← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Samuel
Thread ID: 4661 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2003-01-28
2003-01-28 22:58 | User Profile
This is when we really need some investigative reporting. The normal ZOG sources will not give us the real story of the races of these two but how much do you want to bet that the perp is negro and the victim white (same old story).
I am reminded that Dr. Pierce kept reminding us that the evil forces were brain washing us to accept negro aggression and force us (especially the white women) to be passive.
We as a nation passively await our orders to parade naked before them.
[url=http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/summit/10437499121]http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/...mit/10437499121[/url] 06821.xml
2003-01-28 23:10 | User Profile
Passivity is correct. The non-Whites sense (and all to often) see the timidity of brainwashed Whites. Whites from 60 years ago on back would have killed any non-White for a transgression against a White woman, never mind what they would have done to non-Whites that pull the crap they do today.
2003-01-28 23:14 | User Profile
Bad link. This is it:
[url=http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/summit/1043749912106821.xml]Article[/url]
Woman is made to walk naked before co-workers
01/28/03
Karen Farkas Plain Dealer Reporter
Akron- A U.S. Postal Service manager was forced to disrobe and walk naked in front of about a dozen employees yesterday morning by a colleague who threatened to kill her unless she complied.
Lonnie Wilson, 60, who planned to retire on Friday, is in Summit County Jail, charged with kidnapping, aggravated menacing and gross sexual imposition.
"We have no idea what led to this," Terrence Sullivan, a postal inspector from Cleveland, said. "They didn't work together, and we can't understand why this occurred."
Wilson, of Canton, was a revenue assurance specialist. He worked in a section of offices adjoining a Postal Service encoding facility, where workers type in codes for the destination of handwritten letters that cannot be read by automated machines, Sullivan said.
Wilson had worked for the Postal Service for 24 years and had no prior problems.
The 43-year-old Akron woman worked in the same office area, in marketing, but normally did not interact with him. Sullivan did not know how long she had worked there.
At 8:30 a.m. yesterday, Wilson approached the woman, became angry and said he was going to kill her if she didn't do what he said, according to police reports. He ordered her to disrobe and forced her to walk in front of employees. He also hugged her and told her to kiss him, the report said.
Sullivan said Wilson, at 6 feet 5 and 235 pounds, can be physically intimidating. He did not have a weapon, but employees were scared.
As Wilson left the building, police were arriving. He drove away slowly, followed by police, and was stopped a short distance from the Exeter Avenue building. He is scheduled to be arraigned today in Akron Municipal Court.
Sullivan said Wilson will be placed on administrative leave. The locks to the building have been changed, and he has no access to computers.
Counselors will be available to talk to the woman and the employees.
"We are very concerned about the victim," Sullivan said. "She was not physically harmed, but emotionally she had a very rough day, the first of some rough days."
**how much do you want to bet that the perp is negro and the victim white (same old story). **
No thanks, that's a bet I would lose. Maybe 3 to one the victim is white, but I lay it 9-to-1 the attacker is black.
2003-01-29 00:59 | User Profile
Well Wintermute, I took your advise. I will let all of you know what she says.
Karen,
I was shocked about the incident you reported on. I thought that the article was very well written and wondered if their might be some political or racial overtones here. You did not state the race of Wilson (the soon to be retired, alleged perpetrator) and the victim.
Obviously there was more going on here than just sexual exploitation. Were they both of the same race? If not did a white man make a woman of color disrobe?
Samuel Owens
2003-01-29 01:20 | User Profile
My money's on Karen ducking this, deftly.
For instance if this is- as we mostly feel - a towel attendant/white woman pairing, she can pirouette out of hot water by responding to your specific question, "did a white man make a woman of color disrobe?" with a simple "no".
2003-01-29 02:14 | User Profile
Heeeeere's Lonnie:
[url=http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_fullstory.asp?id=2272]http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_fullstory.asp?id=2272[/url]
2003-01-29 02:30 | User Profile
Wintermute - The nature of the act, and the name "Lonnie," made it nearly a sure thing that the perp was black. That the woman is white is probable, but black males have little compunction in humiliating or abusing their own women. She might have been black.
2003-01-29 11:45 | User Profile
Wintermute,
That is sage advice. While it might be emotionally satisfying to give someone both barrels, one will only guarantee that the truth won`t ever come to the surface. At least the method you propose could at least cause the target to inadvertly give out information to the writer, if not causing him to modify his style to be more honest in these matters.
2003-01-29 14:55 | User Profile
I'm not 100% sure of that.
If you accuse - soberly and respectfully, not stridently - a reporter of hiding the race info when it's black on white, and leading the story with same when it's white on black....and they happen to be doing just that with the item in question.... it stings them with truth.
They may not fess up to you, may call you a 'hater', but neither could they risk printing your letter and their response. Because the truth has teeth that can't be pulled, only gagged with a retainer; and the truth hurts.
Remember that the scandal of our time ain't that the truth is not known...but that it may not be spoken.
The reason why the small child is the hero of "The Emperor's New Clothes" isn't because he Jewishly connived anyone into an inadvertant admission, but because he spoke - and acknowledged - the bloody-obvious, hand-in-front-of-your-face truth with neither malice or affectation toward anyone. He simply noticed what was happening; out loud, without fear or machination.
Had you simply asked this "Karen", "Was the assailant in this case black, and his victim white?" sure you might've received "Why do you ask? Why do you, or anyone, need to know this? I think you are a racist, sir" as a reply....well, I drool at the thought of the propaganda value of an email transmission from a journalist chiding the public for requesting all the facts.
Disseminate that exchange throughout the WWW and a few more fence-sitters topple our way. But don't think for a minute you can out-Jew the Jew with Jewish tactics. White folks simply aren't made that way; it's not innate with us.
Stick to simple yes-or-no questions. As Wintermute said, no ranting; no editorializing; no thorny detours. But I wouldn't pretend to be a nog, or a landsman, or a Chomskyite self-hating white if you are none of these things.
Set the best example by being as straightforward as possible. You may 'secure a little abuse', like Sert's sig suggests, but you will have also secured the high ground in the battle for the hearts and minds of our own.
2003-01-30 00:28 | User Profile
I would like to pass a nude negro law. When out in public, all negroes must be nude, weather permitting. There should not be much negro opposition to this proposal, being that it supports african cultural values and takes them back to their roots. If this law is successful and I think it will be, it should be extended to include arabs as well.