced this Talmudic toxin into Christendom.
Judaism and "Judeo-Christianity" are two sides of a counterfeit coin. Far from representing the radix of our American heritage and western civilization, they are the focal points of its perversion and dissolution. If we wish to defend the Founders against the subversion of their American dream, we will fight Judaic as well as Islamic demands. To single out Islam alone as a threat, is an exercise in bullying and cowardice.
Islam could not produce a Shylock, but Judaism and its masonic-capitalist American Oz have minted a legion of Shylocks, and they have the gall to call their diabolic system, "liberty as the Founders envisioned it." In truth, this is not liberty, but license to rob widows and orphans, a crime as old as the anathemas thundered by Isaiah.
"No offense intended," but rabbis made zero contribution to the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution, even though "they're part of the discussion now." What the Judaic community needs to make are positive contributions to Christian culture and society. They might begin by ceasing all pressure to censor or interdict Mel Gibson's forthcoming motion picture about the crucifixion of Christ; lifting the national ban on Nativity scenes and Bethlehem Christmas pageants in our schools; and desisting in their replacement theology -- replacing Calvary with Auschwitz as the central ontological event in western history and the basis of the new Judaic religion for gentiles, Holocaustianity.
Until these first few steps are taken, the rabbis have far less claim on our affections and heritage than the mullahs and imams, the majority of whom wish peace and respect upon any authentically Christian nation. The trouble is, they haven't seen any such nation of late, anywhere on earth. Unlike Boobus Americanus, contentedly munching his genetically-modified junk food and dutifully paying 24% interest on his credit card's "overdue balance," Muslims don't mistake Oz, with its Skull-and-Bones president, for the Republic of Christ. Rather, they see what Chesterton saw, a "utopia for usurers."
[Hoffman, a former reporter for the Associated Press and the author of six books, is the editor of Revisionist History newsletter].
2003-07-12 10:55 | User Profile
Abraham was not a Jew! The first time the word Jews is used in the Bible is 2Kings 16:6
The whole confusion concerning the word ââ¬ËJewââ¬â¢ arose because there were some of the people who we would call Jews today as translators of the Bible. They deliberately used the term ââ¬ËJewââ¬â¢ instead of Judahite or Judean to confuse people into thinking they [the so-called Jews of today] are the people of the Bible.
After the reign of Solomon, God divided Israel into two kingdoms; Judah and Benjamin were combined into the Southern Kingdom, and were called the House of Judah. Members of the tribe of Judah are Judahites, and people who lived in Judea were Judeans.
Nevertheless, the deception has worked ââ¬â look at the amazing amount of political and financial clout these imposters have by pretending they are our ancestorââ¬â¢s descendents and that we are not.
2003-07-12 20:22 | User Profile
Aryans did not originate in the Middle East. Aryans started in the northern part of Europe and migrated eastward. The few aryans that may have migrated into the Middle East were conquered by Semitic people. The people that believe in Christian Identity are a joke. They are artificial Jews. They worship a jewish god. They so brainwashed into believing in the false identity that the Jews have created for aryans throught Christianity that they create this bullshit argument that has no basis in historical fact.
The original white society's were the Pagan society's of antquity (ancient rome, ancient Greece, the celts, the Germanic tribes). These society's created a positive concept of the differences that existed between themselves and other groups of people. Paul of Tarsus is a racially conscious Jew that tricks the pagan societies in Antiquity into believing in the negative concepts that Jewish people have created for people outside of thier society. Christianity believes that god loves everyone, therefore all people must love each other. Jesus taught that you must pray for those that persecute you. He taught that you must love your enemies. Jesus also taught that everyone must abandon their father in order to follow him. These are sick and degenerate ideas. By manipulating the Pagans into following these ideas Paul of Tarsus was able to corrupt their societies.
Christianity has allowed Jews to become even more powerful because it destroys the Nordic people's idea that they are unique.
2003-07-12 22:30 | User Profile
Is it just me or does this board have some kind of flashing neon sign that attracts every wacko fruitcake on the internet?
:angry:
2003-07-13 01:15 | User Profile
You are on a roll :lol:
2003-07-13 01:41 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Robbie@Jul 10 2003, 16:47 * ** Islam could not produce a Shylock, but Judaism and its masonic-capitalist American Oz have minted a legion of Shylocks, and they have the gall to call their diabolic system, "liberty as the Founders envisioned it." In truth, this is not liberty, but license to rob widows and orphans, a crime as old as the anathemas thundered by Isaiah.
**
Just to add an on-point comment... :lol:
This is the sort of thing Hoffman does better than anybody, and it should remind a few of them that if more Christian leaders had been paying attention when Reagan put the foxes in charge of the henhoouse, America would be a very different country right now.
The 80s were frustrating for patriots. The Soviets were still around to irritate us (and kill Afgan freedom fighters, whom we were later to bomb). Moral Majority types were busy demonstrating against abortion and covering for Reagan, without paying the slightest attention to who he was really working for. It's twenty years later and Israel owns the the government and 99% of the media, mostly because of Reagan's foreign policy and media "deregulation".
Hoffman knows these things. He knows the Reagan years were not some kind of conservative Christian golden age. And unlike Duke and Hale, Hoffman manages to say these things and stay out of jail.
2003-07-13 07:12 | User Profile
*Originally posted by madrussian@Jul 12 2003, 20:15 * ** You are on a roll :lol: **
I knew you'd enjoy, mr.
Love is on a roll Love is on a good roll
A little Don Williams never hurts. :cowboy: