← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · DRSLICEIT
Thread ID: 3931 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2002-12-09
2002-12-09 17:21 | User Profile
Now that our Bushwhacker has fired the two sensible people in his corrupt administration, we will know less of the cost to each of of us for the insane actions taken by this government.
With Snow replacing O'neil and Fredman the ever kosher condiment replacing the truthful Lindsy, we are headed towards a 7-8 Trillion dollar deficit before Bush is impeached and tried for economic terrorism.<< my dream)
For the facts of what Israel and our zionist dominated government is costing each of us Americans, go here>>
[url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html]http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html[/url]
2002-12-09 17:38 | User Profile
To see a great Poster of our beloved Buhshwacker>>
[url=http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/11/images/Bush_poster.jpg]http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/11/images/B...Bush_poster.jpg[/url]
Don't forget to Enlarge so that you can reall see it all.
2002-12-11 02:58 | User Profile
DRSLICEIT,
Yes, Multi-Trillion dollar deficit and a Soviet America before Bush leaves.
2002-12-11 15:37 | User Profile
Cool poster. Someone has a lot of time on their hands! With the National debt, state debts, and public debts exploding, Bush wants Iraq's oil stockpile bad.
For the past ten years Iraq has been digging wells, but can only sell a small portion of the oil. There is an estimate 3+ Trillion worth of oil sitting in Iraqs' wells and in stockpiles of drums.
Control of this oil will be turned over to American companies for "Iraqs' own good" after the invasion.
2002-12-11 22:06 | User Profile
Heritage<< thanks for the response, what is your take on "who is taking orders from whom" ie Bushwhacker and gang?
2002-12-12 12:00 | User Profile
Yes heritagelost, lovely poster with apt credits at the bottom.
** what is your take on "who is taking orders from whom" ie Bushwhacker and gang? **
Allow me, if you will, to take a stab at this. First, a couple of preliminaries:
George II may or may not be a complete moron, and never having met the man I cannot say for certain, however the persistent butchery of his motherââ¬â¢s tongue (the only language he ever had to work with) and his ignorance of history affords us a good guess without the aid of psychometrics, but what is certain is that at least some of his handlers are not. (BTW, the heavily promoted image of him fondling a book, on leadership I believe, after 9-11 is to be viewed as gravely as pictures of Clinton emerging from some slum of worship every Sunday morning with bible in one hand and Hillary in the other during the Lewinsky comedy).
The wrench that further skews the calculus of hierarchy guessing is the tendency of sheep to occasionally stray from the path prescribed by the shepherd. Nixon, reported to be the most intelligent of relatively recent presidents, was (not incidentally) the most unpredictable of the herd and doubtless scared the wits out of the Israelis by delaying as long as he did during the Egyptian conflict and, generally, made life interesting for his superkraut supervisor. George I committed a similar faux pas by getting mushy and failing to deliver the head of the man who dared to send Scuds towards Holly land -- hence the inevitability of Gulf War II.
Who is calling the shots? Well, the idea that area inhabited by goat herders and few oil sheiks will not sell, for eternity and at an accommodating price, the only commodity they have and others care to possess is ludicrous. Only unlimited US support for Israel makes the bargaining a tad stressful. Everyone here knows that the Jewish dominance in US politics, finance, and media means that the s****y little country is given more attention in DC then any other state within the union. ââ¬ÅTheirââ¬Â progeny has a future but the same cannot be said for the descendents of whites in California, Arizona, and Texas (just for starters), and all Americans get shafted when welfare comparisons are made. All that remains is to sum up of the savings gotten by dumping Israel (and I mean every dollar from the public purse that finds its way there regardless of whether it calls itself loan or the like), dumping the House of Saud, cancelling the Iraq invasion, and disbanding Homeland Security. Then compare that figure to any savings resulting from US having direct control of Iraqââ¬â¢s oil fields, or the whole of the Middle East if desired. But do not some US companies already possess controlling interest of the fruits of said fields? Who benefits? Jews do, oil barons do, but no one else does. The Chosenites have done well in finding a like-minded sheep.
Despite my denigration of George II, I actually believe the man is at least in some way honest in his belief that the coming war is best for America and that the decision to go forth is his own. Anyone who answers: ââ¬Åbecause they hate our freedom and democracy,ââ¬Â in response to a question seeking motives for 9-11 is incapable of serious discernment. Since everything at such levels is scripted and the question so obviously central to any discussion pertaining to the attack, I find it impossible to believe that he was not prepared. I would have fired any advisor who would offer such a childish response, and the fact that he used it, or worse came up with it, is frightening. Fortunately, his ability to discriminate adds little to the final equation.
I do not believe in the theory that all events are somehow guided by a hidden hand of a select few, though there may well be groups of individuals who fancy themselves doing just that and whether they call themselves Zionists or Masons is irrelevant. The president evaluates recommendations and gives orders. Yes, the recommendations may be thinly disguised orders from a zhid, fully gift-wrapped in seemingly valid reasons that he is incapable of evaluating or is indifferent to. It does not matter. He is like the general fighting a never-ending series of battles. Like the general, he finds his plan shot with the first shot. But unlike the general, he has no comfort of disciplined and unified troops for he commands mobs united only in their motive to profit from one another. The whole of history is nothing but a reminder that nobody knows the consequences of their actions, regardless of how it may seem from their vantage point.
For instance, I am fairly certain that a Fuehrer-type will arise at some point and avoid Hitlerââ¬â¢s mistakes (namely, underestimating the extent of Jewish penetration within potential adversaries and within his own ranks, and embracing alliances with people eager for his brand of liberation). However, I am equally certain that the man will decide poorly on some other no less important matter and who is to say that after his reign his people will be better off than were the survivors of the Judeo-Communist disaster of 1945.
Feel better now? :o
2002-12-12 17:27 | User Profile
SYSYFOS......One of the best written post I have seen on this here forum. Damn, your gooooooood. Could not have said it better myself....lol.
What do you think of Congolosleeze and the fact that her "Mentor" was none other then Josef Korbel, father of the Mad Albitch and robber of household effects in Europe???
U me, could start a real revolution, if your not tooooo busy. ̉̉̉
2002-12-13 07:39 | User Profile
Her presence in the cabinet is purely cosmetic. Clintonââ¬â¢s appointment of Albright made it inevitable that someone of Candyââ¬â¢s physical description would have a role in any subsequent Republican administration. Remember, they are just as inclusive as the other gang, so there!
I do not know if Korbel was a brigand, but I am certain he was a vulture and an opportunist. You know, all the jazz about him ââ¬Åescapingââ¬Â prior to the German annexation of Bohemia, despite having diplomatic immunity and despite the well-known German attitude of not minding the exodus of geniuses. ââ¬ÅEscapingââ¬Â (again) the communist takeover of Czechoslovakia, despite being named by President Clementis into the new socialist government. This survivor and resolute anti-communist came to bless the US with his presence but forgot his vows during Vietnam and advocated capitulation. We know Marie Anna ââ¬Åwhy have the best army in the world if we are not going to use itââ¬Â Albright learned some survivor skills from Dad (and then some power tips from Zbigniev), but did Candy receive the same lessons? Your guess is as good as mine.
Politics is all about power and proximity to even more power. Apparent proximity means nothing. When you saw Albright, Cohen, and Burger weathering the storm over Serbia by bombing power grids and other infrastructure (yes the air force advocated just such an approach from the beginning, but the blatant disregard of war crime statutes was a political decision), you saw the application of power. Albrightââ¬â¢s position was common knowledge from the beginning, but does anyone know what Candy thinks now? We never will and no amount of exuberance from our lie papers about her closeness to George II will change that. <_<
2002-12-13 16:00 | User Profile
SIS, Good god, you must be an "insider" to have that capacity to know the truth. What a refresher to see so much insight and intelligent in a forum.
Perhaps there is a Monic/Bill type relationship with the Congo and Boy Gerorge..any thoughts on that...hahahaha
2002-12-13 20:14 | User Profile
Get you head out of the gutter, DRSLICEIT.
Unlike Clinton, George II actually has a wife (who knows, she may even be of the loving variety). If forced to choose, and without knowing anything else, Iââ¬â¢d take the likely-to-be-repressed librarian over certain-to-have-chip-on-her-shoulder butch lawyer every time. :D
2002-12-13 20:31 | User Profile
Sis......"gutter", hell we live in a cesspool here in the USA and with all the crap that one is exposed to by our so-called leading elite, what the hell do you expect?
Someone has posted an interesting photo of the 'twins' on a pub crawl across the border...have you seen it?
As for the 15min of fame Lewdinsky, one more tribal member auditioning for the gong-show along the way.
You probably are right about Ms Velcro.