← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Faust

Thread 5893

Thread ID: 5893 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2003-03-30

Faust [OP]

2003-03-30 13:47 | User Profile

The European Union - a totalitarian monstrosity from www.patriot.dk

**The European Union - a totalitarian monstrosity

By Ole Kreiberg

On the 19th March 1995 the ministers of justice and internal affairs agreed to "a common action against racism and xenophobia" which binds the member countries "to secure an efficient judicial co-operation" within following five areas:

* Public call for discrimination, violence, and "racial hatred" * Public defence of "crimes against humanity" * Public denial of the crimes that Germany committed during the Second World War * Public distribution of material that contains "racist" or "xenophobic" information * Participation in activities carried out by groups or organisations which implies "discrimination, racists or ethnic hatred"

Now, you must be incredible naive if you think that it is only so-called "racism" that the EU wants to oppose with unconstitutional Soviet methods. As soon as the few "racists" have been send to special EU prisoner camps, re-education camps or what ever the EU may prefer to call them, the turn will come to the far more numerous EU-adversaries whose EU scepticism will be cried up as nationalism.

The experience from the former Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and various historical empires shows that the only way to keep such multinational states together is through ruthless repression of all tendencies to separatism. The first thing that happened when freedom of speech was introduced in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia was that these states collapsed. It should be easy for everyone to understand that you are not able to have both an European Union and democracy at the same time.One of them has to go - either the EU or democracy.

url: [url=http://www.patriot.dk/eu1.html]http://www.patriot.dk/eu1.html[/url] **

**The Meaning of the Ethnic Differences

by Ole Kreiberg

The problem of immigration is fundamentally about the ethnic status of Denmark. Is Denmark supposed to be multiethnic or not? I can see no advantages at all in a multiethnic society.

If one takes a look around the world, one will find a vast number of places, where different ethnic and cultural groups live within the same state. This seems more often to lead to violent conflicts in these societies than to "enrichment" the way our politicians normally maintain in the mass media.

Cyprus is a good example of this matter. Here the Greeks and the Turks had so much difficulty in living together within the same state, that this state was crushed in 1974. On this background I would very much like to ask our politicians: "When the Greeks (and furthermore the Kurds and the Armenians) are not able to live in peace with the Turks, what reason is there then to believe that the Danes in the long run will be able to do so?"

Only the national solidarity is able to create the coherence which is the very foundation for our democracy. The immigration from Africa and Asia with the following unnatural biological mixing of fundamentally different peoples will dilute this coherence. History is not able to show just one example that something good can result from miscegenation. On the other hand there are plenty of examples that prove the contrary.

One just has to take a look on the political, social and economical conditions in the Latin-American countries where the people is one big mixture of Europeans, Red Indians and sometimes also Africans. Political repression, chaos, poverty and bad social conditions are prevailing here and this could very well become that way in a future Denmark, if the immigration from Asia and Africa isn't checked and the immigrants from there already settled in Denmark sent back. To me the future of my country and the true interests of the Danish people are far more important than absurd and self-destructive internationalism or "globalism".

I do not base my outlook on the meaning of the ethnic differences on neither the German chauvinism of nazism nor the right of one race to rule other races such as in racism (supremacy). No my foundation is on the other hand the experience of history, common sense, logic and the eternal laws of nature.

Benjamin Disraeli who was prime minister in England in 1872-80 and of Jewish heritage wrote the following in his book Endymion p. 249-250:

"No one must lightly dismiss the question of race. It is the key to world history, and it is precisely for this reason that written history often lacks clarity - it is written by people who do not understand the race question and what belongs to it. Language and religion do not make a race - there is only one thing which makes a race, and that is blood"

The anti-racist allegation of an inborn and natural racial equality is nothing but a political doctrine based on wishful thinking, When it come to the question of race it is often forgotten that the truth about the racial differences for most people is so compelling obvious that the burden of proof must lie with those that proclaim racial equality - and not the other way round.

The first law of nature is self-preservation. This natural law does also apply for nations and ethnic groups.

The German philosopher Arthur Shopenhauer once wrote on how the undesired truth is received: "Firstly it is ridiculed, secondly it is fought violently for at last to be accepted as self-evident."

You shall understand the truth, and the truth shall set you free (John 8.32)

Only truth triumphs (Upanisad)

url: [url=http://www.patriot.dk/meaning.html]http://www.patriot.dk/meaning.html[/url] **

**Zionism and Racism

By Ole Kreiberg

In November 1975 a majority of the nations of the world agreed in the UN General Assembly that Zionism, that is Jewish nationalism, is racist. The Jewish national state, Israel, is thus built on a racist foundation.

Many Jews are heavily engaged in anti-racism, but it is usually the racism of other peoples and very seldom their own that seems to take their interest. Count Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), Austrian Jew and founder and honorary president of the Pan-European Movement, wrote something very characteristically in one of his Books (Praktischer Idealismus, Vienna 1925):

"The man of the future will be of mixed race. For Pan-Europe [that is united Europe] I want a European-Asiatic-Negroid mixed race. The leaders shall come from the Jews because a benevolent providence has with the Jews given Europe a new spiritual and intellectual noble race."

Here we have Jewish racism in a nutshell. All Non-Jewish peoples shall become equal while "God's chosen Jewish people" shall be the master race the way it is in Israel/Palestine. All criticism of Jewish racism shall be made a "criminal offence" through anti-racism laws. One of the most keen to push for so-called anti-racism legislation in the EU is the chairman of the Management Board of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia in Vienna, Jean Kahn, who also happens to be the president of the European Jewish Congress. All racism must be made a "criminal offence", except the Jewish, which will be "criminal Anti-Semitism" to criticise.

url: [url=http://www.patriot.dk/zion1.html]http://www.patriot.dk/zion1.html[/url] **

Ragnar

2003-03-31 04:54 | User Profile

Originally posted by Faust@Mar 30 2003, 13:47 ** Count Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), Austrian Jew and founder and honorary president of the Pan-European Movement, wrote...(Praktischer Idealismus, Vienna 1925):

url: [url=http://www.patriot.dk/zion1.html]http://www.patriot.dk/zion1.html[/url]ÃÂ [/QUOTE] **

Great quote! Does the fact that this threat against European civilization was made in 1925 not shed light upon the events that transpired in the following 20 years? Are Europeans supposed to swallow any and all attacks against their race and culture? Amazing this sort of thing is not better known.

mwdallas

2003-03-31 19:08 | User Profile

Wow, that is a hell of a quote! And guess what, the Coudenhove-Kalergis are still at it:

Vier mal pro Jahr diskutieren SchÃÂ¼lerInnen im Rahmen einer SchÃÂ¼lerradio-Sendung ÃÂ¼ber aktuelle gesellschaftspolitische Themen. Diesmal diskutieren SchÃÂ¼ler des BG Polgarstrasse mit Barbara Coudenhove-Kalergi ÃÂ¼ber die EU-Erweiterung.

Translated:

Four times a year, the students, in the framework of a student radio broadcast, discuss social/political topics. This time, the students discuss the expansion of the EU with Barbara Coudenhove-Kalergi(!).

mwdallas

2003-03-31 19:13 | User Profile

Here:

[url=http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SPRINGcoudenhove.htm]http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SPRIN...Gcoudenhove.htm[/url]

We have a picture and a statement that he had a Japanese mother.

John Crichton

2003-04-08 06:50 | User Profile

Up until 1991 we only had one Soviet Union ,now in 2003 we have two; USA-ZOG and EU-ZOG aren't we lucky.

jamestown

2003-04-09 18:20 | User Profile

Well, Mikail Gorbachev called the European Union the New Soviet Union a while ago. In my country the EU bureaucrats are called EU Kommissars. All major decissionmaking is done by the EU commission, which is undemocratic as its representatives are sent from the national governments, not elected by the people. The European parliament gets elected by the people, but has only limited powers, furthermore it leads initiatives to censor the internet globally. The people serving in the EU bureaucracy are either technocrats or left leaning as the EU monster hardly attracts traditionalists or nationalists. In EU parliamentary elections nationalist parties usually show up strongly, as people use their vote as a protest against the institution, but usually nationalist representatives are shunned by the socalled "democratic" parties the same way as on the national level. A few years ago the EU commission led by Belgium even lowered itself by launching a boycott against Austria as the people there voted the wrong way. That pretty much shows where the path is going.