← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Javelin
Thread ID: 5255 | Posts: 34 | Started: 2003-02-27
2003-02-27 23:55 | User Profile
[color=blue]Let's face it: Buchanan is a back-stabbing little jackal getting rich by playing the role of prick-tease of the radical right. [/color]
Squinty Pat's Rag Denounces "Anti-Semitism" Butt-Bopper Raimondo Responsible For Fear Of Naming The Jew?
2/19/03 1:19:24 PM Discuss this story in the forum Bill White
Commentary -- Squinty Pat is up to his old game of pretending he's got something against anti-Semites. The lead piece in his new magazine, the American Conservative, denounced the "anti-Semitism" of those who oppose the Jew's War on Iraq, and claims that "anti-Semites" have no influence on the "anti-war movement" outside of the internet. The style of writing, and the peculiar phrases used, lead me to suspect this piece was written by Jewish butt-bopper Justin Raimondo, who leads his life by a hysterical fantasy of his own self- importance -- a fantasy he oftens just outright lies about in order to maintain. However, to allow such a moronic piece as this latest scribblig of Raimondo's to lead his paper, Squinty Pat opens himself up to a number of criticisms that must be made. Ole Squinty has been friendly with anti-Semites, and has actively worked with them and solicited their support, for more than a decade. Or, at least, his organizations have; having worked for Pat in the past, I have questioned how much actually knowledge and involvement he has in the organizations to which he lends his name.
Further, Squinty has recognized the war problem as an explicitly Jewish problem for more than a decade, and it private, with his friends, has openly denounced international Jewry and their role in the destruction of America.
Now, none of this is based on ADL press releases or other nonsense -- Pat has never publically engaged in anti-Semitism, and whenever someone has exposed his links to anti-Semitism, he has run like a coward and denounced those he has worked with, in order to save his image in the eyes of international Jewry. This is all well known, but the delusional rantings of his latest lead in the American Conservative require me to state some facts.
In 1991 Pat, along with several other media personalities, formed an anti- Jewish dinner club that has met regularly, and that still meets regularly for dinner, in the vicinity of Washington DC. At this club, he and other media figures and other politicians openly denounced Jewry, the role Jews and the Israeli lobby have played in our politics, and plotted as to how to use their media power to short circuit Jewry's plans. When the Jews discovered this, it led to their concerted propaganda effort against himself, Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, and, less publicly, several other political figures.
During the 2000 elections (and before), Pat's organization openly solicited support from anti-Semitic organizations, including National Socialist groups. Bay Buchanan personally met on several occassions with individuals like Mark Cotterill, who functioned as an informal liason to several neo-Nazi organizations. They deliberately recruited individuals affiliated with groups like the National Alliance and the World Church of the Creator, and placed those individuals into positions of responsibility, knowing the politics these folk had. Further, individuals with explicit anti-Jewish views often worked at Pat's Reform Party 2000 election headquarters, and shared their anti- Semitic views with other staffers, who agreed with them.
In addition, I know some of the people who continue to be good friends of Pat's and/or close aides and/or people involved with his projects, and I can say that several of them are devoted readers of this website, share my view that Jews are an incorrigible spiritual movement of destruction, and are avidly reading folk like Evola and Hoffman's Judaism's Strange Gods as I write.
I don't even want to go into too much detail, because I don't want to drag into this fight more people than I have to to make my point, but dumb Jews like Raimondo and the whole CLC crowd are actively used by anti-Semites in the media and on Capitol Hill in order to provide a cover by which those non- Jewish personalities can hide their "anti-Semitism". Further, they are used so badly that if they were to discover it, it would give such lie to the bullshit they print about the anti-war Right not being anti-Jewish, that a large portion of their reason for existing as an "anti-war Right" would be destroyed. If the Jews who write that the anti-war Right is not anti-Semitic knew how much the non-Jews on the anti-war Right disliked Jews, they would immediately abandon any association with their favored gentiles.
As to the impact publications such as ours have, we have 60,000 + unique readers over the course of the month, and that number has been increasing so rapidly I wouldn't be surprised if, at the end of February, we've had 70,000 or more. Further, our readers represent both "left" and "right" wing tendencies, and hold, in many cases, influential positions in the anti-war movement, the anti-globalist movement, in the government, in the press, and in all the institutions that shape American consciousness. As such, the belief that "anti-Semitism" is playing no real role in the opposition to the Jewish neo-conservatives and their "Judaeo-Christian" Shabbos Goy, is a near delusional and utterly fantastic propaganda line that ranks up there with Judaism being the religion of the Old Testament and Justin Raimondo's Jewishness having nothing to do with his politicla perspective.
It disgusts me to see the dishonesty and lies a formerly honest person like Pat Buchanan stoops to in the pages of his own publications. Pat may not be personally responsible for this article, but he refuses to exercise the leadership necessary to reign in the delusions and fantasy of his Jewish writers, and in doing so, he assumes responsibility for the nonsense that is published in his name.
Pat struck a deal with the Jews, after his last failed election campaign, in order to get back on television. It is my opinion he values his ability to comment through Jewish and Shabbos owned media more than the contents of those commentaries themselves. It is only when one delivers oneself into the powers of the Jews -- by depending on their media for circulation, for instance -- that they have the power to affect one's successes or failures. When you build without Jews, and without Jewish money, and without Jewish media, and refuse to deal with them or depend on them or take anything from them, you become liberated from their perverse mores and you become able to speak the truth without filtering it through a philo-Semitic lense.
One could only wish that Pat, who is strong enough to be independent, would be willing to take the burden of disentangling himself from the Jews onto his shoulders. What we have seen, however, is that while he has started using a few dumb Jews like Raimondo to cover his position, he has ended up with his positions being dependant on Jewish approval, and has found himself entangled by a power of destruction he thought he could control.
A bit like Mickey Mouse in Fantasia, itz.
2003-02-28 00:40 | User Profile
That's one thing I actually like about 'The Right,' deviate a bit here or there from someone else's idea of Orthodoxy and the offended is ready to assemble a firing squad. One doesn't readily observe that on the Left, although I admit I don't follow their internal skirmishes closely or at all, really.
Does anyone have a copy of the lead article Mr. White is criticizing here? I'm not a subscriber to TAC and I would like to reserve judgement until at least having all the facts. I will admit to being a bit taken aback by the knock on Raimondo, the one polemicist among a handful on the greater Right to my mind that has continuously and aggressively placed a spotlight on the Israeli/Neo-Con connection to 9/11 and now Bush Iraq II. I realize that Justin will readily denounce 'anti-Semites,' yet his work continues to probe and push in a direction where he may expect an ability of his readership to put two and two together. These days one meets their friends where they can find them and on foreign policy I think very highly of Justin Raimondo.
With regards to Patrick Buchanan, again I am dubious. Few individuals seem to be more of a lightning rod for criticism than he. Now I have my own issues with Mr. Buchanan and no doubt he is not perfect. But as far as his detractors go, when they have taken the maverick steps Buchanan did beginning in 1992 up through 2000, then they have a leg to stand on. The point man always gets shot at the most and takes the most heat and it's easy to say what should or shouldn't be done from the rear.
Anyway, I look forward to reading the article in question.
2003-02-28 03:27 | User Profile
Sooner or later the I-am-not-an-anti-Semite Right...now indistinguishable from the racism-is-worse-than-mass-murder-you-betcha Left & flag-decal-in-car-window-but-otherwise-try-not-to-think-about-bad-things-too-much Middle....was going to have to send out a Shabbas Goy to do a Learned Elder of Zion's job and rend MacDonald piece by piece.
This will only mount in intensity in the coming months. The full-scale assault on K-Mac is now underway. Thus the first shot on Sumter had to be fired by a Saturday Errand Boy; it not only establishes "impartial integrity" like a 24-karat cubic zirconium, but it clears the way for the taffy-pull of truth still ahead of us, once the John Podhoretzes and Debbie Schlussels and Ron Radoshes get to weigh in with their 'analyses' later on.
As we all know, it only takes a few dozen Jews screaming 'unclean' before the work in question is Officially Discredited to say nothing of Repudiated By Serious Scholars And Freedom-Loving Americans Alike. And make no mistake, they have to torpedo MacDonald now....one too many citings of "The Culture of Critique" have dovetailed with the growing (and open) hostility to the War For Eretz Yisroel. Much to Zionist chagrin, the old 'pretend-it-never-happened' tactic re the K-Mac trilogy isn't working....thus it's time to rip it to pieces, if they hope to salvage Plan A (any resistance to the Sharon Doctrine is deep-seated anti-Semitism requiring a docile apology, a troop commitment and - what the hell - a large check with 'For Nazi death camps- again, [u]so sorry[/u]' written in the indicia corner)
So we know what's at stake for Team Shmuel. What's at stake for us with these three books almost nobody has actually read?
Everything. This is our line in the sand. At stake is the once-inalienable right to speak the truth - to say nothing of the bloody obvious - to our fellows here in what I laughingly call the "gentile nations". The strategy of letting Shahak or Finkelstein do it....because it looks better that way.....has served its purpose. If we can't speak up without the use of a Semitic proxy, we deserve every horror the 21st century has stored up to rain upon the white race.
2003-02-28 03:50 | User Profile
Il Ragno,
McDonald and Solzhenitsyn are the two works of late that the zhids have to discredit, or just pretend that it doesn't exist as in the case of Solzhenitsyn (his work hasn't been translated into English).
2003-02-28 04:38 | User Profile
**hey, someone needs to tell Javelin at OD that Squinty Pat is Robertson, not Buchanan. He has a post up about it... ** I never heard EITHER of them called this.... but Franco sends a correction.
(Sorry, Sertorius, but it's not an essay from Franco, just a correction! :D )
2003-02-28 04:44 | User Profile
It's Bill White's terminology, not Javelin's.
2003-02-28 09:47 | User Profile
Heres a link to Derbyshires article. I have never cared for Derbyshire. He has found himself a perfect home at the formerly great National Review.
[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=6373&st=0&]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...=7&t=6373&st=0&[/url]
I hope he likes carrying water for these people.
2003-02-28 16:10 | User Profile
Originally posted by Javelin@Feb 27 2003, 17:55 [The style of writing, and the peculiar phrases used, lead me to suspect this piece was written by Jewish butt-bopper Justin Raimondo, ...
This is the piece out of AC that Bill White is talking about. -[NEOCONS]
DIVERSIONARY ARGUMENTS
Let's call it the polemic of fools. There is a new neoconservative argument being ginned up to combat those who find their foreign policy prescriptions (bomb Iraq, bomb Iran, to hell with Europe, etc.) downright scary. It goes like this: when liberals or centrist realists or traditional conservatives use the word "neoconservative," they really mean "Jewish." Therefore, their attacks on neocon foreign policy are nothing more than coded anti-Semitism. Max Boot tried this line out in a recent attack on this magazine in the WallStreet Journal, and now Robert Kaganhas brought it to his perch in the Washington Post with a smeary aside about one of our editors. A few simple points: while neoconservativism is unimaginable without the Jewish Left-to-Right migration that began in the late 1960s, it would never have become the phenomenon it did if it had remained exclusively or even principally a Jewish movement. The initial reaction against neoconservativism on the Right, which began in the 1980s, was quite plainly against a group of interlopers and Johnny-come-latelies who seemed more intent on denouncing their fellow Reaganites than on battling the liberals. The irritation of traditional conservatives about the neo-cons was far more provoked by a figure like William Bennett (a Catholic) than it was by Norman Podhoretz and Irving Kristo!.
Second, while there are fringy anti-Semitic elements in both the far Right and far Left, they count for nearly nothing in the antiwar coalition and have little presence beyond the Internet. If President Bush seems regrettably more inclined to listen to Ariel Sharon than to his own State Department about the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, that is entirely the fault of President Bush, Christian the last we heard.
4 The American Conservative February 24. 2003 --.-Third, Jews are prominent among those, both in and out of office, who are making an eloquent case against this rush into a self-defeating, self-isolating, war. We have in mind Russell Feingold, (D-WIS.),who was brilliant in his recent interrogation of Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) who pulls no punches; Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.);and yes, the late Paul Wellstone (D-Minn.).We do not know if these Jewish centrists and liberals have been reading up on Christian Just War doctrine or have taken a yen for the realist foreign policy prescriptions of the likes of Professor John Mearsheimer, but we applaud them. And, we might ask, is Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.)the only Senator who can go to the Holy Land and notice the horrible state the Palestinians are in? At"any rate, he did, and we also commend the wise things he said. Our advice to the neocons is to drop the smear campaign and honestly confront the arguments that are being leveled against their policies; by crying anti-Semitism, they sound a bit like Al Sharpton crying racism. As for those (if they exist outside of the fringe web) who may hope to turn the campaign against the war into a campaign against Jews, they should get a life.
2003-02-28 17:34 | User Profile
I think Bill White is referring to a TAC article already discussed in the Culture Wars Forum here, originally appearing in The Last Ditch:
[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=6&t=6287]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...t=ST&f=6&t=6287[/url]
P.S. I always thought Squinty Pat referred to Pat Robertson.
2003-02-28 20:52 | User Profile
White and Linder and their ilk are unrealistic. They come at this from a pagan/Nietszchean angle whereas Buchanan has a theistic/Thomistic perspective. He can't use the "toss the Jews overboard" rhetoric.
And what is Buchanan supposed to do when even the leader of his Church doesn't rock the boat? "What do you mean, Pat? The Pope doesn't say that."
Having said that, the news of these "meetings" White refers to makes me curious. I haven't heard much along those lines.
2003-02-28 21:35 | User Profile
Originally posted by Buster@Feb 28 2003, 14:52 **White and Linder and their ilk are unrealistic. They come at this from a pagan/Nietszchean angle whereas Buchanan has a theistic/Thomistic perspective. **
Good observation, Buster. There is a huge, deep chasm between those two perspectives and one that is probably unbridgeable.
2003-02-28 21:42 | User Profile
Originally posted by Centinel@Feb 28 2003, 13:27 **[The TAC article Bill White refers to is not available online. It's an unsinged article on page 4 of the Feb. 24 issue, in the "Fourteen Days" section titled "Diversionary Arguments"
**
The article Diversionary Arguments is available a few posts up. I scanned it in.
2003-03-01 02:37 | User Profile
All philosophies are ephemeral, the stuff of dreams, they cannot bridge chasms. Only the bonds of blood are
sacred and eternal.
2003-03-05 17:50 | User Profile
Pat struck a deal with the Jews, after his last failed election campaign, in order to get back on television. It is my opinion he values his ability to comment through Jewish and Shabbos owned media more than the contents of those commentaries themselves. It is only when one delivers oneself into the powers of the Jews -- by depending on their media for circulation, for instance -- that they have the power to affect one's successes or failures. When you build without Jews, and without Jewish money, and without Jewish media, and refuse to deal with them or depend on them or take anything from them, you become liberated from their perverse mores and you become able to speak the truth without filtering it through a philo-Semitic lense.
I began to doubt Pat's credibility even before the last presidential election. If Howard Phillips and the Constitutional Party had been on the ballot here, in Oklahoma, I would not have voted for Pat. The only positive result of Pat's campaign was to make sister Bay rich.
Recently, while sitting in for Pat on his one-eyed Jew show, Bay heaped praise upon the Rummy creep. Since then Pat has moved steadily, inexorably toward the neo-con camp. Yesterday, he even went so far as to Join Alan Dershowitz (sp?) in advocating the government employ torture in interrogating terrorist suspects.
Although Pat still opposes the Iraq war, he never seems to criticizes Bush the Younger's warmongering, blaiming his chicken-hawk advisors instead, tiptoeing round the Jewish question. Once war starts in Iraq, I expect Pat will jump on the war party band-wagon, with patriotism as his rationale, saying that all Americans should support our troops once the shooting begins.
In short, folks, Pat has sold us out to the Jews. The best course is to ignore Pat and his TAC rag.
-Z-
2003-03-05 18:22 | User Profile
Originally posted by Zoroaster@Mar 5 2003, 11:50 ** Yesterday he even went as far as to Join Alan Dershowitz (sp?) in advocating the government employ torture in interrogating terrorist suspects.
Although Pat still opposes the Irar war, he never seems to criticizes Bush the Younger, blaiming his chicken-hawk advisors for his warmongering,ÃÂ tiptoeing round the question of Jewish influence.ÃÂ **
Not to defend Pat, but I think many of the positions he takes on television are dictated by the necessity of opposing his partner. They have to make a good show, and agreement does not spell ratings. He may just be taking a position for the sake of arguing over it. "Arguendo" as the lawyers say.
Besides, when we want to employ torture, we have no problem. Our allies will do it for us if we ask them, as their laws pose no impediment. So it's really a moot point. As I understand it, the usual method is not to touch the suspect, but to drag in his wife or mother and do the job on her in his presence until he opens up. That is most effective.
As for Bush, I think we all know he is puddy in the hands of whosever hands he is put in. Why criticize him when the corporations and the Zionists are dictating the policy of the country? Bush is basically just a trained chimpanzee.
Query: who was it that wrote the book about how the elder Bush's Jewish friends bailed out Bush the younger when he ran his oil company into debt?
2003-03-05 18:55 | User Profile
**All philosophies are ephemeral, the stuff of dreams, they cannot bridge chasms. Only the bonds of blood are
sacred and eternal. **
PIN that! :D
Biology trumps ideology.
2003-03-05 21:53 | User Profile
MadRussian,
Some of Solzhenitsyn's work has been translated.
This from a brief review:
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the chronicler of Stalinist terror, has written a book on Russian-Jewish relations that he calls an unvarnished account of the troubled history of the two peoples despite frequent accusations that he is anti-Semitic. The first volume of "Two Hundred Years Together" hit bookstores Tuesday, and the Nobel Prize-winning writer said he expects the book to spark similar charges of anti-Semitism. He has denied all such allegations.
Additional information can be found at: [url=http://www.mindpleasures.com/private/Alsolz/InTheNews.shtml]Mind Pleasures - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn[/url]
2003-03-05 21:55 | User Profile
naBaron: Biology trumps ideology .
You distilled it to its leanest literary essence in just three powerful little words. Downright Hemingwayesque! Would look great emblazoned on a tee-shirt.
2003-03-05 22:10 | User Profile
Originally posted by seq@Mar 5 2003, 15:55 > naBaron: Biology trumps ideology** .
You distilled it to its leanest literary essence in just three powerful little words. Downright Hemingwayesque! Would look great emblazoned on a tee-shirt.**
Surprisingly enough, I am reminded of a lyrical line from Steven Morrissey on the 'Meat is Murder' album:
On the day that your mentality Catches up with your biology Come 'round
2003-03-05 23:42 | User Profile
Originally posted by wintermute@Mar 5 2003, 17:30 ** Your thing with lyrics is a real gift, Tex.
**
With regards to the lyric thing, many words do come to mind but 'gift' is not one of them I'm afraid. :blink:
The 'No War for Israel' jpeg was generated by me at makeasticker.com. I have the actual sticker proudly displayed on the back window of my truck. No rocks as of yet, but with the Rebel battle flag trailer hitch cover I must have some scratching their heads at least. I know, I know it's cheesy, but it makes me feel better about things just a little bit.
All of your slogans are good ones. Perhaps we could get newly minted 'rwinger' to crank us out some and give us a cut of the proceeds. :)
2003-03-06 02:47 | User Profile
Zoroaster,
Very True. I had begun to suspect Pat's credibility even before the last presidential election... Although Pat still opposes the Irar war, he never seems to criticizes Bush the Younger,
What he did last presidential election was not good.(All the PC stuff!) Then He wrote "Death of the West."(very un-PC) Now he sounds like he is going pro-Bush. What is going on???
Sadly Pat Buchanan has been doing stuff that make the rantings of VNN types look all too true! :blink:
2003-03-07 05:47 | User Profile
Wintermute:
As to the slogan under discussion, may I suggest the more personal "Our biology trumps your ideology"?
I like it. But Inner Party slogans were never more than three words in length and impersonal for a reason.
Prolespeak is plainspeak. Simple, direct, universal. No confusing pronouns.
Islam is Peace
2003-03-07 07:42 | User Profile
Originally posted by wintermute@Mar 5 2003, 17:30 ** Your thing with lyrics is a real gift, Tex.
I haven't thought of Morrisey in a long time. Like Wilde's description of the death of Tiny Tim, I can never read Morrisey lyrics without laughing. And if the day came when I felt a natural emotion/ I'd get such a shock I'd go and jump in the ocean. Recently, I saw some old Tops of the Pops performances from long, long ago, and was shocked at what an electrifying stage presence he was. A long way from the witty-but-sad 'Mozzer' we've all come to enjoy ridiculing. Going back to the old stuff, much of it is fairly adolescent, but there are many touches of greatness. A pity Johnny Marr never lived up to his potential. Could have been one of the greatest guitarists of all time.
As to the slogan under discussion, may I suggest the more personal "Our biology trumps your ideology"? I see the "My Freedom is more Important than Your Good Idea" all around town, and it always does my heart good.
I'm very, very excited about the "One evil empire down, one to go" bumperstickers, but am way too afraid to put one on my car.
For promotions, I've been thinking about an Orwell riff recently, a parody of the Three Slogans of the Party:
ISLAM IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH
Then, somewhere near the bottom, originaldissent.com
Haven't decided if it needs an all seeing eye design, or a ghostly backdrop of Osama bin Laden, but am open to suggestion.
Whaddya think, sirs?
Wintermute
**
By the way, Morrisey is probably some kind of closet white nationalist.
2003-03-07 09:32 | User Profile
National Front Disco, Morrissey
David, the wind blows The wind blows ... Bits of your life away Your friends all say ... "Where is our boy ? Oh, we've lost our boy" But they should know Where you've gone Because again and again you've explained that You're going to ...
Oh, you're going to ... Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah England for the English ! England for the English !
David, the winds blow The winds blow ... All of my dreams away And I still say : "Where is our boy ? Ah, we've lost our boy" But I should know Why you've gone Because again and again you've explained You've gone to the ...
National, ah ... To the National .. There's a country; you don't live there But one day you would like to And if you show them what you're made of Oh, then you might do ...
But David, we wonder We wonder if the thunder Is ever really gonna begin Begin, begin Your mom says : "I've lost my boy" But she should know Why you've gone Because again and again you've explained You've gone to the :
National To the National To the National Front Disco Because you want the day to come sooner You want the day to come sooner You want the day to come sooner When you've settled the score
Oh, the National Oh, the National Oh, the National Oh, the National Oh, the National
2003-03-07 10:36 | User Profile
Two more submissions from his early days with The Smiths:
A rush and a push and the land that we stand on is ours It has been before so it shall be again And people that are uglier than you and I They take what they need and just leave
I decree today that life is simply taking and not giving England is mine and it owes me a living But ask me why and I'll spit in your eye Does the body rule the mind or does the mind rule the body? (the Jewish question??) I don't know Under the iron bridge we kissed, and although I ended up with sore lips It just wasn't like the old days anymore, no it wasn't like those days Am I still ill? But we cannot cling to the old dreams anymore No we cannot cling to those dreams Am I still ill?
And while not as over the top and pretentious as Morrissey, I have found some lyrical gems can be mined from Ian McCullough, both in his solo work and his days with Echo and the Bunnymen.
2003-03-07 20:54 | User Profile
Naw, that's just Bruce Springstein ..."nothin's thicker'n blood on blood". Loved NEBRASKA. Well, one can of course take that, as a view, but it needn't hold for anyone else.
That would make it an "ideology". Right? -- like, what is needed to set up a workable social system, at least in some blueprint form. Doesn't need to be elaborate, but it has to hold enough water to pass laws, execute them, and arm a police force to control criminals who break them, and get honest judge's opinion. All without quavering, quivering, kissing, or confusing anyone else's ***majisterium*** with one's own ***gravitas***. As gladly offered to a free state system, as willingly refused of one imposed by force. Maybe it's not an "ideology", but its something, and its not just blood. Its what blood has to be for; but that doesn't mean shared, even in communions, with others different from you. No one can be required to do that.
I totally agree that "anti-semitism" -- a philosophical critique of what Jewishness is: a way of being based on Matriarchial blood-lineage as religious bond.. . .OK for them, and any similar groups, if able to reproduce and maintain themselves by themselves, through themselves, without bleeding others not similarly organized -- is an intrinsic part (for me, at least) of anti-war conservatrism. The principle relates to national politics: No American blood for foreign Gods.
This means: No wars for the Vatican-Tel Aviv axis. These interests not only usurp the religious understanding of the constitution, they would now dump Bush's immature religious "JudeoChristian" apostacy,as if it were a "West Texas Ideology" (Disneyland showing Scorcese thrown in for vacations at discount prices), and dumping him back onto Dixie land, where I was born ...having installed his re-entry shuttle ***Columbia*** with a faulty left-wing heat-shield at take off. These regions is where its debris should fall, I guess God thinks.
Fineman's to the President he helped create: All Hail The Buffoon. (It wasn't Frum; he was jes' readn' massa's mind.)
2003-03-10 23:07 | User Profile
Today on Buchanan and Press sister Bay announced her support for Bush the Younger and his war on Iraq. Can brother Pat be far behind? Odds are he'll adopt her position.
-Z-
2004-02-06 01:16 | User Profile
Resolves old question I heard, re: the identity of Linder's famous "Squinty Pat and Canny Sammy". Someone thought Squinty Pat was Pat Robertson.
Interesting thread otherwise BTW.
2004-02-06 01:43 | User Profile
Squinty Pat is Pat Robertson.
2004-02-06 04:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=mwdallas]Squinty Pat is Pat Robertson.[/QUOTE]What's the rest of the story then? Is Bill White misrepresenting Alex Linder? And why, out of sloppiness and carelessness?
2004-02-06 05:26 | User Profile
I suppose sloppiness or carelessness might explain it.
Robertson does squint, so it would make more sense to use the term to describe him, but if you want to know what Linder means....
I ran a google search for "squinty pat" and "robertson", and I got two hits. One is this very thread we're in, and the other is Linder at the vnnforum:
[url]http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=65&goto=nextoldest[/url]
"More interesting than her subjects, McCarthy and terror and 'the liberals' weak response to both, is Ann herself, and the class she stands for. She's the type of sycophant who outjews the jew in defending Israel. This type of thing we see in [B]Moist Ralph Reed and Leghound Gary Bauer and grinnin' Jerry Falwell and Squinty Pat Robertson [/B] is embarrassing. These little doggies who snooze silent while jew burglars steal the Christian house blind become mastiffs of massacre when it comes to anybody hinting at denying Israel the next trillion American Christian dollars, whether directly or in the form of yet another jew-engineered war."
2004-02-06 06:19 | User Profile
"Squinty Pat's Rag Denounces "Anti-Semitism" Butt-Bopper Raimondo Responsible For Fear Of Naming The Jew?"
What stupid, vulgar crap. I may not approve of Justin Raimondo's lifestyle, but he's a much more useful American than this poster, one rather suspects. Please provide a link to where either Buchanan or Raimondo served as champions of the Jews or, quite frankly, consider shutting the Hell up. Thanks.
2004-02-06 08:09 | User Profile
[QUOTE=mwdallas]I suppose sloppiness or carelessness might explain it.
Robertson does squint, so it would make more sense to use the term to describe him, but if you want to know what Linder means....
I ran a google search for "squinty pat" and "robertson", and I got two hits. One is this very thread we're in, and the other is Linder at the vnnforum:
[url]http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=65&goto=nextoldest[/url]
......This type of thing we see in [B]Moist Ralph Reed and Leghound Gary Bauer and grinnin' Jerry Falwell and Squinty Pat Robertson [/B] is embarrassing. [/QUOTE]
I don't know. This is "grinnin Jerry and Squinty Pat" not the "Squinty Pat and Canny Sammy" I seem to remember antiYuppie talking about.
I wonder. Could it be he uses another adjective of derision for Pat Buchanan I and Bill White got confused with? Or who knows, perhaps Linder himself might occasionally be less than precise in the adjectives of his polemics.
Will the real "Squinty Pat" please stand up? :lol:
(BTW, Do you think Pat Buchanan might threaten legal action for erroneously calling him "squinty Pat" and confusing him with Robertson, rather than his appropriately unique Linderite tool of derision?)
2004-02-06 08:11 | User Profile
Hollywood buffoons like the FedSpook Bill White and the Mencken/Goebbels wannabe Linder are unworthy to shine Buchanan's shoes.
These counter-productive punks would be better deployed bleating ADL slogans against Mel's new picture... :angry: