← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 20943 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2005-11-08
2005-11-08 03:26 | User Profile
11-7-05
[B]Hitler, Petain, Quisling: Where Art Thou?[/B]
As non-White, Muslim riots spread from France to other European countries [e.g. Germany], we must take note that none of that would be happening in the first place if America and England hadn't kicked the asses of the "fascist" anti-egalitarians during WWII.
In fact, that ass-kicking-of-fascists paved the way for Europe to become filled with millions of non-Whites, leftists and communists.
Even back in the 1940s, certain people were warning about the bogus, Marxist [read: Jewish] idea that the human races are equal and that non-Whites belong in the White countries. Adolf Hitler, France's Petain, Norway's Quisling and other political leaders wouldn't buy into the stupid idea that Blacks and Browns and Jews should vote and govern in the White countries, or that Jews were just another version of White people, or other complete nonsense. They instead sided with the pro-European, pro-White political faction led by Hitler. As a result, the U.S. and England "had to" kick their asses - for "democracy's" sake, of course [note: "democracy" is a much-overused, clever word for "Blacks, Browns, Asians, Jews, leftists, homosexuals and women voting and governing in the White countries." Apparently that's a good thing].
Now Europe has "democracy" - and numerous communist parties, too. In fact, in Italy today there are communists in the parliament [1]. What does communism have to do with "democracy?" We don't know. Maybe you can explain why America and Britain kicked the asses of some "totalitarians," but yet allow others free reign in modern European governments. [Apparently, some forms of totalitarianism are "good" and some "aren't good," depending on the views of the Jewish bankers and media moguls who pull the political and financial strings in most of the White countries].
Egalitarian "democracy" isn't making Europe better. In fact, it is ruining Europe's superior, centuries-old culture.
Once Europe's excellent culture is gone, it cannot be replaced. Ever. What we are witnessing now is, apparently, the beginning of the end of the finest culture mankind ever produced. Was all that "democracy" - and communism - worth it?
Hitler, Petain, Quisling: where art thou?
[1] the communist party of Italy was renamed "Democratic Party of the Left"
2005-11-08 14:10 | User Profile
The White race's last stand was WWII and we lost. Nations are raised, nations fall, all things must pass. Still, it's a sad spectacle for sure.
2005-11-08 14:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]The White race's last stand was WWII and we lost. Nations are raised, nations fall, all things must pass. Still, it's a sad spectacle for sure.[/QUOTE]
You know xmetalhead, you have been showing constantly defeatist attitude lately.
(One of the reasons I have opposed glorifying Nazi Germany is that it leads to this kind of self-pitying nostalgia)
Petr
2005-11-08 14:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Petr]You know xmetalhead, you have been showing constantly defeatist attitude lately.
(One of the reasons I have opposed glorifying Nazi Germany is that it leads to this kind of self-pitying nostalgia)
Petr[/QUOTE]
Things look very bad for White Western Civilization. We assume our enemies can be dealt with by just looking the other way and hoping they don't kill us while we give them everything our forefathers sweated blood to give us. As we see in France today and America yesterday-today-and-tomorrow, that philosophy is a miserable failure, and it's too late for rational discussion or rational solutions to the immense problem. Our enemies have secured our extinction and have us check-mated. Sure we're still breathing, eating, working, consuming, etc but is this all we are to be?
Sorry I can't be more optimistic.
2005-11-08 14:37 | User Profile
the communist party of Italy was renamed "Democratic Party of the Left" The problem is that Democracy is a very broad concept. From Socialistic to Republic. As Ben Franklin once said ,"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch."
2005-11-08 15:47 | User Profile
In fact, that ass-kicking-of-fascists paved the way for Europe to become filled with millions of non-Whites, leftists and communists.
Europe has always been home to many Communists. Surely, Franco, you know enough about German history of the era to be aware that Germany had the largest Communist party outside the Soviet Union, and this was just the largest of several Communist parties in that nation.
The (Marxist) German Social Democratic Party (today, social democrats are those who desire a welfare state, in the 19th and early 20th centuries they were far more radical and had the goal of bringing about a socialist state through parliamentary means) was known as the crown jewel of the Second International, a worldwide socialist organization. "Red Berlin" didn't get its name for nothing.
Communism has always had a following in Italy. American efforts helped to keep the Communists from winning post-war elections.
When Lenin learned that Mussolini had renounced socialism, he was saddened to lose who he thought the best leader of a potential Communist Italy.
The popularity of leftism in Europe is not something resulting from Axis defeat,the Fascist's rise to power was a reaction to this popularity. It might also be added that the renamed Communist party turned into a social democrat group, and the more traditional Communists have formed their own new party.
France's Petain, Norway's Quisling and other political leaders wouldn't buy into the stupid idea that Blacks and Browns and Jews should vote and govern in the White countries, or that Jews were just another version of White people, or other complete nonsense. They instead sided with the pro-European, pro-White political faction led by Hitler.
This false as there were practically no non-whites in those places, nor was there any movement desiring to bring them in. No one was fighting for or against bringing blacks into Europe. This is a a form of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, which assumes an event has a causal relation with a preceding event, just because it occured after the first. There is no reason that post-war Europe had to take in immigrants due to an Axis defeat.
Quisling, furthermore, was a mediocrity who had the good fortune to be able to form a government approved by the occupying Germans. Norwegian nationalists still take a negative view of his administration. From an old American Rennaisance article:
[SIZE=2]> Both the Danish and Norwegian Peopleââ¬â¢s Parties have been very thorough in distancing themselves from Nazis, and they highlight their older members who were active in the resistance against occupation. They can portray themselves as anti-Nazis who have always resisted invaders: yesterday it was German soldiers, today it is Muslim civilians. They even call pro-immigration politicians Quislings, after the Nazi Norwegian leader Vidkun Quisling, who collaborated with the Germans.
[URL="http://www.amren.com/0312issue/0312issue.htm#cover"]http://www.amren.com/0312issue/0312issue.htm#cover[/URL]
[/SIZE]
2005-11-08 16:00 | User Profile
Europe's present day mess goes back before WW II. It started with WW I and the destruction of the old order. That was the worst disaster in Western history, in my opinion.
2005-11-09 00:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=robinder]Europe has always been home to many Communists. Surely, Franco, you know enough about German history of the era to be aware that Germany had the largest Communist party outside the Soviet Union, and this was just the largest of several Communist parties in that nation.
The (Marxist) German Social Democratic Party (today, social democrats are those who desire a welfare state, in the 19th and early 20th centuries they were far more radical and had the goal of bringing about a socialist state through parliamentary means) was known as the crown jewel of the Second International, a worldwide socialist organization. "Red Berlin" didn't get its name for nothing.
Communism has always had a following in Italy. American efforts helped to keep the Communists from winning post-war elections.
When Lenin learned that Mussolini had renounced socialism, he was saddened to lose who he thought the best leader of a potential Communist Italy.
The popularity of leftism in Europe is not something resulting from Axis defeat,the Fascist's rise to power was a reaction to this popularity. It might also be added that the renamed Communist party turned into a social democrat group, and the more traditional Communists have formed their own new party.
This false as there were practically no non-whites in those places, nor was there any movement desiring to bring them in. No one was fighting for or against bringing blacks into Europe. This is a a form of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, which assumes an event has a causal relation with a preceding event, just because it occured after the first. There is no reason that post-war Europe had to take in immigrants due to an Axis defeat.
Quisling, furthermore, was a mediocrity who had the good fortune to be able to form a government approved by the occupying Germans. Norwegian nationalists still take a negative view of his administration. From an old American Rennaisance article:
[SIZE=2] [URL="http://www.amren.com/0312issue/0312issue.htm#cover"]http://www.amren.com/0312issue/0312issue.htm#cover[/URL]
[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
As far as I am concerned, that is sort of splitting hairs.
The "fascist" leaders rejected "democracy" as we know it.
By defeating the "fascist" countries in WWII, America and England severely weakened White, Western culture. That was the main point of the post.