← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Nor cal.skiN

Thread 4590

Thread ID: 4590 | Posts: 2 | Started: 2003-01-24

Wayback Archive

Nor cal.skiN [OP]

2003-01-24 03:29 | User Profile

Ok, I know all about the Globalist agenda, so don't bother. I will say that as an American Revolutionary, who is opposed to both parties, I guess I still prefer the Jew backed GOP, Over the Jew backed Left-wing who are marxists. I have voted Republican for the best possible outcome, if you no what I mean. But if there is ever a chance for a Independent I would change.

Anyway, I also don't want to get in to the "There is only one party in America" claim, could be true though. And again, As I realize, Like alot of you, that Israel is the motive of the Iraq war, However, in my opinion, its not the only one.

Alot of Nationalists want to give up on America, and thats there decision. I myself, will never retreat, I will fight and die for the greatest White founded country to ever exist, not too mention the country my GrandFather fought for. Nor will I even consider surrendering the Worlds largest Nuke warhead stock pile on the planet to a bunch of Foreign ideologies.

With that being said, Regarding Iraq, I believe that this is a strategic move by the Pentagon to seize the resources for the future War with Red China. Do your Homework, and you will find that this was Hitler's intention in order to win the war, only he intended to fight with the Iraqis, not against them. Albert Speer refers to this plan of Hitler's it in his book 'Spandau'.

With a large enough Military force in the region, the USA will control the otherwise easily captured oil by the Reds. Heres some other sinister facts regarding The Peoples Republic Of Red China.- Nor cal.skiN

[img]http://www.hitler.org/art/breker/predestination-thumb.jpg[/img]

North Korea a Nuclear Stooge for China? Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com Friday, Jan. 17, 2003 WASHINGTON – A former high-ranking intelligence officer says China may be building up North Korea’s nuclear strength to threaten the U.S. away from its commitment to protect Taiwan from Red China’s attempted takeover. He warns the United States to bear in mind that much of the deadly threat from rogue states can be traced to Chinese-instigated nuclear proliferation. “Beijing’s willingness to sell and transfer critical components of WMD [weapons of mass destruction] technology makes China directly or indirectly a key component of the global proliferation of nuclear and missile technology,” according to Thomas Woodrow, onetime senior analyst at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).

In a report prepared for the Jamestown Foundation, Woodrow informs us that though "Beijing may have had its political reasons for assisting Pakistan and North Korea, in doing so, it has opened the Pandora’s box of regional nuclear arms race.”

Apparently, other nations are taking note of this. Some have reacted by accelerating or contemplating their own nuclear buildups:

The Indian Defense Ministry, for example, has publicly stated it sees China as India’s “primary strategic threat.” Thus, New Delhi is designing its longer-range Agni missiles specifically for nuclear deterrence against China.

Caught in a Pacific neighborhood threatened by Chinese and North Korean nuclear and missile efforts, Japan, the one nation in the world with firsthand experience at being on the wrong end of a nuclear attack, will “undoubtedly” activate its own nascent nuclear weapons program, possibly devoting some of its launches from Kagashima to military purposes.

South Korea already has “a half-hidden” missile program under way.

Taiwan – Free China, constantly threatened by the mainland communist behemoth – developed medium-range missiles in the 1980s and was well on its way toward nuclear capability. But then the U.S., desiring the role of peacemaker, pressured it to stop some 20 years ago. Now, Taipei will likely rethink its need for a nuclear deterrent. The nuke race is spreading also to hostile anti-U.S. states such Iran, Libya and Syria. Our Saudi 'Ally'

Then there is Saudi Arabia, which Woodrow believes may be funding much of Pakistan’s missile and nuclear efforts and could become a nuclear power overnight through an airlift of missiles. Saudia Arabia, though vowing its alliance with the U.S., has been a source of support for the al-Qaeda terrorist apparatus. Taking stock of all of this proliferation, one has to ask: Why is Beijing willing to help create the regional instability it claims it wants to avoid? After all, it could be fulfilling its own paranoia of encirclement as Asia worries over Beijing’s penchant for throwing its economic and military weight around. (See NewsMax series on Harry Wu’s book “Troublemaker.” Also previous article on Chinese relations with North Korea.)

The Jamestown Foundation study attributes this “mostly” to political blundering, “spurred on by “shortsighted greed.”

Then again – attention, U.S. policymakers! – “Perhaps Beijing plans to use Pyongyang as a lever against Washington in the event of a decision to launch an attack against Taipei.”

Whatever the motivation, China’s rampant proliferation of WMD has created an arms race “that cannot now be stopped.”

Beijing will soon “reap the rewards of its ill-considered policies.” That will come when India, Japan and South Korea accelerate or reactivate indigenous missile and nuclear weapons programs.

Sertorius

2003-01-26 09:58 | User Profile

Norcal,

The biggest problem that I see is that the govt. we have isn`t nationalist, so anything the U.S. does in that region is unfortunately tied to Israel and the multinationals. I believe Red China is a threat, but for now it is a long term one. For the benefit of those who have forgotten, the deputy chief of Red Chinese Intelligence made a veiled threat in 1995 to nuke L.A. if the U.S. interferred in any attempt by the P.R.C. to "reunify" China. (I wonder where the loudmouths of Neo-condom are when it comes to this??)

Right now Red China is engage in a very big military build up. I believe they are spending around 10% of their G.D.P. on weapons. If the U.S. wants to keep Red China from becoming a threat it would quit buying so much junk from them. In short, it is the American consumer who is funding this. By not doing this and instead moving industry to China to take advantage of the cheap labor the U.S. is not only doing what it did to turn the U.S.S.R. into a threat, but much worse by destroying the manufacturing sector that we would need if we ever got into a fight with them.

The P.R.C. does need oil, it has gone from being self sufficent to being an oil importer. That is the main reason they are mucking around in the Sudan. Unfortunately for them to try to get at the Middle East oil they need a blue water navy, which they don`t have unless Wall Street sells them that too. Overland routes would be a logistical nightmare for them, not to mention the problem of moving the crude to China.

I think that the other reason the U.S. is going into Iraq is due to our balance of trade. We import around $500 billion worth of goods a year and we arent exporting near enough to offset that. Right now the last thing they are even thinking about in my opinion, is Red China. Our beloved business community wouldnt allow the interest of this country to interfer with them and I think that we are getting dangerously dependent for too many goods from China to have that supply interrupted.

These people we have running the show arent very good long term planners that I have seen in terms of foreign policy. The only thing they can do really well is screw up a nations domestic politics as they have done with America. I see what you are saying here, but I don`t think they have the brains or the inclination to view it in this manner.