← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Faust
Thread ID: 4022 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2002-12-15
2002-12-15 08:42 | User Profile
Council of Conservative Citizens FAQ
Council of Conservative Citizens [url=http://www.cofcc.org/]http://www.cofcc.org/[/url]
What is the Council of Conservative Citizens?
The C of CC was founded as a non-profit organization to work for the rights and collective interests of true conservatives. Whether the issue is social, cultural, legal, ideological, or governmental, the C of CC stands for ideals put forth by the Founding Fathers. These ideals are anathema to the sprawling, socialistic bureaucracy that controls America.
The C of CC opposes government sponsored race preference programs (e.g . affirmative action, quotas, forced integration) that are bestowed on nonwhites and other preferred minorities at taxpayer expense. The C of CC also stands against the tide of nonwhite, Third World immigrants swamping this country.
How does the C of CC differ from other conservative groups?
The C of CC is different from most conservative groups because the Council concentrates political activity at the local level. The Council is also not afraid to speak out on racial problems. To a large extent, soft conservatives and so-called "neo-conservatives" have embraced the legacy of Martin Luther King and the civil rights movement. Nowadays, the average "conservative" policy maker thinks and acts like a bleeding heart liberal from 1963.
Why is the C of CC "race conscious"?
Most of the issues addressed by the C of CC and its local chapters have nothing to do with race. But, on some issues, such as forced busing, quotas and immigration, the Council does indeed speak out for white European-Americans, their civilization, faith and form of government, but we do not advocate or support the oppression or exploitation of other races or ethnic groups.
The fact is that race influences politics, society, and culture. The great explorations, scientific discoveries, inventions, literature, art, and architecture encompassed by Western Civilization have no rival anywhere in the world. The C of CC recognizes that European Christian heritage is essential for the survival of our standard of living and way of life. There is no acceptable substitute for the civilization that has evolved through the Greeks, Romans, Celts, and Anglo-Saxons.
Is the C of CC a racist hate group?
Various leftwing outfits like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), have branded the C of CC as a racist hate group. Not true. The C of CC advocates and promotes the legitimate causes of European-Americans. Often, support for these causes bring the Council into conflict with the aforementioned groups.
However, the real reason powerful Leftwing operations attack the is because the Council has been politically effective on the local, state, and national levels.
Despite sometimes powerful opposition, the C of CC has been singularly effective in thwarting many schemes by leftwing militants to rob white Americans of their rights and heritage. The C of CC is recognized as the most effective group fighting to keep the Confederate flag at the South Carolina capital and to keep the Mississippi state flag intact. The C of CC has always been at the forefront of the battle to protect Southern heritage.
Does the C of CC oppose racism?
The word racism was concocted by a communist ideologue in the 1920's. The purpose of racism was to instill guilt and shame in the minds of white people and to inflame racial hostility among blacks. This word play succeeded beyond all expectations. Of course, the word racism has no meaning unless whites react to it. Because racism defines nothing, but instead generates dubious connotations, the C of CC refuses to be held hostage by what the word implies at any given moment. It is normal for white people to be proud of their race and heritage, is that racist?
Council of Conservative Citizens Home Page [url=http://www.cofcc.org/]http://www.cofcc.org/[/url]
2003-01-15 03:20 | User Profile
I am deeply disturbed by the CCC's attack on the validity of the notion of racisim. I would never want to be associated with such a group. At a time when anti-white racist policies are every where to be found in the West, giving up on the term 'racisism' is far from wise. It also makes the CCC look like racists fanatics. This is too bad, because they could be an important force in white nationalism.
2003-01-15 05:17 | User Profile
Let us not forget that the very word "Racism" was made up by Leon Trotsky!
THE NEW DARK AGE- The Frankfurt School and "Political Correctness" The Frankfurt School and "PC" [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=11&t=1458&hl=the+new+dark+age]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...he+new+dark+age[/url]
More Marxsim: "Mainstreaming Hate" SPLC on William Lind and Paul Weyrich [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=3&t=3589&hl=racism,or,racist]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...acism,or,racist[/url]
"The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow" More Marxist Trash from PBS! [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=11&t=3508&hl=racism,or,racist]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...acism,or,racist[/url]
So What If Thurmond (Or Goldwater) Had Won? By Sam Francis Vdare.com [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=3&t=4868&hl=racism,or,racist]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...acism,or,racist[/url]
What We Have Learned From the Lott Affair by M. A. Grissom (www.cofcc.org) [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=3&t=4913&hl=]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...&f=3&t=4913&hl=[/url]
Frankfurt School Neocons Freeper Zionists Show Their Roots [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=4589&hl=]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...&f=8&t=4589&hl=[/url]
"Racism" Debate, Jared Taylor vs. Carol Swain [url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=6&t=4098&hl=]http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php...&f=6&t=4098&hl=[/url]
2003-01-15 20:45 | User Profile
CoCC was recommended to me when I inquired about a "safe" pro-White group to get involved with. Problem is, there's no such thing. Pro-White, or the White Nationalist position, is outlaw to begin with. It's an impossible sell in a democracy because you're essentially saying (at least I am when I speak as a White Nationalist), "I don't care a whit about blacks, Jews, Hispanics, etc. I care about Whites, and only Whites. I don't mean your group harm, I just honestly don't care what happens to it. That's your business." Totally revolutionary. No way around it, really. Where I once opposed affirmative action on the grounds that all persons are presumed equal, I now support it --- only for Whites, not anyone else.
On the other hand, I don't see White Revolution happening tomorrow, because Whites are so scattered and scared. So working within the system now is an imperative. Get those brushfires started in men's minds, gentlemen.
2003-01-16 00:53 | User Profile
'It's an impossible sell in a democracy because you're essentially saying (at least I am when I speak as a White Nationalist), "I don't care a whit about blacks, Jews, Hispanics, etc. I care about Whites, and only Whites. I don't mean your group harm, I just honestly don't care what happens to it. That's your business."'
Well, this might be how you understand white nationalism, but I don't think this has much to do with white nationalism has to be about, or ought to be about. One can honestly care about what happens to other groups while still putting the white race first.
2003-01-16 11:34 | User Profile
Darkeddy --
Have you read The End of Racism by D'nesh D'sousa?
2003-01-16 16:54 | User Profile
I absolutely loathe D'sousa and his radical attempts to end the white race. Thus I haven't gotten his book. I hope to look it over someday.
2003-01-16 20:22 | User Profile
"One can honestly care about what happens to other groups while still putting the white race first."
Yes, within the sphere of your mind, out of the corner of your eye, in the same way that I hope that car wreck I pass on the highway didn't have any fatalities. How, exactly, will this "care" about other races manifest itself? I don't wish unnecessary harm to other races, but I don't consider myself under any obligation to care about them because 1) they hate my guts and either want me dead or to pick my pockets and 2) it would be unrealistic and unworkable in any event. My belief is that the outer limits of charity are the outer limits of my race, for the same reasons I get along best with members of my own race: that's where the empathy lies. Benevolence ends at Camdentown. Extension beyond that is overextension. Put another way, it's good for me to spend time with my cousin's children, but it would be absurd for me to try to play toy cars with every kid in the state. See what I'm saying? Don't fool yourself. Nobody cares about Whites, not even Whites, as it stands now. It's easy for people to reflect on their one-on-one personal relationships with members of other races and say, "hey, I care about black people." Yes, if you saw your black officemate trip and fall, you're on your honor to stop and help him up. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the broader social swirls, the ones that lead to laws, government policies, the building of neighborhoods, the levying of taxes, the patrolling of borders and so on. Jews have taken the quite commendable spirit of human brotherhood and stretched it beyond recognition, a stretching that both benefits them as a group and disorients Whites. Protest, and you're an evil "neo-Nazi." Thus will it ever be so. Mark my words, friends. Jews aren't going to wake up tomorrow and say, "you know, maybe those White Nationalists are on to something. Maybe we should back down." Nor will blacks wake up and say, "the free ride we've been getting needs to come to an end. Let's pack up our stuff and move to Africa so that the Whites can have the nation they seem to want." Our racial extrication may, if it comes about, not be the horror some imagine, but I gather someone's gonna smart, somewhere, somehow. Hell, I'm willing it be me, if that means my White ancestors lead the racially sane national life I have been denied. But if others take a hit, that's too damn bad. The stakes here are too high for me to take any other position, and if anyone out there proposes that there's a St. Christopher version of White Nationalism that cradles the other races of the world in our brawny arms and carries them over the river to safety, I'll have trouble taking you seriously.
But I'll listen to what you have to say.
2003-01-16 23:41 | User Profile
When I say it is possible for a white nationalist to care about other races, I mean that we ought to recognize the moral worth of other humans, an attempt to solve our problems within the bounds of such recognition.
In the future, it may be possible for a white person to genetically engineer a virus that kills off all non-whites, but does not affect whites. My point is that it is possible to care enough about non-whites to not want this fate to befall them--this isn't maybe a gushing, emotion care, but one that recognizes our common humanity.
Likewise, part of why I want to see taxes lowered and the welfare state abolished is because I think this will help blacks. If I didn't think this, I might not support such moves. But this hardly a 'St. Christopher' approach.
My point is basically a Christian one, and perhaps a philosophical one. You are right if you imply that putting whites first might feel to non-white as if one doesn't care about them. But it is important to remember the boundaries of one's commitments to one's own race, even if one never actually bumps against them.