← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · xmetalhead
Thread ID: 5219 | Posts: 33 | Started: 2003-02-25
2003-02-25 21:56 | User Profile
Won't you join them? You can learn how to hate France and Germany even if you don't know anything about those countries.... now put that French baguette down! Get "Hannitized" right in your own armchair! O'Reilly camp for the first 10 million subscribers! Take notes people, you'll be expected to recite verbatim everything we say....now get after those Francophiles!
FOX Fan Top Ten
We asked you for the "Top Ten" reasons you're a FOX Fan. This one was submitted by "Hannitized" Michael from Harrison, Arkansas.
FOX & Friends is great to wake up with in the morning, so funny and refreshing.
Love that Mancow!
I love that FOX anchors can think for themselves and are allowed to express it.
The Balance Sheet (love the contests!).
Sean Hannity ââ¬â Enough said! He's a true American with great morals and integrity.
O'Reilly NEVER lets anyone get one over on him.
Shep Smith ââ¬â Heââ¬â¢s passionate, funny, and heââ¬â¢s not afraid of controversy.
FOX doesn't treat viewers like mindless drones. FOX reports the truth so I can decide!
The anchors are not sell-outs! I can trust them to give me the truth.
Three words ââ¬â FOX Fan Central! Thanks guys! Keep up the good work!
Think you can do better? Send us your Top Ten Lists to
speakout@foxnews.com.
[url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77925,00.html]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77925,00.html[/url]
2003-02-25 22:45 | User Profile
Dear Fox News:
Yes, no contest, your shabbas goy frontmen are better than almost all of the other shabbas goy frontmen at spewing disinformation and outright lies posing as news.
Fathead Hannity and No-nothing O'Reilly in particular lead the gullible to the wrong conclusions in most creative ways. And those Irish stages names are so comforting. Like who'd suspect?
Nobody does it better--propaganda, that is--than Fox. You almost don't notice you're being lied to.
2003-02-26 00:35 | User Profile
Xmetalhead,
This is quite amusing, particularly this one:
** 6. Sean Hannity ââ¬â Enough said! He's a true American with great morals and integrity. **
No, he isnt. Anyone who thinks that a person who places another countrys interest ahead of his own and constantly talks about it doesnt possess any integrity. Great American? I think not, but certainly Americas foremost shabbos goy. The clown who wrote this has to be a "freeper." I`d also submit that he is living proof that the I.Q. level in America has been dumb down considerably over the past two decades. On top of it anyone who keeps up with this stuff and listens to Hannity knows that he is a liar. I guess his buddy Netanyahu has trained him well.
**3. FOX doesn't treat viewers like mindless drones. FOX reports the truth so I can decide! **
I think that the best answer to this obvious stupidity was written by Drakmal:
We report what Jews decide.(!)
2003-02-26 04:44 | User Profile
[font=Arial]Rupert Murdoch is at least part ew, does anyone know which parent was ew?[/font]
2003-02-26 06:25 | User Profile
His rich heiress mum, which gives him impeccable tribal credentials.
2003-02-26 13:55 | User Profile
Originally posted by Sertorius@Feb 25 2003, 19:35 ** Xmetalhead,
This is quite amusing, particularly this one:
** 6. Sean Hannity ââ¬â Enough said! He's a true American with great morals and integrity. **
No, he isnt. Anyone who thinks that a person who places another countrys interest ahead of his own and constantly talks about it doesnt possess any integrity. Great American? I think not, but certainly Americas foremost shabbos goy. The clown who wrote this has to be a "freeper." I`d also submit that he is living proof that the I.Q. level in America has been dumb down considerably over the past two decades. On top of it anyone who keeps up with this stuff and listens to Hannity knows that he is a liar. I guess his buddy Netanyahu has trained him well.
**3. FOX doesn't treat viewers like mindless drones. FOX reports the truth so I can decide! **
I think that the best answer to this obvious stupidity was written by Drakmal:
We report what Jews decide.(!) **
Sert, well said. Lemmings everywhere are being Pavlov'd by these defective individuals at Faux News. I think it's getting to dangerous levels of delusion, where I hear the lemmings at work say they'll boycott French wine, bread, etc and Saddam is an evil dictator who's about to kill us all!!! The Fox-zombies need serious help.
I find this one really funny,
**5. O'Reilly NEVER lets anyone get one over on him. **
O'Reilly is a shrieking shabbos goy who has no debating skills whatsoever. He shouts down anyone who's smarter than him, which is quite many.
I love Jeanine Garafolo!
2003-02-26 19:31 | User Profile
I'd rather not get "Hannitized" - I don't swing that way... :lol:
2003-02-27 00:56 | User Profile
And who do y'all like, cnn the communist news network, founded and built by the head commy himself Ted Turner, the Castro boot licker............................................Dont know whos worse Turner or Jimmy Carter
2003-02-27 01:25 | User Profile
Buchanan,
Its like this with me. I dont like either one of them anymore than I did your post. I have no use for C.F.R. fronts (and in the case of FOX, a C.F.R. [color=red]Neo-con front[/color]) that diguise themselves as "news."
2003-02-27 01:39 | User Profile
A little uptight with the sensorship aint we serterios? I'll take a neo con over a commy any day.
2003-02-27 01:54 | User Profile
Judging by the illiteracy you displayed in your last post, I can see why you would prefer the company of Neo-cons.
Here`s a place for you:
[url=http://www.freerepublic.com]Neo-con Heaven for those who don`t know any better.[/url]
2003-02-27 11:25 | User Profile
Originally posted by Buchanan@Feb 26 2003, 19:39 I'll take a neo con over a commy any day.
I wasn't aware that there was a distinction to be made. Then again the philosophies of all anti-Occidental movements appear one and the same to me.
2003-02-28 00:26 | User Profile
Sertorious take a look at your own writings before you call mine illiterate. I thought I had some common ground with you people but youre way off the mark. To me a neo con aint the real thing but at least hes trying, and trying pretty hard I might add. A commy (though no real threat anymore) is someone who goes against every thing I believe in. And another thing, you guys are ranting about all this anti-war nonsense, you better wake up. The arab menace is upon us and only getting stronger. By the end of this century, France and some other European countries are going to have crescents on their flags. We Americans will fare somewhat better, We'll still be Christian but we'll be speakin Spanish.
2003-02-28 00:58 | User Profile
On that "Arab menace" -
Buchanan - any idea how the Arab invasion of Europe and the Mex invasion of the US came about? Do ya think they engineered and OK'd it all by their lonesome? If they were such a threat, wouldn't those western gov'ts act to stop it rather than encourage it? Or are ya of the opinion that they've already seized the levers of power and are only pretending to be Israelites?
2003-02-28 00:59 | User Profile
Originally posted by Buchanan@Feb 27 2003, 18:26 **To me a neo con aint the real thing but at least hes trying, and trying pretty hard I might add. **
No doubt he's trying and succeeding rather well. It's what he's trying for that is the point of contention for me and most here. To my mind, the neo-con is simply a modern-day proponent of the Fourth International dressed up in business suit and tie. Plain and simple. I share no common ground with them and this pending war for Israel has only clarified that even more.
2003-02-28 01:27 | User Profile
Buchanan,
Apparently, you arent all that concerned about speaking Spanish. I am. Bush and his gang havent done the first thing about keeping the U.S. borders from being overrunned by Mexicans or Arabs for that matter. One would think they would use the Army to seal off the borders instead of sending it to Iraq to fight for Israel. Makes you wonder which country they are really concerned about here. To me, it certainly isn`t the U.S.
Maybe you believe that nonsense spouted off by the likes of Rush, Sean, and of course, Jorge, but the vast majority of us here don`t.
BTW, Texas Dissident is correct about Neo-cons. Trotsky color=red[/color] is their hero.
2003-02-28 01:41 | User Profile
Ruffin, first of all most European govts nowadays are run with a liberal strain and a political correctness. Secondly this all started with a need for workers. And once these workers get in they have more kids than the natives. The sand negro even out produces the sub saharan negro. Europeans also feel some obligation to their former colonies. In America its just a matter of a big huge porous border. You cant stop em coming in just like you can never stop the drugs from coming in.
2003-02-28 01:43 | User Profile
Would you guys consider Rush a neo con?
2003-02-28 02:23 | User Profile
Buchanan - you might ask yourself why the 'liberal strain' and political correctness reigns supreme in the face of its clearly destructive effects. Kind of like watching Brezhnev defend communist economics, it's. Yeah, the ruling class wants cheaper labor, no doubt about that. I suppose we should just move over and apologize for taking up space. No, thanks. But do ya honestly believe that the empire that stations its troops all over the world and masses 'em here and there against heretic nations can't defend the Rio Grande? Come on.
Neocon is another word for Jews-who-stole-the-Republican-Party, more or less. Rush and O'Really and their ilk're only wannabees. If Hitler ran the country, they'd be readin' the script from The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and rakin' in the scat marks from a public that seems to buy anything.
Stick around. Read.
2003-02-28 04:13 | User Profile
We asked you for the "Top Ten" reasons you're a FOX Fan. This one was submitted by "Sheppified" Spidey from li'l Zion herself, NYC.
FOX & Friends is great to wake up with in the morning, when it still hurts to think.
Love that Mancow! But besides Cavuto, the other anchors are great too!
I love that FOX anchors think for themselves and I hope to think for myself just like them one day!
FOX reports the truth so I can decide! Why, just the other day, I 'decided' that "2 + 2 = 4" may be good enough for the cowardly French, but it's not gonna rule MY life!
Sean Hannity ââ¬â Enough said! He's a true American with great morals and a head like a Rocky Ford cantaloupe! He's so much more manly and rugged than his goony partner, too!
O'Reilly, like Fred C Dobbs or Roy Cohn, NEVER lets anyone get one over on him.
Shep Smith! ââ¬â Heââ¬â¢s passionate, funny, and his name makes "Jimmy Olsen" sound like "Buckminster Fuller"!
FOX doesn't treat viewers like mindless drones. Next up: Tom Ridge demonstrates proper duct-taping with our own Jillian Barberie!
The anchors are not sell-outs! I can trust them to give me the truth. Extended service warranty? How can I lose?!?
Three words ââ¬â JOE MILLIONAIRE ads! Thanks guys! Keep up the good work!
Think you can do better? Send us your Top Ten Lists to
speakout@foxnews.com.
2003-02-28 09:05 | User Profile
Originally posted by Buchanan@Feb 27 2003, 20:43 Would you guys consider Rush a neo con?
I certainly would. In fact, I consider him to be a traitor. Here`s something on Limbaugh for you to read:
[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=209&hl=rush+limbaugh&s=4da3c01784b7c048fa470]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...1784b7c048fa470[/url]
Comments on some of Rush`s latest stupid remarks:
[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=5&t=6190&hl=]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...&f=5&t=6190&hl=[/url]
Limbaugh has a nice little scam going. He gets people who don`t know any better to trust him as a source of news while steering them away from the things they really should be concerned about. For example, rarely do you hear him talk about immigration. In the 12 years that I have heard him I bet he has spent less than three hours on the subject.
Recently, he has been complaining about the U.N., yet he has never advocated getting out of it. No, what you get out of him is alot of talk about how evil "liberals" and Democrats are and how good "conservatives" and Republicans are. Such talk is meant to distract from the real reasons for the problems we have and today has been rendered meaningless, as on the important issues like world government, ect. both parties are in favor of, the only disagreement is how to get there.
For all practical purposes the Rush Limbaugh Show revolves around three things:
[list] [*]tinkering with the tax code instead of abolishing the 16th Amendment,
[*]"free trade," even though this hurts the nation by eliminating the manufacturing base that made the country great to begin with,
[*]and most important of all, why we should support Israel even when it goes against our interests. [/list]
That`s the nuts and bolts of it when it comes to this lopsided stool.
Limbaugh is no Consevative, but a trojan horse for those who really wish the nation harm.
2003-02-28 09:40 | User Profile
Buchanan,
Ruffin gives you good advice. Here`s some more reading for you. This first one is a critical piece on how the Neo-cons wrecked the Republican party.
[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=205]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...ct=ST&f=8&t=205[/url]
If you think that this is harsh, and unfair coming from a critic, we have other materials as well on these guys. In the case of the next article it is written by a Neo-con himself. They condemn themselves by their own words.
[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=6213]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...t=ST&f=8&t=6213[/url]
I recommend that you look through the folder entitled "Neocon Watch." There is a slew of writings there about them and by them as well.
2003-02-28 14:04 | User Profile
Originally posted by Buchanan@Feb 27 2003, 19:26 ** And another thing, you guys are ranting about all this anti-war nonsense, you better wake up.ÃÂ The arab menace is upon us and only getting stronger.ÃÂ By the end of this century, France and some other European countries are going to have crescents on their flags.ÃÂ We Americans will fare somewhat better, We'll still be Christian but we'll be speakin Spanish. **
Buchanan, first off why the moniker? Are you mocking The Pat Buchanan? I don't think he'd like that. However, I do applaud you for coming on OD and presenting your opinion, but I disagree with you and so would Pat Buchanan. The Arab or Muslim "menace" is a neocon invention because they're really only a menace to Israel and also stupid Western countries duped into letting them into their lands in the first place. They don't belong in Western cultures and our bought and sold politicians under the service of Zion purposely brought them into France, England, Germany, USA to further poison our White Christian heritage making it easier for totalitarian policies to take effect. It's happening now Buchanan, with the emerging new Soviet States of America and Europe, but it's not because of Saddam Hussein, Bin Laden, or Muslims in general "threatening our freedom". Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly are stooges of the NWO leaders put in place purely for disinformation purposes. They lead the sheep astray. And let me ask you, are you happy that the USA will be a Spanish speaking country?? Somehow you don't think that's such a bad thing. We think it's a disgraceful thing for our country to devolve into another Mexico.
Il Ragno, loved your post!
2003-03-01 20:46 | User Profile
Turned on the t.v., saw Tom DeLay on FOX News at a rally called by FOX, a "pro-america rally." Turned the t.v. immediately off.
I love how these Neo-cons try to imply that anyone who doesn`t support Bush (and Israel by extention) is against the country. I dug this quote up for the benefit of the junior Trotskyites in training like those at "Free" Republic and fans of Limbaugh that think that FOX is such a great channel.
** "The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."**
This was written in an editorial in the "Kansas City Star" on May 7, 1918. Note that the U.S. had declared war on Imperial Germany on 6 April, 1917.
Question for the lurkers out there. Who was this traitor who wrote this criticism about the Neo-con hero Woodrow Wilson?
Answer to be given later.
2003-03-01 21:11 | User Profile
Buchanan --
From Pat Buchanan himself:
[url=http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a014.htm]http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a014.htm[/url]
**If you have been wondering about the difference between a true conservative and a neoconservative, hearken to Ledeen's idea of the "historic mission" Providence has given to America.
"Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture and cinema to politics and the law." ...
These are the men who have hijacked the once-honorable name of conservative. **
2003-03-01 21:36 | User Profile
Sert:
Without giving the answer away, your quote was offered by the only Presidential candidate ever to get shot in the middle of a speech - who continued speaking anyway for another half-hour & finished his speech, before being rushed toa hospital.
2003-03-01 22:05 | User Profile
Of course the US can mount troops on the southern border to defend it, but that would bring out cries of racism and that would be the death knell for Bush trying to get the Hispanic vote. I definitely have a problem with speaking Spanish, but its definitely better than kneeling down to some ayattolla which is what they'll be doing in Europe in the near future. To me , Rush is too predictable and his show is just plain boring. I'd rather listen to (dont jump on me now) Stern. At least he gives Daniel Carver a voice.
2003-03-01 22:37 | User Profile
Was it Wallace?
2003-03-01 22:39 | User Profile
**Of course the US can mount troops on the southern border to defend it, but that would bring out cries of racism and that would be the death knell for Bush trying to get the Hispanic vote. **
If racism's supposed to be a bad thing, wouldn't it make sense that the race that's doing the aggression would be the racists, and the ones acting in self-defense would not?
The Mexican immigrants are the aggressors. People who support that aggression are the racists.
2003-03-01 22:42 | User Profile
Il Ragno,
Correct you are! It doesnt surprise me to see you know the answer. Isnt funny how the Neo-cons try to co-opt this man for their bastardized version of "history?" I think that he would have found them repugnant.
I wish the lemmings knew as much as the folks on this board do. It would solve alot of problems.
2003-03-01 23:08 | User Profile
Originally posted by mwdallas@Mar 1 2003, 16:37 ** Was it Wallace? **
Not making speeches in 1918.
Here's a hint. While I'm no fan, he was a much more upright public servant than his more (in)famous and depraved relative.
2003-03-02 00:22 | User Profile
While he was an empire-builder, no question, it's hard not to admire the man. And compared to the other jellyfish in the 20th-century Presidential aquarium, he looms still larger.
2003-03-02 01:19 | User Profile
s the answer with some other quotes by the Great Man. I am of the opinion that if T.R. could can back to life and be president again that he would do a number of things differently. I dont consider him to be a friend of these creatures running the show today. The mistakes that he did make I consider to be done due more to failing to understand just how rotten the forerunners of today were.**Presidential Criticism Recently several people have written to ask us about a viewpoint TR had on criticism of the presidency. This quote was part of an editorial he wrote for the "Kansas City Star" durning World War I.
"Roosevelt in the Kansas City Star", 149 May 7, 1918**
[url=http://history1900s.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theodoreroosevelt.org%2Flife%2Fquotes.htm]http://history1900s.about.com/gi/dynamic/o...fe%2Fquotes.htm[/url]
============================== Putting that aside, I wish to say in defense of FOX News that occasionally you do hear something that you weren`t aware of previously. Where else could you hear other than from watching the Beltway Boys Fred Barnes making the following stupid comment. Fred was getting onto Mort Kondracke about the duct tape fiasco:
"Now, Mort, you would know what to do with those materials," in response to Mort mocking this particular scare by saying who would know what to do with the materials. Fred went onto say the
"I`ve bought all that stuff."
:D :lol:
Me: "Fred, that is because you are a nitwit!" :lol:
I bet Fred has a nifty decoder ring to go along with the items as well. :