← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Sertorius
Thread ID: 5204 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2003-02-25
2003-02-25 11:09 | User Profile
February 24, 2003 Israel urges U.S. help to bolster economy By James G. Lakely
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Israel is asking the United States for billions of dollars in direct aid and loan guarantees to help prop up its stumbling economy and bolster the Israeli Defense Forces as war looms in Iraq.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Dov Weisglass, a top aide to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, led a delegation that met with Bush administration officials for three days last week to lay the groundwork for congressional approval of about$12 billion in aid, in addition to the $3 billion given to Israel each year.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ "Our request, after being substantiated, supported by the data that we have provided to our American colleagues, will be submitted for consideration and approval of the political level here in the United States and hopefully that will happen in a very timely manner," Mr. Weisglass said.
àààààIsrael reportedly is seeking $4 billion in direct aid ââ¬â mostly for the military ââ¬â and $8 billion in loan guarantees to help lift the country out of a two-year recession.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ A source at the Israeli Embassy said he is "optimistic" that Congress would approve the additional funds. If passed, the aid would come on the heels of a request by Turkey of more than $6 billion in direct aid and $20 billion in loans as U.S. forces prepare to use bases in that country as a staging area for any attack on Iraq.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida Republican, led a congressional delegation to Israel last week, and talked with government officials about the need for this aid.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ "All the officials with whom we met are hopeful that they can get this economic package," said Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen, who sits on the House International Relations Committee. "Israel is not economically self-sufficient and depends on borrowing to maintain its economy."
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Israel, which was hit by Iraq's Scud missiles during the Persian Gulf war in 1991, has "already spent millions" preparing for a repeat of Iraqi retaliations, said a source at the Israeli Embassy.
ààààà"Even if there is no conflict with Iraq, and we hope the situation can be resolved peacefully, Israel has spent millions preparing for that war ââ¬â missile defense, homeland defense, inoculations for civilians," the source said. "The Iraq situation is causing us to spend more than anyone thought, in the tens of millions."
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Israel is in the midst of a recession, brought on by a severe decline in the tourism industry since violence with the Palestinians intensified two years ago.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Andy Fisher, spokesman for Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, said hearings on the additional funds will be held "in the next couple of months."
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ "The chairman [Sen. Richard G. Lugar, Indiana Republican] hasn't passed judgment on the aid proposal," Mr. Fisher said. "I can't tell you what members will come back in the mood for as far as military aid. That's why there will be hearings."
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen said she expects Israel's aid request to be granted, but it could hardly come at a worse time.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ "It comes at a difficult time for us because we are in a deficit and have spent a lot on our own security," Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen said. "But it's important for us to come forth with this aid package because Israel could bear the brunt" of a war with Iraq.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Duncan L. Clarke, professor of international relations at American University, said "Israel tends to get what it wants from Congress."
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ "The combination of Congress being a yes man for Israel and a president who is the same way, I'd say that bodes well for Israel and poorly for the American taxpayer," Mr. Clarke said.
àààààThe question that he said probably is not being asked on Capitol Hill is: "Is it the appropriate role of the U.S. to pump up a foreign country's economy?" ààAll site contents copyright é 1999-2003 News World Communications, Inc. Privacy Policy
**"It comes at a difficult time for us because we are in a deficit and have spent a lot on our own security," Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen said. "But it's important for us to come forth with this aid package because Israel could bear the brunt" of a war with Iraq. **
As much as I wish this were the case, it wont and Ros-Lehtinen is an idiot for saying this, seeing how the U.S. has 200,000 troops in the area with more on the way. Other than maybe a few airstrikes, I expect Israel to do absolutely nothing. They have their own objectives, the main one being to run off the Palestinains. Furthermore, why should they do anything? They have the "christian"zio**Nuts** and their fifth column of Likudnik supporters here in the U.S. to push this war, and then you have people like John McCain who has stated that we dont want the Israelis involved.
"Israel is not economically self-sufficient and depends on borrowing to maintain its economy."
Then, maybe the question here is what business do they have being a country in the first place if they arent economically viable, Cong. Ros-Lehtinen? This and the question that if this is the case just how long are we expected to support them?
I have no doubt that with idiots like Ros-Lehtinen sitting in Congress that this appropriation will be approve and the Jew quoted above in the article knows this full well. He doesn`t need t feel optimistic when this is a done deal to begin with.
2003-02-25 12:40 | User Profile
All we've heard from the talking heads this last week is about Turkey trying to "shake us down" for money.
I figured Israel wouldn't be far behind.
Course, there won't be any shakedown talk applied to where it really belongs - Israel.
2003-02-25 12:55 | User Profile
Eric,
I take somewhat of a different view. Israel started this campaign for more direct aid and loan guarantees back around the beginning of the year, I believe. I figured that the Turks took a look at that and considered Israels past success in ripping us off and decided to pull the same stunt. Theyll probably succeed, along with Mexico which now is trying to sell its vote on the Security Council to us for probably taking on all the illegals they have dumped on us.
We do live in some amazing times. It looks like there is nothing Bush won`t stoop to in order to get his war.
2003-02-25 15:28 | User Profile
Originally posted by Sertorius@Feb 25 2003, 05:09 **Duncan L. Clarke, professor of international relations at American University, said "Israel tends to get what it wants from Congress."
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ "The combination of Congress being a yes man for Israel and a president who is the same way, I'd say that bodes well for Israel and poorly for the American taxpayer," Mr. Clarke said.
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The question that he said probably is not being asked on Capitol Hill is: "Is it the appropriate role of the U.S. to pump up a foreign country's economy?" ÃÂ ÃÂ **
That name (Duncan Clarke) sounded familiar so I Googled and came up with this:
Israel 's economic espionage in the United States. Duncan L. Clarke 06/22/1998 Journal of Palestine Studies, Page 20 Israel has conducted espionage in the United States, especially economic espionage,(1) since its creation in 1948.(2) This espionage principally targets military and dual use items (goods and technology with civilian and military uses) and furthers strategic as well as economic objectives. This article examines the scope and nature of this activity, its distinctiveness, its apparent benefits and costs for Israel , and the U.S. response.
In one sense, Israel is hardly unique: it is just one of the dozen countries identified by the National Counterintelligence Center (NACIC) as active against U.S. interests.(3) Israeli operations are reflective of the larger global phenomenon of economic espionage. Like more than half of these countries, Israel is a U.S. ally whose intelligence and armed services work closely with U.S. counterparts. Like most of the twelve, Israel 's defense firms are closely tied to the state and compete actively with American firms. Like South Korea and Taiwan, Israel has sought to exploit potentially sympathetic American ethnic groups. Like Iran and China , Israel has employed economic espionage to advance a nuclear weapons program and the means to deliver such weapons. Like China and Russia, its political-strategic intelligence collection in the United States appears to be ongoing, often merging imperceptibly with its economic collection.
Yet Israeli espionage against the United States is also distinctive. No other country is more frequently said to have a unique "special relationship" with the United States. No ally's security, even survival, is more reliant on U.S. intelligence. No other ally on the list receives U.S. foreign aid. Few countries' defense industries and infrastructures are more dependent on close, cooperative ties with the United States. No other country has a more intimate grasp of the American political system, and no country receives more reliable political protection from Congress. Finally, while allegations of "dual loyalty" are not confined to American citizens supportive of Israel , that explosive charge is particularly disturbing here.
CONSTANCY OF ISRAELI ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE With the cooperation of some American Jews, Israeli espionage in the United States was underway throughout the late 1940s and early 1950s.(4) A far more concerted, systematic effort to collect scientific and technical information was initiated in 1960 when Israel 's Defense Ministry created what was to evolve into its Office of Special Tasks (LAKAM).(5) LAKAM soon became a technical penetration and acquisition network designed to strengthen Israel 's defense industry(6) by giving top priority, according to a CIA report, to "the collection of scientific intelligence in the U.S."(7)
During the cold war, says John Davitt, former head of the Justice Department's internal security section, U.S. counterespionage specialists "regarded Israel as being the second most active foreign intelligence service in the United States."(8) When in 1996 the CIA finally exposed Israel (and France) publicly for being "extensively engaged in espionage,"(9) the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) also issued a report stating that Israel "conducts the most aggressive espionage operations against the United States of any ally. . . . [It] routinely resorts to state-sponsored espionage [to steal] classified military information and sensitive military technology [and] sensitive U.S. economic information."(10)
No foreign country has a more effective informational network inside the executive and, especially, legislative branches of the U.S. government.(11) It appears that several units within Israel 's intelligence community are engaged in economic espionage.(12) They include Israel 's foreign intelligence service (Mossad) and a new organization within the Defense Ministry - the Security Authority (Malmab).(13)
According to the U.S. intelligence community, Israel 's motivations appear to be threefold: to strengthen its industrial base, to sell/trade the information to/with other countries (especially China ) for profit, and to sell/trade the information to/with other countries to develop favorable political ties and alternative sources of arms and intelligence.(14) To these, a fourth factor might be added: the certain knowledge that, in the words of a senior former U.S. intelligence official, " Israel can steal right and left, but we will still pump money in."(15)
The United States and Israel agreed in 1951 not to spy on one another.(16) There is little evidence that the United States has conducted economic espionage against Israel ,(17) but the agreement has been flouted repeatedly and flagrantly by Israel . Israeli economic espionage has infuriated the U.S. intelligence community, especially the FBI and the Customs Service, and has left a legacy of distrust in that community.(18) Still, such espionage does not have the same impact as attempts to penetrate the national security bureaucracy, as in the notorious 1985 Jonathan Pollard case, which strained diplomatic relations and disrupted intelligence cooperation for some time.(19) Economic espionage, on the other hand, has not significantly affected strategic cooperation, including the sharing of intelligence. Indeed, U.S.- Israel strategic ties are closer today than ever before. Among other things, since the U.S.- Israel Counterterrorism Accord was signed in 1996, the United States has continued to preposition munitions in Israel , and financial aid to Israel for counterterrorism and ballistic missile defense increased.(20)
SPECIFIC TARGETS OF ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE
Israeli Defense Industrial Base
Israel maintains a strong defense industrial base. Both the quality of Israel 's arsenal and the competitiveness of its armaments industry are enhanced by economic espionage.
Representative targets of Israeli economic espionage have included: U.S. technology for artillery gun tubes, coatings for missile reentry vehicles, avionics, missile telemetry, and aircraft communications systems? One particularly notorious case concerned Recon/Optical, an Illinois firm producing state-of-the-art aerial surveillance equipment for the Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence community. In 1986, Recon's security guards caught three Israeli air force officers stealing 50,000 pages of technical documents relating to the company's proprietary information. For at least a year, these officers had been exploiting contractually provided visitation rights and passing Recon's documents to a competing Israeli firm, El Op Electro-Optics Industries. An arbitration panel eventually ordered Israel to pay Recon $3 million in damages for what it found to be "perfidious" illegal acts.(22) Nonetheless, Recon suffered grievous damage and barely escaped bankruptcy. The optics technology stolen from Recon apparently provided critical elements of Ofek-3, Israel 's first durable reconnaissance satellite.(23)
There were other troubling episodes throughout the 1980s. For example, in the early 1980s some Israelis were caught illicitly taking classified blueprints of the F-16 fighter out of the General Dynamics plant in Fort Worth, Texas. A separate facility was then set up outside the plant for the Israelis (who were awaiting delivery of about fifty-five F-16s).(24) In another case, the Customs Service intercepted Israeli agents who were suspected of plotting to export U.S. cluster bomb technology to Israel . In 1982, the Reagan administration had banned the export of such weapons to Israel when Israel violated, during its war on Lebanon that year, its end-use agreement with the United States not to employ cluster weapons against civilians. Although there was abundant evidence of intentional wrongdoing, the State Department prevailed on the Justice Department not to prosecute.(25) A third case involved NAPCO, Inc., a Connecticut company. NAPCO worked with Israeli agents to illegally export sensitive new technology for chrome plating the inside of 120mm tank barrels. Indeed, U.S. foreign aid paid for building a plant in Israel to utilize this process. NAPCO pleaded guilty to violating U.S. export law and was fined $750,000. No Israelis were prosecuted.(26) In other cases, the Justice Department charged an executive of the Science Applications International Corporation with illegally transferring missile defense technology to Israel by "dealing with the highest levels of the military. . . in Israel ,"(27) and Israel improperly acquired U.S. RPV (remotely piloted vehicles) technology, allowing the Israeli company Mazlot to underbid its American competitors.(28)
Public U.S. government reports, including the 1996 GAO report and the 1997 NACIC annual report to Congress alluded to above, suggest that the problem has worsened since the end of the cold war. For instance, a 1997 FBI affidavit revealed that David Tenenbaum, a civilian with the U.S. Army Tank Automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM), admitted giving "nonreleaseable classified information to every Israeli liaison officer assigned to TACOM over the last 10 years."(29) This included classified data on theater missile defense systems, the Bradley fighting vehicle, ceramic armor, and other weapons systems.(30) These technologies are necessary to meet what General Matan Vilnai, deputy chief of Israel 's defense staff, says are Israel 's "operational environments," particularly resisting a Syrian armor attack and countering an over-the-horizon missile attack.(31) Tenenbaum also appears to have furthered Israel 's commercial interests as the Israeli company Elbit now offers upgrades of the U.S. army's Bradley fighting vehicle, Israeli companies have long been involved in ceramic designs for tanks, and Israel approached the United States in 1997 about selling its forthcoming Arrow theater missile defense system to Turkey.
Fraud and the Israeli Purchasing Mission
Israeli economic espionage is sometimes associated with two often interrelated factors: the fraudulent acts committed by Israeli officials in the United States and the activities of the Israeli Purchasing Mission in New York.
Concerning the former, Israeli general Rami Dotan was convicted by an Israeli court in 1991 for conspiring with an executive of the General Electric Company, Herbert Steindler, to illegally divert $40 million of U.S. military assistance.(32) Steindler, Dotan, and another person were indicted by a U.S. federal court in 1994 for the same offense.(33) Many of these fraudulent practices were taken at the express direction of senior Israeli defense officials, possibly at the highest levels.(34) A 1992 memorandum from the Justice Department to Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney stated that these fraudulent diversions of U.S. aid may have been intended to "finance Israeli intelligence operations . . . in the United States."(35) Investigators for the House Energy and Commerce Committee concurred, and a knowledgeable congressional source said that "Dotan was continuing a fraudulent diversion of military aid that had been going on before he ever arrived on the scene."(36)
The Israeli Purchasing Mission was established in 1952, well before the United States became Israel 's principal arms supplier. It is run by Israeli military officers and defense officials with a staff of about two hundred (many of whom are Israeli college students). The Purchasing Mission is Israel 's locus of coordination with the U.S. defense industry, and it draws from the $1.8 billion of annual U.S. military aid to buy defense goods and services in the United States. It awards contracts to U.S. firms and obtains export licenses from the Departments of State and Commerce for shipments to Israel . It has liaison officers at many defense plants, sites, and installations in the United States and is accredited to additional U.S. defense facilities. Mission personnel are often aware of evolving new technologies long before key officials in Washington, thus enhancing opportunities for evading export controls.(37)
The unusual access to U.S. firms facilitates economic espionage, as do Israel 's unique arrangements for paying U.S. companies. For other countries that use U.S. military aid to buy defense goods in the United States, the government disburses funds directly to American companies, thereby enhancing oversight. For Israel , however, the Purchasing Mission pays the companies and is then reimbursed by the U.S. Treasury. This, plus other relaxed rules for Israel 's use of U.S. military aid and the presence of many retired Israeli generals and defense officials in American firms seeking business from the Mission, sharply degrades U.S. monitoring of Mission expenditures and activities. This invites the kind of fraud and/or espionage that variously involved Mission personnel in the Dotan affair and the NAPCO, Recon, and cluster bomb cases.(38) When the Justice Department sought to move against some Purchasing Mission personnel for recurring involvement in illegal technology acquisition, Israel requested - and in 1988 received from the State Department-limited diplomatic immunity for most of its professional staff.(39)
Nuclear Weapons and Means of Delivery
Although evidence remains officially inconclusive, there is a "widespread belief" in the CIA and elsewhere within the U.S. intelligence community that in the 1960s Israeli intelligence spirited about two hundred pounds of weapons-grade uranium from the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) in Apollo, Pennsylvania.(40) John Hadden, a former CIA station chief in Tel Aviv, states that NUMEC was an "Israeli operation from the beginning."(41)
This private corporation was owned by Zalman Mordecai Shapiro, an active member of the Zionist Organization of America, who had close ties to Israel . These ties and Shapiro's activities convinced the FBI and CIA that he had helped Israeli agents smuggle the material out the United States to Israel , where it provided fuel for the first four nuclear devices assembled at Dimona.(42) The NUMEC case was investigated by the GAO and the House Interior Committee in 1978, but their reports have never been declassified. Indeed, the political sensitivity of the issue led President Lyndon Johnson and successive administrations to bury various intelligence reports on the NUMEC affair.(43)
Another case arose in May 1985 when Richard Smyth, an American Jew, was charged by a federal grand jury with smuggling 810 krytons to Israel . Krytons can act as electronic triggers for nuclear weapons. Smyth was released on $100,000 bail and failed to appear for trial. He was later seen in Israel .(44) This was a premeditated act of nuclear weapons-related espionage by Israel .(45) Espionage was only one reason for Israel 's successful drive for nuclear weapons. A sophisticated scientific base, early assistance from France on the Dimona reactor, the financial role of individual Jewish Americans, and covert cooperation with South Africa were important factors.(46) Yet espionage got Israeli scientists and engineers past crucial roadblocks, such as the acquisition of weapons-grade uranium and krytons .
Espionage may also help Israel keep pace with technological innovations in nuclear weaponry and missile technology. The 1997 annual report to Congress by the NACIC identifies "inappropriate conduct during visits to secure facilities" as one of the most common collection methods by foreign economic spies.(47) Using a variety of covers to gain access to sensitive U.S. facilities, the visitors "manipulate" the visit by taking pictures or notes, bringing unannounced guests, and utilizing fraudulent data-exchange agreements.(48)
This is a potentially serious problem, given close cooperation between the Israeli and U.S. defense scientific communities on projects such as the Arrow missile. Scores of Israeli scientists visited U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories at Sandia, Los Alamos, and Livermore. Israeli visitors were often treated more openly than others.(49) During just one twenty-month period in the late 1980s, 188 Israeli scientists visited these three labs.(50) Most of the visits were under the auspices of U.S.- Israel cooperation agreements, especially one for the study of nuclear physics and fusion; opportunities for inappropriate behavior were considerable. The GAO has highlighted the need to improve security with respect to foreign visitations of U.S. defense facilities.(51)
Israeli nuclear- and weapons of mass destruction-related espionage has an important economic dimension. As Israel 's nuclear doctrine and posture become more elaborate - and require the integration of command and control systems with satellite imagery - access to new developments in software and computer technology is crucial.(52) The acquisition of these technologies, through licit and illicit means, has a valuable spinoff effect for the civilian economy.
DUAL LOYALTY
The issue of dual loyalty, though not assuming the dimensions it does in cases threatening national security such as the Pollard affair, has also figured in economic espionage. For example, the 1997 case of David Tenenbaum (discussed above), a religious Jew fluent in Hebrew, instantly concerned many in the Jewish community.(53)
The issue of dual loyalty also arose during a 1996 effort to draft legislation to strengthen trade secrets protection. As part of an effort to increase awareness of economic espionage throughout the intelligence community, the Defense Investigative Service (DIS) prepared a profile of Israel . After noting Israel 's "voracious appetite" for information on U.S. defense technologies, the DIS profile stated that Israel 's "very productive collection effort" in the United States was facilitated by "ethnic targeting" and "the strong ethnic ties to Israel present in the U.S."(54) Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League obtained a copy of the profile and wrote Secretary of Defense William Perry asserting that it "borders on anti-Semitism."(55) Senator Mien Specter (R-PA), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, also wrote to Secretary Perry, and Specter's staff met with Defense Department officials. The Defense Department responded: "While the Israelis may have ... attempted to exploit ethnic and religious ties with Jewish Americans, it does not follow that these Americans are necessarily any more susceptible to external exploitation than any other... American citizens."(56) Virtually no one, including Senator Specter, denies the reality of ethnic targeting by foreign intelligence services. Israel has employed this technique repeatedly,(57) as have China , Taiwan, and South Korea.(58) Indeed, instances of improper ties between Israel and some American Jews - ties that contribute to perceptions of dual loyalty - date from the earliest days of the Jewish state.(59) The FBI and CIA have long been aware of such ties. For instance, a 1979 CIA report stated: Israel 's intelligence "depends heavily on various Jewish communities and organizations abroad for recruiting agents and eliciting informants," and, "a substantial effort is made to appeal to Jewish racial [sic] or religious proclivities."(60)
The American Jewish community is rightly concerned that allegations (or insinuations) about the dual loyalty of some citizens could cast aspersions on the patriotism of Jewish Americans.(61) A 1987 CBS News/New York Times poll indicated that fully 33 percent of the general public believed American Jews placed the interests of Israel above those of the United States; this figure was 35 percent in a 1992 poll by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith.(62) These findings, which have been consistent over the past thirty years, also indicate that another 20 percent of Americans say they do not know where Jews' loyalties lie.(63)
In practice, of course, Jews serve in considerable numbers and at the highest levels of the American national security establishment; only very rarely does this issue arise in individual cases. Yet Israel seems insensitive to the damaging effects its illegal acts may have on Diaspora Jews. Former Reagan administration Pentagon official Dov Zakheim, an Orthodox rabbi, states flatly that Israel 's conduct is responsible for it being viewed as an intelligence threat by the Department of Defense: "This is not an American problem, but an Israeli problem."(64) Zakheim also cautions fellow Jews "not to play the card" of anti-Semitism when the U.S. government takes reasonable measures to counter Israeli intelligence activities.(65) In this area, as in so many others, the maintenance of a free and open multiethnic society requires that a balance be struck between guarding against sweeping, McCarthy-like allegations and implementing prudent security measures.(66)
ESPIONAGE AND AN EMERGING TECHNOLOGY-based ECONOMY
As Israel 's national priorities evolve, its government is actively promoting an export-oriented technology sector featuring, among other things, strong software, Internet services, and biotechnology firms. Some of the conditions underlying these current initiatives resemble those existing during the development of Israel 's arms industry and nuclear weapons program in the 1950s and 1960s, when Israel could not have developed nuclear weapons and a sophisticated armaments industry quickly without the illicit acquisition of foreign technology and information. In its quest to "make the desert bloom" with software design firms and telecommunications labs, Israel must overcome its relatively late entry into the international competition for advanced technology. Despite some successful initial public offerings, the Israeli civilian technology sector has little capital to invest in expensive research and development programs,(67) and the stalled peace process discourages investment. The pace of technological innovation and obsolescence is staggering, thereby escalating the risks associated with investment in new product development. Moreover, military scientific research in countries like Israel is hampered by such factors as the emigration of top scientists, insufficient technical support, the relatively small scale of scientific communities, and difficulties in attracting the best minds to applied weapons research.(68) All of these factors point to a continued need for economic espionage in both the civilian and defense sectors.
To be sure, there are countervailing considerations that may dampen Israel 's proclivity to steal from foreign firms. Israeli firms in the new global order have much better access to international customers, potential sources of capital, and joint ventures - something that was impossible for its nuclear arms program and difficult for its early conventional arms industry. In addition, Israel 's innovative defense sector has spun off useful dual-use technologies for its civilian industries.(69)
However, opportunities and incentives for economic espionage are inviting. The Department of Commerce confirms that Israel 's technology-based industries are "eager" for joint ventures with U.S. firms and the U.S. government.(70) In Silicon Valley, there are scores of Israeli-owned or managed companies, and American firms hire many Israeli engineers. This facilitates "brain-theft and idea-theft."(71) Moreover, the U.S. government itself is providing Israeli intelligence with inviting targets. By 1997, the United States and Israel were moving toward several new agreements on everything from basic research to prototype testing under their joint Technology Research and Development Projects. Potential areas of cooperation include avionics, a range of armaments development projects, laser target identification systems, and others.(72) While Israel has expressly agreed not to transfer technology from such joint endeavors to third parties without prior U.S. approval, and while such unauthorized retransfers are prohibited by the Arms Export Control Act (PL 90-629), Israel has repeatedly violated both the law and identical prior commitments concerning technology retransfers.(73)
Beyond this, institutional habits and missions should ensure that Israeli intelligence units continue to utilize existing networks for collecting economic intelligence, while developing new ones to meet civilian needs. Confidential business information, particularly financial information, competitor bids, customer lists, and marketing plans may become as important targets as technical and scientific data. New forms of electronic intelligence collection, including satellites and computer intrusion, will contribute to improving Israel 's capabilities in this area.
U.S. RESPONSE TO ISRAELI ESPIONAGE
Like defense firms in most foreign countries, Israeli companies are closely linked to the government and compete with American firms in the international market. Yet excepting Egypt, Israel is the only country today whose defense industry is heavily subsidized by the United States. That is, even apart from the more than $76 billion in foreign aid (over 90 percent in security assistance) from the United States through fiscal year 1998, the U.S. government, and especially Congress, continues to give Israel numerous unique privileges which, cumulatively, advantage Israeli firms and disadvantage American ones in the international armaments market.(74) In return, Israel conducts an aggressive campaign of economic espionage against American firms. Yet this campaign has never triggered a vigorous response from the U.S. government. Why is this?
While the Israeli case is unique in several respects, the tepid U.S. response (or nonresponse) to economic thievery is not unusual. Indeed, among the countries identified by the NACIC as targeting U.S. economic secrets, it is difficult to identify a single instance where relations were truly disrupted by economic espionage. This is especially true when the culprit is a close ally. Concerning Israel generally, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said: "You don't use levers with friends."(75)
A former senior U.S. defense intelligence official commented: "The closer you come to national defense, the more likely there is to be an effect on cooperation. Pollard really disrupted U.S.-Israeli relations, but Recon-type [economic] operations have less of an impact."(76) That is, significant political fallout from espionage is limited to traditional national security cases; even then, it is rarely severe when an ally is involved. Thus, when Robert C. Kim, a naturalized Korean-American Navy computer specialist, pleaded guilty to passing classified documents to South Korea in 1997, the U.S.-South Korean strategic relationship remained largely undisturbed.(77)
But there is more here than just a reluctance to punish an ally. Individual members of Congress occasionally criticize such allies as France or Japan for their economic espionage,(78) but similar behavior by Israel elicits only silence. Whereas Congress as an institution rarely demands retribution for any ally's espionage against the United States, Congress actively advances Israel 's interests and shelters it from all but the most egregious violations of U.S. law? Hence, as Recon/Optical executive William Owens discovered, any explanation of the moderate U.S. response to Israeli wrongdoing must be rooted in an understanding of the American policy process. Owens pleaded with his Illinois congressional delegation to help him recover from what Israel had done to his company, but it refused to confront Israel and its potent lobby. Said Owens,"We begged people [in Washington] to help us, but we got nothing but their backs."(80)
In addition to hesitancy about reprimanding an ally and Congress's protectiveness of Israel , a third factor moderating the U.S. response is the special strategic tie between the two countries. Despite serious misgivings within the U.S. national security bureaucracy concerning Israel 's net value as a strategic asset,(81) the strategic relationship was formalized at least by 1983 and subsequently acquired significant breadth and depth. It was strengthened in the Clinton administration by, among other things, joint counterterrorism operations and defense research programs, an extension of U.S. defense satellite warning to Israel , and an increase in U.S. funding for Israel 's Arrow missile.(82)
A fourth factor is the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (PL 109-294). While this law makes it much easier to prosecute economic spies successfully,(83) it punishes individuals, not nations. It makes no reference to sanctions against offending states. Criminal prosecutions, publicity, and diplomatic demarches will not alone be sufficient to deter systematic state-sponsored economic espionage, especially when that state is Israel . There is little indication today that Washington is politically disposed toward imposing weighty sanctions that might present a more credible deterrent.
In May 1997, it was reported that the National Security Agency had intercepted communications between Israeli intelligence officials that referred to a U.S. official code-named "Mega" who was illicitly passing sensitive diplomatic information to Israel . This appeared to confirm long-standing rumors to this effect. Israeli officials denied that Mega was a spy.(84) The episode soon vanished from public view, and with its disappearance went the possibility that it might upset U.S.-Israeli relations.(85)
MORE...
[url=http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Jardin/7659/JPS1.html]http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Jardin/7659/JPS1.html[/url]
[url=http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Jardin/7659/]http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Jardin/7659/[/url]
2003-02-25 17:32 | User Profile
You'd think the shakedowns, all thrown together, would cancel one another out. But maybe not. My understanding is that Israel is the No. 1 aid recipient, followed by Egypt. I used to think that this amounted to giving two fighting brats a lollipop each to stay away from each other. I'm now seeing the aid to Egypt, however, as more of one gigantic lollipop for Israel. We wouldn't be paying off Egypt if that didn't benefit Israel. It's like third-party protection money for that excrement-y little country, as the French ambassador to the U.K. so succinctly put it. The same analysis, adjusted slightly, can be applied to Turkey.
Face it: Israel is a pathetic little slice of barren, rocky desert that faces incredible difficulty achieving economic self-reliance. The thought of them cranking up anything resembling an industrial, technological or service infrastructure is as laughable as the Nation of Islam's plan to make toothpaste. Mostly, they deal in White slavery/prostitution and Ecstasy. Those kibbutzes aren't making anything. It's not our fault (Acknowledging Balfour and Truman connivance) God's chosen pets picked that dry patch. Let 'em have it. Keep us out of it. Because staying in it is killing us.