← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · il ragno

Thread 3315

Thread ID: 3315 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2002-10-30

Wayback Archive

il ragno [OP]

2002-10-30 17:30 | User Profile

Excellent Brimelow here- nonstop ragging on Taranto, the WSJ, the INS ....and even Charles (Cheetah) Moose.

The Washington Snipers: A Revolutionary Wind Is Blowing By Peter Brimelow

As the Washington Sniper case reached its climax, we at VDARE.COM received volleys of updating reader emails, virtually all of which said the same thing:

Of course, THEY – the Conservative Establishment Immigration Enthusiasts – would now send this embarrassing development straight down the Memory Hole—as they did with the Nebraska Bank Killers, the 9/11 attacks, etc. etc.

Right on cue, Opinion Journal’s James Tarantoad waddled in (October 25).

The Stowaway

Columnist Michelle Malkin reports that John Lee Malvo, Muhammad's young acolyte, is

“‘an illegal alien from Jamaica who jumped ship in Miami in June 2001.’ Border Patrol agents picked up Malvo and his mother, Uma Sceon James, and James ‘admitted that six months earlier, she and her son were passengers on a cargo ship that was filled with illegal asians’ [sic]…The Border Patrol recommended that the Immigration and Naturalization Service detain the pair pending deportation.”

“That's not what happened. About a month after their arrest, Malvo and his mother were set free by the Seattle district INS--contrary to what the arresting Border Patrol officers had determined should be done. And in clear violation of federal law regarding the removal of illegal alien stowaways.”

Malkin’s report is certainly damning about the INS. Before the nativists on Pat Buchanan's payroll go berserk on us, however, we'd like to point out that Muhammad, the senior member of the pair, is a U.S. citizen, born in Louisiana.

“On Pat Buchanan’s payroll” is presumably a reference to the Buchanan-backed American Conservative Magazine, which got under Tarantoad’s warts in its first issue by publishing my review pointing out that his immigration enthusiasm is directly responsible for the policies that have allowed aliens to enter the U.S. and murder citizens, as searingly demonstrated in Michelle Malkin’s book Invasion.

At the Wall Street Journal Ed Page, of course, they are not motivated by anything as capitalistic as payrolls. They are all religious fanatics, political ideologues and/or agents of a foreign power.

Still, the Tarantoad has to concede gracelessly that 50% of the snipers were illegal immigrants. Now let’s see how he processes this news:

“Kithlyn Nedd, 39, a mechanic on Antigua who said he shared the house with Muhammad, said in an interview today that Muhammad made money by selling fraudulent documents to Caribbean island citizens and others who wanted to enter the United States.”

“‘Antigua's prime minister, Lester B. Bird, and the island's police commissioner, Truehart Smith, said last week that Muhammad and another man were under investigation there but would not disclose why. In an interview today, Smith acknowledged that the probe concerns possible immigration fraud. 'My men are investigating that [Muhammad] allegedly engaged in that activity,’ Smith said.”

(“Sniper Suspect Indicted In Virginia,” by Cheryl W. Thompson, Serge F. Kovaleski, and Josh White, The Washington Post, October 28, 2002)

In other words, John Allen Muhammed may have been an illegal alien smuggler, a trade that has developed exactly because the Wall Street Journal and other immigration enthusiasts in the Treason Lobby have demoralized American public officials to the point where they are afraid to enforce the law.

More than a week ago, VDARE.COM received this from a reader, which we set up as a Today's Letter but never actually posted. (This happens a lot, alas.)

From: Paul Mendez

Please consider forwarding this email to any of your writers who might like to do an "expose" on Montgomery County Police Chief Charles Moose. I believe he is so thoroughly PC—if not outright anti-white—that he is botching the search for the sniper(s) that have killed 9 people. His PC attitude has probably cost several lives by now—and who knows how many more in the coming days.

I live in the D.C. suburbs. The first sniper attack took place 2 blocks away from where I live. So I have been following this tragedy closely.

But I have been critical of Moose long before the sniper attacks started.

First, you must realize that Moose was hired for his non-whiteness. Montgomery County is one of the richest counties in the country, but also has a lot of Latino immigrants. The last police chief had the audacity to actually crack down on crime which was—surprise, surprise—committed largely by Latinos. So the Latino community screamed "discrimination" and muttered loudly about wouldn't it be a shame if there was a riot as a result of this disrespect. So the scared white county leadership hired Moose to smooth things over. He's a PR stunt, not a police chief.

SMOKING GUN: On October 8, 2001 there was a town hall meeting in Rockville, MD about the county's response to 9-11. It was shown on local cable (Channel 8, I believe). If one could find a copy of that tape, one would hear...

1) Moose lecture the audience that 9-11 wasn't the first time Americans suffered from terrorism. Before 9-11 the Klan blew up little girls in Birmingham because it didn't agree with the US government's positions. He seems to be gloating that now it’s white peoples’ turn to know how scared blacks felt back in the Jim Crow South. Just like we defeated the Klan without stigmatizing all white people, he says, so we will defeat terrorism without stigmatizing all Muslims.

Moose bragging that the FIRST THING he did when he heard about 9-11 was to "reach out to our Muslim community and make sure they felt safe." He brags how he sent patrol cars to the mosques and community centers to protect them. NEVER does he mention doing ANYTHING to protect Americans against additional terrorists that might be out there. Clearly, in a time of national crisis, Moose's first instinct was to protect the poor pitiful minorities against the bigoted rednecks of Montgomery County. (Not that we have any more rednecks!)

3) When Yours Truly asks his Congresswoman what—if anything—was going to be done to identify and deport the millions of illegal aliens already in the US, Moose jumps in to say that immigration is a federal issue and his police don't inquire about a person's immigration status. He has instructed his police to give the same level of courteous service to all county RESIDENTS.

…there is plenty of evidence that Moose deliberately overlooked the potential threat of illegal aliens in our county for at least a year, and failed to inform the population about the race of the sniper(s) because of his distrust (dislike? hatred?) of whites…

We don’t know Mr. Mendez, although we owe him an apology for our tardiness.

Nevertheless, whoever he is, his instincts were better than the entire media establishment – including, of course, the “conservative” Wall Street Journal.

To update Bob Dylan, a Victorian poet, you don’t need to be a weatherthing to see which way the wind is blowing—that this is a revolutionary situation.

October 28, 2002

Okiereddust

2002-10-30 17:49 | User Profile

The whole picture when you go over it is exactly as Brimelow says. Of course the media will never give him credit.

[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=5&t=3949&hl=brimelow&amp]Moose and the Washington Snipers Thread[/url]

il ragno

2002-10-30 18:11 | User Profile

Sorry, Oke, I missed your posting the same piece (obviously).

As Chief Moose said upon seeing pix of the actual snipers: whoops!

Walter Yannis

2002-10-31 11:28 | User Profile

Thank Heaven for VDARE.

Hey, I know that some of you purists don't like some of the rhetorical devices they use to appear mainstream, but right now they and AMREN the only game in town.

Walter

Sertorius

2002-10-31 12:17 | User Profile

The Wall Street Journal will never change as this editorial shows. Too bad all those Haitians couldn`t have landed in their gated community.

[url=http://forum.originaldissent.com/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=4038&]Wall Street Journal editorial. [/url]

Feric Jaggar

2002-10-31 16:27 | User Profile

Maybe the lefties in Lewiston, Maine can provide help. I'm sure the Haitians will make nice neighbors for the Somalis in Maine.

mwdallas

2002-11-01 00:30 | User Profile

**I think VDARE, Lew Rockwell, and OD are the only aboveboard operations in town **

Those are the top three in my book.

Walter Yannis

2002-11-01 07:26 | User Profile

Originally posted by wintermute@Nov 1 2002, 00:10 > Thank Heaven for VDARE.**

I agree completely. At least three times a week there is an article on VDARE which is so powerfully written that even the most hidebound multiculti will acknowledge that something stinks if you can get him to read the article. More often that not, VDARE articles are so carefully and convincingly worded, that I can get friends (even lefties) to read it, and to start thinking down the long, long path that leads us all home.

Hey, I know that some of you purists don't like some of the rhetorical devices they use to appear mainstream, but right now they and AMREN the only game in town.

I think that we should be just as careful about language usage as they, even if we proceed into deeper waters. I laud (that's right: laud!) VDAREs approach.

On the other hand, I am not so happy with AMREN, for obvious reasons. They're not a game, in my book, more like a three card monte operation - a grift. I think VDARE, Lew Rockwell, and OD are the only aboveboard operations in town (i.e. can you imagine your mother reading it without screaming?). On the other hand, I remind readers that one needs only three rings in order to have a fully functioning circus!

Bring on the dancing bears,

Wintermute**

                Please forgive my callowness, but what is the objection to AMREN?

Is it that they frequently feature racialist Jews such as Professors Levin & Hart?

I admit that there are dangers inherent in this strategy, but I see AMREN as part of a coordinated effort.

Having Jews among us offers some important advantages. The biggest advantage is, to my mind, that appearing philo-semitic allows AMREN to fly under the doublethink response the Jewish media conditioned into our people. This allows AMREN's salubrious message of the reality of racial differences and the importance of racial identity to slip through the PeeCee brain-filter residing in our people's craniums. Also, since Jews control the mainstream press, their presence in AMREN helps to secure press coverage for AMREN, and by implication our ideas.

We need to be very clear with ourselves about who we are. I believe that the American nation is white, Christian, and English-speaking. So long as one is behind the project of building that nation, I welcome their assistance, be they black, Muslim, Hispanic, whatever. I agree that special care must be taken with the Jews, but so long as they are of use to us, why not take advantage of their services while we can?

Walter

Sertorius

2002-11-03 12:02 | User Profile

I found this in the letters section of VDARE. Check out the demographics of tarantoad land.

[url=http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_103102.htm]http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_103102.htm[/url]

Feric Jaggar

2002-11-03 16:53 | User Profile

Originally posted by Walter Yannis@Nov 1 2002, 02:26 **I admit that there are dangers inherent in this strategy, but I see AMREN as part of a coordinated effort. **

                Thanks Walter.  I agree with you on this.  In fact, I used to work for AmRen back in the mid 90s and can vouch for Taylor's vision and integrity.  A grifter he is not.  He does not say anything he does not believe.

Recluse

2002-11-04 11:14 | User Profile

Originally posted by Sertorius@Nov 3 2002, 06:02 **I found this in the letters section of VDARE. Check out the demographics of tarantoad land.

[url=http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_103102.htm]http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_103102.htm[/url]**

Where are all these White and Jewish diversity lovers in the real world? I worked in black neighborhoods for most of the 80's, doing inspections and other things for the gov't, and I don't recall ever seeing a single White person moving in. I'd like to see someone get the demographic numbers from the '90 census and compare them to the 2000 census and see how many places that were 80% or more black showed an increase in the White percentage of the population between 1990 and 2000. They'd be extremely rare. Most of these cowardly hypocrites who claim to love diversity would soil themselves at just the thought of living in East St. Louis or East L.A. VDARE calls it "[url=http://ny2k.hamilton.edu/angle/op-ed/jo_10_18_00.html]Chappaquism[/url]", or celebrating diversity from a distance. What I call it would never make it past the censors.

solutrian

2002-11-04 20:46 | User Profile

Hypocrisy is an essential element of modern liberalism as is known to all posters on this forum. Those liberals who can afford it will live in affluent secure areas. Lambertville N.J., and Swarthmore Pa. are just two of the many that come to mind. Both are serene, wealthy and liberal, but with vigilant local cops who know what is expected of them. Who wants to get brained or chased up a tree by some refugee from one of the many proximate ghettos. Poorer whites have a more difficult time of it, as they are thown into cheap housing by government policy and lack of a better choice. They soon fit in, begin behaving and acting in the same manner as the other denizens, and indeed become part of a common gene pool. These tracts are numerous in the northeast and are the end result of federal programs to insure such a outcome.

amundsen

2002-11-05 04:59 | User Profile

Originally posted by solutrian@Nov 4 2002, 15:46 Poorer whites have a more difficult time of it, as they are thown into cheap housing by government policy and lack of a better choice. They soon fit in, begin behaving and acting in the same manner as the other denizens, and indeed become part of a common gene pool.

                This is what angers me most.  These damn liberals love the negroes.  They have infinite compassion for them.  But very little for their fellow whites.  For as much as they talk about intermingling with superiors helping the inferior they have little concern for these forces as they affect poor whites.  The bottom line is inferior whites intermingling with superior whites increases the quality of the whites far more than blacks intermingling with whites.  And everywhere the mingling of whites with blacks has only lowered the quality of whites.

il ragno

2002-11-05 10:03 | User Profile

It was once an everyday thing to see large endowments made to white-only charities.

For instance, even that old curmudgeon WC Fields left much of his money to white orphanages. (Contemporaneous reports of his bequest routinely compared the old reprobate to Santa Claus - a lot of stories beginning, "Beneath that scowling exterior he hid behind...".) Today of course, that would be 'hate' and Dershowitz himself would lead the effort to have him exhumed, the better to pound a stake through the heart of such a scurrilous Hater.

That's the problem with "Judeo-Christianity". It's code for Jews dictating what is and isn't 'Christian', to an audience of nodding boobs.

Walter Yannis

2002-11-09 12:33 | User Profile

Originally posted by il ragno@Nov 5 2002, 10:03 That's the problem with "Judeo-Christianity". It's code for Jews dictating what is and isn't 'Christian', to an audience of nodding boobs.

                Perfect, Il Ragno.

Mind if I use that one?

Walter