← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Conservative
Thread ID: 7541 | Posts: 17 | Started: 2003-06-22
2003-06-22 01:04 | User Profile
The following is from [url=http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0103.html]http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0103.html[/url]
IQ and Racial Differences
by Henry E. Garrett
Professor Garrett, former president of the American Psychological Association and chairman of Columbia University's Department of Psychology, writes concisely, lucidly, and authoritatively on racial differences in intelligence and the need for an educational system which takes them into account. Unexcelled as a short survey.
Visit [url=http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0103.html]http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0103.html[/url] for complete details.
Regards,
Ares
2003-06-22 14:25 | User Profile
This is the Magnum Opus:
[url=http://home.attbi.com/~neoeugenics/lev.htm]http://home.attbi.com/~neoeugenics/lev.htm[/url]
2003-06-22 17:21 | User Profile
Mr. Toner: Isn't Michael Levin, the author of the book you provided a link to, a Jew? If so, anything he says on this forum will be automatically rejected as false.
What is your view?
2003-06-22 17:26 | User Profile
Mike Levin IS a Jew, but he's OK in my book. He has a listed phone in Manhattan.
I called him to ask a few questions. He said in the beginning "Ed, just call me Mike, OK".
I had been calling him "Proffesor".
I even got him to post a letter in a newspaper that was calling him a racist.
2003-06-22 17:42 | User Profile
Ares
Good Post. I will be reading the book.
2003-06-25 20:28 | User Profile
Levin's a Jew, alright, but Why Race Matters is a neutron bomb. There's no denying reality in my book, and that includes 1) the reality that Jews are the enemy and 2) the reality that even the enemy can provide good information from time to time. The motivation is right: Why Race Matters is strictly a slam on blackies (barely mentions Hispanics, even), so Yahoodis are left safe. But his book ties together the science and the social in an especially tight manner.
Levin's commented on the whole thing by declaring that "It's White IQs that drop when the subject of Jews come up." Or, the Jew just don't like the microscope swung upward.
2003-09-09 05:56 | User Profile
**SUGGESTED I.Q. PECKING ORDER
I.Q.
*********
Jew (European, American). . . . . 115 Asian (in the U.S.) . . . . . . 108 East Indian (from India, in the U.S.) 108 U.S. White (Northern European, Urban) 105 U.S. White (Southern European). . . 100 U.S. White (Rural, South) . . . . 95 U.S. Black (North and West). . . . 90 Hispanic-American . . . . . . . 90 U.S. Black (Rural, South) . . . . 85 American Indian . . . . . . . 80 Laplander . . . . . . . . . 75 Australian Aborigine (full-blooded) . 70
[url=http://www.nutri.com/wn/gp.html]http://www.nutri.com/wn/gp.html[/url] **
2003-09-10 03:30 | User Profile
Intelligence: Evolution, Heredity, Environment, Race (Where Iconoclasts stumble and angels fear to tread):
Intelligence is the capacity of our rational mind to consolidate and evaluate external stimuli by integrating sensory input with our memory and our programming.
Both the quality and the quantity of our memory banks and our central processing unit, our cerebrum, depend on the genetic material passed on to us by our ancestors. These essential components are part of the hardware of our brain and express themselves in the number and connectivity of our neurons. Secondarily to our genetic inheritance, our intelligence is affected by our prenatal development as well as our postnatal growth process: Our environment.
Both genetic and environmental factors have a bearing on the quality of the hardware of our brain and thus on our ability to compute accurately and successfully. Severe nutritional deprivation and the resulting deficiencies in brain tissue are well established as a cause of mental sub normality. It is interesting to note that such environmental influences can only result in a degradation of mental processes below the norm but they have never been established to be the cause of intelligence above the norm. This negative predominance is the result of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics. Entropy stipulates that the inherent nature of all physical and physiological processes insists on a degradation of order and an increase in randomness. The Law of Entropy inherently demands that any energy-driven process must increase the randomness of its energy sources and is therefore predestined to diminish its efficiency. The same natural law also decrees that an engine will not randomly eliminate defects and increase its efficiency. In short: Nature makes it easier to reduce complexity than to enhance complexity. It is inherently easier to degrade brain tissue than to create more complex brain tissue.
The other major factor determining the level of our intelligence, our software programming, is also traceable to our genetic heritage: Our temperament, the measure of our emotions, is clearly genetically imposed on human beings; so are other predispositions ranging from alcoholism to schizophrenia, from musical genius to color- blindness and just about anything and everything that establishes the essence of being human.
Our rational mind, which is analogous to computer software, is our basic operating system and is biologically hardwired into our brain. Our brain, including hardware and software, is analogous to a computer, because computers have been designed using the human brain as a model. The particular method used by our brain to process information has been optimized by evolutionary processes over eons of time and can thus serve as the basic paradigm of computer technology: No information-processing method superior to the basic architecture of the human brain has offered itself to computer designers.
The quality of the output of our biological computer system, our brain, depends approximately 80% on inherited factors, our genes, and 20% on environmental conditions, software adaptations, which are integrated into the bio-electronic structure of our brain. The assumption is often made that the quality of the output of our brain is dependent on the quality of the input into the system but this is only partially correct. Our brain, both hardware and software, determines even the quality of the input available to the processing unit. The quality and structure of our brain determines what input will be allowed to penetrate and what input will be rejected before subjecting it to further evaluation and processing. The same analogy applies to the importance attached to the quality of our education and other environmental factors: It is our bio-electronic brain, our processing ability -- and not our environment -- that determines not only the quality of information input, but also the quality of items retained in memory and the quality of subsequent processing.
Our ability to integrate and process information is genetically imposed on us and is by far the most influential determinant of our ability to cope with changes in our environment: Our intelligence. We express the processing capacity of our intelligence by a unit of measurement called Intelligence Quotient, which represents the ratio of the measured level of intelligence over the physiological age of the subject being measured (and multiplied by 100). If we compile a large number of individual intelligence measurements (IQs), it is statistically inevitable that the graphic display of such results appears in the shape of a bell curve. The bell-curve represents a cross-section of the intellectual capacity of a population group. Whites of predominantly European ancestry, were originally the subjects of standardized intelligence tests. The mean achievement level of these tests was set at 100 and this arbitrary level represents the norm against which the intelligence of individuals and groups is measured.
At times, there have been conflicts regarding the assigned proportional importance of hereditary factors versus environmental factors in determining the level of intelligence displayed by individuals or population groups. From the 1960s to the 1980s, a trend developed among sociologists in the United States to attribute 80% or even 100% of measured intelligence to environmental determinants, with negligible ascription to heredity. This anomaly appears to have been the result of the political correctness demanded by some members of the non-scientific academic community. They were influenced by the Jeffersonian view of the supposedly egalitarian nature of all men as evidenced by his pronouncement that "all men are equal". However, this unrealistic view has been rejected and was never seriously validated by scientists in any country, except in such purportedly egalitarian societies like the United States and the Soviet Union. Parallel to the attitude of American politicians, a similar political trend persisted in the Soviet Union and was promulgated by the state-approved teachings of the Russian biologist Lysenko. The reasoning for the adoption of these erroneous and unscientific statements can be found in the communist doctrine that, similar to the Jeffersonian doctrine, would invest all people with inherently equal human qualities, including their capacity to engage in rational thought processes. This opinion coincided with the enforced equality of Soviet society and the political hypocrisy and demagoguery of Jefferson who pronounced the equality of all men but who, simultaneously, maintained many of such "equal" human beings in a state of enforced slavery. In either case, these unscientific, political pronouncements have been abandoned in Russia and were being phased out in the United States towards the end of the 20th century.
The reality and validity of IQ measurements lies in the fact that different people have different IQs, and that different population groups, races, or ethnic groups exhibit different statistical levels of intelligence as measured by standard IQ tests. Blacks consistently score 15% lower than Whites on standard I.Q. tests, even after adjusting for environmental exposures. This deviation occurs without regard to the geographical area of the world or the society where such I.Q. tests are administered. This indisputable fact compels the conclusion that the I. Q. of Blacks is innately lower than the I.Q. of Whites.
It is interesting to note that the Japanese population has a mean IQ level of 110, Mexicans (Mestizos) score in the low 90ââ¬â¢s. Indeed, it would be truly astounding if all people of the world had the same level of intelligence, because it might indicate that they where produced in the same mold and had identical genes. The graphical display of normal population statistics invariably produces bell-curved graphs with regard to human characteristics and it is difficult to conceive of a reason why this well established quality should not apply to human intelligence.
Intelligence levels of groups of people follow the laws of evolution and do not change rapidly. Significant change might occur over time spans measured in thousand or tens of thousands of years. However, in extraordinary circumstances evolution is dramatically accelerated by violent societal upheavals, resulting in the survival and subsequent propagation of those members of a population group who are best equipped to survive. Societal variations of IQs are, like all other permanent changes in human nature and basic behavior, solely attributable to the process of evolution.
It is illuminating to consider the two opposites of American societal IQ levels: African American Negroes as opposed to American Jewish society. Aside from environmentally unbiased IQ measurements, it is obvious that both groups have sorted themselves out into different occupational structures: Black Americans are predominantly found in occupations which require little intellectual acuity but a high level of physical prowess, such as manual labor or sports activities. The opposite holds true of the Jews who predominate in intellectual and artistic pursuits, which require a considerably higher level of intelligence than physical activities. It therefore does not come as a surprise that IQ levels for both groups as a whole are drastically divergent: The IQ level of American urban Blacks is in the 80-85 range whereas Jews consistently score in the 115-120 range. Since I.Q.s. do not exist in a vacuum but are broad predictors of financial success in life, the income levels of Blacks and Jews are similarly representative of their different intellectual capacity. Earnings of Jews are almost twice as high as the earnings of Blacks and are slightly ahead of the Japanese. It is not the dumb people who run this world; it is the smart people who run this world. Is not the dumb people who have the highest standard of living, it is the smart people, the people with the higher I.Q., who are affluent. Who can argue with this self-evident fact?
The explanation for this discrepancy in IQ levels becomes obvious when we refer to the source of all innate human faculties: The evolution of man over a million years, resulting in a variety of inborn traits reflecting survival characteristics demanded by different environments. Negroes developed in a benign tropical environment where sustenance was readily provided by nature and without substantial competitive pressures for natural resources. The lack of a need for higher intellectual accomplishments did not encourage the elimination of the intellectually disadvantaged from their society. After Negroes had been transferred as slaves to North America, slave owners further discouraged intellectual activities by slaves and placed higher value on the physical prowess of slaves. Black slaves bred and were bred for brawns rather than for brains because manual field labor provided no requirement or evolutional necessity for high levels of intelligence.
The reverse situation prevailed with regard to Jews. Their religious beliefs and shrewdness set them apart from most other population groups with whom they interacted. This separateness frequently placed them into the position of scapegoats and consequentially subjected them to pogroms. They were forced to live by their wits, not by their brawns. The harsh atmosphere of such persecutions favored and honed their intellectual ability to survive these constant onslaughts of malevolence and violence. After thousands of years of pogroms, the weaker and less adroit elements of Jewish societies gradually diminished in numbers. The remaining Jewish population groups attained a higher standard of living due to the constant rise in IQ levels required by their need to survive by their wits. This evolutionary process was the result of the survival of the more intelligent Jews, and was greatly accelerated by the extermination of Jews during World War II: Jews of innately higher intelligence, like Einstein and many of his professional colleagues, had a better chance of survival than intellectually less endowed Jews. This view must be statistical in nature. It does not imply that only bright Jews survived and that only dumb Jews perished: When faced with disaster which is largely beyond oneââ¬â¢s personal control or anticipation, even the best and the brightest can perish where a less intellectually capable person may survive. In any analysis of evolutionary characteristics, the emphasis must be placed on statistical and average results, rather than on individual abilities. In this statistical arena, results speak for themselves: The Jews have become a super-race.
Evolution has no moral connotations. It does not concern itself with the sufferings of individuals or even vast numbers of people. Evolution is the prerequisite of all life and follows only one path: The survival and the perpetuation of the fittest.
Another question pertaining to societal IQ levels deals with the fact that whole civilizations, which have bloomed into supreme artistic or scientific or intellectual supremacy, have subsequently subsided and have returned to the previous level of accomplishments common to the particular population group. The Greeks and the Romans serve admirably as an example in this category of societal intellectual turbulence. In all of these instances of temporary greatness, the supreme rise in accomplishments in a society was not commensurate with a genetically perpetuated intelligence structure. Instead, such excellence was the result of the accretion of artistic or scientific elements within a society due to the temporary confluence of environmental factors.
An analogy to this rare societal development can be found in nuclear explosions. As long as individual particles within a radioactive substance are distinct and fairly widely separated, they merely participate in ordinary chemical processes. However, if the same particles coalesce and interact intimately with each other, they first generate heat and then proceed to avalanche into a chain reaction that generates a disproportionate amount of energy and upheaval. At the apex of the Greek and Roman civilizations, an enormous confluence of artistic elements occurred which resulted in the explosive birth of architecture and art during the Age of Pericles and which culminated in the birth of Western Civilization. However, this unique societal event did not perpetuate itself because it did not involve a permanent, genetic change of the Greek population. This explosive intellectual development was merely the temporary manifestation of an artistic chain reaction resulting from the unique confluence of artistic and scientific minds within the city of Athens during this specific period. After Greek civilization had thus bloomed, after the conglomeration of great minds had faded and had lost critical mass, the history of Greece shows no repetition or continuation of this extraordinary period in the history of the Greek people.
The occurrence of such spontaneous creative pinnacles illustrates another formative aspect of human existence, which correlates to many similar physical and physiological processes: A new structure or organism can increase its complexity and will then exhibit drastically different qualities than the sum of its component parts. The same societal and intellectual chain reaction, which triggered the artistic explosion of Greek and Roman civilizations two thousand years ago, can be observed today in the technological supremacy of the American Society of the twentieth century. If society at large prospers, if it is not involved in self-destructive adventures such as wars or other dissipations of societal wealth, it may allow for the coagulation of large numbers of persons with artistic, intellectual or technological inclinations. The result can be a disproportionate blooming of the pertinent arenas of a society. Such compound factors represent the triggers for the astonishing growth of art and philosophy during the Golden Age of Greece, the vast cultural accomplishments of Rome during the era of the Pax Romana, the artistic dominance of Florence in the seventeenth century, and the supreme technological accomplishments that can be observed in the United Stated of America during the twentieth century. Such a temporary technological or artistic chain reaction can take place even during a period when the general intelligence level of a society is declining due to population shifts, such as the influx of large numbers of less intelligent persons, or due to the percentage increase of a less intelligent sector of a society due to the disproportional replication of members of such groups.
There exists an inevitable correlation between I.Q. and personal income. The measured I.Q. of a student is a statistically accurate predictor of his academic success. I.Q. is also a rather precise predictor for financial success. There is a direct and inevitable correlation between IQ and income: The higher the average IQ level of a group, the higher the statistical income level of the group. This relationship is self-evident because it requires only an IQ of 90 to be a truck driver but it requires an IQ of 120 to hold a college degree. It is beyond dispute that persons with a college degree have substantially higher lifetime earnings than truck drivers: The higher the IQ, the higher the earnings. This statement coincides with the saying: "Bright parents, bright child". It is not the dumb people of this world who run the world or earn high incomes, it is the high IQ people of this world who run the world and earn high incomes. The higher the IQ, the higher the exhibited rationality: i.e. the ability to see Objective Reality clearly and without blinders. This characteristic of a high IQ is the causative factor of the increased earning capacity of persons with a high IQ.
Since IQ determines the degree of rationality accessible to a person, and since any form of religion is inherently steeped in irrationality, it is not surprising that IQ also correlates to religious beliefs. Members of the general public with an IQ between 90 and 110 represent 90% of the population. The percentage of persons in American Society who believe in a god or gods is also 90%. Among scientist, who must be college graduates and must therefore be presumed to have an IQ above 120, 40% believe in gods and 60% are atheists. Only 10% of eminent scientists believe in supernatural beings, including pantheistic beings. In other words, more than 90% of eminent scientists are atheists. Atheism is directly proportional to a personââ¬â¢s intelligence because all religions are an insult to rationality. The lower the IQ of a person, the more pervasive and primitive are the religious or mythical beliefs held by that person.
What are the lessons we can derive from this review of human intelligence? It is evident that evolution always favors higher degrees of specialization in order to deal more efficiently with a change in human environments. Evolution achieves specialization by encouraging higher degrees of complexity. Increased complexity, such as the increased complexity of the human cerebral complex from Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens, enabled man to achieve higher levels of intelligence and thus to deal more successfully and predictably with the ultimate objective of all living organisms: To enhance pleasure (happiness) by the rational manipulation and elimination of adverse advents perceived as pain.
We can also benefit from the recognition that large segments of the population have different IQ levels and thus present diverging performance criteria. This knowledge allows us to be more efficient in allocating our resources to the task at hand, whatever it may be. It saves a great deal of time and effort if we know on a statistical basis, that a Jewish practitioner of medicine or law can be expected to have a higher level of performance than a Black practitioner who may have gone to the same school but may (or may not) have been advanced on the basis of "affirmative action" rather than on the merits of his intelligence and knowledge. This view may appear to some people as racial prejudice, which it is. If we stick our heads in the sand, adopt a politically correct stance and insult our intelligence by pretending that all men are equal, we fail to recognize the true attributes of objective reality and we will be unable to achieve success in whatever arena we are engaged in. If we desire to be efficient in our search for happiness we must "prejudge" a large number of events in our life. The term "racial prejudice" and "discrimination" has been assigned a negative moral connotation. Such moralistic attempt by demagogic politicians to manipulate people should not deter us from engaging in discrimination. Efficient people, successful people, people of discriminating taste will uniformly and expediently apply panoptic filtering criteria during any initial screening process. This discriminatory selection process is the reason why we prefer to buy products with established brand names: We know from experience that a particular brand can be presumed to be superior to an unknown brands or brands which have a reputation for substandard performance. It is inefficient to waste time by exploring the merits of all products that are available in a store. If we indiscriminately consider any and all potential choices that present themselves to our decision-making process, in the mistaken believe that all people (or all products) are equal in quality or performance, we impose on ourselves a high degree of inefficiency in the allocation of our limited resources, including our limited resources of time. It is imperative that we utilize discrimination in any preliminary selection process or we will inevitably reduce the likeliness of being successful in our endeavors, including our effort to achieve happiness.
The ability to discriminate is the ability to choose. The ability to choose is the essence of freedom. This posture coincides with Adam Smithââ¬â¢s "Invisible Hand" of the Free Market System. This economic non-structure has evolved as the supreme economic system because it is in compliance with the evolutionary nature of man and his emotional drives. All other economic systems have ended up in the dustbin of history.
Conclusion
If we desire to enhance our ability to achieve happiness, it behooves us to rely on our intelligence, our rational mind, to help us understand how happiness can be achieved. It is inefficient and unworthy of our intellect to hope that, somehow, we may bump into happiness just by aimlessly running around in circles. If we clearly understand the nature of happiness, we are making it possible for us to purposefully achieve happiness -- just as we have to use our intelligence and our acquired knowledge to find ore deposits and to mine them successfully. A clear understanding of the role of intelligence in our lives is an extremely important aspect of our knowledge how life really works and thus, in our search for success and happiness.
[url=http://www.rationality.net/intelligence.htm]http://www.rationality.net/intelligence.htm[/url]
2003-09-10 04:54 | User Profile
**SUGGESTED I.Q. PECKING ORDER
I.Q. *** Jew (European, American). . . . . 115 Asian (in the U.S.) . . . . . . 108 East Indian (from India, in the U.S.) 108 U.S. White (Northern European, Urban) 105 U.S. White (Southern European). . . 100 U.S. White (Rural, South) . . . . 95 U.S. Black (North and West). . . . 90 Hispanic-American . . . . . . . 90 U.S. Black (Rural, South) . . . . 85 American Indian . . . . . . . 80 Laplander . . . . . . . . . 75 Australian Aborigine (full-blooded) . 70
[url=http://www.nutri.com/wn/gp.html]http://www.nutri.com/wn/gp.html[/url] **
Hehehee. Don't leave out the SD's (standard deviations) amongst individuals for the various groups. While it's 15 points for Whites, it's apparently 8.9 for East Asians and 8.6 for jews. The East Indian IQ numbers you 'suggest' are amusing, in that there is a brain drain from India and E. Asia, but E. Asians consistently outperform E. Indians in intelligence tests. However, there is also regression to the mean, that means we all get to enjoy the majority of the children and especially the grandchildren of the Indians, which means 85 IQ's and the attendant problems numbers like those bring.
Some people get irritated at the SD being brought up, as it is one reason why the far, far right hand side of the bell curve is dominated by those hated White males, while jews and Asians have high numbers of their groups centered around their 'means', but drop off more rapidly in percentage than Whites when moving to either end of the spectrum. Some of it probably also has to do with Whites seemingly being the only racial/ethnic group that has a balance between the verbal and visuospatial portions of intelligence tests, with Asians skewed toward the visuospatial, and jews skewed toward the verbal. Maybe someday psycometrists will be able to test other areas of intelligence and cognitive ability that can't currently be quantified.
I doubt the low IQ's posted here for Whites in the South, even if it is supposed to be in the 'rural' areas that so frighten the hateful jew. The IQ's posted for blacks and latrinos seem a bit generous. Unless of course, in the case of 'hispanics', the numbers are slightly inflated because the scores of 'White' hispanics are factored in, in some fashion.
As it's been said before, take a look around the world, look at real world results. If you want to see what people are really like, look at their native lands, and the accomplishments of their people as a whole. Very few peoples have much to brag about. But they do have a lot of hatred toward Whites. Hatred based almost entirely in jealousy.
2003-09-10 10:17 | User Profile
If you are gonna break US whites down geographically then you have to do it for Asians. Northern Chinese and Indians from the North consider their southern brethern their inferiors in every sense of the word - physically, intellectually and socially. Gen. Stillwell, who should know, considered the northern species of Chinaman to be taller, handsomer, better formed and smarter then his southern counterpart.
Northern Indians considered 1940's juvenile star Sabu to be nothing more than a typically short south Indian "coolie boy". That was their term for him.
Course, people have been saying the same thing about Europeans for years. It's got to have something to do with the way the ancients migrated.
2003-09-10 11:26 | User Profile
I would tend to agree with Roy in that certain circumstancial factors have been avoided. The Indian influx into the US has been mainly a matter of the best that land has to offer and is therefore a bad choice IMHO.
2003-09-14 09:40 | User Profile
Levin's a Jew, alright, but Why Race Matters is a neutron bomb. There's no denying reality in my book, and that includes 1) the reality that Jews are the enemy and 2) the reality that even the enemy can provide good information from time to time. The motivation is right: Why Race Matters is strictly a slam on blackies (barely mentions Hispanics, even), so Yahoodis are left safe. But his book ties together the science and the social in an especially tight manner.
Levin's commented on the whole thing by declaring that "It's White IQs that drop when the subject of Jews come up." Or, the Jew just don't like the microscope swung upward.
I agree that Levin, Hart, Shamir, Weiss, Makow and Shahak are enemies, although they probably don't know it.
They're like the robots in the sci-fi "B" movie "Screamers." They're so deeply evolved to infiltrate our ranks that they're programmed to hide their true identity from themselves. They feel themselves to be friends, when in fact they're acting under subconscious compulsion to advance their own agenda.
That agenda, as always, is to ensure the leadership of Jews in gentile society, but I think that really this phenomenon of "WN Jews" is an attempt to create new options in the increasingly likely event that their current leftist coaltion falls apart.
The kosher neo-con takeover of the GOP is the most obvious move to create a fall-back position, but the WN is being covered, too. It's now marginalized, but Jews think many steps ahead, and a WN upsurge in the face of general collapse caused by Jewish immigration policies and culture destruction programs is an a contingency they cannot and will not ignore.
Thus, we have a the beginnngs of a Jewish takeover of AMREN. Not that this is altogether bad, so long as we recognize it for what it is and prepare for the time when we'll have to take appropriate action.
Walter
2003-09-16 23:21 | User Profile
If the Jews are working so hard to miscegenate us, but are not doing this in Asian countries, it's an indication that they think Whites are a potentially greater obstacle to their supremacy.
I'd welcome some input as to why this might be.
My guess is that although Asians have high IQ's (by gentile standards), they lack the kind of intelligence not measured by IQ tests that enables original thought, as is evidenced by our superiority in inventing things.
The following speech was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952
"The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave. We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born.
"Our control Commissions will, in the interest of peace and wiping out our interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with white. The white woman must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark people."
Is it that Asians, in spite of their IQ are easier to herd?
The main targets of Jewish aggression are Whites and Arabs. Arab resistance to Jews is not due to their intelligence, but their history with Jews.
Why are the Jews not worried about these smart Asians? Do they already have them in their hands?
2003-09-17 02:53 | User Profile
**If the Jews are working so hard to miscegenate us, but are not doing this in Asian countries, it's an indication that they think Whites are a potentially greater obstacle to their supremacy.
I'd welcome some input as to why this might be.**
Is it that Asians, in spite of their IQ are easier to herd?
Whites are a potential obstacle because the white community is the vehicle that Jews must use to attain broader supremacy. Whites must cooperate with Jews -- either as a result of fraud or as a result of force -- if Jews are to achieve anything. The Jewish struggle for supremacy occurs wholly within the European community. Non-Whites simply aren't in a position to pose an obstacle, nor (given the attenuated consequences they face) do they much care.
I've been mulling this over for a little while, and it occurs to me that the greater intraracial variance in intelligence (within the White race) creates an ecological niche that begs for the development of a parasite that specialises in dividing the high-IQ elite from the lower-IQ masses. To be sure, in some important genetic senses the members of the White elite share similarities with members of the Jewish group that they do not share with the lower stratis of their own community.
2003-09-17 05:32 | User Profile
Rushton shows that sub-saharan Negroes (i.e., pure Negroes) are in fact retarded by European standards.
It's hard to run a tight ship when your populace is composed of drooling morons.
Unless massive genetic-engineering occurs on the "dark continent", the place will continue to be the violent, anarchic, disease-ridden hell-hole that it is.
Is Race A Valid Taxonomic Construct?
J. Philippe Rushton
This essay is Professor Rushtonââ¬â¢s latest ââ¬ÅStatement on Race.ââ¬Â It updates the research in his book Race, Evolution, and Behavior (3rd edition, 2000), which contains over 1,000 references to the literature.
[url=http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol2no1/jpr-taxonomic.html]http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol2no1/...-taxonomic.html[/url]
**I published several other studies during the 1990s, also in Intelligence, confirming the racial differences in brain size. In one study, I (1991) analyzed data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and found the mean cranial capacity for East Asians was 1,460 cm3, and for Europeans it was 1,446 cm3. From a stratified random sample of 6,325 U.S. Army personnel, I (1992) calculated average cranial capacities for Asians, Whites, and Blacks, respectively, of 1,416 cm3, 1,380 cm3, and 1,359 cm3. (I also found that officers averaged 1,393 cm3 while enlisted personnel averaged 1,375 cm3.) From a compilation made by the International Labour Office in Geneva of tens of thousands of people from around the world, I (1994) found that samples from the Pacific Rim, Europe, and Africa averaged cranial capacities, respectively, of 1,308 cm3, 1,297 cm3, and 1,241 cm3.ÃÂ Travis Osborne and I (1995) published a paper showing that brain size was about 50% heritable for both Blacks and Whites using data from the Georgia Twin Study based on 236 pairs of Black and White adolescent twins. And once again we found Whites averaged greater cranial capacity than Blacks.
Since one cubic inch of brain matter contains millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of nerve connections, brain size helps to explain why the races differ in IQ. On standardized IQ tests, hundreds of studies show the three-way pattern. Orientals average slightly ahead of Whites on such tests and Whites average substantially ahead of Blacks. Most IQ tests have an average score of 100, with a ââ¬Ånormalââ¬Â range from 85 to 115. Around the world, Whites average an IQ of about 100, Orientals an IQ of about 104, and Blacks in Britain, the Caribbean, and the U.S. average lower IQs -- about 85. The lowest average IQs are found for sub-Saharan Africans ââ¬â around 70 (see Chart 4). Like the other data sets in this essay, these are reviewed in my book Race, Evolution, and Behavior. An even more recent book on the topic is by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, IQ and the Wealth of Nations.**
2003-09-18 18:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE]I've been mulling this over for a little while, and it occurs to me that the greater intraracial variance in intelligence (within the White race) creates an ecological niche that begs for the development of a parasite that specialises in dividing the high-IQ elite from the lower-IQ masses. [/QUOTE]
I think that's a very important insight.
There is something about the European organism that lends itself to the creation of an elite that sees itself as a separate species from its own kin.
I noted on another thread that I'd finished Darwin's Cathedral. Perhaps we could get a thread going on that. I think that it's a very important book - even a candidate for our classics list.
Speaking of which, I have been trying to get ODer's to watch Tarkovsky's "Andrei Rublyov", which to my mind is the greatest WN film ever made. Have you had a chance to see that yet?
Walter
2003-09-18 18:19 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Walter Yannis Speaking of which, I have been trying to get ODer's to watch Tarkovsky's "Andrei Rublyov", which to my mind is the greatest WN film ever made. Have you had a chance to see that yet?
I don't think that movie is for everyone. True, the topic of nation's rebirth while under occupation is a powerful theme in that movie. The US is a nation without problems if compared to Rus of that period.