← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · heritagelost

Thread 6797

Thread ID: 6797 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2003-05-19

Wayback Archive


heritagelost [OP]

2003-05-19 19:16 | User Profile

[url=http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=1&u=/ap/20030519/ap_on_re_us/florida_school_tests]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...da_school_tests[/url]

Thousand of Negroes will not Graduate because they failed ultra easy test!

"Da Test Be RACIST!!!!!!!"


Valley Forge

2003-05-19 19:19 | User Profile

Dem white tests be racist tools to keep the Black man down.

Word.


Hugh Lincoln

2003-05-22 16:21 | User Profile

The most damning statistics are those showing that black students from WEALTHIER homes fare more poorly on standardized tests than White students from POORER homes. So much for, "it's really a class thing."


edward gibbon

2003-05-22 17:59 | User Profile

Hugh Lincoln wrote:> **The most damning statistics are those showing that black students from WEALTHIER homes fare more poorly on standardized tests than White students from POORER homes. So much for, "it's really a class thing." **

If I remember correctly, this phenomenon was noted many years ago and then again. I must assume it is constant and indicative of native ability.


Roger Bannister

2003-05-22 20:19 | User Profile

You're right Mr. Gibbon. This link here will take you to an article that brings that issue up, along with the economic stats.

[url=http://www.amren.com/9211issue/9211issue.html]http://www.amren.com/9211issue/9211issue.html[/url]

" ... Scores on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) provide some of the most eye-opening data on the relative unimportance of environment. The SAT is not designed as an intelligence test, but it gives results that virtually mirror intelligence. Black students who grow up in families with incomes of more than $70,000 a year get lower scores than whites who grow up in families with incomes of less than $20,000 a year. It would be hard to find more persuasive evidence that race counts for more than family circumstances."


Happy Hacker

2003-05-22 20:40 | User Profile

Yes, poor whites easily outperform well-off blacks on the SAT. But, regardless of a race's average IQ, poor whites still should not be able to outperform rich blacks because of the free-market link between ability and prosperity. That dumb blacks make more money than smart whites reflects the racial preferences for blacks in our society.

Anyway, the SAT score vs. income (and parental education) refutes the lie that there is any such thing as "white privilege." Being white is being born handicapped because of our anti-white society.

(Edited)


Roger Bannister

2003-05-22 20:54 | User Profile

You're right Happy Hacker. The article doesn't really go into the aspects you bring up, but most informed people are aware of this. Being born a white male is the handicap. You don't have to sit in the back of the bus, but you do go to the back of the line unless you are 'connected'. This goes for jobs, school, everything. Mediocrity rules when it comes to enforcing diversity.


Hugh Lincoln

2003-05-22 20:59 | User Profile

That dumb blacks make more money than smart whites reflects the racial preferences for blacks in our society.

Absolutely. Yet another cost of the multiracial society. To see "black performance" in action, just dip your head into any organization where they're ensconced and take a look at the "work product." It always adds up to zilch. Blacks are so lazy that we're inspired to cheer whenever they actually DO something, sort of like proud parents clapping for their toddler when he craps in the potty.


Roger Bannister

2003-05-22 21:03 | User Profile

Yeah, but the blacks are crapping on us!


Cracker of the Whip

2003-05-23 02:58 | User Profile

You can show statistics proving every facet of this topic to no avail. Blacks don’t understand statistics, Leftists will denounce it all in favor of their view whatever that may be and the rest will shrug their shoulders and move on. In the end the Blacks will progress due to one action or another by the government. The public will forget the whole thing before the month is out. Society will then continue on degrading just as it has for the past 30-40 years.

What I’d like to know is when will enough be enough? What does it take for the non-voting apathetic majority of this country to say “That’s it!” and take back control? Will it have to come to a complete economic collapse to awaken people? Or would that just make them more government dependant? What about being overrun by the immigrants till Whites are considerably less than 50% of the population? Or would they embrace the circumstance as a fulfilled ideological achievement?

Do any of you think that the voting booth will reverse the present societal/political situation? If not then what are the recourses available?


Sisyfos

2003-05-23 07:14 | User Profile

**Do any of you think that the voting booth will reverse the present societal/political situation? **

Salvaging the situation via electoral means is impossible and has been for some time. Demographics alone make this clear. North America is at best 2/3 White and this fraction includes those Jews and mongrels who think it useful for the moment to self-identify as White. The Aryan balance is far too deluded to yield the minimum ¾ necessary to get results at the booth, and, as recent pollings make abundantly clear, the average Joe possesses memory whose life span is inferior to a fruit fly, i.e., malleable by enemy propaganda and hence unreliable. Naturally, the numbers become less favourable with each passing year.

That is not to say that we won’t see any “hard right turns” in the future, most likely engineered by opportunists who’ll tap into genuine concerns, but the remedies will invariably fail to address the fundamentals--racial separation and hyper-capitalism, for these are paradigm busters which few are able to contemplate let alone stomach the actual implementation. All else is blowing in the wind and merely prolongs the agony.

If not then what are the recourses available?

All energies should be devoted to promoting racial polarization. This need not be akin to spreading hatred, just encouragement of natural race-specific preferences. Also, let’s not forget that many “Liberals,” though they lack the acumen to perceive as much, are already aiding this cause via persistent peddling of multiculturalism. Each piece of new legislation spawned in the California legislature, for example, aimed at strengthening the “Hispanic community” is but another step on a road toward the only possible destination--separation. This journey ought to be expedited since every argument in favour of separate Aztlan, by implication, makes the case for a separate all-White nation.

I realize that severing the country may not be especially palatable, but it is high time we renounce pretence. It’s either a piece of the pie or nothing at all, i.e., racial absorption. If it helps, think of it as strategic withdrawal, for every rational Nationalist wants the world for his tribe and I naturally assume that the Mestizo and Mongrel nations will decline considerably, and, in time, do our posterity the courtesy of submitting their real estate for colonization. If they are true men, unlike their pitiful predecessors, the exercise will be a straightforward affair.


Bardamu

2003-05-23 18:45 | User Profile

Originally posted by Cracker of the Whip@May 22 2003, 20:58 **

What I’d like to know is when will enough be enough? What does it take for the non-voting apathetic majority of this country to say “That’s it!” and take back control?

**

Oh, didn't you know? as it is known today the white race is doomed . The white elite will remain, except it will have a jewish component in most family trees. The white middle and lower class is going to disappear into mixed race forms.

To answer your question directly, nothing is going to wake up the lazy, fat, run of the mill white idiot because they don't care, and the reason for that is they haven't been programmed to care.

All of this was fought out during World War Two, and we lost.


heritagelost

2003-05-23 19:35 | User Profile

For the past ten years, I have heard the same line over and over. "This will wake white people up!" Unfortunately the average person cares so little about their surrounding that they will never wake up. Waking up is to scary for them. Only when conditions are so bad that their wealth is gone, their livelyhood is gone, and they are in fear of their lives from murderous non-white hordes will white people wake up.


Wayland

2003-05-23 20:07 | User Profile

Originally posted by heritagelost@May 23 2003, 11:35 For the past ten years, I have heard the same line over and over. "This will wake white people up!" Unfortunately the average person cares so little about their surrounding that they will never wake up. Waking up is to scary for them. Only when conditions are so bad that their wealth is gone, their livelyhood is gone, and they are in fear of their lives from murderous non-white hordes will white people wake up.

"The causes and motives of seditions are, innovation in religion; taxes; alteration of laws and customs; breaking of privileges; general oppression; advancement of unworthy persons, strangers; dearths; disbanded soldiers; factions grown desperate; and whatsoever in offending a people joineth them in a common cause." - Francis Bacon, from Durant's "The Story of Philosophy":


Roy Batty

2003-05-23 20:51 | User Profile

Most white people are still far too comfortable in terms of their living conditions. When things get worse, and they will, then the gears will begin to turn, faster and faster. We are not in an impossible situation, not by any means. At the moment, most white people don't have that gnawing feeling of despiration, of justification, to begin to right the wrongs. At the moment that is. All bets are off once whites are forced to have to compete with the blacks and browns in earnest for the simplest of necessities. The state isn't going to carry the day.