← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Texas Dissident
Thread ID: 5457 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2003-03-10
2003-03-10 17:48 | User Profile
A little dated, but I just received it via an email and I couldn't find it posted here.
[url=http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2002/gibson/qtr3/0729.htm]What Happens When Whites are no Longer the Majority?[/url]
by Dave Gibson
July 29, 2002
The United States today has 100 million people of non-European ancestry. It is no secret that millions of Latinos cross our border every year and the ones already here breed like rabbits. Both political parties have failed to defend our borders to stop illegal immigration. Our largest state, California, already has a majority non-White population. It will be only twenty years before America has a non-White majorityââ¬âperhaps only ten years if race-mixing and non-White immigration grow worse.
When America is eventually dominated by Blacks and Hispanics, this country -as we know it- will cease to exist. Crime and drug use will cripple this nation. There will be no tax base to pay police, maintain the roads or even keep the lights on. Every item sold in this country will be imported from Europe and Asia. South Africa has demonstrated the chaos that a Black majority brings.
Since the end of Apartheid and the election of Nelson Mandela as president, that nation has been coming apart at the seams. Black taxi drivers have ââ¬Åshot it outââ¬Â over customers. AIDS is an epidemic among Blacks and many resort to superstitions to try to cure it. One African superstition is that having sex with a virgin will cure AIDS. As a result AIDS-infected Blacks have been raping children and even babies in an attempt to cure themselves. It has become shockingly commonplace for gangs of Black youths, roaming the countryside at night to attack and kill White farmers throughout South Africa. (You wonââ¬â¢t hear that from Dan Rather!) Crime has become so rampant in that country, that the government now refuses to issue crime statistics.
The Clinton regime had an open door policy with our neighbors to the south, and now President Bush is continuing the fiesta. The flood of illegals gets worse every year. This unlawful invasion has placed a terrible strain on public schools, which quickly become filled with little brown mestizos often depriving the White taxpayers of being able to admit their own children (as if any White parents would want to send their children to a school two-thirds Mexican).
County hospitals in California have literally gone bankrupt providing emergency service for Latinos. The federal government dictates that American hospitals must treat all illegal immigrants for everything from gunshot wounds to millions of pregnancies, but the federal government does not provide one penny to help with this mandate, nor do they stop the stampede of illegals across our southern border. The beleaguered residents of southwestern states already feel as though they are living in a war zone.
It is also a war that they are losing. Every major U.S. city is plagued with non-White problems. The short term solution has been for Whites to flee to the suburbs to escape the mayoral incompetence of the likes of Tom Bradley, David Dinkins and Marion Barry (the only known crackhead mayor). Under the direction of non-White mayors and police chiefs most big cities have become filthy, frightening places with an increasingly Third World population. Many major American cities are on the brink of bankruptcyââ¬âspared only by the profits from a few major corporations and their professional White work force that commutes in from the suburbs. Most Whites have no desire to leave the suburbs, where the police come when you call them, the snow is plowed in the winter and the garbage is actually picked up on time.
Much of the blame for the current state of affairs can be placed squarely upon the shoulders of an evil scheming liberal demagogue, Lyndon Johnson, who was regrettably president from 1963 through 1969. This criminal is responsible for inviting an invasion of illegal aliens, creating the welfare state to transfer money from producers to parasites and creating the Civil Rights Act, which gave the federal government the authority to harass every business in America if it didnââ¬â¢t hire ââ¬Åenoughââ¬Â non-Whites.
The Civil Rights Act put America on the road to quotas and over thirty years of reverse discrimination. Welfare programs have helped to destroy the Black family increasing the Black illegitimate birth rate from less than ten percent to 66 percent. Most of the bleeding heart liberals, who demanded the integration of our once functional public school system, were hypocritically sending their children to lily-White private schools. Our school system was once a model for the world. Now it is a model for the Third World.
We have seen our major corporations sabotaged by political correctness and quotas. European and Japanese corporations have increasingly beaten their American competitors in recent years. Airbus has quickly gained on Boeing, which once dominated commercial jet production. Today Boeing goes out of its way to hire minorities and has full medical benefits for ââ¬ÅGay spouses.ââ¬Â A few decades ago, Boeing used to focus on hiring good engineers and building the best airplanes. American corporations are terrified of lawsuits whenever they want to fire a minority employee, who is hopelessly incompetent.
This country is obsessed with hiring and promoting minorities simply because of the color of their skin. (Isnââ¬â¢t that racism?) We are constantly bombarded by the liberal news mediaââ¬â¢s claim that ââ¬Ådiversity is our strengthââ¬Â even though America became a superpower when it was 90 percent White, and any honest historian would admit America has been in a steady decline as the non-White percentage has risen. Jesse Jackson tries to shame White Americans for the actions of a few White people in previous generations.
As the non-White percentage rises, America will turn more and more into a Third World nation. California recently had power black outs because the incompetent liberal state government (elected by the non-White majority of that state) could not plan ahead. California today has a 35 billion dollar deficit in their latest budget thanks to the crushing burden of millions of Mexicans and the big-spending habits of liberal politicians. While a few businesses profit from cheap Mexican labor, White taxpayers get buried with the crushing tax burden.
A Mexican family with eight children will cost the local county hospital $120,000 for eight normal pregnancies, and the public schools will need $864,000 to put all eight children through twelve years of education. Does anyone seriously believe that a minimum wage Mexican is going to contribute enough in taxes to pay for that colossal burden? It is far better to have White teenagers handle the minimum wage jobs as they did before millions of Mexicans arrived. At least young Whites have the ability to get an education and eventually contribute enough in taxes to pull their own weight.
The disastrous situation in California will quickly spread across America. White people, who once escaped the non-White problem by running away to the suburbs, will find no refuge in the future. State income taxes and property taxes will rise exponentially as liberal politicians try to maintain free medical care and free education for millions of poor non-White immigrants. The current trend toward a non-White America can only be stopped if people like you finally decide to be politically active and to fight the corrupt political system destroying America.
2003-03-11 01:41 | User Profile
Good article. It should be sufficient to shift any thinking person toward explicit WN views.
Does this mean you and the other traditional paleo-cons are finally coming around? :~)
2003-03-11 02:05 | User Profile
Not in my case, as the premise of the article (specifically, that whites are destined to be a minority in 10 to 20 years) is completely inaccurate. In fact, the Third World majority America is projected by most demographic studies to occur in approximately 50 years...should 'traditional' paleocon measures, such as a moratorium on immigration (or better yet, a return to national quotas featuring European immigration), a rigid committment against quotas, affirmative action, and multiculturalism, and aggressive deportation of illegals all be enacted, then 50 years becomes 100, 200, or never.
2003-03-11 05:40 | User Profile
Third World majority America is projected by most demographic studies to occur in approximately 50 years...
2048 according to UN statistics, but I understand that these reckon only with citizens and known newcomers pending naturalization. Avoidance or short-changing of illegal invaders makes such studies seriously deficient, and when Jews and mongrels (who think themselves white) are added into the mix the relevant date is impacted by at least a decade.
should 'traditional' paleocon measures, such as a moratorium on immigration (or better yet, a return to national quotas featuring European immigration), a rigid committment against quotas, affirmative action, and multiculturalism, and aggressive deportation of illegals all be enacted, then 50 years becomes 100, 200, or never.
Short of a revolution whose end product is the repudiation and obliteration of sacred social paradigms, these ââ¬Åtraditional measuresââ¬Â will never see the light of day. Given present demographics and the reality that invaders have long attained a critical mass in the Southwest, the proposed revolution must necessarily entail the splintering of the US, or, else, be a very bloody affair -- an unpalatable thought for a thoroughly conditioned and satiated consumer-driven society whose happy existence, as presently constituted, is utterly (inter) dependant on Globalization.
For the sake of argument, let us assume that said paleocon measures have been enacted with minimal social disruption and sans ethnically inspired warring and unbearable acts of sabotage. Pray tell, what is the genetic result of a populace composed of 2/3 Aryans, with Latinos (Asian derivative), Blacks and Mongoloids comprising the remainder, in a century or two. Even if free to assume balanced fecundity among the races -- an impossibility, since different innate abilities imply unequal wealth, which in turn imply unequal breeding rates, but let us engage in further charity -- the best that could be realistically hoped for would be an Iran genetic equivalent, as shown by its intermediate ranking on charts representing genetic differences of races. Assuming varying fertility rates, a more honest result would probably be found among the various shades of Indians.
We ought not forget that Nordics appear as they do only because of fortuitous migration history, which saw them take the Northern route along the Gulf of Bothnia and thus remain relatively free of alien genetic admixture. Other European branches were less fortunate, and as one travels further south and east the claims of Aryan status become tenuous. Beliefs and societal norms had little to do with breeding habits and genetic inheritance for geography and proximity of other races was central. Blue-eyed blonds have travelled the globe since time immemorial but absent mass separation from natives the results have always been the same, be it Egypt, South America, Easter Island or China, namely, extinction, supplantation and loss of genetic uniqueness.
To paraphrase one Belgian governmental official: Our citizens will in due time be replaced by those of other nations, and our people seem to have accepted it. Leaving aside the question of assigning responsibility for inducement of having ââ¬Åaccepted it,ââ¬Â it follows that personal beliefs today are crucial (only thing left) since status quo and the reality of Globalization guarantees that geography alone will save no Aryan nation. Individuals and groups will be saved but for the whole of nations ââ¬â nothing!
We may marshal out facts and arguments and quibble over present tactics, but we remain social pariahs (of course, paleos may be more respectable) and I fear that vindication may not come in our lifetime. It may be that our counsel is for the next civilization to evaluate, and, if so, there are bound to be interpretation issues. For instance, I wonder what significance future explorers will assign to the discovery of Dr. Martin L. King statues in US given that some historians posit a Black civilization predating Mayas and Incas based on undeniable Negro features of numerous Olmec statues found in Mexico. You see, TD may not know it, or admit as much, but ODââ¬â¢s best chance for fame comes not as a paleo-conservative venue conducive to fruitful discussions, but as potential legacy -- comprising assorted opinions of dissidents and well-meaning but wishful thinkers, the non-suicidal elements of a suicide intended society -- to the next civilization by way of time-capsule of its hard disk. :D
2003-03-15 18:05 | User Profile
Sisyfos assumes that wealth will forever result in reduced birth rates. However, wealthy whites can make a conscious choice to have many children.
The entire sphere of white reproduction has fallen under scientific-technical controls; reproduction is becoming more and more a very-conscious affair, not something that happens by accident. Given that most whites have not yet understood our demographic problems, there has not yet been a drive to have more white children. In the future, this will change; and such a drive can have real results, particularly with armies of non-white nannies around to care for white children.
2003-03-15 21:24 | User Profile
Hey, eddy --
What is with your "Invade Iraq Now" signature? Hmmm?
Who do you work for, eddy? Huh? C'mon, you can tell me. I won't tell anyone...just like Connie Chung....come on, eddy. Tell me.
2003-03-15 21:45 | User Profile
Franco, my signature indicates that I think we ought to invade Iraq. Hope that clarifies things for you. I think we have already had a little discussion about who I work for, so I see no need to help your ailing memory. Goodbye.
2003-03-16 00:34 | User Profile
eddy, eddy, eddy ---
I'm gonna tell my rabbi, Hymie Goldbrickbergbaumsteinwitz, about you. He'll fix your wagon, buster!
[Hmmm...hmmmm -- humming the love theme from Schindler's List...]
C'mon, eddy...my rabbi will call your rabbi. We'll eat bagels and lox and matzo balls, an' curse dose eeeeevil gentiles. Whaddaya say, eddykins?? You can even wear a yarmulke if'n ya want to...
2003-03-16 01:51 | User Profile
Obviously, Franco, I am a Jew, because only Jews support the war.
Could you quit spamming threads I post to? Thanks.
2003-03-16 06:17 | User Profile
eddy --
Do you have an extra yarmulke I could borrow? I lost mine at a Klan rally in Northern Arkansas...right near Harrison....[giggle]
Just send the yarmulke to:
Franco, c/o Hatemongers Anonymous, 1234 Whiteguy Lane, Somewhere, Idaho 12345
[ Hmmmm....hmmmm -- humming the love theme from the 1978 TV comedy mini-series, "The Holocaust," starring Michael Moriarty and Peter Strauss....coming to a TV set near you....narrated by Adam Sandler and Billy Crystal...]
Oh, yeah -- toss in some gefilte fish while yer at it....and some MD 20/20....
2003-03-16 17:11 | User Profile
Franco -- you sound like a real bad ass. Very scary.
Sisyfos assumes that wealth will forever result in reduced birth rates. However, wealthy whites can make a conscious choice to have many children.
The entire sphere of white reproduction has fallen under scientific-technical controls; reproduction is becoming more and more a very-conscious affair, not something that happens by accident. Given that most whites have not yet understood our demographic problems, there has not yet been a drive to have more white children. In the future, this will change; and such a drive can have real results, particularly with armies of non-white nannies around to care for white children.
2003-03-17 03:59 | User Profile
This is a rhetorical question, right? We all know what happens. Just look to South Africa, Zimbabwe or any of Americaââ¬â¢s inner cities for confirmation. Many Western European [London, Paris] and Canadian [Toronto, Montreal] cities, too, now feature no go zones for Whites.
Denial is only temporarily comforting.
2003-03-17 04:06 | User Profile
darkeddy Posted on Mar 16 2003, 11:11
**Sisyfos assumes that wealth will forever result in reduced birth rates. **
An assumption reinforced by the fate of every advanced civilization in recorded history. Here I speak of civilizations (Occident is one such) and not societies lacking distinction or subgroups, of which there have been exceptions, e.g., post-war baby booms, but these are invariably event-specific and fleeting. Political incentives via punitive and/or rewarding statutes have been notorious failures. National Socialism may have been an exception but the experiment was discontinued, depriving us of proper analysis concerning domestic social policies and its impact on ultimate birth rate.
However, wealthy whites can make a conscious choice to have many children.
Theoretically, this is possible but the likelihood of it occurring is miniscule. See above.
Given that most whites have not yet understood our demographic problems, there has not yet been a drive to have more white children.
This is demonstrably false. Most whites know or have heard of the demographic problem but have not been impressed by it. Canuckistanââ¬â¢s papers have been engaged in a decade long campaign (predictions, statistics, coloured graphs, the works) to motivate its population to go about multiplying, and seldom fail to mention the need for immigrants to relieve the natives of their obligation to contribute to the almighty GROWTH. Europeans have been schooled in similar fashion for even longer, with similar results. US may be the exception but its birth rate is above replacement level, and given current immigration levels it is unlikely that the press will echo the sentiment. In any event, we have accounted for ââ¬Åmost whites.ââ¬Â It goes without saying that multicultural countries, comprising 1/3 non-whites, will never know an official ââ¬ÅAryan baby driveââ¬Â, so we need not discuss it.
But assuming that most whites understand the problem, presumably, to a lesser extent than you do but along the same lines, is to say that neither you nor they truly understand it. Again, we find ourselves rehashing worn-out points pertaining to procreation contest between races, Earthââ¬â¢s optimal carrying capacity, and concept of finite space. Here is a quote you really must learn to appreciate:
ââ¬ÅBeyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans in the finite space of a planetary ecosystem as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kink of existence is possible for those who do survive.ââ¬Â
In the future, this will change; and such a drive can have real results, particularly with armies of non-white nannies around to care for white children.
Subcontracting of parental obligations to other races is a hallmark of non-viability.
On another note, your signature interests me. Your postings thus far indicate a predisposition for conventional remedies for our ills, free of anything hinting of far right origins and, hence, wicked encumbrances. My admittedly convoluted thinking on the potential benefits of this war is detailed elsewhere, but I am curious what reasons find favour with a presumably representative American (of the nearly 2/3 who favour armed intervention if blessed by UN). Why dispatch Janissaries to massacre a token force and incite hatred toward your own?
2003-03-17 04:26 | User Profile
While whites might be aware of our demographics problems, few understand them to even a minor extent. I do not predict full understanding, only enough to realize that immigration must be chocked off and the birth-rate increased among worthy whites.
I am not interested in an 'official' Aryan baby-drive, if by that you mean a government sanctioned one. Due to our multiracial woes, I in essence advocate a 'paleolibertarian' stance: i.e., minimal government with a return to racially-conscious conservation and augmention among whites. Other races are free to be socially-liberal or conservative, as desired, but they must accept minimal government.
I don't agree that we are not viable if we use non-white nannies. Only if we cannot do without them, are we in trouble. But if we were in fact surrounded by non-whites with equal long-term economic abilities to our own, or by no non-whites at all, we would not non-white nannies in the first place.
As to the war: I think we ought to elimate all non-democratic regimes possible who possess or are likely to develop nuclear weapons. Iraq fits the bill; I am not sure any other nation does at present, at least in the sense of 'possible' I have in mind. (I.e., N. Korea is perhaps too dangerous for us to attack them.) Why do I advocate this position? It has always been a good idea to eliminate potential threats when the stakes are at the level of nuclear attack (for example, on Rome). It is just that now, with the USSR truly dead and gone, we have more opportunities to make these sort of eliminations. And hopefully, we can finance them by using our geo-political power to gain economic advantages, such as cheap oil.
2003-03-18 15:44 | User Profile
**Hey, eddy --
What is with your "Invade Iraq Now" signature? Hmmm?**
Franco,
He's obviously one of those Jews who dominate the enterainment industry and who have been so vocal in their support of the war..... OOPS wrong stereotype...
Geez give it a break.