← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Sisyfos
Thread ID: 4800 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2003-02-05
2003-02-05 10:12 | User Profile
This is mainly for the edification of rban and those OD members who think his interest in reviving the glory of Aryan India is insincere or lacking in direction. The recent poll pertaining to the mental stability of our notable fellow is indicia of immaturity and/or lack of understanding of the true nature of his quest and the banner under which he spreads his wisdom. There is method to his apparent madness and once realized all notions of foul play will cease. At the very least, there is no need to be annoyed or pretend to be insulted if you are an Aryan, least of all if you are of Slavic extraction. So let us all get along.
You see rban is an admirer of ancient India, as should be obvious by his enthusiasm and readiness to expound on the merits of the Sanskrit language, the Vedas, and the caste system at every appropriate and not so appropriate (further evidence of enthusiasm) opportunity. Erudite and scholarly-inclined individuals sometimes have difficulty in expressing themselves and it appears that in this instance it falls to a lowly disciple such as myself to lay bare rbanââ¬â¢s position. Accordingly, mistakes in interpretation are mine alone.
Sanskrit is the earliest known language used by Aryans of which written samples survive in relative abundance. Even so, it appears to have originally been a strictly oral language with scripts added considerably later in its history, which made possible the preservation of works such the Vedas. It is indeed the ââ¬Åmother of all European languages,ââ¬Â but our esteemed associate neglected to mention that it is virtually dead, even in India where it was the language of the upper classes, i.e., Brahmins or light-skinned individuals, and became progressively corrupted by infusion of Dravidic and other savage terms over three plus millennia. It remains only as a source of study/amusement and is employed by a handful of scholars worldwide. It has had considerable influence on various languages currently used in the biological cesspool that is India but, predictably, this influence fades along with the degree of melanin.
The following list provides a conventional alphabetic representation of Sanskrit numbers (Vedic being the older variant); flanked by modern examples of Germanic, Slavic and Romance languages respectively.
[list] []English - One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten []Sanskrit - e1ka, dwau, traêyas, catvar, panþca, shash, saptan, ashtau, navan, dacà âa []Vedic Sanskrit - eêkas, dvauê, traêyas, catvaßêras, paênþca, sà ½aêtà ½, saptaê, asà ½tà ½auê, naêva, daêsêa []Czech - jedna, dva, tri, ctyri, pet, sest, sedm, osm, devet, deset [*]French - un, deux, trois, quatre, cinq, six, sept, huit, neuf, dix [/list]
If we stress the all-important first syllable in our comparisons with either Sanskrit language we find seven similar terms for both Czech and French while English yields four relatively close matches (e.g., three, six, seven and nine). Comparisons with German would reveal about six and Spanish would rate seven. Other Slavic languages would also merit about seven, including Russian, which despite its alphabet retains similar sounds with western branch of the Slavic language fork when it comes to expressing numbers. Fellow members are free to look beyond numerical comparisons to gage their linguistic proximity to the one-time pure Aryan/Indian race, the object of our colleagueââ¬â¢s adoration.
Myself, I am especially touched by the persistent displays of reverence bestowed on the originators of the Veda books. The word veda means knowledge in Czech and no spelling alteration is required save an accent over the e. So each time rban speaks ofââ¬Â¦ what is the exact phrasing his Hindu worship is so fond of: ââ¬Åa genetically pure master race,ââ¬Â my eyes become watery and images of lily-white grade school comrades parade about my cerebrum. Frankly, I think the veneration a bit excessive if not embarrassing.
Of course, none of this is remotely close to being conclusive in settling the argument of who is linguistically, to say nothing of genetics, closest to the white band that crossed the Himalayas so long ago. Suffice to say all Aryans are an offshoot of varying degree of that tribe. With this settled, we may now place the balance of rban's meditations into proper perspective:
-As a realist who envisions total supplanting of whites, he advocates the caste system to instil proper breeding habits in whatever remains of the more civilizing elements of our societies.
-Resisting immigration is pointless hence why not focus on importing those with first hand experience of the above system, and who would be more susceptible to support its implementation.
-Any indifference to the welfare of Slavs is mere reverse verbal over-compensation to disguise his reverence for this venerable race, which has had the unenviable duty of bearing the brunt of alien assault on western civilization.
-Perceived lack or respect stems from his interpretation of the apparent helplessness of our situation and self-guilt over inability to offer a historically valid alternative -- a position many of us can sympathize with.
Others can add their own observations of his somewhat maverick though realistic contributions to white nationalist thought, but I must insist on civility and strict avoidance of suggestions pertaining to mental instability. There is after-all no basis for this conclusion once readers transcend the barrier to a new way of thinking.
2003-02-11 00:29 | User Profile
I have been fascinated by the Indo-European language since my teens. The Indo-European words for one to ten looked something like this: oinos, dwo, treis, kwatwer, penkwe, sweks, septm, okto, newn, dekm
Compare Latin: unus, duo, tres, quattuor, quinque, sex, septem, octo, novem, decem.
No one is sure where the original Indo-Europeans lived, but Anatolia seems a likely possibility. That does not mean the people of India and Europe are descended from Anatolians, of course.