← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Avalanche
Thread ID: 5228 | Posts: 3 | Started: 2003-02-26
2003-02-26 04:35 | User Profile
[url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/peirce/peirce63.html]http://www.lewrockwell.com/peirce/peirce63.html[/url]
... American conservatives are much like that. They are quite aware that the United States government is working actively against the best interests of the people of this country. The failure to defend our borders, the draconian and unconstitutional assault on our God-given right of self defense, the mass murders of the unborn, the transformation of the public school system into left wing indoctrination centers ââ¬â conservatives are aware of these things. But there exists this huge disconnect ââ¬â constantly one hears the same mantra, "Donââ¬â¢t worry, the adults are in charge now."
If they had but eyes to see they would see that it wasnââ¬â¢t liberals who recently announced a plan to send fifteen billion extorted dollars to Africa, ostensibly to fight the AIDS epidemic that is depopulating a continent. It wasnââ¬â¢t the liberals who declared, "Islam is a religion of peace," ignoring history and common sense. It wasnââ¬â¢t the liberals who tried to sneak through a general amnesty for illegal aliens and who failed to take any action whatsoever to protect the unborn or the Second Amendment. And it is certainly not Al Gore who has dreamed up this horrific plan of attack against a third-rate country in the Middle East, claiming that we will not forget 911, an action in which Iraq had no part. ... It makes me physically ill when I hear a "conservative" crack jokes about drug pushers being sent to jail where they will encounter homosexual rape and other horrors which make our prisons so disgustingly bad that we owe an apology to the Inquisition. Yet these same folks deplore the Nazis who after all, were only acting against "Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, political undesirables and other anti-social elements." They had it coming right? Rule of law? Naw, too complicated to fit in a slogan. Constitution? So what? To paraphrase Hitler, that is nothing but "ââ¬Â¦a scrap of paper." ...
2003-02-26 05:00 | User Profile
** It wasnââ¬â¢t the liberals who declared, "Islam is a religion of peace," ignoring history and common sense. **
Actually it might have been a few paleoconservatives, responding to neoconservatives demands for a jihad against Islam. :D I don't know, I haven't really been able to discern a consistent paleo line here lately, other than "if the neo's are for it we're against it".
I don't know, Peirce I saw this article of Peirce before, and in general, his polemics don't seem the most logical thing on Rockwell. Like others of his ilk, you are sure he's unhappy at mainstream conservatives, but not always exactly sure why from his writings. That's my two cents.
2003-02-26 06:50 | User Profile
**If they had but eyes to see they would see that it wasnââ¬â¢t liberals who recently announced a plan to send fifteen billion extorted dollars to Africa, ostensibly to fight the AIDS epidemic that is depopulating a continent. It wasnââ¬â¢t the liberals who declared, "Islam is a religion of peace," ignoring history and common sense. It wasnââ¬â¢t the liberals who tried to sneak through a general amnesty for illegal aliens and who failed to take any action whatsoever to protect the unborn or the Second Amendment. And it is certainly not Al Gore who has dreamed up this horrific plan of attack against a third-rate country in the Middle East, claiming that we will not forget 911, an action in which Iraq had no part. **
That's right, but the point is that "liberals" want basically the same things, which means that liberals = neo-cons = Trotskyites = Jews. Well, "equals approximately" - I don't have that mark on my keyboard.
It's not that tough once you identify the Jewish interests. And I can't believe that anyone today with access to the Internet doesn't know about Jewish interests. There's really no excuse for this sort of thing, especially from "conservatives."
As to "Islam is a religion of peace", that's clearly an IP tactic aimed at keeping the international coaliton together with a view to keeping the oil flowing while the IP works to destroy the Arab nation. Our IP masters don't want to piss off the Saudis or the Gulf Sheiks anymore than necessary, and saying anything derogatory about Islam could cause major problems in Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, hence the patently absurd talk about a peace-loving Prophet who was simultaneously one of the greatest military conquerors of history (surpassed only by Genghis Khan).
For the IP we're just cattle and canon fodder. They tell us what suits them at the moment, and as long as we shut up and follow orders we can go ahead and produce and consume and indulge any lust.
"Conservatives" feel uneasy about all of that, but they're still unwilling to say "Izzy."
I'm hoping that the stresses of this war may change that.
Walter