← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · xmetalhead

Thread 6791

Thread ID: 6791 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2003-05-19

Wayback Archive


xmetalhead [OP]

2003-05-19 12:40 | User Profile

I like this movie and I'm surprised it made it to TV.

I can't help but believe that if I was a German citizen in 1925, living under the oppression of traitorous defeat in WWI, stifled under Versailles, and no right to self-determination coupled with the ominus threat of a Bolshevik/Marxist takeover......well, I know who'd I join up with.

If you have watched the first part of this miniseries, do you think Hitler was wrong in anything he was trying to accomplish during that period in time? Does anything he said about "foreigners" and "immigrants" remind you of anything in our present day?

I saw a patriot of the highest degree determined to save his people ONLY. Not a determination to takeover the world. Hitler was/is greatly misunderstood.


Hugh Lincoln

2003-05-19 16:01 | User Profile

I figured it wasn't worth bothering with, but whilst surfing through I saw an ad featuring a mother and her White child, who told her child to play with the White children instead of the black children. The child then asks, "Why?"

Of course, there's a great answer to that. But the public service message was, "encourage your little White child to endanger her life by playing with black kids."


Faust

2003-05-19 16:40 | User Profile

Hugh Lincoln,

** I figured it wasn't worth bothering with, but whilst surfing through I saw an ad featuring a mother and her White child, who told her child to play with the White children instead of the black children. The child then asks, "Why?"

Of course, there's a great answer to that. But the public service message was, "encourage your little White child to endanger her life by playing with black kids."**

Yes I seen this so-called "PSA". You are most Right. Yuck.


PaleoconAvatar

2003-05-19 16:53 | User Profile

I decided to watch the miniseries just for some laughs.

I thought the portrayal of the dog incident near the beginning was foolish--I doubt that even happened.

I noticed the movie makers made the communists of the time look rather sedate and harmless--they're always shown as "peaceably" putting up their red posters on walls only to have the government (or the Nazi party private security forces) come and beat them up, etc. They don't show all the violence and mayhem the communists caused--it wasn't just a one-way street and the communists were not persecuted victims "minding their own business."


il ragno

2003-05-19 17:08 | User Profile

I figured it wasn't worth bothering with, but whilst surfing through I saw an ad featuring a mother and her White child, who told her child to play with the White children instead of the black children. The child then asks, "Why?"

Oh what a moment to flash the VNN logo!


xmetalhead

2003-05-19 17:40 | User Profile

Originally posted by PaleoconAvatar@May 19 2003, 11:53 ** I decided to watch the miniseries just for some laughs.

I thought the portrayal of the dog incident near the beginning was foolish--I doubt that even happened.

I noticed the movie makers made the communists of the time look rather sedate and harmless--they're always shown as "peaceably" putting up their red posters on walls only to have the government (or the Nazi party private security forces) come and beat them up, etc. They don't show all the violence and mayhem the communists caused--it wasn't just a one-way street and the communists were not persecuted victims "minding their own business." **

Paleo, yes, I noticed the Marxists were clearly shown as a benign and otherwise peaceful movement. And the jews too. And the newspaper writer played by Matthew Modine. And anyone else who wasn't a nazi. Ridiculous. Figures.

But one thing comes through: Hitler was sincere in his speeches and convictions and that is contagious.

And yes, those ADL spots were ridiculous!


Texas Dissident

2003-05-19 17:54 | User Profile

Didn't catch it, but wondering if Bonhoeffer or Niemoller are featured in any capacity.


Valley Forge

2003-05-19 19:30 | User Profile

I laughed out loud during the WWI scene when Hitler points out that Jews occupy positions of power all over Germany, but none are to be found on the front lines fighting the war.

Remind you of anything today? (Jews in positions of power, none on the front lines)

It's time to admit that Hitler was right.


xmetalhead

2003-05-19 19:48 | User Profile

Originally posted by Valley Forge@May 19 2003, 14:30 ** I laughed out loud during the WWI scene when Hitler points out that Jews occupy positions of power all over Germany, but none are to be found on the front lines fighting the war.

Remind you of anything today? (Jews in positions of power, none on the front lines)

It's time to admit that Hitler was right. **

The nature of the yoos has not changed, therefore Hitler's views are still valid even when applied to America's maladie. Of course that is why he's still talked about as an All-Evil Anti-Human on a daily basis; because he was/is right.

**Didn't catch it, but wondering if Bonhoeffer or Niemoller are featured in any capacity. **

Tex I believe it was General Bonhoeffer in the movie, portrayed as a legitimization figure towards Hitler's fledgling party. Does this sound correct? He stands trial with Hitler after the Munich Beer Hall Putsch. Bonhoeffer is found not guilty, while Hitler is found guilty and sentenced to 5 years prison.


Wayland

2003-05-19 21:06 | User Profile

I only watched about half the program last night but I thought the portrayal of Hitler was absolutely ludicrous. Who could ever believe that such a maladjusted, defective, dishonest character would become the most-loved man in Germany?

The scene with Hitler beating the dog was typical; as far as I know there's no recorded instance of Hitler, an animal lover and vegetarian, ever committing a violent act like that against animal or human. The producers went so far overboard, right down to the bad clothes and bad haircut, that I really believe many people will be more likely to question this story than accept it.


N.B. Forrest

2003-05-19 22:12 | User Profile

I missed it. I was going to watch, but didn't know when it would be on. I might watch part 2, since I'm a glutton for punishment.

:hit:


Javelin

2003-05-19 22:33 | User Profile

Itz funny how Yehudi preaches general cynicism and contempt for the concept of "facts". Yet we're given the most laughably crude picture of Hitler and the most childishly simplistic rationale for Hitler's motivation and Yehudi asks us to believe it without blinking. :hit:


Exelsis_Deo

2003-05-20 02:20 | User Profile

when you OWN the media, you can put it on front page and there's always plenty of WIGGERS willing to participate in such a SHAM. After all, the economy is not well, but TV will always survive.. so we get a dose of misinformation, could you expect anything more ? no.. I didn't think so.. Note to Mr. Carlyle who played Hitler : I would not feel comfortable sleeping if I were you...


Ruffin

2003-05-20 03:43 | User Profile

xmetalhead:

**Tex I believe it was General Bonhoeffer in the movie, portrayed as a legitimization figure towards Hitler's fledgling party. Does this sound correct? He stands trial with Hitler after the Munich Beer Hall Putsch. Bonhoeffer is found not guilty, while Hitler is found guilty and sentenced to 5 years prison. **

I believe you're thinking of Ludendorff.


Zoroaster

2003-05-20 05:59 | User Profile

I didn't watch it. The one-eyed Jew does not broadcast programs harmful to Jews. It's merely another example of Bolshevik agitprop. No doubt, Jewish pundits and their shaboos goy puppets will be reviewing the Hitler mini-series all summer long. You'd think, after fifty years, folks would catch on to the lies of the Jews and their guilt game.

Silence is the highest form of contempt.

-Z-


xmetalhead

2003-05-20 12:32 | User Profile

Originally posted by Ruffin@May 19 2003, 22:43 ** xmetalhead: **Tex I believe it was General Bonhoeffer in the movie, portrayed as a legitimization figure towards Hitler's fledgling party. Does this sound correct? He stands trial with Hitler after the Munich Beer Hall Putsch. Bonhoeffer is found not guilty, while Hitler is found guilty and sentenced to 5 years prison. **

I believe you're thinking of Ludendorff. **

Thanks Ruffin.

I may punish myself tonight and watch part deux. Curiousity kills the cat, ya know.


heritagelost

2003-05-20 15:41 | User Profile

Can someone post what times it is going to be aired again?

I saw that the ADL gave it a thumbs up, so it couldn't be that good.


N.B. Forrest

2003-05-21 05:27 | User Profile

Well, I watched part two, and what a steaming pile of jew :dung: it was. Such laughable scenes & characterizations: Hitler snatching the cigar out of Ludendorff's hand & tossing it out the window of the car; the saintly anti-Nazi newspaperman bravely facing death at Dachau when Uncle Wolf took the reins after the Enabling Act.....I noticed that they said at the end that Hitler actually killed six million jews during the war. My God - I, I had no idea!

And where did they get this manic dwarf Carlyle? He looks & sounds nothing like Adolf.

:hit:


Eendracht Maakt Mag

2003-05-21 16:20 | User Profile

Originally posted by rban@May 21 2003, 05:20 ** I'm watching it tonite, CBS 9 pm. I hope they mention how he hated Slavs and loved Hindus! **

Yeah, too bad his hatred and love were both misplaced greatly...


Robbie

2003-05-22 01:33 | User Profile

I didn't watch the film, and had no desire to watch it. I've never seen the film "Schindler's List", either.

I doubt I'd watch a film about the Gulags and Jewish-dominated Bolshevism becau-----oh that's right; nobody would make a film about that.