← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · NeoNietzsche
Thread ID: 5523 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2003-03-13
2003-03-13 16:50 | User Profile
BANKERS!
We know this because all of "our," we-the-people's, money is perversely borrowed at interest in favor of lending institutions, among others, with contrary interests to those of the commonwealth.
Letting the bankers run the country means inevitable economic contraction, bankruptcy, repossession and dispossession. Money loaned out at interest means that X amount of dollars must be requited with X amount of existing dollars plus Z amount of non-existent dollars. Hence the inevitable contraction, bankruptcy, etc. Bankers are naturally interested in these manifestations of deflation (the enhancement of the value of their money) and the progressive surrender of control of resources to themselves through interest slavery.
If politicians were really running the country, even the dimmest among them would lately have figured out that they could simply print the money and give it away to buy votes (rather than merely monkeying with the tax code). Eva Peron was a genius by comparison with our lamentable legislative lackeys - she simply lacked appropriate restraint in the give-it-away phase of the management of the Argentinian economy.
If our politicians (a'la the Third Reich) ran the country, they could expand (inflate) the fiat money supply to fully and sensibly employ otherwise unused resources. It is so pitifully simple for the politicians to overcome recession: print the money, give it away, and reflate the economy. Trying to induce borrowing toward re-employment of productive resources, with even so little as zero interest, is the infamous "pushing-on-a-string" trick which neither the Japanese bankers nor any others have figured out how to perform.
So, Gentlemen, let us then form - out of compassion and rational consideration - the Print the Money and Giveitaway Party (PMGP) - with a promise not to empower irresponsible administrators such as the late and lovely Eva Peron.
2003-03-13 17:37 | User Profile
Remember the charts that mafia-investigating congessional committees used to put up, delineating the structures of the syndicates? This is what's needed on big financial string pullers... with pictures, addresses, lines of succession, etc. And a lot of exposure.
2003-03-13 18:15 | User Profile
I'm surprized I haven't seen any articles about who really benefits from government deficit spending. Deficit spending makes the government (and thus us) poorer because it must pay interest out of the tax proceeds. One-time borrowing can be beneficial for special circumstances, but annual borrowing is not beneficial.
Who benefits? Those who want to buy government debt? Banks. Certain foreign governments. Rich people who want to avoid taxes. Those who want higher interest rates or inflation?
2003-03-13 18:27 | User Profile
**Remember the charts that mafia-investigating congessional committees used to put up, delineating the structures of the syndicates? This is what's needed on big financial string pullers... with pictures, addresses, lines of succession, etc. And a lot of exposure. **
I've seen such a book at a used-book store. It had diagrams of the interlocking relationships of Jewish banking families in the early 20th century. I wish I'd bought it, but money was tight at the time, and I couldn't afford to walk out with more than 5 or 6 books on Jewish themes.
2003-03-13 22:47 | User Profile
Hey, gang, here is some interesting trivia about the Federal Reserve bankers:
"Now that we know the Federal Reserve is a privately owned, for-profit corporation, a natural question would be: who OWNS this company? Peter Kershaw provides the answer in "Economic Solutions" where he lists the ten primary shareholders in the Federal Reserve banking system.
1) The Rothschild Family - London 2) The Rothschild Family - Berlin 3) The Lazard Brothers - Paris 4) Israel Seiff - Italy 5) Kuhn-Loeb Company - Germany 6) The Warburgs - Amsterdam 7) The Warburgs - Hamburg 8) Lehman Brothers - New York 9) Goldman & Sachs - New York 10) The Rockefeller Family - New York." [end of quote].
[*denotes Jewish/Jewish controlled; 8 out of 10. --Ed.]
Dat'll be 5 bucks from each one of ya, goyim....[say, NeoN, do ya think that all dose Jews be a co-in-ci-dence?? Must be, huh?]
2003-03-13 22:50 | User Profile
Thanks for the list.
You're telling me Lazard Freres is not a Jewish concern? I think you're mistaken.
2003-03-13 22:51 | User Profile
Hmmm......maybe so....do not know....readers?
2003-03-13 23:03 | User Profile
Well, the Lazard brothers themselves were Jews. Last time I checked, the CEO was a former chairman of the Council of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
2003-03-13 23:22 | User Profile
Oh well, one out of 10 [the Rockefellers] ainââ¬â¢t bad. The Rockefellers, whatââ¬â¢s up with
them? Cryptos? Marranos? Druids?
2003-03-14 01:42 | User Profile
Everybody who has read about international Jewish finance knows of these families that ran the banks eighty years ago. Their names may still be on the doors but more comprehensive and updated info is needed. Specific full names, current positions and connections, individual histories, etc. I mean, if Frank Pentangeli is running numbers, charging the patriarch of the Corleone family with perjury ain't gonna inhibit Frankie much, right?
A big fat database like the ADL maintains on us, but on real decision makers instead?
NN, I didn't intend to change the direction of your thread. Sorry. Please realign as desired.
2003-03-15 23:53 | User Profile
It's obvious that no group, no matter how well organized, or well " funded " or well-armed can effectively form a nation anymore. Let's say for example, that a group of 100 wealthy anti-globalist and non-pc wanted to take over a certain country in the Arctic and start a new country. Outside of the IMF and Federal Reserve, with their own monetary system etc.. well what do u think would happen, they would be blamed for a terrorist attack and a US campaign would be launched against them. Thats the deal now. Worth is only a percieved element. Even the ageless perception that gold and platinum are precious is indeed under scrutiny acientifically, never mind the precious gems racket. I listen to various shortwave broadcasts late at night and would like info from any members here who would recommend any broadcasts. Still outside of the internet, shortwave is the only forum I know of where almost anything goes. Ham radio less penetrable but more complicated to run. Is there any real effort to establish a society removed from the NWO ?? You tell me..