← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · JoseyWales

Barbershop - whites only

Thread ID: 20745 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2005-10-25

Wayback Archive


JoseyWales [OP]

2005-10-25 12:54 | User Profile

[url]http://katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=4016414[/url]

good reply by the owner too


EDUMAKATEDMOFO

2005-10-25 14:00 | User Profile

Poor guy better start hiding his assets...


BlueBonnet

2005-10-25 14:23 | User Profile

Hell he should just start cutting the fros the way he does white hair. Then when they get upset that he ruined their hair they won't come to him any more. Problem solved.


Brooke

2005-10-25 16:32 | User Profile

Hell he should just start cutting the fros the way he does white hair. Then when they get upset that he ruined their hair they won't come to him any more. Problem solved.

[img]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif[/img]


DakotaBlue

2005-10-25 18:44 | User Profile

It always amazes me to see how "appalled" we Americans get over a perfectly plausible explanation to a "whites only" sign but don't raise an eyebrow when confronted in the supermarket by a Muslim woman in full Muslim garb, in a black hijab with only face and hands showing.


skemper

2005-10-25 21:25 | User Profile

[QUOTE=BlueBonnet]Hell he should just start cutting the fros the way he does white hair. Then when they get upset that he ruined their hair they won't come to him any more. Problem solved.[/QUOTE]

Maybe. But a money hungry black could always say that the barber made a racist statement while he was doing a crop job on his hair. I think it would be better to say "not licensed to do African or Ethnic hair". I think a proprietor should be able to chose his customers. That way both customer and proprietor will be happy.My son's and husband's Barber shop does not cut women's hair. I have heard the barbers there state such to women who came there before. It does not offend me but I suppose if a woman was angry enough she could sue and win in court with the current laws.


skemper

2005-10-25 21:26 | User Profile

[QUOTE=BlueBonnet]Hell he should just start cutting the fros the way he does white hair. Then when they get upset that he ruined their hair they won't come to him any more. Problem solved.[/QUOTE]

Maybe. But a money hungry black could always say that the barber made a racist statement while he was doing a crop job on his hair and win in court. I think it would be better to say "not licensed to do African or Ethnic hair". I think a proprietor should be able to chose his customers. That way both customer and proprietor will be happy.My son's and husband's Barber shop does not cut women's hair. I have heard the barbers there state such to women who came there before. It does not offend me but I suppose if a woman was angry enough she could sue and win in court with the current laws.

Maybe this is the start of a new trend.


DAB

2005-10-25 22:50 | User Profile

[quote=DakotaBlue]It always amazes me to see how "appalled" we Americans get over a perfectly plausible explanation to a "whites only" sign but don't raise an eyebrow when confronted in the supermarket by a Muslim woman in full Muslim garb, in a black hijab with only face and hands showing.

I just don't think traditionalists get it at all. I would much rather see a Muslim woman dressed in full Muslim garb and in a dress, modest and looking like a woman, than I would to see your typical neutarized, unisex masculine American female dressed in the standard marxist, new world order uniform of jeans, sweatshirt and tennis shoes.


Ralph Kane

2005-10-26 02:19 | User Profile

[quote=skemper]Ithink a proprietor should be able to chose his customers.

I think I should be able to have an organization called the National Association for the Advancement of White People meet at my house without another Waco breaking out.


BlueBonnet

2005-10-26 02:38 | User Profile

[quote=DAB]I just don't think traditionalists get it at all. I would much rather see a Muslim woman dressed in full Muslim garb and in a dress, modest and looking like a woman, than I would to see your typical neutarized, unisex masculine American female dressed in the standard marxist, new world order uniform of jeans, sweatshirt and tennis shoes.

pass the face wax:saddam:


DakotaBlue

2005-10-27 21:19 | User Profile

[QUOTE=DAB]I just don't think traditionalists get it at all. I would much rather see a Muslim woman dressed in full Muslim garb and in a dress, modest and looking like a woman, than I would to see your typical neutarized, unisex masculine American female dressed in the standard marxist, new world order uniform of jeans, sweatshirt and tennis shoes.[/QUOTE]

[B]They're not mutually exclusive.[/B]