← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Happy Hacker
Thread ID: 4915 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2003-02-10
2003-02-10 21:10 | User Profile
The average person sees just two sides. The anti-war side is the leftist peaceniks who want to give special rights to sodomizers, give racial preferences to blacks, and make killing babies in the womb the only constitutional right. This gives de-facto appearance of the moral high ground to the warmongers -- the pro-war side -- the side waving the flag and evoking God. This is the reason that middle-America supports the war on Iraq. They donââ¬â¢t know that you can be a conservative and anti-war, a third side.
The leftist peaceniks who say give peace a chance will also say that war has never solved anything. Any halfway competent warmonger can easily refute the claim that war never solved anything. Any case of real self-defense will do.
But, in American history, what has war really done for us? The Revolutionary war gave us independence which certainly could have been gained through peace (ala Canada) and independence doesnââ¬â¢t really have any inherent value (notice the lack of secessionist movements among the states; although, if there is any such movement, count me as a member).
What if the US minded its own business in WWII? Japan would not have attacked (we did provoke them) and Communist China may never have risen (we were helping China by trying to hinder Japan). Leaving WWII to Russia to fight might have prevented the Cold War. In any case, I canââ¬â¢t imagine Germany being able to keep much of a grip on Western Europe for very long (itââ¬â¢s not like anyone liked Germans).
But, Iââ¬â¢m not asking what if the US stayed out of any war we did fight. When has failing to fight a war ever hurt the US? Where is the historical precedent that teaches us not to error on the side of peace?
2003-02-10 21:25 | User Profile
Our 20th century wars are what concern me. Like it or not, the net result of them - besides world Communism, Jewish hegemony [same thing?] and ni**ers dancin' wif yo' date - has been the wanton killing of the very best white breeding stock on the face of the Earth.
The white dead of two World Wars & Korea were a whole other breed of men; had they been given the chance to live and continue their bloodlines, we would not now be the sick joke that every white man of feeling & awareness knows we are, dancing for Jews on marionette strings in a grovelling Brave New Service Economy. You know the phrase "we won't see their like again?" America today is what happens a generation or two after "their like" was last seen.
I wonder if the servicemen who survived D-Day only to be forced into strongarming, abusing & starving refugees in IDF camps to placate their true masters thought the same thing I did, watching the Twin Towers fall:
"All of this horror - for Jews. All for Jews."
2003-02-10 21:41 | User Profile
Try this one. We should have invaded Israel after the sinking of the USS Liberty. Any takers?
2003-02-11 00:32 | User Profile
Pulling Israel's multibillion-dollar/year welfare check would result in the collapse of Israel, no US invasion needed.
2003-02-11 01:08 | User Profile
**Pulling Israel's multibillion-dollar/year welfare check would result in the collapse of Israel, no US invasion needed. **
Nope.
**... in Jerusalem Friday, Professor Martin Van Crevel said Israel had the capability of hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons. "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that this will happen before Israel goes under."ÃÂ **
That's why there'll be no invasion, come a hundred Libertys, and no cutoff from Uncle Sucker, either. You may not consider that threat credible, but I can assure you there are dozens of military intelligence agencies aroundthe world who know better.
2003-02-11 03:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE]" We have the ability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under"
Can someone please straighten me out? According to my program guide [ televitz, jooz media, ect.] the suicide bombers are supposed to be a bunch of camel jockeys, not a nation full of insane, paranoid Yahoodis.
:lol:
2003-02-11 04:17 | User Profile
**mwdallas: Try this one. We should have invaded Israel after the sinking of the USS Liberty. Any takers? ** INVADED?!?! Hell! We should have nuked them to pretty melted-sand GLASS!!! :angry:
2003-02-11 11:59 | User Profile
Originally posted by il ragno@Feb 11 2003, 01:08 ** > **Pulling Israel's multibillion-dollar/year welfare check would result in the collapse of Israel, no US invasion needed. **
Nope.
**... in Jerusalem Friday, Professor Martin Van Crevel said Israel had the capability of hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons. "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that this will happen before Israel goes under."ÃÂ **
That's why there'll be no invasion, come a hundred Libertys, and no cutoff from Uncle Sucker, either. You may not consider that threat credible, but I can assure you there are dozens of military intelligence agencies aroundthe world who know better. **
Right again, Il Ragno.
Everybody knows that Israel is nuclear-blackmailing Europe. I listen in to many conversations amongst European executives, and they all know what that "sh*tty little country" is capable of. They all know why and for whom the US gives them - kinsmen and allies - the finger and goes it alone on Iraq. They're talking about it now almost openly. Not quite yet. But I sense something in the air. If NATO breaks apart over this mess then the gloves will be off.
Worse is better, Il Ragno. Maybe, just maybe, this war will do the trick.
Walter
2003-02-12 22:24 | User Profile
American forces should have smashed the Reds in 1945...instead, Morgenthau (and his Zionist brethren whom Roosavelt had welcomed into the power corridor) sat back and enjoyed the rape of Berlin by the communist horde...I have heard speculation that Gen. Patton's staunch resistance to this abominable policy was the primary cause of his falling out with the civillian authorities.