← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Eendracht Maakt Mag
Thread ID: 7408 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2003-06-16
2003-06-16 21:50 | User Profile
JAPAN, THE NEXT TARGET FOR MULTICULTURALIZATION by Srdja Trifkovic
The furor surrounding Jean-Marie Le Pen last spring was largely due to the liberal establishment's amazement at the discovery that there are still so many Europeans around who have the gall to resist Third World immigration, globalization, multiculturalism, multiracialism, and other blessings of Our Global Village. The media and politicians did an effective hatchet job on Le Pen in the manner well known to Pat Buchanan over here. The resultââ¬âpredicted in this column immediately after the first round of the presidential raceââ¬âwas that the "soft Right" led by the unspeakable Monsieur Chirac (a man about as conservative as George W. Bush) is more firmly in charge of France's continuing Arabization than ever before. The grim moral of the story is that resistance to the bad guys is futile on their own terms.
The only developed country in the world of any significance where this does not hold true is Japan, and for that reason it is increasingly targeted by the proponents of collective suicides of nations. Many leading newspapers in the U.S. and Western Europe publish articles every few months warning of Japan's resistance to what is allegedly "inevitable" influx of foreigners to compensate for an aging workforce and a declining birthrate. Newly founded "NGOs," funded from abroad, are aggressively lobbying for an end to Japan's "restrictive and racist immigration policy." Anti-discrimination suits have been filed against the main Japanese air carrier, JAL, for refusing to accept Chinese citizens on its planes if they are suspected of wanting to work illegally or are deemed "likely to abscond." They are particularly incensed that "illegal stay" is now considered a crime under Japanese law.
At the same time the influx of illegal immigrants, mostly from China and Korea, has reached epidemic proportions. The cost of being smuggled into Japan ranges from $10,000 to $25,000, with the smuggling fee often paid on delivery by the migrant's relatives in Japan or with wages earned in Japan. Many of the illegal migrants work as unskilled laborers in construction and small factories. In the past five years, 200 vessels with 4,000 illegal immigrants have been captured.
An advocacy group for those being held in a detention center in Ushiku sent a letter of protest to the Justice Ministry regarding the quick deportation of five Iranians between November 1999 and January 2000. The group claims that the Iranians were seeking refugee status for fear that they would be persecuted if they returned home. It did not explain the apparent mystery of the Iranians crossing six or seven other international frontiers before reaching Japan, and NOT requesting political asylum in any one of them. The ostensible correlation between a country's GNP per capita and the number of "asylum seekers" seeking its protection-and economic opportunity, welfare, buzz, etc.-remains unstated and unexplained by the advocates of these queue-jumpers who seek to bypass immigration procedures of the host-countries, unpardonably lax as they are. In Japan this discrepancy is still allowed into the public debate on immigration, and for that reason Japan is soon going to be singled out as a "racist" and "bigoted" society.
The "NGOs" also demand that the Japanese government cancel the 60-day deadline for application for refugee status after entering the country and to guarantee the safety of those who claim to fear persecution. They regard as unpardonable the fact that between January and April 2000, only four out of 78 applications for asylum have been approved, while in 1999, 16 out of 260 applications were accepted.
Unlike the United States or Western Europe, in Japan immigration officers go around the country arresting unauthorized foreigners and bring charges for overstaying their visas or entering Japan illegally. Of those arrested, 968 were working without the proper documentation. The raids were conducted in Tokyo, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Saitama, Chiba, Yamanashi and Nagano.
Watch out for the pending demonization in the Western media of the outspoken governor of Tokyo, Shintaro Ishihara, as "the Jean-Marie Le Pen of Japanese politics" (the London Independent). The fact that "it is rare for him to have a good thing to say about foreigners and their foreign ways" is a crime. His references to "Sangokujin"ââ¬âan allegedly derogatory word that literally means "people from third countries," and generally refers to those from the former Japanese colonies of Taiwan, China, and the Korean Peninsulaââ¬âis presented as the Japanese equivalent of using the "N" word over here. When Ishihara says that "atrocious crimes have been committed again and again by sangokujin and other foreigners" he is telling the truth: illegal foreigners are 300 times more likely to commit crimes than native Japanese citizens. When he publicly expresses fears that "we can expect them to riot in the event of a disastrous earthquake," he is simply stating what an overwhelming majority of Japanese think and fear.
The bien-pensants claim that Japan's demographics make the influx of immigrants inevitable, and New York Times lamented, on March 14 of last year, the fact that four-fifths of Japanese are against allowing more foreigners into Japan. The captains of the race-relations industry simultaneously lament the fact that "not only has the Japanese government never made any sincere attempts to educate the public on issues of racism nor encourage its citizens to self-reflect on the subject, it itself has often been racism's very own mouthpiece":
"Japanese politicians are renown for their outrageously bigoted comments that seem to appear like clockwork every few years or less (three memorable examples are former prime minister Yasuhiro Nakasone's beliefs that blacks and Puerto Ricans were responsible for America's intellectual decline, former Justice Minister Seiroku Kajimaya's remarks that blacks ruin every neighborhood they move into, and most recently, the statement of current Tokyo governor Shintaro Ishihara, who said that daisankokujin . . . might cause "great chaos" in the event of a national disaster."
The obvious conclusion is that Japan is the last remaining place in the civilized world where the truth about race relations, immigration, and barbarization of the host societies is still allowed to be told. The fact should be lauded and copied. America needs to learn from different nations different things, and Japan's attitude to the satanic plot to kill all traditional identities off is one lesson that is long overdue.
2003-06-16 22:09 | User Profile
Civilization will be restored the day the last jew dies.
2003-06-16 22:15 | User Profile
Originally posted by jamestown@Jun 16 2003, 16:09 * Civilization will be restored the day the last jew dies.*
I don't think physical death is necessary. When Jewry ceases to exist as an ethnoreligious combine, dedicated to advancing its own interests, a renaissance of the West may take place. A massive repatriation of all Jews to Israel and whites reverting back to a folkish, classicist culture would have the same effect. I do not advocate genocide. That's been tried before, with disastrous consequences. If the Nazis did not so violently persecute the Jews (which they did, whether you like it or not), the world's most powerful state would not today be run by a cabal of Zionists and their goy sympathizers. Neither would The Holocau$t™ serve as a bar to intelligent, fact-based criticism of their behavior.
2003-06-16 22:22 | User Profile
I just like Japan. To me, they are the most advanced race on earth. I wouldn't forgive the destruction of that country. As for a genocide of the jews, that is not possible anymore, as Israel has WMDs now, thanks to the goy. They could easily nuke Rome or other European cities. Israel is a roque state, and unfortunately too close to Europe.
2003-06-16 22:26 | User Profile
Have you spent time in Japan? If you did, I don't think you'd be calling them the most advanced race on the planet.
That said, no one has the right to go and destroy anyone else's land. Although the jews believe they are the one group with that right. I don't believe jews will be eradicated (just like I dont' believe the hysterical prattle about white extinction), but they can be put in line, WMD's or not.
2003-06-16 23:25 | User Profile
Originally posted by Leland Gaunt@Jun 16 2003, 17:11 * The "Nazis" never tried to exterminate the Jews. (Even if they would have made that attempt, I would just like them the more!).*
The National Social Party killed a few Jews, probably in the neighborhood of a couple of thousand, definitely less than the 6 million that is claimed (and has been claimed to have happened before in the Ukraine). However, Germany lost WWII. Henceforth, Jews were given free license to use the excuse of The Holocau$t™ to stifle all vestiges of fact-based criticism of their behavior.
Your suggestion to "send them all to Israel" is hardly a good idea. there is no such thing as "israel". That is PALESTINE and it belongs to the Arabs. I think it is possible to wipe the State of Israel off of the map and give it back to the Arabs. the Arabs will get it either way, since their birthrate is higher than that of the Jews.
What do you suggest to be done about "The Jewish Question", then, if anything?
2003-06-17 07:08 | User Profile
My view on the Holocaust:
Up until the entrance of the US into the European war theatre, the nazi policy was to keep as many jews alive as possible, as they knew very well who put Roosevelt into office and who was shaping American public opinion. That is why the Red Cross was allowed to visit the camps in order to appease the public. Zyklon was a delousing agent that every German housewife could buy in a drug store. Germany had the biggest amount of chemical weapons in WWII stored in the Alpine bunkers. They were never used as Hitler fell victim to a gas attack in WWI in Belgium that almost blinded him. He thus ordered not to use them.
Rita Süssmuth, the former parliamentary house leader of the Bundestag published a report that put jewish casualties at Auschwitz at 250000. Overall, 1/2 million people died there, half of them Polish. Overwork, starvation, deseases and natural deaths were responsible for the deaths. IG Farben, Mercedes, Siemens and other companies build the Auschwitz complex in order to exploit cheap labor, as the SS rented the slave labour for pennies. To me there is no reason for the companies to show up there if the camp was a death camp, as dead labor is not very profitable. Conrad Adenauer mentioned in his speeches that the overall death toll of the jews were 380000 as reported in the Red Cross investigations. The 6 million number was invented by Stalin.
The real murder of the jews did not happen in the camps, but at the eastern front where the Einsatzgruppen rounded them up in the antipartisan warfare campaign. I saw statistics numbering to 1 million dead, but one must always be careful with numbers nowadays. 500000 German soldiers were killed behind the frontlines due to the partisan warfare. My Grandpa told me that life at the front was more secure than life in the hinterland. Even Red Cross camps were attacked by the partisans. So yes, it was a bloody war at the eastern front, the Geneva convention was not applied neither by the Soviets nor by the Nazies. A take no prisoner program was adhered to by both sides. One must see that the cruelties on the eastern front in contrast to the war on the western front was in the context of a very ideological war, Hitler even called it a race war (Rassenanschauungskrieg), and thus it was a very bloody conflict. I can't say that the Red Army nor the Wehrmacht were fighting in a gentlemanly manner. Overall, I put jewish deaths between 1 million and 1 1/2 million.
I have nothing against Russians personly. But as I see it, war between Russia and Germany seemed to be inevitable. Lenin sent the Red Army into Poland in 1919 to invade Germany. Stalin's army was about 10 times the German army at the height of the war, so this is hardly a sign that the Soviet Union was a peaceful fellow. The question of WWII just was who fired the first shot, the Germans or the Russians. The Germans did, even though the Red Army marched into Eastern Poland at the same time the Germans bombed Danzig. A detail in history easily forgotten.
The thing that makes me really ashamed is the extermination warfare against the Slavs conducted by psychopaths like Heidrich, Himmler, Koch and Keitel. Once the Germans were in Poland, the Polish intellectual class (teachers, lawyers. officers, writers etc.) were rounded up and shot. The Danzig corridor was ethnically cleansed of the Poles and the Government General of Poland was systematically starved, leading to millions of deaths. The same pattern emerged in Ukraine, where Koch ordered the confiscation of the annual harvest, leading to mass starvation of the civilian population. Leningrad was besieged by the German Army Group North, leading to the death of 1/3 of the civilian population in a city of 2 million. Hitler even sarcastically remarked that starving them to death is cheaper than taking them prisoner, as this requires to feed them. I just wonder why there are no books and documentaries about the German warfare against the Eastern Europeans. But such a thing would destroy the victimhood monopoly of a certain tribe.