← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · toddbrendanfahey
Thread ID: 4532 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2003-01-20
2003-01-20 03:05 | User Profile
and here
& this just made the headline-slot of WorldNetDaily.com, which means Drudge and NewsMax will run with it.
Gonna be hard (no pun intended) for Mr. Ritter to deny the charges or in any way go on with his life until this distraction is dealt with meaningfully. Might be his last few seconds of fame...
2003-01-20 03:58 | User Profile
What do you want to bet that the DA (Clyne) is a jew. This goddamn gestapo govt will stop at nothing to discredit anyone who disagrees with their war-mongering and killing of innocent people.
2003-01-20 04:08 | User Profile
Misdemeanor talking-to-a-girl charge, huh. And never followed through on.
Isn't it odd how paperwork on old 'crimes' can suddenly materialize at opportune moments, in the hands of people who know just what to do with it? The political universe and the real universe clearly have different physical laws.
2003-01-20 07:14 | User Profile
Todd,
I heard Drudge bring this up. I didnt believe it then and after reading the articles I dont believe it now. In short, bullshit.
Lately I have noted that child porn charges seem to be the fad to accuse someone of and I have a damn good idea where this story originated and why.
2003-01-20 07:20 | User Profile
**Lately I have noted that child porn charges seem to be the fad to accuse someone of and I have a damn good idea where this story originated and why. **
NY Daily News, Zuckerman's rag
[url=http://www.nydailynews.com/01-19-2003/news/story/52750p-49424c.html]UN's Ritter faced sex rap[/url]
The War Party will run with this one. Character assasination is their specialty.
2003-01-20 07:26 | User Profile
Centinel,
Thats right. I wouldnt be surprised to see a retraction a few days later buried in the paper. By then the damage to his reputation will be done. This "story" makes me think of that article about the Mossad going after "terrorists," i.e., anyone who the Israelis dislike.
URL for the NY Daily News smear.
[url=http://www.nydailynews.com/01-19-2003/news/story/52750p-49424c.html]http://www.nydailynews.com/01-19-2003/news...50p-49424c.html[/url]
Mort Zuckerman-- C.F.R. member and Zionist.
2003-01-21 23:36 | User Profile
Every sixteen year old girl on the internet talking sex with an adult is a cop. I'm really amazed at the time the police spend enticing people into imaginary crimes when there are so many real crimes they overlook.
2003-01-22 00:10 | User Profile
Originally posted by wintermute@Jan 21 2003, 18:03 ** > **Every sixteen year old girl on the internet talking sex with an adult is a cop. **
Sixteen year old girl cops? That's very exciting.
Why no Aaron Spelling TV tie in?
Wintermute **
That's pretty funny.
:D
2003-01-22 11:14 | User Profile
This is absolute horses*it, but it's not without merit. Remember that - a few years back - Ritter was found to be useful to Jewish interests and lionized from coast to coast.
This is what Jewish 'friendship' counts for the day your usefulness stops.
PS They will not only seek the one-and-done dismissal of their enemies - but the negation of every word ever uttered, every thought ever set down in print by same. For years, the m.o was the "Nazi/racist" smear, but its value has diminished with the overkill of repetition.
Then last year it looked like the all-purpose "terrorist" was set to replace it (had the Saudis offered us a cure for cancer a year ago, a phalanx of attack-goys eager to secure their financial futures would've leaped at any such benefactor's throat) except that - as competent investigative journalists have shown us - dogged tracking of the spoor of 'terrorism' will inevitably lead you to the sulfur-pits of Our Only Democratic Ally In The MidEast.
But "child sex"/"child molesting" is perfect. It's the rubber hammer on the knee that rolls down ALL the storm doors on reflex. The best thing is it doesn't even have to be proven ('member all them 'Satanist day care centers' of the 80s? Man, they were handing out 99-year sentences like f*in' door prizes!) This is where controlling the media really comes in handy! Just get the allegation out there, in print, in a few select outlets, and bet the ranch that the cloud will permanently follow your victim no matter how many retractions you print on page 31, section B, column 5!
Raimondo's take:
TARGET: SCOTT RITTER The War Party gets ugly
Scott Ritter, the former UN weapons inspector who quit in 1998 and now says the U.S. is intent on manufacturing phony "evidence" of arms violations as a pretext for war, is the victim of what may be the sleaziest set-up job in recent history, a smearing so foul that it makes the Clinton crowd look like a bunch of amateurs. The news that he may have been arrested, in June 2001, as the result of an internet sex sting, in which an undercover cop posing as a sixteen-year-old girl lured him into "sex chat" over the internet, came to light in a very strange way. A local newspaper, the Daily Gazette, of Schenectady, New York, was first to pick up the dirt, which apparently came to light when an assistant district attorney was fired for settling the case and not informing the D.A. According to the Gazette:
"Police and prosecutors have declined to discuss the case, which involved at least one class B misdemeanor, because it was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal and ordered sealed by a Colonie Town Court justice. The Daily Gazette's request for access to the arrest report was denied by the Colonie town attorney's office, which ruled disclosure was barred under the state Freedom of Information Law."
So the police just happened to conduct a "sex sting" operation against the one man who had exposed the lies of our war-mad rulers from the inside. On the eve of war, as hundreds of thousands protest in the streets, this staunch Republican and solid family man who has become one of the War Party's most formidable enemies is suddenly "exposed" as a child molester.
Since the court records have been sealed, and the case was merely "adjourned in contemplation of dismissal," the authorities will say nothing, at least in public. The entrapment was apparently so transparent, so obviously the clumsiest sort of Cointelpro-style operation badly bungled by our newly-empowered political police, that the charges were dropped to the legal equivalent of a traffic ticket. Could it be that the records were sealed not to protect Ritter, but to protect whomever tried to set him up?
Anybody who doesn't believe that Ritter was specifically targeted on account of his political activities needs to seek help: that sort of naivete can be terminal, and the patient probably shouldn't be trusted to cross the street unattended.
In the post-9/11 era of the "Patriot" Act and the Office of Total Information Awareness, what is happening to Ritter is meant as a warning to anyone who dares oppose this government. Former UN inspectors, it seems, are a special target. Remember that other inspector, Jack McGeorge, also an American, who was "outed" as being a member of a sado-masochistic "advocacy" organization? Just as our war birds were wailing in bitter disappointment that the inspections process would delay or maybe even derail themuch anticipated bloodbath, suddenly one of the inspectors is "exposed" as a sadomasochist. The point was not to somehow prove that this made him unfit for the job, but simply to degrade him, to make the experience so painful that he would immediately withdraw ââ¬â which is precisely what happened.
There's nothing at all fishy about a "sealed" court record leaked to reporters, complete with an alleged "mug shot" of Ritter broadcast on television and republished by MSNBC. It's all a coincidence that this comes out just as the war crisis reaches its climax ââ¬â or anti-climax ââ¬â and the administration is desperate to come up with a half-way convincing rationale for war. What are you ââ¬â a conspiracy theorist? Everybody knows the U.S. government is inherently and constitutionally incapable of pulling off such a dirty rotten lowdown trick. After all, isn't that why they hate us ââ¬â because we're so wonderfully "free?" Free to be spied on; free to be set-up and smeared if we defy the powers-that-be; "free" to be entrapped by cyber-cops who randomly chose the single most convincing opponent of the War Party to snare in a web of deception.
The reaction to this is really a sight to behold. The same "conservative" movement that reveled and rolled around in the muck of the Clinton years like a pig in a deluxe pen, luxuriating in the filth that bubbled up like a perpetual hot bath, is all abuzz. With all the defiant malignity of Lucianne Goldberg and her son, what's-his-name, rolling the latest Clintonian dirtball around on their tongues as if it were the last bon bon in the box, they are drooling over this one. (Look at bottom-feeder Jonah Goldberg lap it up.)
It's sickening, really, to even contemplate what is going on here, but we should look at this ugliness full in the face. Because in forcing ourselves to see it, we can see the War Party ââ¬â the gang of lying, thieving, conniving thugs with delusions of grandeur who dominate this administration ââ¬â in its essence.
Look on the face of evil, and, if you don't turn to stone, remember it well. Because this what we're up against, in America: an evil that is almost demonic in its pure malevolence, a dark destructive spirit that feeds on pain and is animated by the will to crush its enemies underfoot. This is the face of an enemy that must be defeated.
ââ¬â Justin Raimondo
2003-01-22 11:25 | User Profile
But "child sex"/"child molesting" is perfect.
The media laid the ground work for this last year by harping on the Catholic priest scandals, which seemed to conveniently come to light around the time of the after-Passover offensive in the West Bank.
2003-01-28 15:38 | User Profile
Sadly most sixteen year old girls talking sex on the net are probably really sixteen year olds. The cops are among the 14 an 15 year old because that is a much more serious crime. In many states 16 is the age of consent.
They have people on the news all the time who agreed to have sex with 15 year old girls who were cops pretending to be 15 year olds. Sadly many of those arrested are ones who met with actual 15 year old girls and they were caught because the girls' parents found out.
If you go on yahoo chat, it's full of teenagers asking to see each other naked on their webcams and doing sex talk.
2003-01-28 18:17 | User Profile
I wonder how often it occurs that one cop posing as a teenager picks up another cop posing as a teenager. When they meet, do they try to arrest each other, or just go out for a beer and a laugh?
I know they're supposed to let the other party make all the advances, so as to skirt around entrapment laws, but if that were so, they would probably drop fewer of these cases.
[PS: Wintermute, is it my imagination or did your avatar... move slightly to the left? That's creepy.]