← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco

Thread 5704

Thread ID: 5704 | Posts: 81 | Started: 2003-03-21

Wayback Archive


Franco [OP]

2003-03-21 22:33 | User Profile

3-21-03

The Mind of Kathy Churchgoer

*April, 2002: "We will not allow Israel to be crushed." -- George W. Bush, in Crawford, Texas. [By whom?, one wonders]

*March, 2003: Iraq War begins, led by America.

Kathy Churchgoer, Ohio housewife, being interviewed on the 10 o'clock news about the Iraq War:

Reporter: "What do you say to people who claim that the Iraq War is being waged to benefit Israel or Jews?"

Kathy: "Oh! -- that's anti-Semitism! I don't see any connection between the Iraq War and Jews. Besides, my favorite television preacher, Sam BibleWhacker, says that Jews are our friends. And don't forget, Jesus was a Jew -- it says so right here in [flip, flip, flip] Genesis 12:34:71:28! I love Israel. Jews are our friends. In fact, I'm going to send a large cash donation to the Israeli government..."


Happy Hacker

2003-03-25 04:20 | User Profile

A couple weeks ago I caught a TV preacher (I don't know his name nor remember the cable station) telling people to send in their money.

What impressed me was the total hard-sell (wickedness) of this guy requesting money. I'm sure he is not the exception to televangelists, but I don't know. I'm not an old lady who would be watching these guys (who watches televangelists?).

He was telling people to give him $200 each and that God had told him to say these things. Those who give him $200 will be doing God’s work. He said this is “seed money” and giving this money will cause God to bless you and take care of your problems. If money is your problem, $200 isn’t enough to pay your bills, but it’s enough to get God to pay your bills, if you send in the money. This is how God works, according to the Bible; seed money is what you need to get things going. If you don’t trust God then you have no faith and God cannot do anything with people like that. Blah, blah, blah.

Sorry, my paraphrase of him doesn’t do him justice. But, I’m sure many needy old ladies were writing checks. I’m sure they were thinking “Someone who praises God so much cannot be a crook.”

The point is, I imagine, that many people who support Bush’s war are saying “How can someone who waves the flag so much do anything less than protect this country?”

The most evil of people will pretend to praise God and will pretend to love America.


Blond Knight

2003-03-25 04:34 | User Profile

This reminds me of some wisdom that a friend of mine was given by his grandfather many years ago.

"When you are doing some business with a person, keep an eye on them, but if they claim to be religious, keep BOTH eyes on them."


weisbrot

2003-03-25 04:42 | User Profile

Conflating all Christians with the minority that constitute the flimflam artists and zealots is a practice worthy of Spielbergs and Roths.

Right now precision and cohesion would probably be most valuable, as opposed to the suspicion and deracination sowed by the culture wreckers among us.

Churches in the U.S. are in crisis but they are not entirely to blame for their own troubles. Maybe we could come up with some more deserving targets for these broad attacks, and settle the internal problems after the real work at hand is accomplished.


Okiereddust

2003-03-25 05:04 | User Profile

Originally posted by weisbrot@Mar 25 2003, 04:42 **Conflating all Christians with the minority that constitute the flimflam artists and zealots is a practice worthy of Spielbergs and Roths.

Right now precision and cohesion would probably be most valuable, as opposed to the suspicion and deracination sowed by the culture wreckers among us.

**

Quite right. Actually this is the exact line of course taken by Hollywood.

Really people who describe religion in this way don't know anything about it. I can never understand how people describe Christian America as a bunch of blind people who worship Jerry Farwell and Co and pay homage to them every Sunday. In truth, only a small percentage of Churches are even affiliated with Christian Coalition at all, and those that do not very obstentatiously in my opinion.

It really is funny to see how basically the attitudes of white racialists and Jews toward Christianity is basically exactly the same. It really fits to a certain extent with how MacDonald described this movement, "mirror-image Judaism". Of course I don't know, I suspect a lot of these people are half-wittingly imbibing in stereotypes deliberately encouraged by movement provoceteurs.


weisbrot

2003-03-25 05:06 | User Profile

Originally posted by wintermute@Mar 24 2003, 23:55 ** The internal problems are the work at hand.

**

Self, I said, don't hit "reply" until the frosty one is gone.

Well, I tend to disagree. For one thing, sheer numbers would make the task of purging potential WN/paleo ranks of all Christian adherents- Zionists or not- unlikely if not impossible. For another, those who hold to Israel as fanatically as they hold to their odd eschatology really don't represent the majority of Christians here, or even close to it. They've just got their hands on the wheel at this point.

I'll go down the road with you this far- the Ralph Reed Republicans are a problem that needs to be solved posthaste.


Okiereddust

2003-03-25 05:09 | User Profile

Originally posted by wintermute@Mar 25 2003, 04:55 The internal problems are the work at hand.

Wintermute**

I dunno. Sounds to me like just a lot of verbal masturbation.


mwdallas

2003-03-25 15:47 | User Profile

I have heard some amazing stories about stuff going on during services at a couple places in the Dallas area. Northwest Bible Church, I understand, has two huge Israeli flags hanging in the sanctuary, and offers the congregartion pro-Israel sermons.


Oklahomaman

2003-03-26 01:47 | User Profile

When I say that 'internal problems are the problem at hand', I mean that we need to examine and address aspects of current theology that make racialist political action impossible. If the problem is as simple as 'dispensational' eschatology, then we need to think about how to fight that.

What Okiereddust said is true - these people account for a percentage of Christians in America, regardless of the noise they generate, smaller than what most assume. But it's equally true that this subset resides in areas that tend to be the bread basket of paleoconservatism - small town white America. I have a cousin who is most sympathetic to our cause save for his adherence to Evangelicalism. I find it impossible to hold a discussion with him on religious and certain cultural matters that I would regard as rational or productive.

These people aren't positively inclined toward systematic theology of the type espoused by the Orthodox, Catholic or Lutheran churches. In fact, they oppose such churches, in part, because of this. Handing theological tracts. to even the most intellegent of them avails us nothing. It's been my experience that people in evangelical/pentecostal crowd latch on to a few points of their theology to the exclusion of all others. I've had good results by attacking them theologically on their concept Trinity and the implications of Jews as God's chosen people theologies by pointing out that this means Christ is not neccessary for salvation. "So, why don't you convert to Judaism?" is a world beater in this regard.

The problem goes beyond merely a certain subset of Christians holding to bad theology. Their leaders and apologists are able to garner support by using the same techniques and outlets which are used to deseminate modern mass culture. In many areas, they've embraced mass culture wholesale albeit by replacing degeneracy with saccarine phrases and bland generalities as in the phenomena of Contempory Chistian Music and WWJD merchandise. Evangelical Pentecostalism and Charismatism are undeniably related to the larger problem of mass culture. The widening of Kulturkampf beyond issues like abortion and prayer in schools into other domains to promote Western culture as it stood 150 or so years ago seems a neccessity. The best vaccination against mass culture is old classical culture.


Okiereddust

2003-03-26 02:31 | User Profile

Originally posted by wintermute@Mar 26 2003, 00:18 When I say that 'internal problems are the problem at hand', I mean that we need to examine and address aspects of current theology that make racialist political action impossible. If the problem is as simple as 'dispensational' eschatology, then we need to think about how to fight that.

I see your point. You want to figure out some way to blame all the problems and failures of white nationalism, rather than on the fixated on thine own navel (or whatever lower parts thou findest most fascinating on the computer) one prefers to blame it all on some mysterious religious predilictions of thy neighbors thou dost not understand.

**If it's something else, then we need to identify what that something else is. Claiming persecution or 'verbal masturbation' is not helpful. **

Maybe that "something else" that is holding back the nationalism is the myopic self infatuation of people who would rather spend days on threads bashing other people's religion than doing anything useful. You say you have something useful to discover, but all I have ever seen is just this ridiculous infatuation with bashing Christianity or Preachers.

There are all sorts of useful things we could be doing, but you just prefer to hang around on these stupid threads, imagining your puerile theology and bigoted antichurchgoer rhetoric for days on end. Well you are right, maybe there is something wrong with Christianity. How long would a Muslim last in Iran or Palestine of the constantly complained that they could not successfully fight Judaism until they could eat pork chops or watch naked women dance inside the mosque? Such might properly be identified as one of those lower life's, common to all cultures, who can not get along with anyone and who is unhappy in any culture, and propery disposed of. Or he might alternatively be targeted as a just a disruptor or provocateur, whether conscious or unconcious, and similarly be disposed of.

The totalitarian demand that everyone here achieve some sort of absolute accord on religious beliefs i.a.w. your own prejudices I feel must be recognized as what it is, just a purely disruptive negative influence. It has no possible good outcome, demanding that we spend endless hours discussing your theological criticisms of others. It strikes me as one of those disruptive tactics that constantly keep WN involved in penny anti arguments and feuds with no good outcome. Sometimes we wonder why the WN movement is so full of sociopathic behavior like people that constantly try to sleep with other WN's wives etc. I can only speculate why these sorts of things seem so common, but the pattern to me seems as least as strong as the pattern you see behind the "Christian conspiracy". Would you like us to speculate on that?

Consider this a response to your other circuitus answer on the other thread.

[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=14&t=6753&st=0&#entry34831]Hot Cross Buns[/url]


amundsen

2003-03-26 03:22 | User Profile

Originally posted by Blond Knight@Mar 24 2003, 23:34 ** This reminds me of some wisdom that a friend of mine was given by his grandfather many years ago.

"When you are doing some business with a person, keep an eye on them, but if they claim to be religious, keep BOTH eyes on them." **

Not bad advice. A Christian who makes it a point to mention how religious they are should be watched to see if they frequently act in ways contrary to the basic doctrines they espouse. Such a person should be watched most especially by fellow Christians who should be concerned that this man's life is a proper testimony. To be sure many churches today dont do a good job of taking care of their own in the interest of not intruding into people's private lives. But there have been many Christians, many have been our greatest Americans, who have not only openly spoken of their devotion, but lived what they said.


Franco

2003-03-26 04:23 | User Profile

Proof-by-anecdote:

Out of the 20+ Kwistians that I have met in my life, 15 were pro-Jew/pro-Israel/"Jesus-was-a-Jew."

Sick....these people are aiding the Jew...


weisbrot

2003-03-26 10:19 | User Profile

Originally posted by wintermute@Mar 25 2003, 19:18 **Weisbrot -

Respectfully -

For Franco, mwdallas, myself or anyone else to notice that there is something in the structure of Christianity in the United States, as it is currently practiced, which leads to unquestioning admiration and obedience to the Jews is not

**Conflating all Christians with the minority that constitute the flimflam artists and zealots is a practice worthy of Spielbergs and Roths. **

or a call for

**purging potential WN/paleo ranks of all Christian adherents- Zionists or not- unlikely if not impossible. **

To conflate the two is dishonest.

When I say that 'internal problems are the problem at hand', I mean that we need to examine and address aspects of current theology that make racialist political action impossible. If the problem is as simple as 'dispensational' eschatology, then we need to think about how to fight that.

If it's something else, then we need to identify what that something else is. Claiming persecution or 'verbal masturbation' is not helpful.

Wintermute**

Wintermute-

Note the title given this topic references "Kathy Churchgoer". The initial post to which I responded made broad references to what seem to be this "Churchgoer" 's dispensational beliefs. These beliefs are understood to include a blind worship of anything Israel. This would lead one to perceive that the comment was an attack on Christians as a whole- the "Kathy Churchgoer" 's- and that Christians as a whole are assumed to practice a dispensational theology which would require slavish devotion to Israel.

Your reference to "internal problems" seem to confirm and endorse this broad approach to Christianity- you did not specify that the apocalyptic bent of a certain dispensational eschatology was the problem at hand. Your response (similar to the inital posting) seems to imply that Christians at large are the "internal problem". In response, I'll note that there is nothing in the structure of Christianity in the United States, as it is currently practiced, that requires unquestioning admiration and obedience to the Jews. This is a stereotypical assumption that is objectionable, ill-informed and just not true. It is a belief held by many of those in certain fundamentalist denominations who are used while being held in contempt by those of a Zionist bent. But to infer that this belief is inherent to the "structure of Christianity" certainly does require a conflation of a subset of beliefs with Christian theology as a whole. Meanwhile, you haven't identified, addressed or examined anything else as a "problem".

I did not and would not claim "persecution" in this instance or "verbal masturbation" in any instance. My claim is that promoting a stereotype of all devout Christians as dispensational zealots is a practice of Hollywood and other media; and I agree with Okiereddust that this can be traced to Frankfurt School practices and Authoritarian Personality- type rhetoric.

WB


na Gaeil is gile

2003-03-26 10:56 | User Profile

Originally posted by Franco@Mar 25 2003, 22:23 Out of the 20+ Kwistians that I have met in my life, 15 were pro-Jew/pro-Israel/"Jesus-was-a-Jew."

I'd rather expect that at least 15 out of 20 Americans of any persuasion, save perhaps Muslims, hold this view. The other 5 probably don't watch television on a regular basis.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-26 14:33 | User Profile

Is it not the case that, for the Kwistian, the world is primarily divided into K's and non-K's?

Time to put on our thinking caps, boys and girls.


Okiereddust

2003-03-26 16:51 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 26 2003, 14:33 **Is it not the case that, for the Kwistian, the world is primarily divided into K's and non-K's?

Time to put on our thinking caps, boys and girls.**

I suppose though you might gather that since Christianity not only assumes but proclaims the existance of universal truths and universal moral law it does presume the logical nature of antithesis between the followers and non-followers of this universal law. In the case of Christianity the antithesis is between the true followers and non-followers of Christ.

To followers of postmodernists like Nietzsche and Foucault of course, the existance of such universals is oppressive, thus per MacDonald they espouse the necessity of:

**a rejection of the possibility of shared values or any sense of universalism or national culture, discussion of "post-colonial theory" - another intellectual descendent of the Frankfurt School; a "hermeneutics of suspicion" in which any attempt to construct such universals of a national culture is energetically resisted and "deconstructed" - essentially the same activity termed by Adarno "negative dialectics". **

From listening to the various postmodernists on this forum (Franco, Wintermute and Yourself) it strikes me you Nietzschien postmodernists certainly loudly trumpet share and trumpet this general rejection and disdain for Christianity, its universal nature, and assertion of universal standards of truth as your reasons for rejecting it and harassing us as "duplitious" and "not fully committed" WN, and constantly engage in your own "negative dialectics". One wonders if you have ever considered like Foucault how

If I had known about the Frankfurt School in time, I would have been saved a great deal of work. I would not have said a certain amount of nonsense and would not have taken so many false trails trying not to get lost, when the Frankfurt School had already cleared the way

Unfortunately Nietzsche was not still alive, when Adorno and Horkheimer came along - quite possibly he would have made the same recognition Foucault did. And quite possibly some of his followers will eventually the same thing - that where they presently are is just a lot of nonsense or false trails, and gravitate over to mainstream postmodernism.

That is, assuming you wish to avoid nonsense and false trails. My impression of these threads is that their entire purpose is to keep us embroiled in nonsense and chasing false trails, to the detriment of any productive activity.

Maybe you can enlighten me if you see any purpose for these endless nihlistic snipe hunting and windmill chasing Wintermute's trails constantly lead us on.


Texas Dissident

2003-03-26 18:32 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 26 2003, 08:33 ** Is it not the case that, for the Kwistian, the world is primarily divided into K's and non-K's? **

I assume you mean Christian? Then spiritually speaking, yes.

Doesn't an atheist do the same?


Texas Dissident

2003-03-26 18:44 | User Profile

Originally posted by na Gaeil is gile@Mar 26 2003, 04:56 > Originally posted by Franco@Mar 25 2003, 22:23 Out of the 20+ Kwistians that I have met in my life, 15 were pro-Jew/pro-Israel/"Jesus-was-a-Jew."**

I'd rather expect that at least 15 out of 20 Americans of any persuasion, save perhaps Muslims, hold this view. The other 5 probably don't watch television on a regular basis.**

Exactly. Yet for some reason certain elements of the greater Nationalist movement continue to single out Christians for demagogic diatribes, completely alienating sizable portions of the American populace.

As long as those elements continue in such tactics, then I will go on record as stating that no meaningful or significant greater alliance will be made among various nationalists of all stripes. Of course that is assuming that the folks that participate in Christian bashing desire any such thing. Right now it appears they don't, which to my mind is a shame given our current situation.


Ragnar

2003-03-26 19:15 | User Profile

This whole subject is dumb right now. For those of us looking past the keyboard, the times are terrific for getting our point of view out.

Locally at least, patriots are confused and looking for answers. I got 20 copies of TAC's "Whose War" cover story to pass around and so far everyone that has read it has responded logically if with some anger. Since this area is mostly Christian, it's "Kathy Churchgoer" I'm dealing with.

Create a stereotype in your head and that's what you'll deal with. But there are not many of them in the real world.

People are looking for answers right now. They are very open. I suggest arcane theological squabbles be ignored while we deal with this windfall.


Lane

2003-03-29 00:49 | User Profile

Anti-Yuppie noted, "...the frustration many white nationalists feel towards today's liberalized churches..."

That is part of the problem, though the frustration may be abit deeper. Namely a feeling that because of the Bible, we live under the "Semitic yoke."

I do have some thoughts that Christianity "won" because this Jewish religion attached itself to white people and Greek philosophy.

There is some searching going on about what is "true religion" and that strikes me as healthy. This man, Evola is interesting, though difficult for someone with a public school education to understand!

And...this search for the Divine is a difficult one! No wonder there are lots of agnostics.

I also would not let this search and questioning get in the way of defeating ZOG. Nor would I spend my time "flaming" or enflaming Christians on this forum: they strike me as intelligent and honorable people: though I wonder if they are so inspite of the Bible and not because of it: maybe these people clean up and make presentable a nasty and violent religion.

I assume these types of arguments can go on endlessly, though I believe a man is better for having engaged in them and in searching for ultimate answers.


Valley Forge

2003-03-29 05:14 | User Profile

You would think that if WNs were serious about achieving success, they would take the position that WN and Christianity are not mutually exclusive. You would think that that would be an obvious starting point in light of the fact that a very large number of our people choose to call themselves Christians. Instead, many WNs choose to villify Christians. Many even resort to language so hateful sounds like something out of the Talmud. This group doesn't seem to realize that in any contest between WN and religion, WN will lose every time.

Villifying Christianity is something that thoughtful Nationalists don't do (David Duke, Yggdrasil, and Polinco's Triskelion come to mind as examples). Why? Because attacking the most deeply held beliefs of the majority of your own people is just foolish beyond belief.

On the other hand though, many (Paleo) Conservative White Christians are just as foolish. They fail to recognize that Traditionalism is dead as a political force in this country, and it's not coming back. Neither is paleo-conservatism. Traditionalist ideas have about the same relevance to the current political landscape as pre-Copernican ideas have to astronomy -- which is to say, of course, that outside of the ivory tower Traditionalist ideas have no relevance to anything at all.

This makes individuals like Thomas Fleming and Lew Rockwell worse than pathetic in my judgment. If these men had any sense, they would use their positions to begin fostering a Christian-friendly racialism (and an "anti-Statist, pro-individualist" - friendly racialism). By rejecting explicit racialism, Rockwell, Fleming, and the other thinkers like them -- already marginal figures to begin with -- have just made themselves even more marginal.

So, now that I've offended both sides in this discussion, I'll shut up.


Centinel

2003-03-29 05:19 | User Profile

Tex,

What happened to the two pages of posts on this thread before OD went offline yesterday? Were they lost?


il ragno

2003-03-29 06:21 | User Profile

**Villifying Christianity is something that thoughtful Nationalists don't do **

...enough of!

The history of the world is littered with the bones of dead gods and dead religions. Christianity has already joined them. Jews who infiltrate and conquer and who place the group first above all - even when they don't know they're doing it - they are alive. Muslims who strap incendiaries to themselves to destroy an enemy who have utterly degraded them- who fight jets and tanks with rifles and rocks and sticks if all that'sall that's available to them - they are alive.

Christians who will kill and die for either of the above, but NOT for their own - are following a dead faith. Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Christian nation. Sht, you can't even find one who will identify themselves *as such! And when you point this out to 'em, they nod sagely and grin, "Just like the prophecy says! Truly, the End Times'll be here any minute now!"

So long as we all continue to play the God-of-Abraham game, Hymie will keep coming up trumps in this. He's got dibs on everytrhing you hold sacred, Christian. Your most-holies are his hand-me-downs, and that gives him an edge today's Krispy Kreme Kristian won't surmount. The future is going to belong to the first group that joins the Jews in getting off their knees. If the Palestinians were American Christians, every last one of them would be long dead already,and the last one would've helpfully pointed out to his executioner that his rifle scope was off 20 degrees. After all, it's the Christian thing to do!


Centinel

2003-03-29 06:41 | User Profile

**This makes individuals like Thomas Fleming and Lew Rockwell worse than pathetic in my judgment. **

How do you explain LewRockwell.com coming out of nowhere, then, and now boasting an Alexa ranking at [url=http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=lewrockwell.com]1,457[/url] that tops National Review's? Someone out there is paying attention.


amundsen

2003-03-29 16:05 | User Profile

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Mar 28 2003, 20:51 I say all of this not because I entirely endorse atheism or moral nihilism, but rather because we have to deal with certain political and cultural realities. Like it or not, we live in an age of disbelief. Even those who profess to be believing Christians are very often just going through the motions, i.e. they go to Church on Sundays but live their lives as the very "pagans" and "atheists" who their Churches condemn.

Excellent point. Churches have become a club. The remnants of what was is still strong enough to attract people, but the power of the Church is dying. Many in Church really dont believe in the Christian Faith. If one really believes in Christ they are a light to the world. For many in Church it seems that they follow the false light of the world. Churches have been finding ways to incorporate secular ideas into Christianity and as a result have had to outright ignore the Word of God. Modern Christianity makes racism a sin while saying homosexuality is not. That homosexuality is explicitly condemned in both the Old and New Testaments while racism, as broadly defined today, is not seems to be no trouble to most modern Christians. This is not the fault of the true Faith, which rest entirely upon the Bible. It is the fault of modern Christians, who use the Bible not as a roadmap, but rather as a book of myths reflecting ancient wisdom that could reflect prejudices of the day.

I really cant blame those who find modern Christians to be a danger to our survival. I myself cant respect most professed Christians. If you say you believe in God as revealed by the Bible and then lead a life no different from a heathen then your living testimony shows the true degree of your faith. You are not going to convince others to believe in God and Heaven if you yourself live as if you dont.

Let us not forget that many of the industrious people who came and settled the wilderness of America came so with deep religious faith. They lived soberly, transforming the wilderness, battling the Indian savages, and living under limited government. These people did not leave Europe and come here to live in comfort. They did not come here with a lukewarm faith. They did not come here believing the heathen savages to be equal to them. This was a truer faith, and one I can only pray we return to.


Okiereddust

2003-03-29 16:08 | User Profile

> Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Mar 29 2003, 01:51 From listening to the various postmodernists on this forum (Franco, Wintermute and Yourself) it strikes me you Nietzschien postmodernists certainly loudly trumpet share and trumpet this general rejection and disdain for Christianity, its universal nature, and assertion of universal standards of truth as your reasons for rejecting it and harassing us as "duplitious" and "not fully committed" WN, and constantly engage in your own "negative dialectics". 

Unfortunately Nietzsche was not still alive, when Adorno and Horkheimer came along - quite possibly he would have made the same recognition Foucault did.  And quite possibly some of his followers will eventually the same thing - that where they presently are is just a lot of nonsense or false trails, and gravitate over to mainstream postmodernism.

That is, assuming you wish to avoid nonsense and false trails.  My impression of these threads is that their entire purpose is to keep us embroiled in nonsense and chasing false trails, to the detriment of any productive activity.

Maybe you can enlighten me if you see any purpose for these endless nihlistic snipe hunting and windmill chasing Wintermute's trails constantly lead us on. **

I don't mean to split hairs here, but you seem to imply that somehow neo-Marxism, multiculturalism, etc. are somehow a logical outcome of atheism and paganism, i.e. your argument that if NN, WM and others here wish to be anti-Christian, they should gravitate towards the Frankfurt School in the name of internal consistency. In doing so, you are distorting the spectrum of internally consistent secular worldviews in much the same way as facile White Nationalist anti-Christians distort theism.

**

Well I don't have time to get into a deep philosophical discussion here, or discuss right now the broader implications of how ones conservatism is necessarily tied to traditional religion. There's an argument there that even Suba (himself an unbeliever but a student of Heidegger) addresses, but I don't have time for it here. There have been skeptical varients of conservatism, such as with David Hume and some others of the scottish enlightenment. However if one adopts a specifically Nietzschien stance, not only in ones logic, but in ones sentiments and polemics of hating Christianity, not only inspite but almost because of its virtues and absolute pretentions, one is starting to adopt a very anti-Western set of attitudes which, do seem to me and others to bear certain rememblences to the conclusions of other antiWestern systems such as critical theory.

Whether they be necessary to your view of reality, I question if pursued to their logical conclusion whether they can be conservative. Of course Nationalism is not necessarily the same as conservatism, some branches can be much different than it. Just think you should know were you're going.


Edana

2003-03-29 16:15 | User Profile

Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Christian nation.

Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Pagan nation.

Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Atheist nation.

Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing WHITE nation.

We're all in the sh*ts, and it will do no good to be tearing off huge chunks of our own flesh.


amundsen

2003-03-29 16:28 | User Profile

Originally posted by Centinel@Mar 29 2003, 01:41 > This makes individuals like Thomas Fleming and Lew Rockwell worse than pathetic in my judgment. **

How do you explain LewRockwell.com coming out of nowhere, then, and now boasting an Alexa ranking at [url=http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=lewrockwell.com]1,457[/url] that tops National Review's? Someone out there is paying attention.**

1 Corinthians 3:2-3

I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

We must give people time. Rome wasnt built in a day, nor is years of indoctrination so quickly eroded.


il ragno

2003-03-29 16:38 | User Profile

**Modern Christianity makes racism a sin while saying homosexuality is not. **

Actually, I'd push it even farther: it makes racism a worse sin than, say, murder. America's noted racists are exiled into non-personhood, never to be heard from again until their obituaries run. Our noted murderers play golf and whistle at white women from their Bentleys while waiting for the traffic light to change. Our Xian Leaders import jungle savages into America out of a narcissistic altruism.....then - when the inevitable bloodbaths occur - go rifling thru the Good Book for the properly comforting quote to anaesthetize the mourners with. Lettuce pray.

**Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Pagan nation.

Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Atheist nation.

Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing WHITE nation.**

What does that mean exactly? Gobbledygook. Western Civilization was built by 'heretics' with the brass to reject religion, not by the cattle with heads bowed and hearts cowed. Every step away from medievalism was tentatively taken over the misgivings/objections/sanctions of a tinpot martinet in one round collar or another. The Founders wanted to be free of those dogmatic chains - and guess what? It's STILL a good idea.


Edana

2003-03-29 16:44 | User Profile

I would just like one person to explain how attacking Christians is good from a strategic point of view. I don't want more essays about how Christianity sucks, etc. Just some good strategic reasoning.


Edana

2003-03-29 16:53 | User Profile

What does that mean exactly? Gobbledygook.

It means exactly what it says, Il Rag. You said, "Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Christian nation", as if that's supposed to mean anything. I don't see ANY vibrant, strong, growing white nations nowadays. The vast majority of early Americans were Christian separatists. You're using the ol' ACLU fallacy of a few deist founders (mixed in with ignored Christian founders) to negate the fact that America was made up of mostly Christians.

You're also using the stale old fallacy of trotting out the far leftist Christians who have been corrupted by cultural marxism to attack Christianity as a whole instead of attacking the liberalism. Guess what? There are an awful lot of liberal PAGANS and ATHEISTS as well! For quite a long time, Christianity wasn't an ideology which condoned flooding your neighborhood with Muslim Somalis. Nay, Muslim Somalis would have been driven out of town.


Texas Dissident

2003-03-29 17:28 | User Profile

Originally posted by il ragno@Mar 29 2003, 10:38 ** Every step away from medievalism was tentatively taken over the misgivings/objections/sanctions of a tinpot martinet in one round collar or another. The Founders wanted to be free of those dogmatic chains - and guess what? It's STILL a good idea. **

You argue like a good Protestant, IR.

Lutheran?

:D


Valley Forge

2003-03-29 19:01 | User Profile

Originally posted by Centinel@Mar 29 2003, 06:41 > This makes individuals like Thomas Fleming and Lew Rockwell worse than pathetic in my judgment. **

How do you explain LewRockwell.com coming out of nowhere, then, and now boasting an Alexa ranking at [url=http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=lewrockwell.com]1,457[/url] that tops National Review's? Someone out there is paying attention.**

I don't put much stock in Alexa rankings. From what I understand, Alexa only counts people who use the Alexa toolbar on Internet Explorer. I don't know how many people that adds up to, but it seems likely that the number is only a fraction of the total number of Internet users.

For example, Stormfront is only listed at [url=http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=stormfront.org]7,545[/url], even though their discussion forum has nearly 13,000 members. That's a heck of a lot more people than both OD and LF, which are the closest things on the Net to discussion forums for Lew Rockwell.


il ragno

2003-03-29 19:24 | User Profile

**You're also using the stale old fallacy of trotting out the far leftist Christians who have been corrupted by cultural marxism to attack Christianity as a whole instead of attacking the liberalism. Guess what? There are an awful lot of liberal PAGANS and ATHEISTS as well! For quite a long time, Christianity wasn't an ideology which condoned flooding your neighborhood with Muslim Somalis. Nay, Muslim Somalis would have been driven out of town. **

1. I submit the Somali-hounding white Christians are far, far outnumbered by 'far leftist' Christians.

2. The 'trick' the Jews used to weaken and collapse Christianity is otherwise

known as the Gospel. Love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, Jesus was a Jew, apologize to those who have wronged you, etc. Show me where Christ said anything that might remotely be interpreted as 'drive Somalis out of town' and I'll cede you this argument. The problem is that Christianity itself contains the seeds of its own destruction.

A believer..a true believer.... wouldn't even get too upset at what's going on in the news anyway. Christ admonished his flock to be in this world but not of it, correct? Likewise to render under Caesar what is his. Which means Zip Your Lip And Be Steadfast For This Too Shall Pass. Let the governments have their wars....your at-bats await you in Heaven.

No matter how you look at it, Christianity is loaded with booby-traps like these. If the Wichita Four had been pagans or atheists, there's a damn good chance they would be alive right now.


Valley Forge

2003-03-29 20:13 | User Profile

Originally posted by il ragno@Mar 29 2003, 06:21 ** > **Villifying Christianity is something that thoughtful Nationalists don't do **

...enough of!

The history of the world is littered with the bones of dead gods and dead religions. Christianity has already joined them. Jews who infiltrate and conquer and who place the group first above all - even when they don't know they're doing it - they are alive. Muslims who strap incendiaries to themselves to destroy an enemy who have utterly degraded them- who fight jets and tanks with rifles and rocks and sticks if all that'sall that's available to them - they are alive.

Christians who will kill and die for either of the above, but NOT for their own - are following a dead faith. Show me ONE vibrant, strong, growing white Christian nation. Sht, you can't even find one who will identify themselves *as such! And when you point this out to 'em, they nod sagely and grin, "Just like the prophecy says! Truly, the End Times'll be here any minute now!"

So long as we all continue to play the God-of-Abraham game, Hymie will keep coming up trumps in this. He's got dibs on everytrhing you hold sacred, Christian. Your most-holies are his hand-me-downs, and that gives him an edge today's Krispy Kreme Kristian won't surmount. The future is going to belong to the first group that joins the Jews in getting off their knees. If the Palestinians were American Christians, every last one of them would be long dead already,and the last one would've helpfully pointed out to his executioner that his rifle scope was off 20 degrees. After all, it's the Christian thing to do! **

Il Ragno:

Even though you are correct in most of what you write, you seem to be ignoring AY and Edana's rebuttal to your position, namely, that the malady you're describing afflicts nearly all White people, including the overwhelming majority of non-Christians.

Apart from this, you're also ignoring a huge chunk of history. That is, if Christianity is so "fatally flawed," how is it that Christianity converted all of Europe's pagans to begin with?

How did the people you contempuously describe as "collared martinets" ever come to power in the first place? Doesn't this make White pagans even stupider than the Christians you condemn?

Whatever their religion, most White people adhere to a suicidal belief system. That is the problem we're trying to solve. Other races are working together to further their interets, and White people aren't. This means that any belief system that does not make room for explicit White Racial Nationalism is a belief system that will ultimately result in death. We agree on this much.

Where we disagree, however, is on the issue of what to do about it. I don't believe villifying our people's religion accomplishes anything constructive. When a WN espouses Anti-Christian rhetoric, it has the same effect as Christian Zionist teachings -- it turns people away from the movement. In this respect, anti-Christian WNs are as much a part of the problem as the so-called "Christian" Zionists.

It's quite ironic really. The corrupted modern Christian teaches conservative people that Racial Nationalism is a "sin" -- even though the church was un-PC on race for most of its history. The anti-Christian WN, on the other hand, teaches that Christianity is a belief system for fools -- even though most White people call themselves Christian.

Both of these factions are dead wrong in my judgment, and unless we see a reconcilliation between them soon, both groups are likely to suffer the same fate in the end. And our real enemies will be laughing all the way to the bank.


Edana

2003-03-29 20:33 | User Profile

1. I submit the Somali-hounding white Christians are far, far outnumbered by 'far leftist' Christians.

Irrelevent. The same is true with the general public as a whole nowadays. Christianity has been corrupted by the same forces which corrupted society as a whole. That corruption spreads across religious lines.

#2. The 'trick' the Jews used to weaken and collapse Christianity is otherwise known as the Gospel. Love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, Jesus was a Jew, apologize to those who have wronged you, etc. Show me where Christ said anything that might remotely be interpreted as 'drive Somalis out of town' and I'll cede you this argument. The problem is that Christianity itself contains the seeds of its own destruction.

What religion did those White people have when they drove the Moors out of Europe? Wiccan?

**A believer..a true believer.... wouldn't even get too upset at what's going on in the news anyway. Christ admonished his flock to be in this world but not of it, correct? Likewise to render under Caesar what is his. Which means Zip Your Lip And Be Steadfast For This Too Shall Pass. Let the governments have their wars....your at-bats await you in Heaven.

No matter how you look at it, Christianity is loaded with booby-traps like these. If the Wichita Four had been pagans or atheists, there's a damn good chance they would be alive right now. **

This sounds eerily like the Michael Moore arguement that if all the passengers on the 9/11 planes were black, everyone would have been alive because "black people don't take sht". Some of the most PC dolts in the world are pagans and atheists. An honest thing to say would be "If the Wichita Four had been White Nationalists, there's a damn good chance they would be alive right now." And, Christians can definately be racially aware and take care of their kind when they haven't been raised with a bunch of excess modern society-induced liberalism. What religion was the early KKK who defended White Southerners during the Reconstruction? Scientologists?*


Edana

2003-03-29 20:35 | User Profile

Still awaiting that answer to my question about the strategic benefits of attacking Christians. Without that answer, this conversation is doomed to an irrelevent tangent.


Valley Forge

2003-03-29 20:52 | User Profile

**What religion did those White people have when they drove the Moors out of Europe? Wiccan? **

LOL. One might also ask about the Byzantine Empire generally. They ruled the civilized world for 1000 years.

Last time I checked they were Christians.


il ragno

2003-03-29 22:28 | User Profile

Religions, being created by living beings, are likewise living things in that they have a gestation period, a reckless adolescence, a period of maturity and genuine productivity and...eventually, as comes to all living things...death.

I think Christianity is wonderful. Or it was. It was exactly what mankind needed at a time when tyranny was necessary to drag us out of the caves and get that silly blue paint off our faces, in that it made understandable the concept that freedom is only possible by voluntary servitude. But that was a long time ago.

And Christianity...unlike the other major religions...is like milk in the ice box, gradually coming to taste like whatever's in there next to it. It's the most trend-conscious religion by far. Sects and offshoots and warring tribes and more"branching" than the plants in Todd Fahey's backyard. Does 12th-century Christianity resemble that of the 15th-, or 18th-, let alone 21st-? And Christian which exactly? Christian Baptist? Christian Catholic? Christian Unitarian? Christian Methodist? Christian Mormon? How One and True can a One True Faith be if it comes in 31 flavors, each tailored to fit your lifestyle and pocketbook?

I like to think of the Almighty as a benevolent being with limited patience for idiots, who gave us a few clearly defined road-markers, with the idea being "these are like training wheels for your bike." I think he's been looking on in embarrassed horror ever since,when he slowly realized we had no intention of ever taking them off.


Ragnar

2003-03-30 03:13 | User Profile

Originally posted by il ragno@Mar 29 2003, 22:28 ** Religions, being created by living beings, are likewise living things in that they have a gestation period, a reckless adolescence, a period of maturity and genuine productivity and...eventually, as comes to all living things...death.

**

Hey! Tell that to Moses!

Ancestral religions, Elmer Pendall argued, are survival mechanisms. It works for one tribe.

This issue annoys Europeans because Christianity was Europe till a century or so, give or take. Then... what happened? If European civilization don't realize that lots of things degenerated starting with the allied "victory" of World War I, we are going to keep getting this all wrong.

Christianity was an ancestral religion for Europeans. Then we dropped our borders, sent out way too many missionaries, started feeling way too guilty. Then (logically) Christianity stopped working. It ceased being "our" religion because the elites took Christian Universalism seriously. Not because Christian Universalism ever mattered much to most Europeans; it didn't. I come from a family that produced Jesuits. Christianity has changed in the past couple generations, and it changed a lot.

The difference right now is that pagans can see that Christianity has mutated a bit better than Christians. This is logical too, you see a system better from the outside than you can from within. This hardly means all Christians are missing the point. The current mess has loads of Christians shaking their heads.

We can all help our racial evolution here. First we must admit that we are evolving.


seq

2003-03-30 06:26 | User Profile

**Religions, being created by living beings, are likewise living things in that they have a gestation period, a reckless adolescence, a period of maturity and genuine productivity and...eventually, as comes to all living things...death. **

Almost two thousand years, and no new god! —Nietzsche

**America's noted racists are exiled into non-personhood, never to be heard from again until their obituaries run. Our noted murderers play golf and whistle at white women from their Bentleys while waiting for the traffic light to change. **

**Western Civilization was built by 'heretics' with the brass to reject religion, not by the cattle with heads bowed and hearts cowed. Every step away from medievalism was tentatively taken over the misgivings/objections/sanctions of a tinpot martinet in one round collar or another. **

[Christianity] ... *is therefore not national, not racially conditioned; it appeals to the disinherited everywhere; it is founded on a rancor against everything well-constituted and dominant—It also stands in opposition to every spiritual movement, to all philosophy: it takes the side of idiots and utters a curse on the spirit. Rancor against the gifted, learned, spiritually independent: it detects in them the well-constituted, the masterful. *

Friedrich Nietzsche, *The Will to Power *


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 14:21 | User Profile

Originally posted by Edana@Mar 29 2003, 14:33 What religion did those White people have when they drove the Moors out of Europe?  Wiccan? 

What religion was the early KKK who defended White Southerners during the Reconstruction?  Scientologists?**

1) The religion of Mary the Virgin Intercessor, not the religion attributed to Yeshua bar Yusef.

2) The religion of the Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus, not the religion attributed to Yeshua bar Yusef.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 14:51 | User Profile

Originally posted by Edana@Mar 29 2003, 14:35 Still awaiting that answer to my question about the strategic benefits of attacking Christians.  Without that answer, this conversation is doomed to an irrelevent tangent.

One hopes to induce the Nietzschean "self-overcoming" of Christianity out of Christian truthfulness. With this discarding of a disarming superordinate fiction which knows no nationality, the living White Nation emerges from the mist of superstition as the authentic focus and locus of investment.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 15:06 | User Profile

Interrogatory to the Christians:

1) What is the name of the God of War of the Christians?

2) Where in the Decalogue is conspiracy in restraint of trade consistently defined and proscribed?

3) What is the definition of murder?

4) What is the proof of the non-existence of Santa Claus?

5) When did the Jews start lying?


amundsen

2003-03-30 15:09 | User Profile

Originally posted by il ragno@Mar 29 2003, 17:28 And Christian which exactly? Christian Baptist? Christian Catholic? Christian Unitarian? Christian Methodist? Christian Mormon? How One and True can a One True Faith be if it comes in 31 flavors, each tailored to fit your lifestyle and pocketbook?

That there are differences of opinion, some large and some small, does not prove that their is not absolute truth. It only proves that human beings are fallible, non-omniscient creatures, which is entirely in keeping with Christian doctrine. The Bible is the foundation on which Christian doctrine and practice should rest. That so many are poorly read in the Bible and thus make such significant errors in basing decisions on it should not suprise you. Look at how our Constitution is interpreted by our politicians. That so many are unwilling to submit themselves to God is no more suprising than that so few politicians submit themselves to be bound by their proscribed limits. The problem is not Christianity or the Bible; it is the sad state of White men.


amundsen

2003-03-30 15:27 | User Profile

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Mar 29 2003, 17:35 ** Where I disagree is that we're necessarily better off in a society of atheists than a society of believers. Your average leftist college kid is an atheist or something along those lines...do you suppose that his political views are any closer to yours or mine than "Cathy Churchgoer's" views? If anything, your average atheist tends to be further to the Left and more militantly multiculturalist than a sincere Christian.

**

A fair many of the leftist atheist college kids were raised in lukewarm Christian homes. Homes where they went to Church but did not really live a life devoted to God. Homes where prayer was something you did in church, before everyone else. Homes where you'd work on Sunday if the boss needed you to because your job was more important than your faith. The kids had a nice, comfortable life. They took in the forgiveness, love, and charity of Christianity, but by example were taught that this was enough. They did not learn about devotion, submission, or sacrifice. These are the tough parts of Christianity, but are essential. Raised in such a way these kids were ripe for Marxist indoctrintion by Jew professors.

However, until modern liberal rot infiltrated the Churches, they were probably the strongest institutions opposing leftist doctrines of any stripe in Europe and America alike.

It was southern preachers who stood up to the Jew and Yankee civil rights assault.

Except for the Fundamentalists, most Church-goers in America are new-agers or atheists IN PRACTICE, so using their actions to judge Christendom is rather like using a rotten corpse to study human physiology.

The two great moments in Christianities history are linked to persecution. The first days, and the days of the Reformation where characterized by persecution of those who held devoutly to the Faith. In such times a person was not a Christian, or a Protestant unless they truly believed. Men are not willing to risk death for something they know to be a lie. Christianities birth changed Europe. And the Protestant movement made North America. Now it is safe, and easy to be a Christian, because Christiandom stands for nothing. If Christianity were ever again a threat to the power of the world you can be sure its members would be persecuted and its membership plummet.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 15:59 | User Profile

Originally posted by Texas Dissident@Mar 26 2003, 12:44 **...Yet for some reason certain elements of the greater Nationalist movement continue to single out Christians for demagogic diatribes, completely alienating sizable portions of the American populace. 

As long as those elements continue in such tactics, then I will go on record as stating that no meaningful or significant greater alliance will be made among various nationalists of all stripes.**

An alliance to what end and by what means? Will Christians be willing to commit the systematic atrocities necessary to their survival without endorsement and incitement by some alien, universalist theocrat?

If Nationalists of all stripe cannot, for example, unapologetically endorse and affirm a Saddam Hussein as an atrocious force for order as against the sanctimonious, crypto-anarchist Jew World Order presently assaulting him, the cause is lost whatever the state of an "alliance". Morons and AIDS cases, at best, qualify their opposition to JWO with expressions of distaste for Saddam, evidencing the state of their moral disarmament by, respectively, spiritual and ideological individualism. Behold a herd to be stampeded by theocratic Cowboys rather than a pack of predators in charge of its own destiny.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 16:13 | User Profile

Originally posted by amundsen@Mar 30 2003, 09:09 That there are differences of opinion, some large and some small, does not prove that their is not absolute truth.  It only proves that human beings are fallible, non-omniscient creatures, which is entirely in keeping with Christian doctrine.

Thus it proves that Absolute Truth, even granted its existence, is unrecognizable as such.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 16:36 | User Profile

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Mar 28 2003, 19:51 That many white European atheists and nihilists are attracted to ideologies that advance Jewish or colored interests is proof not of the ill effects of atheism, but rather of the fact that in an atheistic world those lacking a cultural or tribal survival instinct are destined to be enslaved or destroyed.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-30 16:43 | User Profile

Originally posted by Valley Forge@Mar 28 2003, 23:14 ...Instead, many WNs choose to villify Christians. Many even resort to language so hateful sounds like something out of the Talmud. This group doesn't seem to realize that in any contest between WN and religion, WN will lose every time.

Precisely.


na Gaeil is gile

2003-03-31 09:49 | User Profile

White Nationalists defend Western Civilization by attacking one of its corner-stones. Next week we launch our assault on the two parent family. Backwards to victory comrades!


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-31 13:46 | User Profile

Originally posted by na Gaeil is gile@Mar 31 2003, 03:49 **White Nationalists defend Western Civilization by attacking one of its corner-stones. **

White Nationalists defend Western Civilization where and when it is in the hands of alien, internationalist, theocratic oligarchs.

White Nationalists do not identify Western Civilization with the Occupation regimes and theologies which have distorted it since its inception.

The Saxons who resisted Charlemagne and the Germans who resisted Roosevelt are the true West, which refused the pushers' narcotics and retained a short-lived health and honor.

The alternative has been collaboration, contamination, and dishonor and a relatively long life in that state.


na Gaeil is gile

2003-03-31 14:55 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 31 2003, 07:46 White Nationalists defend Western Civilization where and when it is in the hands of alien, internationalist, theocratic oligarchs.

That's super NN, let me know when your army of atheistic ideologs have overthrown the throne of darkness. With Christianity out of the way we will only have to deal with 'secular humanists' and they've always being most receptive to our message :P


Oklahomaman

2003-03-31 15:51 | User Profile

**White Nationalists defend Western Civilization by attacking one of its corner-stones. Next week we launch our assault on the two parent family. Backwards to victory comrades! **

The nihilist contingent of White Nationalism has been attacking the two-parent family for quite some time. It fits into a larger pattern of behavior that's been their modus operandi from the very beginning of their rather bizarre sect.

The Nihilists were bombing the Tsar for his support of the Church even though he was the last person of import in the Western world, at the time, trying to protect his people from the malinfluence of the Jews. They continue to persist in this delusion that they're the sole defenders of Western civilization even as they stridently attack its most ancient and venerable institutions. It's nice to see they haven't changed much in the last 100 years.

Nihilism is nothing more than a group of psuedo-intellectuals that have managed to transform their own dark suicidal tendencies into an ideology. When they start taking it seriously they opt for self destruction. Look how Nietzsche died.

I AM THE CRUCIFIED

Not exactly a confidence builder for our ernstwhile "defenders" of Western Civilization.


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-31 19:28 | User Profile

Originally posted by na Gaeil is gile@Mar 31 2003, 08:55 > Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 31 2003, 07:46 White Nationalists defend Western Civilization where and when it is in the hands of alien, internationalist, theocratic oligarchs.**

That's super NN, let me know when your army of atheistic ideologs have overthrown the throne of darkness. With Christianity out of the way we will only have to deal with 'secular humanists' and they've always being most receptive to our message :P**

One marvels at the Kristian fixation on Kristian dualism.

The point of White Nationalism is the affirmative one of the White Nation taking precedence over all else.

The point is not the negative one of the vacuum that is atheism, product of the evident absence of deity.

There is and will be no army of WN such as could displace the present alien regime. The Kosher Kowboys are in firm command of the ranch, and the old Circle K will meet its end only when their past mischief back in Asia comes full circle, so-to-speak.

Of the 'secular humanists' how many lacked Kristian ancestors? How did the tiny band of Kowboys take over the former Triple Cross spread from the far more numerous Kristians? Does it not appear that Kristianity cultivates the Kow in all of us?


NeoNietzsche

2003-03-31 19:43 | User Profile

Originally posted by Oklahomaman@Mar 31 2003, 09:51 **Nihilism is nothing more than a group of psuedo-intellectuals that have managed to transform their own dark suicidal tendencies into an ideology.  When they start taking it seriously they opt for self destruction.  Look how Nietzsche died. 

I AM THE CRUCIFIED

Not exactly a confidence builder for our ernstwhile "defenders" of Western Civilization.**

Nietzsche sought the resurrection of "the ancient fire" - the "supreme rights of the few".

He hoped for the emergence of a new aristocracy and the subsequent growth of a culture uncontaminated by a slavish inversion of values.

Look rather at what Nietzsche wrote and make mature allowance for his incapacitation.


Leveller

2003-03-31 23:17 | User Profile

Walter from The Big Lebowski: "Nihilists! F*ck me. I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos."


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-01 03:20 | User Profile

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Mar 31 2003, 16:20 **What Nietzsche failed to take into account was that in the modern world, Machiavelli's "foxes" are destined to rule far more than the "lions." That was already true in the 19th century (when mass politics, demagoguery, intrigue and subterfuge triumphed over old Greco-Roman "hero" and "stoic" virtues alike) and it is even more so today. Nietzsche may not have had the advantage of foresight to know that it takes no courage to advocate remote control "video game" wars or the mass propaganda machine in the electronic age, but he certainly could have seen these things in embryo.

What this means of course is that the rulers of a nihilistic world will not be the heroes of antiquity. There will be no more Alcibiades or Caesar, what we will have instead is rule by plutocrats and master-manipulators of public opinion. Our plutocratic elites and the verbalist think-tank classes already have the would-be "lions" (the Generals and would-be Statesmen) under their thumbs. They will come to acquire even more power in a world without moral restraint than what they enjoy today.**

242

Whether that which now distinguishes the European be called civilization' orhumanization' or 'progress'; whether one calls it simply, without implying any praise or blame, the democratic movement in Europe: behind all the moral and political foregrounds indicated by such formulas a great physio­logical process is taking place and gathering greater and ever greater impetus ‑ the process of the assimilation of all Euro­peans, their growing detachment from the conditions under which races dependent on climate and class originate, their increasing independence of any definite milieu which, through making the same demands for centuries, would like to inscribe itself on soul and body ‑ that is to say, the slow emergence of an essentially supra‑national and nomadic type of man which, physiologically speaking, possesses as its typical distinction a maximum of the art and power of adaptation. This process of the becoming European, the tempo of which can be retarded by great relapses but which will perhaps precisely through them gain in vehemence and depth ‑ the still‑raging storm and stress of national feeling' belongs here, likewise the anarchism now emerging ‑: this process will probably lead to results which its naive propagators and panegyrists, the apostles ofmodern ideas', would be least inclined to anticipate. The same novel conditions which will on average create a levelling and mediocritizing of man ‑ a useful, industrious, highly serviceable and able herd‑animal man ‑ are adapted in the highest degree to giving rise to exceptional men of the most dangerous and enticing quality. For while that power of adapta­tion which continually tries out changing conditions and begins a new labour with every new generation, almost with every new decade, cannot make possible the powerfulness of the type; while the total impression produced by such future Europeans will probably be that of multifarious, garrulous, weak‑willed and highly employable workers who need a master, a commander, as they need their daily bread; while, therefore, the democratization of Europe will lead to the production of a type prepared for slavery in the subtlest sense: in individual and exceptional cases the strong man will be found to turn out stronger and richer than has perhaps ever happened before ‑thanks to the unprejudiced nature of his schooling, thanks to the tremendous multiplicity of practice, art and mask. What I mean to say is that the democratization of Europe is at the same time an involuntary arrangement for the breeding of tyrants ‑ in every sense of that word, including the most spiritual.

243

I hear with pleasure that our sun is moving rapidly in the direction of the constellation of Hercules: and I hope that men on the earth will in this matter emulate the sun. And we at their head, we good Europeans!


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-01 06:11 | User Profile

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Mar 31 2003, 16:20 In short, whatever one may think of the old Medieval Theocracy, it was probably a better system for our cause than what we will have in the absence of Christendom.

Better the child be molested by a parent than left an orphan?


na Gaeil is gile

2003-04-01 09:35 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 31 2003, 13:28 ** One marvels at the Kristian fixation on Kristian dualism. **

It is heartening you still find marvels to wonder at in this world. Personally, as a non-theist, I think on Christianity little if at all. The empirical evidence leads me to the firm conclusion that Christians and Christian Nations will fight and they will fight for ethnic nationalism. Therefore all I need to know, as a White Nationalist, is how to make them fight.

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 31 2003, 13:28 ** There is and will be no army of WN such as could displace the present alien regime. **

No there certainly will not as long as certain sections of White Nationalism insist on playing philosopher instead of politician or at very least warrior. In my experience the such people talk the talk but walk not a all. It follows that Nietzsche's lion will lie down with the lamb if all it could ever do was roar.


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-01 12:19 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 31 2003, 13:28 > Originally posted by na Gaeil is gile@Mar 31 2003, 08:55 > Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Mar 31 2003, 07:46 White Nationalists defend Western Civilization where and when it is in the hands of alien, internationalist, theocratic oligarchs.

That's super NN, let me know when your army of atheistic ideologs have overthrown the throne of darkness. With Christianity out of the way we will only have to deal with 'secular humanists' and they've always being most receptive to our message :P**

One marvels at the Kristian fixation on Kristian dualism.

The point of White Nationalism is the affirmative one of the White Nation taking precedence over all else.

The point is not the negative one of the vacuum that is atheism, product of the evident absence of deity.

There is and will be no army of WN such as could displace the present alien regime. The Kosher Kowboys are in firm command of the ranch, and the old Circle K will meet its end only when their past mischief back in Asia comes full circle, so-to-speak.

Of the 'secular humanists' how many lacked Kristian ancestors? How did the tiny band of Kowboys take over the former Triple Cross spread from the far more numerous Kristians? Does it not appear that Kristianity cultivates the Kow in all of us?**

Personally, as a non-theist, I think on Christianity little if at all.

Strange, then, that you would characterize the imaginary "army" as one of "atheistic ideolog[ue]s" rather than as one of WN.

The empirical evidence leads me to the firm conclusion that Christians and Christian Nations will fight and they will fight for ethnic nationalism.

No one doubts that they will fight - that's why we are having this discussion. Refresh me on the instances where a fight for ethnic nationalism was other than an incidental result of Kristian Krusading. And balance that meager offering against the righteous warring against Germany twice over.

No there certainly will not [be a victorious WN army] as long as certain sections of White Nationalism insist on playing philosopher instead of politician or at very least warrior. In my experience [] such people talk the talk but walk not a[t] all. It follows that Nietzsche's lion will lie down with the lamb if all it could ever do was roar.

A statement fair enough in principle. In particular, yours truly did some "walking" with Matt Koehl in full dress. You?


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-01 13:13 | User Profile

Putting the question as forcefully as possible, what really triumphed over the Christian God? The answer stands in my Gay Science, p. 290:

Christian morality itself, the increasingly strict understanding of the idea of truthfulness, the subtlety of the father confessor of the Christian conscience, transposed and sublimated into scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. To look at nature as if it were a proof of the goodness and care of a god, to interpret history in such a way as to honour divine reason, as a constant testament to a moral world order and moral intentions, to interpret one's own experiences, as devout men have interpreted them for long enough, as if everything was divine providence, everything was a sign, everything was thought out and sent for the salvation of the soul out of love—now that's over and done with. That has conscience against it. Among more sensitive consciences that counts as something indecent, dishonest, as lying, feminism, weakness, cowardice. With this rigour, if with anything, we are good Europeans and heirs to Europe's longest and bravest overcoming of the self. . . .

All great things destroy themselves by an act of self-cancellation. That's what the law of life wills, that law of the necessary "self-overcoming" in the essence of life—eventually the call always goes out to the law-maker himself, "patere legem, quam ipse tulisti" [submit to the law which you yourself have established]. That's the way Christianity was destroyed as dogma by its own morality, that's the way Christendom as morality must now be destroyed. We stand on the threshold of this event. After Christian truthfulness has come to a series of conclusions, it will draw its strongest conclusion, its conclusion against itself. However, this will occur when it poses the question: "What is the meaning of all will to truth?" . . . Here I move back again to my problem, to our problem, my unknown friends (—for I still don't know anything about friends): what sense would our whole being have if not for the fact that in us that will to truth became aware of itself as a problem? . . . Because this will to truth from now on is growing conscious of itself, morality undoubtedly dies. That great spectacle in one hundred acts, which remains reserved for the next two centuries in Europe, that most fearful, most questionable, and perhaps also most hopeful of all spectacles . . .


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-01 14:06 | User Profile

Roosevelt Betrays America!

by Dr. Robert Ley

"...The USA once conducted a war of independence against the British Crown. The Declaration of Independence of those freedom fighters even today is thought to be the beginning of North American freedom and independence, celebrated annually. But one today hears voices on both sides of the ocean about reuniting the Anglo-Saxon world. Churchill even makes the idea the center of this Christmas message in Washington. The sly old fox is quite right. The USA has decayed into the English world of Puritanism and Calvinism. The hypocritical lying capitalist world of Manchester and Oliver Cromwell is today the world of Roosevelt, Morgenthau, Knox, Stimson and their consorts. One can even say that the Jew rules more fully, ruthlessly and completely in New York than in London. Remember the oft-cited quotation from Calvin that the masses of workers and craftsmen must be kept poor so they will be obedient to God, and will work only when they are driven to it by necessity. This is a central theme of the capitalist economy, resulting in the theory of the 'productivity' of lower wages. The misuse of the concept of God runs like a red thread through English history. God was always the ground for any crooked dealing. The notion of the Old Testament's chosen people fits in here as well. This clearly proves the similarity in English and Jewish thinking. We find such nonsense repeatedly by the leading English circles over the centuries.

"The original claims of chosenness, of God-willed wealth and God-ordained poverty, of dark secrets and mystic superstitions was begun by Oliver Cromwell and became the foundation of the English Empire. On can read the following about the English saint in Volume II of Wilbur Contez Abbot's 'Writing and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell': 'They could hardly say anything to Cromwell without him putting his hand to his heart, raising his eyes to the heavens and calling God as his witness. He will weep and lament and moan, all the while sticking the knife in your ribs.'

"Does that not remind one of our contemporaries Churchill and Roosevelt when they together sang 'Onward Christian Solders' on the since-sunken 'Price of Wales'? Or when they sing in a Methodist church in Washington. They are Cromwell's pious, hypocritical successors.

"Oliver Cromwell always called on God in the midst of his atrocities, his bloodthirsty orgies against the Irish and the Scottish, and viewed his devilish soldiers as the chosen people of God. Churchill and Roosevelt have learned the methods of the bestial hypocrite Cromwell by heart, and have proven that nothing, absolutely nothing has changed in the English-American world over the past three hundred years. That is the lying capitalist world that calls God as its witness to every shameful act and enslaves and exploits humanity in its dreadful superiority. Its father was Calvin, its sword Oliver Cromwell and its benefactors and successors are Churchill and Roosevelt. They are so proud and self-confident that they call the USA God's Own Country. As the Jews use Jehovah, they use the Lord God!"


The Skunk

2003-04-01 14:18 | User Profile

[url=http://home.att.net/~professorboris/Music/Shallwegatherheriver.mid]Click for music[/url] be burnt at the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?** One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions. Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* > nt at the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?** One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions. Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* > e stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?** One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions. Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* > or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?** One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions. Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* >

Christians Must Continue Their Undying Support for Israel the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?** One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions. Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* >

ou? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* >

you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a *bete noire*. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the *Marranos* >

By Dr. Jerry Falwell Publisher, National Liberty Journal

Every Evangelical Christian who loves Israel is celebrating the victory of Ariel Sharon 03, 21:36 > as that nation’s new prime minister. By a landslide margin, Mr. Sharon defeated Ehud Barak, and immediately set in motion a plan to prevent the fulfillment of Mr. Barak’s earlier misguided concessions to the Palestinians. nquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?

One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

ion, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?**

One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?**

One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

During his final days in office, Mr. Barak had offered the Palestinians a state in about 95 percent of the West Bank and control over parts of Jerusalem. In addition, according to a New York Post report, Mr. Barak had also indicated a willingness to partially relinquish Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem, where the Al Aqsa Mosque stands above the ruins of the sacred biblical Jewish Temples. one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

t imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

ne Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

ism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

Mr. Barak, seemingly a willing dupe of President Clinton and rabble-rouser James Carville, was convinced by the Democrat leadership in the U.S. to make unnecessary concessions to the Palestinians even though history proves that these concessions do nothing to appease Yassir Arafat, the terrorist leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization. The PLO has long sought the destruction of Israel, which became independent on May 14, 1948agine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

. nism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

le, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

Bill Clinton, who poured untold amounts of money into the Barak election in 1999, was consumed with bringing peace to the Middle East as a personal legacy. His intent was clearly not to bolster Israel, but solely to direct his own individual glory before his presidency played out.

When Bill Clinton entered office, the Middle East was quite stable. However, when he left office, the region was languishing in confusion and turmoil.


The National Unity Coalition for Israel reported, “In 1991, only rogue states like Iraq spoke openly of destroying Israel: in 2001, putative and pay-rolled U.S. allies like Egypt make it an official plank of foreign policy, backing Yassir Arafat’s demands for demographic destruction of the Jewish state through the ‘right of return’ of Palestinian refugees.” can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

9;t imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

gine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

The fact is that peace is not the important issue to Israelis. Security of the region is the prime concern of the vast majority of the 5.7 million residents of Israel. Sacrificing security in the desperate hope for peace was Mr. Barak’s downfall.

However, Mr. Sharon, a 72-year-old retired general,t's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

has called on the Palestinians to end the latest four-month uprising and has vowed to hold on to a “united Jerusalem” as Israel’s capital. Additionally, he has pledged not to give up control over Arab sections of East Jerusalem.

Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

tion as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

“The state of Israel has embarked on a new path ... striving for security and a real, genuine peace,” he told exhilarated Likud Party supporters. “I am aware of the fact that peace requires painful compromises by both sides. I call upon our Palestinian neighbors to cast off the path of violence and to return to the path of dialogue and to resolving the disputes between us by peaceful means.” ou would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

d be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

iticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

Autonomy over Arab East Jerusalem, captured during the 1967 Middle East war, and the Temple Mount -- revered by Muslims as “Noble Sanctuary” -- are the primary obstacles in securing an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement.

Tom Rose, publisher and CEO of the Jerusalem Post, told me that, in addition to working for peace, Mr. Sharon will also attempt to preempt the terrorism that has gone unpunished in the region. “That terrorism has terribly hurt Israel’s deterrent capability,” he said. “And that deterrent capability is what has brought stability to the region. When that capability goes down the tubes, the entire region becomes unstable.”

Concessions to the Palestinians, he said, do nothing to alleviate this problem. “The more concessions we make, the more violence we see,” said Mr. Rose.


Of course, dealing with a madman -- Yassir Arafathistory tell us that we must have a dominant "viable substantive religion with mass appeal"? Odinism is an Olympian religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition. Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

"The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I, in the fourth century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church and, along with Justinian I 200 years later, essentially made the Catholic Church the state religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the next 700 years aristocracy migrated toward the tax-sheltered positions of power in the higher offices of the church, those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgences and salvations. The common people were terrified of purgatory (Hell) and the last bit of wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go to heaven. Edward Burman, in The Inquisition, from which this chronology is taken, explains that with the returning Crusaders in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries came many different Christian beliefs, others (called cults and heresies) were springing forth all over Europe, and various unorthodox Christian beliefs were filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.

"Some of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and (primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians) openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All power brokers fear the expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.

"Such was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress heresies since the middle of the tenth century. As with all crusades (the crusade of the Cold War is a very good example), this required a massive Social Control belief system (propaganda) portraying the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to justify the slaughter of targeted people and theft of their wealth.

"The burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206 into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215 the Latern Council was held which listed 'clause by clause' heretical interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for punishment.

"With the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized the form of the Inquisition.

"'The Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the mid-point of the thirteenth century' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

-- is frequently a losing premise. It is important to note that Mr. Arafat wickedly exploits the children mfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition. Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

"The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I, in the fourth century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church and, along with Justinian I 200 years later, essentially made the Catholic Church the state religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the next 700 years aristocracy migrated toward the tax-sheltered positions of power in the higher offices of the church, those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgences and salvations. The common people were terrified of purgatory (Hell) and the last bit of wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go to heaven. Edward Burman, in The Inquisition, from which this chronology is taken, explains that with the returning Crusaders in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries came many different Christian beliefs, others (called cults and heresies) were springing forth all over Europe, and various unorthodox Christian beliefs were filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.

"Some of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and (primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians) openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All power brokers fear the expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.

"Such was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress heresies since the middle of the tenth century. As with all crusades (the crusade of the Cold War is a very good example), this required a massive Social Control belief system (propaganda) portraying the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to justify the slaughter of targeted people and theft of their wealth.

"The burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206 into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215 the Latern Council was held which listed 'clause by clause' heretical interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for punishment.

"With the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized the form of the Inquisition.

"'The Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the mid-point of the thirteenth century' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

of his nation, convincing them to fling rocks and bottles at Israeli troops. When one of these children is killed, their families are given up to $2,000 as a reward for their efforts and the children are buried as martyrs.

Sadly, the mainstream American press ignores this fact. Also often ignored is the fact that PLO terrorists who blow up busses are hailed as heroes. is an Olympian religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition. Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

"The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I, in the fourth century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church and, along with Justinian I 200 years later, essentially made the Catholic Church the state religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the next 700 years aristocracy migrated toward the tax-sheltered positions of power in the higher offices of the church, those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgences and salvations. The common people were terrified of purgatory (Hell) and the last bit of wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go to heaven. Edward Burman, in The Inquisition, from which this chronology is taken, explains that with the returning Crusaders in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries came many different Christian beliefs, others (called cults and heresies) were springing forth all over Europe, and various unorthodox Christian beliefs were filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.

"Some of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and (primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians) openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All power brokers fear the expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.

"Such was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress heresies since the middle of the tenth century. As with all crusades (the crusade of the Cold War is a very good example), this required a massive Social Control belief system (propaganda) portraying the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to justify the slaughter of targeted people and theft of their wealth.

"The burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206 into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215 the Latern Council was held which listed 'clause by clause' heretical interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for punishment.

"With the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized the form of the Inquisition.

"'The Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the mid-point of the thirteenth century' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

lympian religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition. Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

"The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I, in the fourth century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church and, along with Justinian I 200 years later, essentially made the Catholic Church the state religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the next 700 years aristocracy migrated toward the tax-sheltered positions of power in the higher offices of the church, those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgences and salvations. The common people were terrified of purgatory (Hell) and the last bit of wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go to heaven. Edward Burman, in The Inquisition, from which this chronology is taken, explains that with the returning Crusaders in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries came many different Christian beliefs, others (called cults and heresies) were springing forth all over Europe, and various unorthodox Christian beliefs were filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.

"Some of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and (primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians) openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All power brokers fear the expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.

"Such was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress heresies since the middle of the tenth century. As with all crusades (the crusade of the Cold War is a very good example), this required a massive Social Control belief system (propaganda) portraying the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to justify the slaughter of targeted people and theft of their wealth.

"The burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206 into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215 the Latern Council was held which listed 'clause by clause' heretical interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for punishment.

"With the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized the form of the Inquisition.

"'The Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the mid-point of the thirteenth century' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition. Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

"The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I, in the fourth century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church and, along with Justinian I 200 years later, essentially made the Catholic Church the state religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the next 700 years aristocracy migrated toward the tax-sheltered positions of power in the higher offices of the church, those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgences and salvations. The common people were terrified of purgatory (Hell) and the last bit of wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go to heaven. Edward Burman, in The Inquisition, from which this chronology is taken, explains that with the returning Crusaders in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries came many different Christian beliefs, others (called cults and heresies) were springing forth all over Europe, and various unorthodox Christian beliefs were filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.

"Some of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and (primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians) openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All power brokers fear the expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.

"Such was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress heresies since the middle of the tenth century. As with all crusades (the crusade of the Cold War is a very good example), this required a massive Social Control belief system (propaganda) portraying the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to justify the slaughter of targeted people and theft of their wealth.

"The burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206 into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215 the Latern Council was held which listed 'clause by clause' heretical interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for punishment.

"With the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized the form of the Inquisition.

"'The Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the mid-point of the thirteenth century' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

Mr. Arafat often attends the funerals of the “martyrs” of his nation. The press typically chooses to report that about 385 people have died in the bloodshed since September -- about 330 of them Palestinians -- without explaining the diabolical reason for many of these deaths.

“Palestinians don’t want peace,” said Tom Rose, “because Arafat is an unrepentant revolutionary.”

[img]http://home.att.net/~whitesox/israel/evds.jpg[/img]

Mr. Sharon’s victory, said Bret Stephens, editorial page writer for The Wall Street Journal Europe, was more than a vote against the policies of Ehud Barak. “[Sharon’s victory] was a decisive vote against the ‘peace process’ as it has been pursued by Mr. Barak,” wrote Mr. Stephens. “And it was a vote for Mr. Sharon; a man whose virtues became more attractive to Israelis as the country’s situation became direr … [Israelis] rejected submitting to the cant of liberal elites in order to win the approval of the Western governments.

They rejected a policy of giving without getting, as if only that could expiate the terrible guilt of their existence on this land.”


Following his victory, Mr. Sharon quickly faced pressure from other leaders in the region to continue making concessions to the Palestinians. Iraqi Foreign Minister Mohamed Said Al-Sahaf has already called Mr. Sharon a “criminal,” no doubt referring to Mr. Sharon’s authorization of the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon to drive out Mr. Arafat’s PLO forces. y' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

While I unreservedly believe that Mr. Sharon is the right man to lead Israel today, the truth is that the opposition to his leadership within the region is sure to be increasingly heightened.


American Christians should be firmly in support of Mr. Sharon’s work to protect Jerusalem.y explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

(“Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: May they prosper who love you.” -- Psalm 122: 6.)We must be praying for the peace of Jerusalem and for the Jewish people. And we must be encouraging our own government to be doing everything it can to prevent Mr. Arafat’s success in destroying this great nation. President George W. Bush needs to promptly make his administration a new beginning in American-Israeli relations.uld also be discarded because of its Arabic origins?**

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.**

Are you serious?**

Absolutely B)


Oklahomaman

2003-04-02 16:24 | User Profile

o be discarded because of its Arabic origins?**

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.**

Are you serious?**

Absolutely B)


Oklahomaman

2003-04-02 16:24 | User Profile

scarded because of its Arabic origins?**

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.**

Are you serious?**

Absolutely B)


Oklahomaman

2003-04-02 16:24 | User Profile

After Mr. Sharon’s government is in place, he must establish a 2001 budget, which the Knesset must pass by March 31. If that budget is not approved, new elections must be initiated for prime minister and parliament. Needless to say, this is a crucial time for this new leader.


After 32 visits to Israel, I can tell you that the grassroots of this tiny but momentous nation express great appreciation for the unswerving support of American Evangelicals who fervently pray for a strong and secure Israel. Let us not grow weary in well doing and continue to earnestly pray for Mr. Sharon rsecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies." **

No longer defending nihilism are we? I don't blame you. What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was. I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people. After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign. I AM THE CRUCIFIED. ROTFLMAO! What a joker!

Now that you are finally in on the joke of Nietzscheism, we can get down to the business at hand.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. The Germanic tribesmen who were Odinists couldn't even write until well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason. Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around? And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it." That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.

and his efforts to bring peace -- and, most importantly, security -- to our friend, Israel. as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies." **

No longer defending nihilism are we? I don't blame you. What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was. I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people. After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign. I AM THE CRUCIFIED. ROTFLMAO! What a joker!

Now that you are finally in on the joke of Nietzscheism, we can get down to the business at hand.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. The Germanic tribesmen who were Odinists couldn't even write until well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason. Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around? And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it." That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.

ared with that in other faiths and philosophies." **

No longer defending nihilism are we? I don't blame you. What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was. I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people. After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign. I AM THE CRUCIFIED. ROTFLMAO! What a joker!

Now that you are finally in on the joke of Nietzscheism, we can get down to the business at hand.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. The Germanic tribesmen who were Odinists couldn't even write until well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason. Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around? And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it." That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.

th that in other faiths and philosophies." **

No longer defending nihilism are we? I don't blame you. What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was. I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people. After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign. I AM THE CRUCIFIED. ROTFLMAO! What a joker!

Now that you are finally in on the joke of Nietzscheism, we can get down to the business at hand.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. The Germanic tribesmen who were Odinists couldn't even write until well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason. Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around? And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it." That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.


Okiereddust

2003-04-01 15:17 | User Profile

**During his final days in office, Mr. Barak had offered the Palestinians a state in about 95 percent of the West Bank and control over parts of Jerusalem. In addition, according to a New York Post report, Mr. Barak had also indicated a willingness to partially relinquish Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem, where the Al Aqsa Mosque stands above the ruins of the sacred biblical Jewish Temples.

Mr. Barak, seemingly a willing dupe of President Clinton and rabble-rouser James Carville, was convinced by the Democrat leadership in the U.S. to make unnecessary concessions to the Palestinians even though history proves that these concessions do nothing to appease Yassir Arafat, the terrorist leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization. The PLO has long sought the destruction of Israel, which became independent on May 14, 1948**

In truth there have been a lot of people, not kneejerk defenders of Israel, who have criticized Arafat's rejection of the Barak plan and think it undoubtedly strengthened the hand of those who always questioned his competency, reliability, and sincerity as a leader, and brought into question the whole peace process of trying to negotiate with him. The Yugoslavian correspondant for Chronicles for instance thought this.

There are a number of ironies regarding Farwell's support for Israel vs. Jews role in American domestic politics, but Farwell and the other evangelicals I'm sure misses these completely.


eric von zipper

2003-04-01 15:48 | User Profile

Poor stupid, all too willing dupe Falwell has obviously been bought off. I suspect most of those 32 freakin trips have been freebies.

This hawg jawed simpleton was emasculated by the tribe years ago when the Moral Majority had its 15 minutes of fame and now he is seeking to resurrect himself from non person status by sucking up to his persecuters so he can get some face time on TV.

Falwell is one of life's unfortunate souls whose character is writ large on his face. And Hawg Jaw's character can be summed up as one in which he will always reach for one more jelly donut.

And in order to get that last donut he doesn't care whose butt he has to kiss.

As for that sweetheart deal that Arafat supposedly turned down. I don't care what some guy in Kosovo says, I don't believe it. My recollection is that it was a typical mid eastern deal. Neither party was really happy with it. It had to be couched in diplomatic pettifoggery to obscure the fact that neither knew what the hell the specific details would turn out to be. And that it had to be couched such that both parties could present it to their constituents as a win for their side. It contained Talmudical details that only tribesmen could dream up such as we'll have control over the surface of Jerusalem and you will have control over any underground areas. What the f*** is that supposed to mean? To me it means if your house is on fire call me and I will decide whether or not to send a fire engine. And the Israelis have a very poor record in Jerusalem for sending fire trucks when arab or Christian property is burning.

Anyway, the war criminal Sharon queered the deal by staging a provocation at the Temple Mount purposely contrived to provoke an arab riot. And we are still dealing with that riot - the infitada.


Valley Forge

2003-04-01 17:57 | User Profile

Originally posted by The Skunk@Apr 1 2003, 14:18 ** .. **

Hello Skunk! It's great to see you here...

I think I can speak for everyone when I say we are all looking forward to many more of your posts exposing the malignant influence of the Jew.


Valley Forge

2003-04-01 18:02 | User Profile

VF...Instead, many WNs choose to villify Christians. Many even resort to language so hateful sounds like something out of the Talmud. This group doesn't seem to realize that in any contest between WN and religion, WN will lose every time.

NN: Precisely.

NN, could you elaborate on your answer please?

Is this an admission that when it comes to seeking converts to WN, there is no strategic advantage to attacking Christians?


Ragnar

2003-04-01 18:58 | User Profile

Originally posted by Valley Forge@Apr 1 2003, 18:02 ** ...Instead, many WNs choose to villify Christians. Many even resort to language so hateful sounds like something out of the Talmud. **

The part they really miss is that the hate in the Talmud predates Christianity and will post date it if no one recognizes it for what it is.

Just tell neopagans that when they dump on Jesus, they hit Mithra and Osiris too. Schwaller R. A. Lubicz was adamant on that. Symbolically these are equivalent figures. So how come they are hated equivalently in some parts? It's a good question and not only for pagans.

Both neopagans and Christians might note that there's been two books in the last season about the so-called "Exodus papyrus" that indicates an antagonism quite literally racist and going back over 3000 years.

Irony: Jesus is hated by Talmudic commentators because he is seen as pagan; Jesus is hated by pagans because he is seen as not pagan.


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-01 21:36 | User Profile

Originally posted by Valley Forge@Apr 1 2003, 12:02 **VF...Instead, many WNs choose to villify Christians. Many even resort to language so hateful sounds like something out of the Talmud. This group doesn't seem to realize that in any contest between WN and religion, WN will lose every time.

NN: Precisely.

NN, could you elaborate on your answer please?

Is this an admission that when it comes to seeking converts to WN, there is no strategic advantage to attacking Christians?**

It is, in effect, your admission that WN and the religion to be associated with it are not properly allied and that the latter takes precedence where the two are uncoordinated. This is obviously the case because the religion in question is, in part, an alien imposition and thus allegiance thereto is a form of treason aside from its unreason and inhibition. If a Kristian cannot overcome himself as such, he misrepresents himself as a "White Nationalist". If he wishes to be a theist, he needs to have an allied rather than an alien faith. This is the reason that the Interrogatory includes the question about the name of the Kristian God of War.

I suppose that one must concede that there is no strategic advantage to "attacking" anyone one hopes to convert. I note, however, that the inability of Kristians to handle matters of substance seems to incline them to the feeling that they have been "attacked" rather than engaged. TD, for example and by his own admission, over-reacted to my remark about no Jewish lies lacking believers amongst the Morons. Obviously some sensitivity there and the reason for the question in the Interrogatory about Jewish lying .


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-02 01:40 | User Profile

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Apr 1 2003, 17:33 Where I disagree with you is in your claim that just because aspects of Christian theology had their roots in an alien culture that Christianity in its Occidental form is alien to the West.

How many Odinist heretics and protestants had to be burnt at the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists? Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa? What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?

Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Apr 1 2003, 17:33 ** I suppose that the number system should also be discarded because of its Arabic origins?**

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.


Okiereddust

2003-04-02 03:36 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Apr 2 2003, 01:40 How many Odinist heretics and protestants had to be burnt at the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?

One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

> Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Apr 1 2003, 17:33 ** I suppose that the number system should also be discarded because of its Arabic origins?

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.

**

Are you serious?


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-02 13:33 | User Profile

Originally posted by Okiereddust@Apr 1 2003, 21:36 > Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Apr 2 2003, 01:40 How many Odinist heretics and protestants had to be burnt at the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?**

One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.

Also, you haven't read much of MacDonald in SAID have you? If you'd read that, or understood anything about the Spanish Inquisition as he articulates it, I doubt if you would be criticizing it, or at least using it as a bete noire. It was in fact a classic example of a western society ingroup trying to protect itself against outgroup subversion the "New Christians" aka the Marranos

> Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Apr 1 2003, 17:33 ** I suppose that the number system should also be discarded because of its Arabic origins?

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.

**

Are you serious?**

Where does the pattern of history tell us that we must have a dominant "viable substantive religion with mass appeal"? Odinism is an Olympian religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition. Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

"The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I, in the fourth century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church and, along with Justinian I 200 years later, essentially made the Catholic Church the state religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the next 700 years aristocracy migrated toward the tax-sheltered positions of power in the higher offices of the church, those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgences and salvations. The common people were terrified of purgatory (Hell) and the last bit of wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go to heaven. Edward Burman, in The Inquisition, from which this chronology is taken, explains that with the returning Crusaders in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries came many different Christian beliefs, others (called cults and heresies) were springing forth all over Europe, and various unorthodox Christian beliefs were filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.

"Some of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and (primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians) openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All power brokers fear the expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.

"Such was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress heresies since the middle of the tenth century. As with all crusades (the crusade of the Cold War is a very good example), this required a massive Social Control belief system (propaganda) portraying the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to justify the slaughter of targeted people and theft of their wealth.

"The burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206 into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215 the Latern Council was held which listed 'clause by clause' heretical interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for punishment.

"With the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized the form of the Inquisition.

"'The Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the mid-point of the thirteenth century' and, as the Christian sects went underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to their power.

"Franciscan and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700 years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims; as they disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and personal enemies were targeted.

"'Only the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.'1 That it was political power that was at stake was evident in the Albigensian Crusade and in the Spanish Inquisition. 'Wars are politics by other means' and the Cathar, Waldensian, Jewish, and Muslim communities were under assault by formal military forces led by Catholic secular powers."

> > Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Apr 1 2003, 17:33 ** I suppose that the number system should also be discarded because of its Arabic origins?**

First order of business of the Fourth Reich.**

Are you serious?**

Absolutely B)


Oklahomaman

2003-04-02 16:24 | User Profile

** Odinism is an Olympian religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies." **

No longer defending nihilism are we? I don't blame you. What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was. I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people. After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign. I AM THE CRUCIFIED. ROTFLMAO! What a joker!

Now that you are finally in on the joke of Nietzscheism, we can get down to the business at hand.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. The Germanic tribesmen who were Odinists couldn't even write until well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason. Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around? And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it." That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.

** The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.**

In the final analysis, your "Olympian Religion" cannot survive your own principle critique of Christianity for the "native religion" of the Indo-Europeans was not "Olympian Religion" but ancestor worship. The story of Romulus and the founding of Rome is a carry over from such religious practices. "Olympian Religion", like the alphabet, was an import, from the gasp semitic peoples of Mesopotamia via the equally semitic Phoenicians. I will pay you back with your own coin: If you posit that Christianity is alien then I tender the widespread theory that Judaism developed along these lines: polytheistic -> henotheistic -> monotheistic. And as such, Judaism and "Olympian Religion", in all likelyhood, share a common ancestor - Semitic Polytheism.


Okiereddust

2003-04-02 20:50 | User Profile

Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Apr 2 2003, 13:33 > Originally posted by Okiereddust@Apr 1 2003, 21:36 > Originally posted by NeoNietzsche@Apr 2 2003, 01:40 How many Odinist heretics and protestants had to be burnt at the stake or otherwise dispatched by orthodox Odinists?  Can one imagine an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa?  What about an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem?

One can't imagine these things because one cannot imagine Odinism as a viable, substantative religion with mass appeal. Going back to the West's pagan roots, of course there were persecutions of Christians. Although every religion has its own flavor or persecutions.**

  1. Where does the pattern of history tell us that we must have a dominant "viable substantive religion with mass appeal"?.... 2. The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.**

  2. It certainly tells us that we must have a "viable substantive religion with mass appeal" if we are going to have things like pass Odinist heresy persecutions, an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa, or an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem. None of these things obviously has hapeened with Odinists, simply because it has just a tiny number of adherents, and it is arguable to me at least how many of these even really take it seriously. Like any tiny movement it accomplishes little, neither good nor bad.

And I perfectly understand and affirm Mac's account of the Spanish Inquisition.  Evidently you were not aware that there was another and more comprehensive Inquisition:

Doubtless there were many, just as you describe by your fascinating account. And one wonders exactly if a a modern WN/NS sympathizer isn't being a little hypocritical for criticizing persecution of Jews, Freemasons, and even Muslims. But the term inquisition in popular parlance generally refers to its best known varient, that of Spain.

> > > Originally posted by AntiYuppie@Apr 1 2003, 17:33 ** I suppose that the number system should also be discarded because of its Arabic origins?

First order of business of the 4th Reich.**

Are you serious?**

Absolutely B)**

What will the "4th Reich" look like in non-Arabic numerals?


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-02 21:00 | User Profile

Originally posted by Oklahomaman@Apr 2 2003, 10:24 **> ** Odinism is an Olympian religion such as comfortably sustained Classical Civilization until the racial rot set in, and the issue of heresy and persecution in the derivatives of Judaism has had a prominence rising to a qualitative distinctiveness as compared with that in other faiths and philosophies." **

No longer defending nihilism are we? I don't blame you. What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was. I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people. After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign. I AM THE CRUCIFIED. ROTFLMAO! What a joker!

Now that you are finally in on the joke of Nietzscheism, we can get down to the business at hand.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. The Germanic tribesmen who were Odinists couldn't even write until well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason. Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around? And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it." That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.

** The implicit point stands that Odinism is obviously the native faith, with which faith the pattern of Kristian performance strongly contrasts as a highly contested and thus alien imposition or acquisition.**

In the final analysis, your "Olympian Religion" cannot survive your own principle critique of Christianity for the "native religion" of the Indo-Europeans was not "Olympian Religion" but ancestor worship. The story of Romulus and the founding of Rome is a carry over from such religious practices. "Olympian Religion", like the alphabet, was an import, from the gasp semitic peoples of Mesopotamia via the equally semitic Phoenicians. I will pay you back with your own coin: If you posit that Christianity is alien then I tender the widespread theory that Judaism developed along these lines: polytheistic -> henotheistic -> monotheistic. And as such, Judaism and "Olympian Religion", in all likelyhood, share a common ancestor - Semitic Polytheism.**

No longer defending nihilism are we?

The defense of Nihilism was not pertinent to the discussion. Please pay attention.

What a sorry piece of work Nietzsche was.  I think his books were meant as a practical joke on sophomoric people.  After people buy into his "philosophy" spread it around, they walk around with a sort of a verbal "kick me I'm a complete idiot" sign.  I AM THE CRUCIFIED.  ROTFLMAO!  What a joker!

Your assessment of Nietzsche does not speak well of your attention to scholarship. Perhaps you are young and yet have time to rectify this oversight.

By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt.

A ludicrous assertion regarding the Greeks, who were centuries classically civilized before unification under a Macedonian king, who was never - and was never worshipped as - an emperor. The Romans likewise, before the Roman emperor (who became the emperor of the conquered Greeks) was progressively elevated with the evolution of the Roman state in a seemingly natural and native process as the demands of the state required. There was no premature importation of an unsuitable Egyptian model. Emperor-worship was the beginning of the end of Classical culture, not co-extensive with it as you suggest. And Olympian religion is not being defended here as a racially prophylactic measure. Please pay attention.

The Romans called the germanic peoples barbarians for good reason.  Furthermore, the germanic tribesmen didn't classify people into nations or races but tribes and rather brutal inter-tribal warfare was their sorry lot until the coming of Christianity.

True, but not pertinent.

Secondly, if "Olympian Religion" didn't protect the racial purity of the ancients in the first place, what makes you think it will a second time around?  And please don't say "It would have if they only hadn't abandoned it."  That's only begging the question about the modern impulse to abandon Christianity.

I do not think it would and did not suggest that it would. Pay attention.

In the final analysis, your "Olympian Religion" cannot survive your own principle critique of  Christianity for the "native religion" of the Indo-Europeans was not "Olympian Religion" but ancestor worship.  The story of  Romulus and the founding of Rome is a carry over from such religious practices.  "Olympian Religion", like the alphabet, was an import, from the gasp semitic peoples of Mesopotamia via the equally semitic Phoenicians.  I will pay you back with your own coin:  If you posit that Christianity is alien then I tender the widespread theory that  Judaism developed along these lines:  polytheistic -> henotheistic -> monotheistic. And as such, Judaism and "Olympian Religion", in all likelyhood, share a common ancestor - Semitic Polytheism.

As if the Semites invented polytheism - which has been, rather, a natural, evolutionary, and parallel (rather than derivative, as you suggest) development for peoples all around the globe. Olympian religion in general can only ludicrously be referred to as an "import". It evolved amongst many peoples from an IE nucleus, with appendages in varying degree. Whatever may qualify (as below) the pure nativeness of the Greco-Roman faith may not be said of the remote Odinism which is pertinent to the discussion. The following material (which makes your best case) will instruct you in the proper qualification of your otherwise laughable position:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Thus modern philology has effectively demonstrated that Greek mythology is to at least some extent inherited from a mythology that was originally common to all the Indo-European peoples. It is difficult to be very specific about the forms that this mythology took: we do not have a body of Indo-European poetry that contains myths as elaborate as those of the Greeks, and the myths that do survive in ancient Indian or Irish poetry differ from the Greek myths in many respects. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to assume that the Greeks did not invent their mythology entirely, but rather that their invention took place within certain parameters established by earlier cultures.

"But What Did the Greeks Think?

"We have referred more than once to Herodotus' famous dictum that it was Hesiod and Homer that gave the Greeks their gods. But Herodotus surely did not think of the two poets as simply inventing the Olympian religion; rather they gave artistc form to what became extremely influential ways of thinking about the gods among later Greek culture. Herodotus also thought that the Greeks borrowed or inherited elements of their mythology from older cultures. But Herodotus and the other Greeks knew nothing about the Indo-European hypothesis. Instead, they tended to suppose that their culture was borrowed from the "older" civilizations of the Mediterranean with whom the Greeks were in contact through trade, colonization, warfare, and so forth. The two main cultures involved were the Phoenicians and the Egyptians.

"Linguistically, these cultures were outside the Indo-European family, and the general shape of their religious systems too differs from that of the Greeks. Nevertheless, Herodotus did not shrink from tracing certain Greek institutions to the Egyptians in particular, and from identifying certain Greek gods and goddesses with Egyptian counterparts. There is, moreover, the myth of Io and her descendants Io was the daughter of the King of Argos. Seduced by Zeus, she wandered to Egypt and gave birth to a child, Epaphus. Epaphus became the father of Libya -- the name of a large part of northern Africa -- and of Belus, who in turn became the father of Danaus and Aegyptus. Danaus returned to his ancestral Argos, while Aegyptus became king of Egypt. (A portion of this myth is the subject of Aeschylus' Suppliants or Suppliant Maidens.) Thus, according to this myth, the Greeks and the Egyptians were actually related through their ancestors Danaus and Aegyptus, two brothers descended from the Argive heroine Io.

"Another myth concerns the foundation of Thebes by Cadmus, who comes to Greece from Phoenicia. One of the deeds ascribed to Cadmus is the invention of the alphabet; and in fact, it is clear that the Greek alphabet (from which our alphabet is descended) was borrowed from that of the Phoenicians. So the myth of Cadmus, which traces the origin of a centrally important Greek cultural institution to Phoenicia, appears to contain a nucleus of historical fact.

"Greece and 'the Orient'

"In the reading for today, Walter Burkert discusses the meaning of parallels that have been observed between certain Greek myths (Heracles; the succession myth; Perseus and the Gorgon) and a number of apparently similar myths found in Near Eastern cultures. For some years now scholars have explored the relationship between Greek and Near Eastern cultures, for which myths like the ones discussed by Burkert offer an important class of evidence. But it is an open question just what such parallel myths mean. Are they cases of borrowings by a 'younger' Greek culture from the 'older' civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt, or the Levant? Are they evidence that Greek culture was part of a larger, international culture that thrived in the Eastern Mediterranean throughout antiquity, a culture in which myths circulated freely and were constantly adapted to satisfy local conditions? Or are the similarities between Greek and Near Eastern material due less to the fact that these civilizations were in contact with one another, and more to the status of mythology as a kind of 'universal language' that speaks to the human condition at a basic level that transcends cultural difference?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-02 21:46 | User Profile

1. It certainly tells us that we must have a "viable substantive religion with mass appeal" if we are going to have things like pass Odinist heresy persecutions, an Odinist Witch Trial, an Odinist Inquisition, or an Odinist Canossa, or an Odinist crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem. None of these things obviously has happened with Odinists, simply because it has just a tiny number of adherents, and it is arguable to me at least how many of these even really take it seriously. Like any tiny movement it accomplishes little, neither good nor bad.

Nor did these things happen in the historic, pre-and-proto-Kristian context which is relevant to the discussion, as is the point. We are discussing the "alien-ness" of historically disruptive Kristianity in contrast to the seemingly undisturbed naturalness of the historically precedent faith. The insignificance of Odinism presently is beside that point, and I do not endorse it as other than a prescription for those WN who simply must have a faith.

Doubtless there were many [Inquisitions], just as you describe by your fascinating account.  And one wonders exactly if a modern WN/NS sympathizer isn't being a little hypocritical for criticizing persecution of Jews, Freemasons, and even Muslims.  But the term inquisition in popular parlance generally refers to its best known variant, that of Spain.

I am not criticizing persecution of Jews and Muslims (basically the Spanish episode which I earlier endorsed) and am not even being critical in general. The point is the implicit manifestation of alien-ness in the extraordinary persecution, as described, of "Kristians" by "Kristians" in the earlier, larger, and longer Inquisition to which scholars have reference by that unqualified term.

What will the "4th Reich" look like in non-Arabic numerals?

Reich IV


askel5

2003-04-06 04:37 | User Profile

Originally posted by amundsen@Mar 30 2003, 09:09 ** The Bible is the foundation on which Christian doctrine and practice should rest. **

Given that the Bible was the product of apostolic tradition, this can't be true.


Ragnar

2003-04-06 08:22 | User Profile

Originally posted by Oklahomaman@Apr 2 2003, 16:24 ** By the time Classical Civilization set in both the Greeks and Romans had essentially abandoned your "Olympian Religion" and were officially practicing Emperor-Worship which was imported from ahhhh so racially pure Egypt. **

It matters little, but this is ahistorical. The confabulation that "pharaoh was god" is a modern invention. The pharaoh was often referred to as "neter" which is translated as "god" but more often means "guardian"; pharaoh was hence the guardian of state and protector of the realm.

What irks me is that the correct information is easily obtained but even history books repeat the old yarn about Egyptians "worshipping their pharaoh like a god". This would come as news to the two pharaohs of the 18th Dynasty who were cashiered for incompetence.

But then maybe firing god might have been fun... :P


NeoNietzsche

2003-04-12 14:12 | User Profile

[From a VNN contribution:]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The bishop mixed Latin sentences into the baptism speech. The words of the ceremony flew like confused night birds over the grounds and found nowhere the hearts of the listeners. So their effect was lost like the smoke from incense. The climax of the ceremony seemed to be past. Ratbod's eye mustered the group of his people surely and firmly, who lacked reverence just like he himself.

The priest portrayed the holiness of the baptized and painted the hell torment of the damned who did not want to hear the word of the High Priest in Rome. Now Wulfram of Sens turned to Ratbod himself:

"Take then, King, the water of baptism, so that you, freed of all sins, may one day enter heaven with the throngs of believers, to sit at the right of the omniscient God from eternity to eternity, while all those go to hell, who die unbaptized."

Then Ratbod's voice interrupted the speaking bishop.

He asked in the language of his ancestors:

"You have said, priest, that I shall go to heaven if I allow myself to be baptized? Now tell me, priest, where are my parents, who are dead and had never been baptized?!"

Terror spread through the ranks of the group of priests, because the holy act had been so unexpectedly interrupted. The bishop, completely in the enthusiasm of the conversion, threw out the words:

"All of them are with the devil in hell, because they died as pagans!"

Then Rotbad kicked the clay pan with the holy water so that it fell to the ground and burst into fragments. And he hurled his free words into the priest's face:

"Then I want to tell you, priest, I would rather go to my parents and the devil in hell than with you priests to heaven!"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What would Kathy Churchgoer say to this insolence, boys and girls?


weisbrot

2003-04-13 23:36 | User Profile

She might think, as do I, that this Gerhard is shoveling a big load of crap. He reads like a Star Trekkie-novel ghostwriter going medieval.

Next thought: Why do you even care? If you're looking for burnt offerings or perhaps some incense, start your own religion.