← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Walter E Kurtz
Thread ID: 7216 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2003-06-08
2003-06-08 22:15 | User Profile
I know very little about this text. Is it a "forgery" as is so often claimed by the Tribe? Who penned it? When? What exactly does it document? Where can I locate a copy of it? Thanx in advance.
2003-06-08 22:25 | User Profile
[url=http://abbc.com/islam/english/toread/pr-zion.htm]http://abbc.com/islam/english/toread/pr-zion.htm[/url]
Online version. I didn't read that version, so I don't know how accurate it is; I have a paperback copy, that, has several typos ( :angry: Damn colombians.... I should never buy a book that says "Printed in Bogota"... now I know...) but it's still decent... As far as I know, they are real, they were made in the Zionist Congress in Basilea in 1897... that link provides further info.
2003-06-08 22:49 | User Profile
The Protocols are a narrative. The tell about The Jew and his habits. I don't believe that they are "true" per se [the minutes of a Jew meeting], but they are very accurate, nonetheless...whoever wrote them knew The Jew.
2003-06-09 16:59 | User Profile
There are "The Damning Parallels" that make good sense to me.
2003-06-09 17:31 | User Profile
Originally posted by Pinochet@Jun 8 2003, 16:25 ** [url=http://abbc.com/islam/english/toread/pr-zion.htm]http://abbc.com/islam/english/toread/pr-zion.htm[/url]
Online version. I didn't read that version, so I don't know how accurate it is; I have a paperback copy, that, has several typos ( :angry: Damn colombians.... I should never buy a book that says "Printed in Bogota"... now I know...) but it's still decent... As far as I know, they are real, they were made in the Zionist Congress in Basilea in 1897... that link provides further info. **
Thanx for the responses. I actually became interested in this work after acquiring the "new" translation of Evola's "Men Among the Ruins". The introduction makes mention of the fact that Evola distributed an edition of the protocols sometime during the 1930s...but he later questioned the veracity of it upon further investigation.
I'll read the document, and let you people know what I think.
2003-10-19 10:43 | User Profile
The "protocols" were forged by agents of the Russian Secret Service. The fact that antisemites (oops!) believe they "tell about the Jews and their habits" has to do with the fact that the forgery is based on a excellent book by a certain Joly containing fictive discussions between Machiavalli and Montesquieu, occasionally an accurate description of our time. And consequently, for Jew-hater (oops!) it's an accurate description of the evil Jews.
2003-10-19 16:35 | User Profile
Nesta Webster on Free Masonry, the French Revolution, and the Protocols of Zion:
"To sum up then, the Protocols are either a mere plagiarism of Maurice Joly's work, in which case the prophetic passages added by Nilus or another remain unexplained, or they are a revised edition of the plan communicated to Joly in 1864, brought up to date and supplemented so as to suit modern conditions by the continuers of the plot."
The link is an interesting one, presenting the cases for and against the Protocols.
2003-10-19 16:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Franco]The Protocols are a narrative. The tell about The Jew and his habits. I don't believe that they are "true" per se [the minutes of a Jew meeting], but they are very accurate, nonetheless...whoever wrote them knew The Jew.[/QUOTE]
Thats right, they are false but there is some truth in it.
2003-10-19 16:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hans]The "protocols" were forged by agents of the Russian Secret Service. [/QUOTE]
More philo-semitic canards. (oops!).
2003-10-19 17:12 | User Profile
Thank you Hans, or is it Moshe?
[QUOTE=Hans]The "protocols" were forged by agents of the Russian Secret Service. The fact that antisemites (oops!) believe they "tell about the Jews and their habits" has to do with the fact that the forgery is based on a excellent book by a certain Joly containing fictive discussions between Machiavalli and Montesquieu, occasionally an accurate description of our time. And consequently, for Jew-hater (oops!) it's an accurate description of the evil Jews.[/QUOTE]
2003-10-19 17:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter E Kurtz]I know very little about this text. Is it a "forgery" as is so often claimed by the Tribe? Who penned it? When? What exactly does it document? Where can I locate a copy of it? Thanx in advance.[/QUOTE]
If it is a forgery, as the hook noseds never tire of puling, pray tell, just what is it a forgery [B]OF[/B]?
It is a forgery in the same sense that a photograph is a forgery or that the equations of phyics are forgeries, or the words issuing from your mouth are a forgery - they are an accurate description of something, but they are not the thing itself. A better question to ask, per Henry Ford, is "Do they fit what's been happening and continues to happen in the world?", the anwer to which is most damning to the eternal nation of parasites.
2003-10-19 18:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=friedrich braun]Thank you Hans, or is it Moshe?[/QUOTE]
Und Sie sind bestimmt die Forums-Hanswurst?