← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 7705 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2003-06-29
2003-06-29 21:12 | User Profile
[url=http://cptwc.matriots.com/JuliusStreicher.html]http://cptwc.matriots.com/JuliusStreicher.html[/url]
Proof Of America's Modern 'Jewishness': Julius Streicher at Nuremberg
Julius Streicher founded a successful newspaper in 1923 Germany called Der Stürmer. It was, according to some Germans, a little 'over-the-top,' but the newspaper was very successful.
At the end of WWII, Julius Streicher was arrested, tried at the Nuremberg war-crimes trials for participating in Nazi-committed "crimes against humanity," and then executed -- even though:
a) Streicher was not a member of the Nazi government in any fashion
B] he had committed no actual crime
c) the Soviets -- America's 'allies' -- had committed worse crimes during the 1930s with the help of U.S. material given to them by U.S. president Roosevelt [1]
The Nuremberg trials were 'ex post facto' -- trials via 'law passed after a crime is committed,' which was and is illegal in America. Yet America tried and executed Streicher.
Why was Streicher executed? Because of his attitude towards Jews. Here is the golden nugget, from an allied indictment of Streicher: "...including particularly the incitement of the persecution of the Jews set forth in Counts One and Four." [italics ours]. There's the taproot of a gentile's 'crimes' as usual: Jews.
Adding insult -- and suspicion -- to injury is the fact that Streicher and his comrades were hanged on Purim, the Jewish holiday [2]; and further, many of the people who sat in judgement of Streicher and his pals at the Nuremberg trials were Jewish. In fact, some of the Jews involved in the Nuremberg production were Jewish/Soviet communists whose regime, again, murdered more people than the Nazis.
Furthermore, supporting our views about Streicher, the book about Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Harlan Fiske Stone, "Pillar of the Law," 1956, by Alpheus Thomas Mason, page 715, notes that Stone wrote to the editor of 'Fortune' magazine saying that not only did he disown the Nuremberg trials, but that he regarded them as "a high-grade lynching party."
[1] America aiding the Soviets Here
[2] The Purim holiday is centered around revenge, i.e. the hanging of Haman, an enemy of the Jews during Biblical times. Julius Streicher's last words: "Purim Fest, 1946, and now [it goes] to God. The Communists will likewise hang you one day. I am with God my Father."
2003-06-29 21:39 | User Profile
See slight revision to that webpage, after the posting of the URL/article [minor].
2003-06-29 22:09 | User Profile
Sorry, added even more stuff to the Streicher page [long footnotes].
2003-06-30 00:01 | User Profile
I've always held a certain admiration for Streicher, as well as for his French counterpart Brasillach, both of whom were executed merely because of the things they wrote.
2003-06-30 19:25 | User Profile
Old thread on this subject. [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?showtopic=3408&hl=streicher]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...08&hl=streicher[/url]
2003-06-30 20:03 | User Profile
I have always admired Streicher; he courageously told the truth about Jews and made the ultimate sacrifice for it.
Another reason I admire Steicher is he was one of the first to question that Jew lie known as the Holocaust. He did so at Nuremberg, and retained his dignity right up until the end, spitting in the face of the Allied henchman manning the gallows on the day of this execution.
Let's hope that one day Julius Streicher gets the recognition he deserves as one of the great men of the White race.
2003-07-01 00:32 | User Profile
It's not reasonable to refer to Brasillach as a French Streicher. Brasillach was a very importaint theorist with lots of worth while economic and societal ideas that were published in numerous serious journalists. Streicher was a basically a forerunner of Alex Linder with the differance being that Streicher made propaganda suited the times while Lider doesn't. Brasillach's ideas on the jews were a continuation of those of Sorel, La Tour Du Pin's and Deat but a bot omore interesting in that he could be very blunt about the jewish problem but also deal with other aspects of the problems facing our people.
2003-07-09 07:30 | User Profile
*Originally posted by Franco@Jun 29 2003, 15:12 * **
a) Streicher was not a member of the Nazi government in any fashion
B] he had committed no actual crime
**
I wish all the pro-Nazis would either get their facts right, or stop presenting truth in a slanted light. Streicher was the Gauleiter of Mittelfranken then Franken, between 1925 and 1940, and from 1932 till the end a Nazi member of the Reichstag. So he was a member of the government from the start, to the bitter end. Also he was an Obergruppenführer of the SA.
This hardly qualifies him as an apolitical, innocent newspaper publisher caught up in the net of War Criminal Trials.
Gauleiters served as political and legal adminstrators, and had authority over the local police and other administrational bodies.
They were responsible for politically and administrationally ruling their Gaus. They were directly involved in administering and intrerpreting Nazi directives from Berlin and Hitler, and were empowered to order arrests, trials etc. I imagine even a cursory look at what happened in his Gau would yield a nauseating list of crimes.
I find it amazing that with so many 'political' and govermental functions, leave alone his crimes in terms of the false statements and characterisations in his odious paper and in forming all sorts of 'anti' attitudes in the general public, that Streicher is made so remote from the centre of Nazi power in your analysis.
2003-07-09 19:29 | User Profile
Leland, I was responding to a mis-statement of fact. It is not a matter of my or anyone else's business in regard to Streicher's reign as Gauleiter and the appurtenances of that office, it is just a historical fact. I was responding to the statement that he had no political office or influence, expressed by:
a) Streicher was not a member of the Nazi government in any fashion[COLOR=blue]
And if your anti-American remarks are directed at me, I am not an American, just FYI.
I did not even suggest whether or not he should have been Gauleiter, nor suggest he should be appointed by outside influence.
As well, I do not think that your response to my post, based on nationality, is either reasonable or temerperd, or really factual in nature.
Inflammatory, yes. But I do not think such hot-headed responses will win many people over to your viewpoint, least of all most Americans reading your response.
Ein wunderschönen guten Abend wünsche ich Ihnen noch!
2003-07-09 19:32 | User Profile
Leland, I was responding to a mis-statement of fact. It is not a matter of my or anyone else's business in regard to Streicher's reign as Gauleiter and the appurtenances of that office, it is just a historical fact. I was responding to the statement that he had no political office or influence, expressed by:
a) Streicher was not a member of the Nazi government in any fashion[COLOR=blue]
And if your anti-American remarks are directed at me, I am not an American, just FYI.
I did not even suggest whether or not he should have been Gauleiter, nor suggest he should be appointed by outside influence.
As well, I do not think that your response to my post, based on nationality, is either reasonable or temerperd, or really factual in nature.
Inflammatory, yes. But I do not think such hot-headed responses will win many people over, least of all most Americans reading your response.
Ein wunderschönen guten Abend wünsche ich Ihnen noch!
2003-07-09 19:39 | User Profile
As well, you mention a free press. In most countries, the press has an obligation to meet some minimum standards in terms of slander and observation of objective truth. The paper was not only damaging to Jews, but to liberals, democrats, humanists ie anyone in any way opposed or having a different opinion on ANY facet of the Nazi program. Sounds more like polemics than a free press. But I am sure that Goebbels and his Gleichschaltung of the media were laudatory in terms of your attitude.
Odd that you seem to benefit from freedom in uttering your views, yet wish to deny that to me and other posters here. Seems a sort of double standard, doesn't it, old chap?
Hmm, I imagine applying your standards today, you might be tempting arrest by the authorities in terms of some of your postings.
Let's hope the BND is not using Carnivore and Magic Lantern, and right now locating your whereabouts...