← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · PaleoconAvatar

Thread 4005

Thread ID: 4005 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2002-12-13

Wayback Archive

PaleoconAvatar [OP]

2002-12-13 20:31 | User Profile

The table of National IQ's can be found here:

[url=http://fp.rlynn.plus.com/pages/article_intelligence/t4.htm]http://fp.rlynn.plus.com/pages/article_int...lligence/t4.htm[/url]

Some quick samples:

United States 98 Mexico 87 India 81 [color=red]rban take note![/color] Israel 94 Russia 96 Japan 105 New Zealand 100 United Kingdom 100 Italy 102 Zimbabwe 66 South Africa 72 Germany 102 Austria 102 China 100 Cuba 85 Australia 98 N. Korea 105 S. Korea 106 Switzerland 101 Poland 99

I assume that the U.S. figure factors in Blacks, Hispanics, and the like--the millstone around our national neck. Sadly, this country seems to be playing "how low can you go?" with its genetic capital and is endangering its biological future.

Sisyfos

2002-12-13 22:53 | User Profile

The master (RPO) noted decades ago that the human genetic material of this continent around the year 2050 would consist of “half-a-billion coffee coloured mongrels content in their squalor.” Absence immediate drastic measures -- this prediction is sure to stand. Brazil’s 87 is as fair answer as any to how low you can go. More bluntly, picture the denizens of “inner cities” as being representative of the whole country. PeleoconAvatar and I will likely live long enough to see it, and watch our children attempt to raise their families in it.

A good resource site, but I take issue with Math and Science numbers for Asians in Table 1 as being meaningful to measures of potential or raw intelligence (i.e., what you do when you don’t know). My trips to libraries in evenly split Asian/White municipalities yield a consistent 8:2 ration of youngsters of said races. Significantly, the Asians are the only ones seen working out problems from school texts. We are not losing. We are committing suicide. :(

PaleoconAvatar

2002-12-13 23:25 | User Profile

Originally posted by Sisyfos@Dec 13 2002, 18:53 **The master (RPO) noted decades ago that the human genetic material of this continent around the year 2050 would consist of “half-a-billion coffee coloured mongrels content in their squalor.” Absence immediate drastic measures -- this prediction is sure to stand. Brazil’s 87 is as fair answer as any to how low you can go. More bluntly, picture the denizens of “inner cities” as being representative of the whole country. PeleoconAvatar and I will likely live long enough to see it, and watch our children attempt to raise their families in it.

A good resource site, but I take issue with Math and Science numbers for Asians in Table 1 as being meaningful to measures of potential or raw intelligence (i.e., what you do when you don’t know). My trips to libraries in evenly split Asian/White municipalities yield a consistent 8:2 ration of youngsters of said races. Significantly, the Asians are the only ones seen working out problems from school texts. We are not losing. We are committing suicide. :(**

                You're right, Sisyfos. Revilo P. Oliver is the master, and as correct as he is, I hope this prediction of his doesn't come true.

For interested OD readers, here's the official RPO website which archives many of his articles and even audio files of his speeches you can listen to:

[url=http://revilo-oliver.com/]http://revilo-oliver.com/[/url]

il ragno

2002-12-15 04:49 | User Profile

Asians are proof that racial homogeneity works. I've read all kinds of nonsense that whites create; Asians merely memorize, and I politely submit that nativism without realism is foolishness.

Asians have resisted the inroads of Jewish scheisskultur, 'diversity' and the Mongrel Agenda, thus they have remained both fecund & productive. Even their intermarriage rates are disproportionately with whites rather than blacks or mestizos. If you don't think that makes a huge difference, you haven't been paying attention. While no group can remain wholly immune to the siren song of Yahweh's media, I wish whites showed the insularity of Asians. They don't have to worry about 80% of their own people serving them up to Pinchas Pilate.

Sisyfos

2002-12-16 01:45 | User Profile

**I politely submit that nativism without realism is foolishness. **

This is sound advice at any time.

**I've read all kinds of nonsense that whites create; Asians merely memorize, **

I thought we were discussing IQ scores only, and not some subset that IQ tests fancy they measure. But I will take that “nonsense” and submit (with equal politeness) that it is not entirely devoid of sense.

Imagine that public usage of your “scheisskultur” had grown wide enough for it to be included in a decent English dictionary and that the word found its way on some test deemed to measure intelligence and two Anglos had to pick from a provided list of definitions. While no candidate read the whole dictionary, chap A studied some German so he circled the correct answer in a second. Lad B, never having cracked a German text in his life, was baffled. Then he noticed that the part starting with the second syllable was the phonetic equivalent of an English word. Taxing his cerebrum further, he remembered seeing a film staring Matt Damon in the role of an assassin and a Gypsy girl pretending to be a German and his love interest. The Zhidwood dung did not bother with furnishing subtitles for the words that kept escaping from her unladylike mouth. But Lad B noted that she had a favourite for situations for which an English word starting with the same letter seemed fitting. He circled the same as Chap A and moved on, but only after 60 seconds.

Of the two Anglos, only Lad B may be said to have entered into some realm of creativity while answering. Some say IQ tests only measure how well one does on an IQ test. Others say that the assessment of some combination of verbal, logic, gestalt and math-type performance yields a valid approximation of raw intelligence or g. I have no problems accepting the latter, provided that words like approximation are used for disarming. This is necessary, especially when discussing vague qualities like creativity. Unless, one accepts that the honorary Aryan Richard Feynman’s index of creativity is around the 80th percentile.

As well as working suckers, the SAT/GRT prep industry does render some legitimate aid to committed students by furnishing study materials. Improvement by as much as a standard deviation is not atypical. Commitment and study is key. Hence my original comments on the meaningfulness of the 6-point spread between whites and far eastern types.

It is what I draw from a humble study of history, understanding of standard deviation, and, most importantly, close and prolonged personal contact. The stated ratio for library attendance (filled with meaningful study v. reading a newspaper/novel) is real and verifiable. It represents a tip of the iceberg. As a thoroughly indoctrinated adolescent I have spent time in the homes of several Asian friends and can attest to the emphasis placed on doing well in school. Math was heavily pushed (gatekeeper of the Sciences and all) and no child dared cite poor language skills as an excuse to demanding parents. The pressure to perform was far above to what I (an immigrant kid) received from my parents, to say nothing of the laissez-faire attitude I witnessed in the homes of most indigenous white friends.

I do not believe that the Asian subjects were representative of their respective populations – not for a second. Scribbles of “random samples” and “avoiding contamination” are meaningless when talking about studies impacting national pride of communist states. Was the launching of Sputnik representative of progress of other sectors of Soviet society? Koreans and Japanese are no different in this “showcase” aspect of nationalism, though I concede that traditional schooling (discipline & drill) sufficed to account for their high scores, and that no “preparations” were needed. Lest we forget: Only the West flaunts its leprosy; the rest of the globe keeps it hidden (Guardian article of “bagging Nazis” comes to mind).

My original comments concerned Table 1 scores only, and I made no mention of creativity. Again, there is no point in discussing something utterly non-quantifiable, except to say that when it comes to scientific breakthroughs, history reveals a tendency for whites to “get there first.” In the spirit of realism I will call this evidence -- circumstantial.

**Asians have resisted the inroads of Jewish scheisskultur, 'diversity' and the Mongrel Agenda, thus they have remained both fecund & productive. Even their intermarriage rates are disproportionately with whites rather than blacks or mestizos. If you don't think that makes a huge difference, you haven't been paying attention. While no group can remain wholly immune to the siren song of Yahweh's media, I wish whites showed the insularity of Asians. They don't have to worry about 80% of their own people serving them up to Pinchas Pilate. **

Sadly, this is very true. It would be interesting to see how the Asian insularity would hold up against the full brunt of Jewish filth, which seems destined to be Whitey’s penance. Pound away on the samurai’s authority at home and abuse his sense of honour at work. Encourage independence, careerism and profligacy in his better half. Let his smiling daughter stand next to the savage in every background shot (except when the central theme renders it redundant), of every show, of every timeslot, of every network on the tube. Would suicide rates increase? Then again, you can say that the strength to keep out invaders is evidence of intelligence itself. Aye. But we shall see once the bulk of the vampires finish with their western corpse and seek nourishment in whatever remains of civilization.

BTW, do not judge too harshly my liberal use of insults to describe other hominids, for one of my chief reasons for being here is to vent. Thought crimes are no fiction out my way.

PaleoconAvatar

2002-12-16 02:04 | User Profile

Only the West flaunts its leprosy; the rest of the globe keeps it hidden (Guardian article of “bagging Nazis” comes to mind).

I caught that article, if you're talking about the one I think you are involving the liberal gay guy who seduced a Muslim and a Nazi. I thought his argument was absurd--it basically went, "homophobes' are wrong because gays are everywhere." If I reversed the terms of his argument and said that homophobes are right because homophobes are everywhere, he'd say that their omnipresence doesn't make them correct. If so, then why is the omnipresence of gays seen as an argument in favor of homosexuality by his crowd?

I mean, heck, the common cold is everywhere too. How long until that virus gets the same civil rights as the AIDS virus apparently has?

Sisyfos

2002-12-16 03:02 | User Profile

Yes, the one posted by il ragno a couple days back. The article had no purpose other than to advertise the extent of the writer’s degeneracy and to furnish further proof that the ownership of the rag is bent on contributing to the coming demise. Hell, if I read it correctly, in some places it would be tantamount to admission of rape.

Sodomites will always be around, but for a society to encourage the growth of their numbers, by calling the perversion normal and a lifestyle choice, is to announce that an agreement with the undertaker has been signed.

Queer + queer = 0 progeny Queer + straight = 0 progeny Queer + queer + adoptee = greater likelihood mature adoptee = queer Queer + straight + adoptee = greater likelihood mature adoptee = queer

APPLIED COMPLEX VARIABLES, ITZ

eric von zipper

2002-12-16 14:33 | User Profile

Zimbabwe 66!!!!!!

They can't be that stupid, can they?

I thought 70 was considered the cut off point. The point where everyone below it had to live with mom and dad because they were too freakin dumb to live alone and conduct their own affairs.

I shouldn't have said too freakin dumb. That was insensitive and possibly racist. I may want to visit Canada one day.

Let's say, oh let's see, hmmm, how about - lacks sufficient human capital - instead.