← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Mr.Wilson

Thread 5170

Thread ID: 5170 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2003-02-23

Wayback Archive


Mr.Wilson [OP]

2003-02-23 02:09 | User Profile

Is The American Conservative heading in the same direction as The National Review? A critique of TAC Feb.24 "Free Taki" Editorial. [url=http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_paleocon.htm]http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_paleocon.htm[/url]


Okiereddust

2003-02-23 03:11 | User Profile

No doubt, he makes TAC look pretty pusillanious alright. Usually I try to defend mainstream paleocondom, and it would be nice to have the original article and know who wrote it, (presumable Buchanan or McConnell now) but I detect a certain ambivalence in the article toward aggravating the powers that are now threatening Taki, a certain undertone of conciliation. Sounds like Taki and Pat may have, for some reason ore another (a lot of possibilities easily cross ones mind, lost the necessary audacity to really challenge an increasingly brazen PCdom.

All of real paleodom may be headed irreversibly underground and for the internet. If that is realy what's happening, goodbye democracy.


solutrian

2003-02-23 14:35 | User Profile

The reviewer is far too tough on TAC, and bases his critique mostly on supposition. I have fullest confidence that the editors and TAC will maintain a healthy position on PaleoConservatism. Any magazine can't be all every reader wants it to be.


Buster

2003-02-24 22:23 | User Profile

Originally posted by Mr.Wilson@Feb 22 2003, 20:09 ** Is The American Conservative heading in the same direction as The National Review? **

Good gosh! The groveling tone of that editorial was horrendous. TAC gets the Bill Buckley award for most obsequious Jew brown-nosing.

Who is this Henry G. Fields guy, anyway? He was spot on. Anyone know his background?

I hereby demand a retraction or explanation from TAC. That editorial was more abject than anything National Review ever wrote.

Thanks, Wilson.


Mr.Wilson

2003-03-04 03:32 | User Profile

A scathing review of the Derbyshire book review of "The Culture of Critique". [url=http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_derby.htm]http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_derby.htm[/url]


darkeddy

2003-03-04 03:49 | User Profile

Derbyshire should keep his mouth shut until he understands basic evolutionary theory.


Mr.Wilson

2003-03-08 19:37 | User Profile

Prof.MacDonald's letter to TLD Editor: [url=http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_derby_lte.htm]http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_derby_lte.htm[/url]


Frederick William I

2003-03-08 20:48 | User Profile

Originally posted by Mr.Wilson@Mar 4 2003, 03:32 A scathing review of the Derbyshire book review of "The Culture of Critique". [url=http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_derby.htm]http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/fields_derby.htm[/url]

This is Henry Gallagher Fields second review of Derbyshire's CoC review.

[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=6&t=6287]Paleocon Pullisamity[/url]

Dan Dare would say he's making a whole lot of ado about nothing. ;)

[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=6373&view=getlastpost]The Marx of the Anti-Semites[/url]