← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · DRSLICEIT
Thread ID: 3968 | Posts: 4 | Started: 2002-12-11
2002-12-11 13:48 | User Profile
Please read the articles at the following sites>>>>
[url=http://www.bankindex.com/read.asp?ID=1535]http://www.bankindex.com/read.asp?ID=1535[/url]
[url=http://www.savethemales.ca/260602.html]http://www.savethemales.ca/260602.html[/url]
and let me have your opinions.
Thanks
2002-12-11 14:37 | User Profile
Both excellent links.
Here's another from an anti-Zionist Jew:
[url=http://members.cox.net/jjsaah/Index.html]http://members.cox.net/jjsaah/Index.html[/url] THE DECADENCE OF JUDAISM IN OUR TIME
by Moshe Menuhin
1965
PREFACE (1)
"Tsdakah [Justice, Salvation, Charity] did God to Israel by dispersing them among the nations."
THE TALMUD
I have entitled this book THE DECADENCE OF JUDAISM IN OUR TIME, but I prefer an earlier title, 'JEWISH' NATIONALISM: A MONSTROUS HISTORICAL CRIME AND CURSE. Please take your choice. Both titles mean the ame thing to me.
I have reached the age and stage in life (I am now past seventy, but I still hope to complete before long a complementary book* that I am now updating and revising) at which an intellectually honest, free and independent man is moved by an inner compulsion to stand up and bear testimony to the beliefs, convictions and conclusions of a lifetime. As a conscientious Jew, I feel it necessary to set forth my views on Jewish history after studying and observing for many years the lofty and dignified Judaistic past of pure ethics, philosophy and religion, on the one hand, and the current decadent, tragic and revolting perversion of it into rampant Israelism on the other.
It is not an easy or a pleasant job to perform, yet my very strong sense of duty and my anxiety compel me to undertake it. I am absolutely convinced of the truthfulness of my studies, observations and conclusions. I serve nobody's interests, and I am paid by no one. Yet, though I carefully and honestly stick to facts, I know that I am bound to antagonize the fanatical and professional idealists among the "Jewish" nationalists. Therefore, please remember this, my son Yehudi Menuhin is in no way responsible for any opinion expressed here on Jewish life. In fact, he knows nothing about this spiritual adventure of mine. He has not read my manuscript. At this stage of our lives we are two wholly independent persons, fully emancipated from each other, intellectually and spiritually. Neither of us is answerable for the other. If the "father has eaten sour grapes . . . the son shall not bear the sin of the father . . ."
I am now ready to "tell it in Gath," think the unthinkable and mention the unmentionable, tell what for a lifetime has been in my heart and on my mind. I feel that I must take stock of my Jewishness, and clear up my personal equation with the Jewish people and with historical Judaism from the point of view of a twentiethcentury Jew who is a free and fully integrated citizen of his country, which in my case .......................
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~` Long download, but worth it.
I had heard about this book back in the 1970's. It was impossible to find locally. The only reference I could find to it was that the author lived in Los Gatos, CA.. So, I went to Los Gatos during a SFO layover.
I tried the local library to find out where Moshe Menuhin lived. They never heard of him, nor did the Post Office. I just happened to pass a local ladies club during a meeting, and I popped in and asked the group. One lady knew where they lived and gave me instructions.
I found the place, and it was heavily gated, with 2 dogs roaming the property. I chucked a few small stones at the door, and an old woman came out. I told her I wanted the book.
She invited me in, offered me tea from a samovar, and I met old Moshe. He gave me a copy, and autographed it for me.
He was making notes for another book, which he showed me. His handwritting was undecipherable. I have no idea how the publisher made a book from his manuscript.
The old couple were very well dressed and showed quite a bit of old fashioned class. It was a trip that was very worthwhile.
Ed
2002-12-11 16:15 | User Profile
On the FED subject, let's say I just got $1,000,000.
Whoopee!!
Except, there are NO 'Dollars' in any bank that I know of due to a series of acts, including but not limited to, Public Law 90-269, Public Law 90-349 and Public Law 95-147. Good luck on collecting your "million" non-Federal, no Reserve, non-Notes or checkbook money accounts of computer digits that claim to be a 'dollar'... but are not. It seems to me you need a little enlightenment, which I provide as follows.
The People extended their original natural liberties to establish and ordain the de jure governments of the several Republican States of the Union and the de jure government "FOR the United States of America. It is not disputable, therefore, that without vesting of the original natural Right of the People, and the exercise of there political Liberty to form, establish and ordain a State and government, the State would not and does not exist. If the State has been subjugated under doctrines of "emergency" and "necessity" and is operating in a de facto character and capacity, without right, the government of the United States does not exist. The existence of he States is absolutely necessary to the existence of the Federal government.
The question that you need to be addressing is, WHO ARE THEY?
WHO is it that directs, controls, finances and subsidizes their operations?
The CONTROL of the entire "essential engine" was relinquished and surrendered to the "Governor" of "The Fund" (IMF- 22 USC 286) and "The Bank" (International Bank For Reconstruction and Development, commonly referred to as The World Bank) under PRETENSE of Reorganization Plan No. 26, Section 1.
The numerous international agreements were not "made under Authority" in accordance with the tenor of the commission as expressed in the Constitution for the United States of America, Article VI, Clause 2.
The express terms of "under authority" were described by Joseph Story in his Commentaries On The Constitution For The United States, Chapter XXXVII.
The principles were enacted into Public Law 85-766, 85th Congress, Second Session, Section 1602, to wit:
"Sec. 1602. No part of the funds appropriated in this (or any other) Act shall be used to pay (1) any person, firm, or corporation, or any combinations of persons, firms, or corporations, to conduct a study or to plan when and how or in what circumstances the Government of the United States should surrender this country or its people to any foreign power, (2) the salary or compensation of any employee or official of the government of the United States who proposes or contracts of who has entered into contracts for the making of studies or plans for the surrender by the Government of the United States of this country and its people to any foreign power in any event or circumstances." (See: 50 USC 407)
Such acts are a felony under uncodified Public Law 471, 83rd Congress, Session 2, Chapter 456, Title VI, Section 601, to wit:
"Sec. 601. No part of any appropriation contained in this Act, or of the funds available by an corporation included in this Act, shall be used to pay the salary or wages of any person... who advocates, or is a member of an organization that advocates, the overthrow of the Government of the United States by force or violence... Provided further, That any person... who is a member of an organization of Government employees, who advocates, or who is a member of an organization that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States by force or violence and accepts employment the salary or wages for which are paid from any appropriation or fund contained in this Act shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more that $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both: Provided further, That the above penalty clause shall be in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other provisions of existing law." (See also Public Law 330, 69 Stat. 624 [uncodified felony]; 5 USC 3333)
The "Secretary of Treasury" is undeniably and admitted to be, the "Governor" of the International Monetary Fund (The Fund) and the International Bank For Reconstruction And Development (The Bank) pursuant to 22 USC 286a, and numerous other international organizations, and whose officers, employees and agents owe their PRIMARY ALLEGIANCE to the respective organizations and do not take directive from ANY Nation or State.
Under PRETEXT and PRETENSE of "Reorganization" the position also includes the exercise of the powers of the President under the "Trading With The Enemy Act" of October 6, 1917, 50 USC 1, as "Alien Property Custodian."
The Articles of Agreement of The Fund, The Bank, The U.N., the Export-Import Bank, Agency for International Development (AID), etc., etc., etc., are all VOID and of no effect under the Vienna Convention, and due to violation of public policy and the Law of Nations. The Vienna Convention is self executing and is operative as part of the domestic Law of the Land. U.S. v. Enger, 427 F.Supp. 452, 490.
No emergency justifies a violation of ANY Constitutional provision. 16 Am Jur 2d "Constitutional Law', Section 70 & 82. Coercion has been continually utilized by the corporators of The Fund and The Bank, and their sister organizations, corporations, associations, combinations and AGENTS within each of the several States of the Union - occupying offices and positions of Public Trust, Honor and Profit - to ensure that the Offices do no function within Constitutional import, in order to implement their pollicies and programs, and their agents and representatives have continually used threat, coercion, misrepresentation, fraud, usurpation, oppression and tyrannical means and modes against the Citizens of the several States of the Union, and against the several States themselves.
Under PRETEXT and PRETENSE of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, The Fund and its incorporators usurped the delegated authority whereby the Congress and their association no longer met the Perfect Obligation to maintain the de jure weights and measures and regulate the Value of the domestic or foreign Coin or Securities pursuant to the Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 and 6.
The Fund and The Bank, its sister organizations, corporations, associations, combinations and AGENTS OF A FOREIGN PRINCIPAL in each of the several States of the Union, then subjugated and used, and have continually used, the People as "human resources" and "human capital" (commonly call Cannon Fodder) and held their property and rights to property as collateral on the fraudulent, unconscionable, repudiated, dishonored obligations. See: Public Law 98-181, 79 Stat. 1153, Legislative History, House Report No. 98-175.
The parties to the Articles of Agreement of The Fund and The Bank knew of the emergency conditions existing, and devised an entire SYSTEMATIC SCHEME to dishonor, disavow and repudiate their rehypothecated debt-credit instruments. See: Public Law 90-269; Public Law 90-349; Public Law 94-564; and, Public Law 95-147. Further, they devised, implemented and enforced this systematic scheme to obtain a benefit and unjust advantage and enrichment through the known prospective failure of consideration and secret executory accords. See: Senate Report 94-1148, pgs. 5938, 5939; and, Public Law 98-181, House Report No. 98-175, pg. 1926.
The Fund and The Bank and its corporators, including but not limited to, the United States, having breached their obligations, duties and public trust, deceitfully and craftily confiscated the People's gold Coin through an unlawful confiscation, nationalization and expropriation process. See: Emergency Banking Relief Act, March 9, 1933; 12 USC 95a; and, Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934, Public Law 87, Chapter 87. They then used this purloined gold Coin to purchase voting share stocks in The Fund and The Bank, which are both instrumentalities of the world wide Communist movement: The United Nations. See: 22 USC 286e.
Error is perversion of law or fact, or both. Perversion of law by any of the corporators of The Fund and The Bank, or numerous of its other sister organizations, corporations and associations and their agents, is not authorized at any time, and entry into an agreement which excludes the corporators and their agents from the operation of the domestic Laws is the height and epitome of fraud, absurdity, and excess of authority and constitutes a criminal act. See: 18 USC 219; 18 USC 241; 18 USC 242; 18 USC 951; and, 18 USC 1961.
The Constitution for the United States of America specifically delegated the following "powers" to Congress under Article I, Section 8:
Clause 5:
"To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;"
Clause 6:
"To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;"
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, qualified the phrase "coin Money" as used in Clause 5 above.
"No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Titles of Nobility."
The issue of the United States being empowered to "emit bills of credit" was discussed in the Constitutional Convention on Thursday, August 16, 1787. The power and authority was DENIED to the general government upon good and sufficient grounds. See: Federalist Papers No. 44.
The original Mint Act was passed on Thursday, January 12, 1792, and provided for the minting of both gold and silver dollars under section 9. The issuance of paper as a "legal tender" and circulating medium of exchange did not occur under 1862 during the Civil War. The Congress authorized the emission of non-interest bearing Treasury notes and declared the Bills of Credit to be legal ender for all debts, public and private, with the exception of taxes on imports. The notes were deemed necessary to "float the debt of the United States" for the war effort. In short, the paper "green backs" were "printed" under PRETEXT of "War Powers".
On June 3, 1864, Congress passed "An Act to provide a National Currency, secured by a Pledge of United States Bonds, and to provide for the Circulation and REDEMPTION thereof." This Act recreated the central banking system as a "National Association" which later evolved into the Federal Reserve Banks. All private bank notes issued under the authority of the Act were "issued and circulated the same as money", had to be REDEEMABLE at "par value" [one-for-one] with the Coin, and were declared to be legal tender for the payment of all debts public and private. (Section 23) "Pledging or hypothecating" and of the notes in circulation under this Act were prohibited by Section 37.
By 1908, the United States had accumulated a large deficit. Discussions had begun to surface concerning amendments to the Constitution regarding revenue and taxation. In 1909, Congress and the President passed the Corporate Tax Act of 1909 while knowing that the activity had previously been declared to be unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers Loan And Trust Co, 187 U.S. 429 (1895). The Sixteenth Amendment was proposed by Congress on July 12, 1909. The amendment was certified to be a part of the Constitution on February 25, 1913. The Constitutional IMPEDIMENT concerning State intervention in direct taxation had been removed, however it did not expand the taxing power of Congress beyond the limitations set forth in Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4.
On December 23, 1913, Congress passed "An Act to provide for the establishment of Federal Reserve Banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act, which is codified as 12 USC 411 declared that the "Federal Reserve Notes" were "obligations of the United States". The "full faith and credit" of the United States was thereby hypothecated and rehypothecated to the lending institutions for the issuance and emission of bills of credit as legal tender "for all taxes, customs, and other public dues." The paper in circulation and transaction accounts could then be inflated by 60% and the purchasing power depreciated and reduced by an equivalent amount. However, even though the fractional reserve system paper was on a float, the dollar was still made of silver and gold Coin, and the Federal Reserve notes and Treasury notes clearly stated on their face that they were REDEEMABLE at par value upon presentment and demand. Redeemability ended by 1965 with the Coin Act of 1965, in which the base metals were removed from circulation. Thereafter, Public Law 90-269 and Public Law 95-147 assured the elimination of reserve requirements for redeeming Federal Reserve notes for lawful money.
The Emergency Banking Relief Act of March 9, 1933, Public Law No. 1, 48 Stat. 1, claimed and nationalized all of the People's money then on deposit in the banking system, i.e., all gold Coin. The gold was considered as a "reserve" asset in the international banking system. The Emergency Banking Relief Act amended and used the Trading With The Enemy Act to assert the claims of the President and Congress to all of the monetary gold Coin, i.e., Double Eagles, and threatened fine and imprisonment for anyone who did not turn in their monetary gold Coin. There is little difference between the use of "War Power" against the Citizens to accomplish the nationalization of the "Coin Money", and the acts of the famous frontier bandit, Jesse James. Both were accomplished under threat of force and compulsion.
Nationalization of the People's gold Coin is a violation of the Law of Nations and existing public policy of Congress. See: Hilton v. Guyot, 159 US 113 (1895); Public Law 87-565, 76 Stat. 255, 260. The complete debasement of the Constitutional Coin was thereafter effected and accomplished under the International Monetary Fund's (IMF-The Fund) Articles of Agreement. The international agreements had taken precedent over domestic limitations and obligations.
The terms "Dollar" and "Fair Market Value" were thereafter evaluated in fractional proportion to the SDR (Special Drawing Rights) which have become the new "standard of value". The Constitutional mandates and domestic laws had no further meaning and effect. The fundamental Law of the Land had been overthrown by various international institutions and agreements. This is the economic condition that has unlawfully been imposed on the People of the several States of the Union and their institutions of FORMER "government". The international organizations and their agents have gained economic control of the domestic monetary system, and now make all political decisions for their members. Domestic "monetary policy" is set by an independent agency specifically referred to as the Federal Reserve Board, not by Congress. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation. Between 1965 and 1977, the monetary system made a "de facto transition", in which the United States, as a voting share stockholder in The Fund and The Bank and other international organizations, determined that Constitutional mandates did not apply to them or their operations. Does the Federal Reserve note meet the criteria of a note? NO. A note has four essential elements in law: (1) A valid offer; (2) A valid acceptance; (3) Consideration; and, (3) Time. A valid offer can not be made by passing a note off that has been dishonored, disavowed, and repudiated. Valid acceptance cannot be obtained because of the illegal aspects of the activities which gave rise to the "material difference" in the value of the paper, which on its face professes to be the representative of the "dollar', not the "dollar" itself. There is no "material" "Consideration" because it does not promise to pay anyone at any time. It is based wholly on "credit" which is derived from the Latin word "credito" which means "faith". The fourth element of a "note", "time", is wholly lacking. Does the Federal Reserve note meet the criteria of a "worthless security" under 26 IRC 165(g)(2)©? The answer is "YES".
Presently, "Fair Market Value" is based upon the SDR (Special Drawing Rights) and Federal Reserve note floating values determined by international organizations, not by Congress. The so-called "State", its political subdivisions, enforcers, attorneys, and the Wizards of Oz in their little black bat suits are all claiming benefit to a series of innovative, slight of hand acts and omissions that were and are patently unconstitutional.
"To violate the spirit of the law, while pretending to respect the letter of it, is a fraud no less criminal in character than an open violation of the law would be; it is not less contrary to the intention of the legislator, and indicates only a more cunning and deliberate wickedness." (The Law Of Nations Or The Principles Of Natural Law, Emer de Vattel, Book II, Chapter XVII, Section 291)
An example of such fraud is found in the more recent determination, U.S. v. Greenstreet, 912 F.Supp 224 (1996), where the Wizard of Oz determined in pertinent part:
"Perhaps the most bizarre basis for Greenstreet's position rests on the theory that the American system of currency is illegal and unconstitutional... Attacking the legitimacy of federal reserve notes is not a novel argument. Others have asserted such claims; however, they have been summarily rejected. (citations omitted) This Court will also reject Mr. Greenstreet's coinage arguments. The Court believes that Defendant's position is simply irrational." (912 F.Supp 229)
The Wizard apparently could not distinguish "facts" nor discern and understand existing law and legislative intent. Moral turpitude and corruption is more appropriately the true source of authority for the Wizard who conjured up such an insane delusion and had the audacity to put it in writing and have it published. The statement by Congressman Philip Crane of Illinois and others was as clear and unambiguous as the Constitution itself. Fraud and crime are more easily obtainable where the judges are prone to corruption.
"The purpose of a monetary standard is to fix the weight and quality of the monetary unit. A standard monetary unit is something which itself has value; it cannot be an abstraction, a legal fiction, or debt, such as the U.S. dollar is today. A depreciating monetary unit is not an acceptable standard of value." (Congressional Record - House, November 20, 1985, pg. 32634)
The Federal Reserve note was and is fluctuating in its depreciated value and remains in its disavowed and repudiated condition. The standard of value cannot be an abstraction, a legal fiction, or a debt, which the SDR-Federal Reserve note system is.
The Federal Reserve note is defined as an "OBLIGATION"... NOT as a "dollar". 12 USC 411. The Federal Reserve note's fluctuating value is based upon Special Drawing Rights (SDR's), a book keeping entry in the International Monetary Fund. "Dollars", "gold and silver Coin", are legal tender within the meaning and intent of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787), and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof, 31 USC 5112, and are circulating, and intended to circulate, as "MONEY". All assessments are to be reduced to the nearest "DOLLAR VALUE". See: 26 IRC 3402(B)(4); 26 IRC 6102; and, 26 IRC 7504.
2002-12-11 20:14 | User Profile
ED, many thanks for posting some great data....knowledge is really the only power we have to fight what we know is the real threat to all mankind and hopefully we will all learn who that enemy is and expose them at every avenue.