← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Walter E Kurtz
Thread ID: 4959 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2003-02-12
2003-02-12 22:26 | User Profile
Are their any Yockey scholars in attendance? I just finished "Imperium" and I am quite impressed. It strikes me as a "sequel" of sorts to Spengler's "Decline of the West". Thoughts/Comments about Yockey?
2003-02-13 01:40 | User Profile
Walter E Kurtz,
Have the following link on the BATR [url=http://pages.zdnet.com/sartre/rules/id19.html]Media[/url] page.
[url=http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/10/2/Yockey143-147.html]On Propaganda in America[/url]
SARTRE :ph34r:
2003-02-13 10:01 | User Profile
[url=http://members.odinsrage.com/superman/Imperium.pdf]http://members.odinsrage.com/superman/Imperium.pdf[/url]
Imperium online :o :D
Francis Parker Yockey is great.
2003-02-13 14:38 | User Profile
His writings on America are the most insightful-particularly regarding the Revolution and the frontier wars.
One day, while in a used book store, I saw a small book with a beaten red dustcover- a first printing of Imperium, Vol. 1, Westropa Press.
Library of Congress discard. Got it for $6 :D
2003-02-13 15:57 | User Profile
This paragraph from 'Imperium' is definitely my quote of the day:
** In a country where the cant of morality exercises a monopoly over political vocabulary, politicians cannot speak openly even to one another. The propaganda terror necessary to maintain such an absurd type of political terminology in contradiction to facts ends by weakening from within governments in such countries. Anyone making a purely factual remark becomes suspect, and some of the best brains have found their way thus into the concentration camps. **
2003-02-13 19:50 | User Profile
naBaron,
I'll give you $60 for it!
2003-02-14 20:29 | User Profile
Thanks for all of the replies...I just picked up "Men Among the Ruins" by Julius Evola. I've heard that Evola and Yockey consulted one another on occasion, and that Evola's works compliment Yockey's.
Also:
When Yockey was detained before his death, what were the grounds for his incarceration? I have heard many different things.
2003-02-14 22:36 | User Profile
Yockey is another I'd known of without knowing his work.
Many thanks for this thread, Colonel. Brilliant stuff; I've been immersed in it all day now; and will remain immersed all weekend.
Passages like this are why:
Russian "successes" -- except for its German-made rockets -- are all the gift of the Washington regime. Jewish-American political stupidity is invincible. But the power-gifts which the Washington regime has made to Russia are not explicable entirely by simple stupidity, simple incapacity. There is the further factor at work that the Zionist Washington regime is on both sides of most power-questions in the world. Its sole firm stand is its fundamental anti-German position: Germany must be destroyed, its young men must be slaughtered. In Algeria, Washington is on both sides: it is with the French Government, as its "ally": it is with the rebels by virtue of its world-program of "freedom" for everybody. In Egypt, the Washington regime told Palestine, England and France to attack, and when Russia rose, it told them to stop. It was, within a week, anti-Nasser and pro-Nasser. It occupied Lebanon, then evacuated. It held back Chiang when from his island, he would have attacked China with whom the Washington regime was then at war. It defended South Korea, but helped the Chinese maintain their supply line to the front. During the Chinese War in Korea, it made and negotiated peace at the same time, for years. In Cuba it forbade exportation of arms to the loyal Batista and thus helped Fidel Castro; now it is committed to the overthrow of Castro.
It is a psychological riddle, decipherable only thus: the Zionists have two minds, which function independently. As Zionists, they are committed to the destruction of the Western Civilization, and in this they sympathize with Russia, with China, with Japan, with the Arabs, and as such they anathematize Germany, which is the mind and heart of the Western Civilization. As custodians of the United States, they must half-heartedly remain at least the technical and political domination of that Civilization even while destroying its soul and its meaning. In a word, they are working simultaneously for and against the Western Civilization. Quite obviously they are thus doing more damage than conferring benefit! If a commander of a fortress sympathizes with the enemy, but yet insists in defending the fortress rather than surrendering it, he has surely found the highest formula of destruction.
---THE WORLD IN FLAMES (Feb 1961)