← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Robbie
Thread ID: 6564 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2003-05-08
2003-05-08 19:29 | User Profile
Black Basketball Coach: "Blacks are not Comfortable in Boston"
May 8 2003
Nets head coach Byron Scott said in a radio interview yesterday that many NBA players feel uncomfortable playing in Boston because the city has been slow to accept black athletes.
"I know a lot of black players feel that way," said Scott, appearing on the Mike and the Mad Dog Show on WFAN. "I know we did in the 80s, we knew you couldn't go to certain places -- and that was their own players (who felt that).
"Some cities or organizations or whatever you want to say haven't caught up to the year 2000 yet."
Scott's comments come one year after crowd behavior at the FleetCenter became an issue in the Eastern Conference Finals. Joumana Kidd, the wife of Nets point guard Jason, said unruly fans had directed racially insensitive comments at her and her young son, T.J., during Game 3 of the series
:afro:
[url=http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/ind...75740151360.xml]http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/ind...75740151360.xml[/url]
2003-05-08 20:17 | User Profile
Byron Scott should look into the stands now and then to see those White "haters" who are paying the coaches and players salaries in the NBA by attending those black-worship contests! F*ck him. :punk:
2003-05-08 22:44 | User Profile
Byron Scott is still mouthing the same complaints the Lakers did back in the 80's when they were having their battles with the Celtics for NBA titles. Left out in all the crying, is the fact that the Celtics were the first NBA team with a black player, first with an all black starting five, and first with a black coach (Bill Russell). A lot of that helped turn the league into the undisciplined imitation of basketball it is now, but those facts are conveniently ignored when blacks want to cry about something. What's bothering Scott and company is that they aren't getting their asses kissed constantly as Scott did when he enjoyed his stint with Lakers in the 80's.
This is some kind of b.s. story because he and some players are probably jockeying for some type of concessions or freebies from management, or the team is helping put them up to this to get more from the city.
<_<
2003-05-08 23:09 | User Profile
I do not understand Mr. Scott's complaint.
Boston has everything that the African athlete could want. Plenty of weed and rock available in Mattapan. Plenty of eager and willing white "hoes" at our institutes of higher learning. And in case of misunderstandings with the local po-lice, attorney SilverDiamondGoldstein is ready to take your case to the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination.
What's not to like? :huh:
2003-05-08 23:23 | User Profile
Mather - I like the moniker, by the way - all you've done is remind me of some of the outrageous crap I would see when I worked in TV sports. The 'ballers' would line up at the player's hotels, at the arenas, they knew the 'watering holes' frequented by the players, the whole deal. What was scary was how many of these girls were white. And how great looking so many of them were. And how brainwashed they were. It wasn't always a question of brainpower, they were completely brainwashed.
Here's something interesting for you, you may know this already. In all pro sports, the rookies are taught how to dispose of a used condom correctly. No joke. How to tie it up, and flush it down the toilet. Why? Because there have been cases of the women fishing the used rubber out of the trash, or off the floor, and making sure they got the baby gravy in their love canals. The players would roll over and go to sleep or go run off right away. Big mistake. But their own fault. How many jobs out there can count constant sexual advances by women as job hazard?
Not all of these women were looking to have a baby from a player or get married. Lots of them just want to get poked by a celebrity. That's it. ;)
2003-05-09 23:55 | User Profile
If they aren't burned to death over a small dowry, raped at 12 and sold into prostitution, defecating in the street or having a sip of their own urine, they remain loyal. No Indian woman would ever, ever debase themselves. Then again .... [url=http://www.pelonmaantiede.com/]http://www.pelonmaantiede.com/[/url] Over 18, please.
I'd say they are right down there with the sports groupies. Just not as hygenic.
2003-05-10 11:29 | User Profile
"I know a lot of black players feel that way," said Scott, appearing on the Mike and the Mad Dog Show on WFAN. "I know we did in the 80s, we knew you couldn't go to certain places -- and that was their own players (who felt that).
Nothing at all like the warm, friendly reception given by nigras to, say, a White whose car breaks down in da 'hood after dark - right, boy?
:afro: = :dung:
2003-05-10 19:56 | User Profile
Hindu women know that their high moral standards dictate that they can only have relations with fellow Hindus, because this is the only way, along with our vaunted caste system
You either exaggerate or are unaware of the ââ¬Ëprogressââ¬â¢ in human relations between Indians of various ethnic backgrounds upon arrival on this continent. From the horseââ¬â¢s mouth, if you like:
[url=http://www.hinduweb.org/home/sikh/rverma/goel1.html]http://www.hinduweb.org/home/sikh/rverma/goel1.html[/url]
ââ¬ÅSikhs have always been honoured members of Hindu society. Hindus at large have always cherished the legacy left by the Gurus and venerated Sikh Gurudwaras no less than the shrines of any other Hindu sect. There has never been any bar on inter- marriage, inter-dining and many other modes of inter-mingling between the parent Hindu society on the one hand and the Sikh community on the other. Hindus and Sikhs share a common cultural heritage...ââ¬Å
As you can see, vulnerability to propaganda is not race-specific. You didnââ¬â¢t really think it was just a case of lecherous white men trolling after yellow ladybugs and white sluts slumming with brothers, did you?
Between your inept attempts to elevate Hindus to ranks of supermen while demeaning other Indian ethnics and taunts seemingly intended to fracture white groups along sub-racial lines, it would seem that youââ¬â¢re the biggest racist here (not that I care for labels, mind you). Given the calibre of competition, this is quite an accomplishment. My compliments.
Then again, imputing behavioural attributes to others when they so perfectly describe you is a race-specific characteristic, more pronounced in Semites than Hindus, who care only for caste. You have much to overcome before they welcome you in their ranks. But do not be dissuaded, your goal is, well, noble. :punk: