← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Centinel
Thread ID: 5261 | Posts: 3 | Started: 2003-02-28
2003-02-28 21:27 | User Profile
From The Washington Times, available online at: [url=http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/20030227-26542174.htm]http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/2003...27-26542174.htm[/url]
Lethal outsourcing
By Paul Craig Roberts February 27, 2003
Do you remember those Information Technology (IT) jobs that were going to take the place in the "new economy" of those outsourced manufacturing jobs? Don't bother to retrain. The IT jobs are leaving, too.
Knowledge work can be done anywhere there are educated people. These days that's just about everywhere: the Philippines, India, China, Russia, Eastern Europe, Costa Rica, and South Africa. Outsourcing of "new economy" jobs is exploding.
A recent article in the Feb. 3 Business Week describes "dazzling new technology parks" on the outskirts of India's major cities where U.S. companies such as Bank of America, Texas Instruments, pharmaceutical companies, Intel, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Hewlet Packard, American Express, Dell Computer, Eastman Kodak, IBM, GE, Microsoft, Procter & Gamble, Fluor Corp, Electronic Data Services, Citibank, Boeing, mortgage lenders, Massachusetts General Hospital, and even architectural firms hire Indians to do knowledge jobs that Americans did three years ago.
In Bangalore, Indian radiologists interpret CT scans for Massachusetts General Hospital, and Indian engineers design third-generation mobile-phone chips for Texas Instruments. Other Indians process claims for major U.S. insurance companies and home loans for U.S. mortgage companies. Indian molecular biologists conduct research for pharmaceutical companies. Indians analyze financial data for Wall Street, conduct R&D for U.S. high-tech companies, and design software for Microsoft.
The competition for U.S. knowledge workers is tough. India has 520,000 IT engineers, and starting salaries are $5,000. Five years from now, Indian service exports will add $57 billion annually to the U.S. and European trade deficits, and 4 million IT jobs will have been moved to India.
The same thing is happening in China, a country with which the U.S. is expected to have a $125 billion trade deficit this year due largely to outsourcing. Microsoft alone is spending $1.15 billion for R&D and outsourcing in India and China over the next three years. In Microsoft's Beijing research facility, one-third of the Chinese programmers have Ph.D.s from U.S. universities at U.S. taxpayers' expense.
Filipinos prepare Procter & Gamble's tax returns and crunch numbers for audits conducted by U.S. accounting firms. Architectural work ranging from home design to multibillion-dollar petrochemical plants is outsourced to Hungary, India, and the Philippines.
The U.S. gave away its agricultural knowledge, its education, its technology, its manufacturing jobs and is now giving away its IT jobs. The displaced manufacturing workers did not move to the promised greener pastures. What reason is there to believe that the displaced engineers, Wall Street analysts, accountants, scientists, and other knowledge workers will do any better when their careers are outsourced?
Business Week asked Harvard University globalist advocate Robert Lawrence what happens if America loses its knowledge jobs on top of its manufacturing jobs. His answer was not reassuring. He has no evidence ââ¬â just faith ââ¬â that globalization will make us better off.
What is going on when American policymakers and elites gamble with the livelihoods of tens of millions of Americans on faith? Business Week is correct when it says "economists haven't begun to fathom the implications" for America of globalization. But it is already obvious who the winners and losers are.
The winners are the foreigners with IT educations who live in countries where both the standard and cost of living are very low. The losers are IT employees in the U.S. where both the standard and cost of living is very high. Filipino engineers working for American firms at salaries of $3,000 annually, and Chinese and Indians working for $5,000 to $10,000 annually are unbeatable competition. For American university students struggling to prepare for high-tech careers, the good times are over before they begin.
While jobs leave America and incomes fall, the eligibility of illegal aliens for U.S. Social Security and Medicaid benefits is a powerful magnet pulling in poor foreigners by the droves. The 1996 Welfare Reform Act did not end benefits for PRUCOL aliens, those who entered illegally and "permanently reside under color of law." People collect benefits who have never paid in. And it is American citizens, downsized and outsourced, who are saddled with the burden.
As most everyone knows, Social Security is in dire straits. But its funding problem has not deterred the Bush administration from drafting a treaty with Mexico that will give the Mexican government $345 billion in Social Security payments for Mexicans who have worked legally and illegally in the U.S.
Let's hope the Bush administration is correct and that we are not starting a 30-year war in the Middle East by invading Iraq. Otherwise, the combination of war, job and income loss, unprecedented trade deficits, and the creation of Social Security entitlements for foreign nationals will break the U.S. long before another generation passes.
Before the U.S. can reconstruct the world, it must cease deconstructing itself. For that task, the country will need a champion.
Paul Craig Roberts is a nationaly syndicated columnist.
2003-03-01 02:58 | User Profile
The U.S. gave away its agricultural knowledge, its education, its technology, its manufacturing jobs and is now giving away its IT jobs.
Our righteous, Judeo-Christian government is simply obeying the Biblical injunction: The Law of the Harvest: "Cast thy bread upon the waters: for thou shalt find it after many days" (Ecclesiastes 11:1).
Yeah, any day now.
2003-04-13 10:53 | User Profile
**Business Week asked Harvard University globalist advocate Robert Lawrence what happens if America loses its knowledge jobs on top of its manufacturing jobs. His answer was not reassuring. He has no evidence ââ¬â just faith ââ¬â that globalization will make us better off.
What is going on when American policymakers and elites gamble with the livelihoods of tens of millions of Americans on faith? Business Week is correct when it says "economists haven't begun to fathom the implications" for America of globalization. But it is already obvious who the winners and losers are.**
In one of his essays Yggdrasil informs us that Harvard is admitting retards, but he offers no assessment on the intellectual capacity of its faculty. Being a cautious sort, and unwilling just yet to think the same of the educators, Iââ¬â¢m forced to conclude that Bobby is just a plain liar, belief in the supernatural notwithstanding.
Of course there is no question of who the winners and losers are, and will be. Nor is it a gambling problem because there is not even a small statistical probability of the majority maintaining their livelihood under these conditions. What precisely is it that economists have yet to fathom? Capital chases profit. Profit is obtained by increasing sales or cutting production costs. The domestic population is too indebted to do much about the former; therefore, companies will resort to the latter. Globalization means that business knows no borders, i.e., investments automatically flow to wherever cheapest means of production exist. No company, no matter how well established or currently profitable, will be able to resist the trend in the long run for fear of being buried by competition. Would someone with a more comprehensive formal business education (more than 1 course) please tell me what Iââ¬â¢m missing by way of relevant fundamentals?
Whatââ¬â¢s left for losers? Apart from service and retail they are free to pursue occupations comprising (per Ygg) the real constituents of the Democratic Party, e.g., entertainers, actors, sports stars, and upper echelon contingency trial lawyers, investors, financial advisors and few other suitably positioned players. The trouble with these for the most part parasitic occupations is that membership numbers most be tightly regulated to ensure elite preservation, meaning that an awful lot of losers will remain just that regardless of effort.
For globalization (interdependence) to work it will require global control of resources and favourable or indifferent regimes throughout. Where exceptions resist economic pressure to get with the program, military pressure will be brought to bear. Here we have the one guaranteed employment sector poised for rapid growth -- security and armed forces to keep discontented domestic rabble and uncooperative foreigners in their respective places. These are the only possible implications of current policies. Unfathomable? Please. :crybaby: